Skip to main content
Log in

Fourier transform profilometry for water waves: how to achieve clean water attenuation with diffusive reflection at the water surface?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a study of the damping of capillary-gravity waves in water containing pigments. The practical interest comes from a recent profilometry technique (FTP for Fourier Transform Profilometry) using fringe projection onto the liquid-free surface. This experimental technique requires diffusive reflection of light on the liquid surface, which is usually achieved by adding white pigments. It is shown that the use of most paint pigments causes a large enhancement of the damping of the waves. Indeed, these paints contain surfactants which are easily adsorbed at the air–water interface. The resulting surface film changes the attenuation properties because of the resonance-type damping between capillary-gravity waves and Marangoni waves. We study the physicochemical properties of coloring pigments, showing that particles of the anatase (TiO2) pigment make the water surface light diffusive while avoiding any surface film effects. The use of the chosen particles allows to perform space-time resolved FTP measurements on capillary-gravity waves, in a liquid with the damping properties of pure water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The effect of monomolecular surface film, that we want to avoid, has been studied in Alpers (1989), where the authors show that the power law of the energy spectra in water wave turbulence can be modified by the presence of a surface film.

References

  • Alpers W, Hühnerfuss H (1989) The damping of ocean waves by surface films: a new look at an old problem. J Geophys Res 94(5):6251–6265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behroozi P, Cordray K, Griffin W, Behroozi F (2007) The calming effect of oil on water. Am J Phys 75:407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cini R, Lombardini PP, Manfredi C, Cini E (1987) Ripple damping due to monomolecular films. J. Colloid Interface Sci 119:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobelli P, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P (2009) Experimental observation of trapped modes in a water wave channel. Euro Phys Lett 88:20006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobelli P, Maurel A, Pagneux V, Petitjeans P (2009) Global measurement of water waves by Fourier transform profilometry. Exp Fluids 46:1037–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobelli P, Pagneux V, Maurel A, Petitjeans P (2011a) Experimental study on water-wave trapped modes. J Fluid Mech 666:445–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobelli P, Przadka A, Petitjeans P, Lagubeau G, Pagneux V, Maurel A (2011b) Different regimes for water wave turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 107:214503

  • Ermakov SA, Zujkova AM, Panchenko AR, Salashin SG, Talipova TG, Titov VI (1986) Surface film effect on short wind waves. Dyn Atmos Oceans 10:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DF, Wennerström H (1994) The colloidal domain. VCH, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin B (1774) Of the stilling of waves by means of oil. Philos Trans 64:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorthi SS, Rastogi P (2010) Fringe projection techniques: whither we are? Opt Lasers Eng 48(2):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter R (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Israelachvili J (1991) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagubeau G, Fontelos M, Josserand C, Maurel A, Pagneux V, Petitjeans P (2010) Rosace patterns in drop impact. Phys Rev Lett 105:184503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange P, Hühnerfuss H (1984) Horizontal surface tension gradients induced in monolayers by gravity wave action. J Phys Oceanogr 14:1620–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levich VG (1962) Physicochemical hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, Elmsford Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucassen J (1968) Longitudinal capillary waves. Part 1—theory. Trans Faraday Soc 64:2221–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucassen J (1982) Effect of surface-active material on the damping of gravity waves: a reappraisal. J Colloid Interface Sci 85:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangoni C (1872) Sul principio della viscosita superficiale dei liquidi stabili. Nuovo Cimento Ser 5/6(2):239–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurel A, Cobelli P, Pagneux V, Petitjeans P (2009) Experimental and theoretical inspection of the phase-to-height relation in Fourier transform profilometry. Appl Opt 48(2):380–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles JW (1967) Surface wave damping in closed basins. Proc R Soc Lond A 297:459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prisle NL, Raatikainen TR, Sorjamaa R, Svenningsson B, Laaksonen A, Bilde M (2008) Surfactant partitioning in cloud droplet activation: a study of C8, C10, C12 and C14 normal fatty acid sodium salts. Tellus B 60:416–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda M, Mutoh K (1983) Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-D object shapes. Appl Opt 22:3977–3982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda M, Ina H, Kobayashi S (1982) Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry. J Opt Soc Am 72(1):156–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Kronos for supplying us with Titanium dioxide particles. This work is founded by the ANR Tourbillonde and ProComedia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Petitjeans.

Appendix

Appendix

Let us consider the propagation of a plane wave in x positive direction (coordinate z being normal to the surface at rest) in an incompressible fluid with density ρ and dynamical viscosity μ. Neglecting the nonlinear terms, the Navier–Stokes equations for the velocity field \(\mathbf{u}=[u_{x},u_{z}]\) read:

$$ \begin{aligned} \rho\frac{\partial u_{x}}{\partial t}&=-\frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+\mu\Updelta u_{x} \\ \rho\frac{\partial u_{z}}{\partial t}&=-\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}+\rho g+\mu\Updelta u_{z} \end{aligned} $$
(8)

where g denotes the gravity acceleration, and p is the pressure.

