Abstract
The seedless treatment of seeded table grapes can have a negative impact on the table grape industry due to the occurrence of berry abscission during storage. This study aimed to investigate grape berry abscission by utilizing two distinct cultivars of table grapes, specifically ‘Ziqiu’ and ‘Shine Muscat’. The results revealed that seedless treatment grapes had a higher percentage of berry abscission during post-harvest storage than seeded ones. This may be attributed to the interaction between auxin and ethylene. In the early stage of storage, the higher level of auxin in the abscission zone of seeded grapes compared to seedless grapes may be associated with the continued high expression of auxin synthesis genes (VvYUC2 and VvYUC4) and transport gene (VvPIN4) in seeded grape seeds, as well as auxin transport gene (VvAUX1) in the abscission zone. The higher auxin content in the abscission zone enhances the expression of ethylene receptor genes (VvETR1, VvETR2, and VvEIN4), thereby reducing the sensitivity of the abscission zone to ethylene and decreasing the berry abscission percentage. Consequently, enzymes such as polygalacturonase (PG), pectinesterase (PE), and beta-galactosidase (β-GAL) are quickly activated, leading to pectin degradation and the initiation of the abscission process. Increased ethylene sensitivity in the abscission zone also leads to a reduction in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities, causing reactive oxygen species (ROS) to accumulate, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content to rise. Which results in cell membrane damage, and an acceleration of the grape berry abscission process. This study sheds light on the mechanisms behind grape berry abscission in response to seedless treatment and provides valuable insights for the table grape industry to improve the storage and transportation of seedless grapes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Variant Data are reported in additional supporting files.
References
Abeles FB, Rubinstein B (1964) Regulation of ethylene evolution and leaf abscission by auxin. Plant Physiol 39(6):963–969. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.39.6.963
Abu-Goukh AA, Bashir HA (2003) Changes in pectic enzymes and cellulase activity during guava fruit ripening. Food Chem 83:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00067-0
Addicott FT (1965) Physiology of abscission. Encycl Plant Physiol 15:1094–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50088-6_70
Addicott FT, Lynch RS, Carns HR (1955) Auxin gradient theory of abscission regulation. Science 121(3148):644–645. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121.3148.644
Chance B, Maehly AC (1955) Assay of catalases and peroxidase. Method Enzymol 2:764–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8
Corbacho J, Romojaro F, Pech JC, LatcheGomez-Jimenez AMC (2013) Transcriptomic events involved in melon mature-fruit abscission comprise the sequential induction of cell-wall degrading genes coupled to a stimulation of endo and exocytosis. PLoS ONE 8(3):e58363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058363
Deng Y, Wu Y, Li Y (2005) Changes in firmness, cell wall composition and cell wall hydrolases of grapes stored in high oxygen atmospheres. Food Res Int 38:769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.03.003
Deng BL, Jin XH, Yang Y, Lin ZW, Zhang YL (2014) The regulatory role of riboavin in the drought tolerance of tobacco plants depends on ROS production. Plant Growth Regul 72:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-013-9858-8
Drazeta L, Lang A, Cappellini C, Hall AJ, Volz RK, Jameson PE (2004) Vessel differentiation in the pedicel of apple and the effects of auxin transport inhibition. Physiol Plant 120(1):162–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0220.x
Estornell LH, Agusti J, Merelo P, Talón M, Tadeo FR (2013) Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission. Plant Sci 199–200:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.10.008
Ferrara G, Mazzeo A, Matarrese AMS, Pacucci C, Trani A, Fidelibus MW, Gambacorta G (2016) Ethephon as a potential abscission agent for table grapes: effects on pre-harvest abscission, fruit quality, and residue. Front Plant Sci 7:620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00620
Fu MM, Shi ZY, Li YL, Ye X, Zheng XB, Tan B, Feng JC (2018) Analysis of ethylene release and expression patterns of VvETRs gene in berry and rachis of ‘Shine-Muscat’ rose grape. J Henan Agric Univ 52(06):896–902. https://doi.org/10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2018.06.007. (in Chinese)
Gao J, Meng Y, Liu Q, Wang T, Liu M, Li W, Hui Z, Zhang Z (2017) Changes in endogenous hormones during the development of vitis vinifera L.cv. cabernet sauvignon and their relationship with berry ripening. Food Sci 38(7):167–175. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201707027. (in Chinese)
Gómez-Cadenas A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Primo-Millo E, Talon M (2000) Hormonal regulation of fruitlet abscission induced by carbohydrate shortage in citrus. Planta 210(4):636–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050054
Gonzalez-Carranza ZH, Shahid AA, Zhang L, Liu Y, Ninsuwan U, Roberts JA (2012) A novel approach to dissect the abscission process in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 160(3):1342–1356. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.205955
Goszczynska D, Zieslin N (1993) Abscission of flower peduncles in rose (Rosa × hybrida) plants and evolution of ETH. J Plant Physiol 142(2):214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(11)80966-1
Hagemann MH, Patrick W, Martin H, Wünsche JN (2015) Ethephon induced abscission in mango: physiological fruitlet responses. Front Plant Sci 6:706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00706
Hagerman AE, Austin PJ (1986) Continious spectrophotometric assay for plant pectin methyl esterase. J Agric Food Chem 34:440–444. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00069a015
Hewitt S, Kilian B, Koepke T, Abarca J, Whiting M, Dhingra A (2021) Transcriptome analysis reveals potential mechanisms for ethylene-inducible pedicel-fruit abscission zone activation in non-climacteric sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Horticulturae 7(9):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090270
Hodges DM, Delong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050524
Jiang P, Zhu G, Zheng D (2017) The effects of GA3 and CPPU on fruit quality of Shine Mascut. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine 4:44–47. https://doi.org/10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2017.04.009. (in Chinese)
Jin X, Zimmermann J, Polle A, Fischer U (2015) Auxin is a long-range signal that acts independently of ethylene signaling on leaf abscission in populus. Front Plant Sci 6:634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00634
Karnosky DF, Gagnon ZE, Dickson RE, Coleman MD, Isebrands JG, Lee EH (1996) Changes in growth, leaf abscission, and biomass associated with seasonal tropospheric ozone exposures of populus tremuloides clones and seedlings. Can J For Res 26(1):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1139/x26-003
Kong QL, Xiu DR, Hu WY, Zhang LL (2008) Studies on relationship between SO2 injury and membrane lipid peroxide in gr ape during storage. J Fruit Sci 25:322–326. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2008.03.007. (in Chinese)
Kühn N, Serrano A, Abello C, Arce A, Espinoza C, Gouthu S, Arce-Johnson P (2016) Regulation of polar auxin transport in grapevine fruitlets (Vitis vinifera L.) and the proposed role of auxin homeostasis during fruit abscission. BMC Plant Biol 16:234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0914-1
Li L, Kaplunov T, Zutahy Y, Daus A, Porat R, Lichter A (2015) The effects of 1-methylcyclopropane and ETH on postharvest rachis browning in table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol 107:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.04.001
Liao W, Wang G, Li Y, Wang B, Zhang P, Peng M (2016) Reactive oxygen species regulate leaf pulvinus abscission zone cell separation in response to water-deficit stress in cassava. Sci Rep 6(1):21542. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21542
Lohani S, Trivedi P, Nath P (2004) Changes in activities of cell wall hydrolases during ethylene-induced ripening in banana: effect of 1-MCP, ABA and IAA. Postharvest Biol Technol 31:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.08.001
Marciniak K, Kućko A, Wilmowicz E, Świdziński M, Przedniczek K, Kopcewicz J (2018) Gibberellic acid affects the functioning of the flower abscission zone in Lupinus luteus via cooperation with the ethylene precursor independently of abscisic acid. J Plant Physiol 229:170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.07.014
McManus MT (2008) Further examination of abscission zone cells as ETH target cells in higher plants. Ann Bot 101(2):285–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm269
Meir S, Philosoph-Hadas S, Sundaresan S, Selvaraj KSV, Burd S, Ophir R, Lers A (2010) Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion. Plant Physiol 154(4):1929–1956. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.160697
Meir S, Philosoph-Hadas S, Riov J, Tucker ML, Patterson SE, Roberts JA (2019) Re-evaluation of the ethylene-dependent and -independent pathways in the regulation of floral and organ abscission. J Exp Bot 70:1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz038
Meneses M, García-Rojas M, Muñoz-Espinoza C, Carrasco-Valenzuela T, Defilippi B, González-Agüero M, Meneses C, Infante R, Hinrichsen P (2020) Transcriptomic study of pedicels from GA3-treated table grape genotypes with different susceptibility to berry drop reveals responses elicited in cell wall yield, primary growth and phenylpropanoids synthesis. BMC Plant Biol 20:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-2260-6
Nakano T, Fujisawa M, Shima Y, Ito Y (2014) The AP2/ERF transcription factor SlERF52 functions in flower pedicel abscission in tomato. J Exp Bot 65(12):3111–3119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru154