Considering the existence of the surface tension gradients, the kinematic boundary conditions on the surface (tangential and normal components, respectively) can be expressed as:

$$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{\partial\gamma}{\partial x}-{\mathbf{T}}_{xz}=0\\ &\gamma\frac{\partial^{2}\zeta}{\partial x^{2}}+p-p_{a}-\rho g\zeta-{\mathbf{T}}_{zz}=0 \end{aligned} $$
(9)

where \(\zeta\) denotes the surface elevation, p a is the atmospheric pressure, and \(\mathbf{T}\) the stress tensor. It has to be noted that the only difference in the whole mathematical formulation compared to the clean surface case is the nonzero tangential component of the stress tensor (due to the Marangoni effect of surface tension gradients). This gradient can be expressed as:

$$ \frac{\partial\gamma}{\partial x}=\varepsilon\frac{\partial^{2}\xi}{\partial x^{2}} $$

Here, ξ is the horizontal displacement of the surface, and \(\varepsilon\) denotes the surface-dilational modulus, which characterizes the viscoelastic fluid properties and is a complex number in general. The whole quantity is given by:

$$ \varepsilon=\left|\varepsilon\right|\exp(-{\hbox{i}}\theta) $$

A phase difference between the imposed area change and the surface tension variations, caused by a relaxation processes such as diffusion exchange, is expressed by the θ number.

Introducing the velocity field \(\mathbf{u}\) as a sum of the velocity potential \(\Upphi\) (providing an irrotational field) and the vorticity function \(\Uppsi\) (providing a divergence-free field) and assuming zero velocity at infinite depth, we can obtain the harmonic wave solutions to the linearized Navier–Stokes equations (8).

Substituting these solutions into boundary conditions (9), it can be shown that the system has two solutions at each frequency. One solution corresponds to the classical capillary-gravity water wave and the other to the Marangoni wave. Lucassen (1968) showed experimentally that the wavelength of the capillary-gravity wave does not depend on the surface viscoelastic properties (is almost independent of \(\varepsilon\)), while the imaginary part of their wavenumber (damping coefficient) is strongly dependent on \(\varepsilon\).

A simple way to obtain the dispersion relation of the Marangoni wave is to take the tangential component of the force balance at the surface assuming a horizontal Stokes boundary layer in the fluid:

$$ \varepsilon\frac{\partial^{2}\xi}{\partial x^{2}} \simeq \mu \frac{\partial u_x}{\partial z} $$

Then, the derivative ∂ z u x is equal to m u x (with the exponential decrement of the Stokes boundary layer \(m=\sqrt{{\hbox{i}} \omega \rho/\mu}\)). Eventually, the continuity of horizontal velocity between the film surface and the fluid, u x  = iωξ, is used to obtain

$$ \varepsilon\frac{\partial^{2}\xi}{\partial x^{2}} = i \mu \omega m \xi $$

that yields the dispersion relation for the Marangoni wave, given by Eq. 6.

This Marangoni wave is strongly damped. Assuming purely elastic film (\(\varepsilon\) is a real quantity) and denoting \(\mathbf{k}_{M}=\kappa_{M} + {\hbox{i}}\beta_{M} \):

$$ \begin{aligned} \kappa_{M}&= \cos(\pi/8) \left(\frac{\rho\mu}{\varepsilon^2}\right)^{1/4}\omega_{M}^{3/4}\\ \beta_{M}&=\tan(\pi/8) \kappa_{M} \approx0.414\kappa_{M} \end{aligned} $$
(10)

The real and imaginary part are of the same order of magnitude—the longitudinal waves are damped out very rapidly!

The capillary-gravity waves and surface waves are in general not oscillating with the same frequency and wavelength. However, the character of the dispersion relations allows to intersect the frequency-wavelength branches (Fig. 10). When the frequencies and wavelengths of the capillary-gravity wave and Marangoni wave are equal, the particle motion coincides for both waves, giving rise to a high velocity gradients in a Stokes boundary layer just beneath the surface film. This explains why the strongest enhancement of damping of capillary-gravity wave is found to be around the transverse-longitudinal resonance values.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Przadka, A., Cabane, B., Pagneux, V. et al. Fourier transform profilometry for water waves: how to achieve clean water attenuation with diffusive reflection at the water surface?. Exp Fluids 52, 519–527 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1240-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1240-x

Keywords

Navigation