Oberholster SD, Peterson CM, Dute RR (1991) Pedicel abscission of soybean: cytological and ultrastructural changes induced by auxin and ethephon. Can J Bot 69(10):2177–2186. https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-273
Pastenes C, Villalobos L, Ríos N, Reyes F, Turgeon R, Franck N (2014) Carbon partitioning to berries in water stressed grapevines: the role of active transport in leaves and fruits. Environ Exp Bot 107:154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.009
Patterson SE, Bleecker AB (2004) Ethylene-dependent and -independent processes associated with floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(1):194–203. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.028027
Rizzuti A, Aguilera-Sáez LM, Gallo V, Cafagna I, Mastrorilli P, Latronico M, Pacifico A, Matarrese AMS, Ferrara G (2015) On the use of Ethephon as abscising agent in cv. crimson seedless table grape production: combination of fruit detachment force. Fruit Drop Metabolomics Food Chem 171:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.132
Roberts JA, Elliott KA, Gonzalez-Carranza ZH (2002) Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53(1):131–158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.092701.180236
Sakamoto M, Munemura I, Tomita R, Kobayashi K (2008) Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in leaf abscission signaling, revealed by analysis with an in vitro abscission system in Capsicum plants. Plant J 56(1):13–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03577.x
Sawicki M, Aït Barka E, Clément C, Vaillant-Gaveau N, Jacquard C (2015) Cross-talk between environmental stresses and plant metabolism during reproductive organ abscission. J Exp Bot 66(7):1707–1719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru533
Sexton R, Roberts JA (1982) Cell biology of abscission. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33(1):133–162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.00
Stern RA, Gazit S (1999) The synthetic auxin 3,5,6-TPA reduces fruit drop and increases yield in “Kaimana” litchi. J Pomol Hortic Sci 74(2):203–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1999.11511095
SuehiroY MK, Tsuma M, Yasuda Y, Itamura H, Esumi T (2019) Effects of gibberellic acid/cytokinin treatments on berry development and maturation in the yellow-green skinned ‘Shine Muscat’ grape. Hortic J 88(2):202–213. https://doi.org/10.2503/HORTJ.UTD-046
Sun L, Zhang M, Ren J, Qi J, Zhang G, Leng P (2010) Reciprocity between abscisic acid and ethylene at the onset of berry ripening and after harvest. BMC Plant Biol 22(10):257. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-257
Taylor JE, Whitelaw CA (2001) Signals in abscission. New Phytol 151(2):323–340. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00194.x
Tian S, Nie SuH, Nie S (2019) Analysis on the production and market situation of Chinese table grape in 2018. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine 224:103–106. https://doi.org/10.13414/j.cnki.zwpp.2019.02.021. (in Chinese)
Toivonen PMA, Sweeney M (1998) Differences in chlorophyll loss at 13 ℃ for two broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) cultivars associated with antioxidant enzyme activities. J Agric Food Chem 46:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970490n
Uzquiza L, Martin P, Sievert JR, Arpaia ML, Fidelibus MW (2014) Methyl jasmonate and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid interact to promote grape berry abscission. Am J Enol Vitic 65(4):504–509. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2014.14038
Xu Y, Jiu ST, Wang JY, Wang L, Xu WP, Zhang CX, Zhao LP, Wang SP (2021) Effect of root restriction on IAA content and metabolism-related gene expression in roots of Vitis vinifera. Acta Botan Boreali-Occiden Sin 41(1):0052–0062. https://doi.org/10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2021.01.0052. (in Chinese)
Ye X, Zheng X, Zhai D, Song W, Tan B, Li J, Feng J (2017) Expression patterns of ACS and ACO gene families and ethylene production in rachis and berry of grapes. HortScience 52(3):413–422. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci11050-16
Ye D, Shi JC, Gao SX, Wang ZY, Shi GA (2021) Correlation analysis of auxin involved in the process of petal abscission of tree peony Luoyanghong cut flowers by ethylene promoting. Sci Agric Sin 54(23):5097–5109. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.23.014. (in Chinese)
Yu J, Zhu M, Bai M, Xu Y, Yang G (2020) Effect of calcium on relieving berry cracking in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) ‘Xiangfei.’ PeerJ 8(12):e9896. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9896
Zhu MT, Liu ZF, Zeng RX, Yu J (2022a) Nordihydroguaiaretic acid reduces postharvest berry abscission in grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol 183:111748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111748
Zhu MT, Zheng L, Zeng YX, Yu J (2022b) Susceptibility of two grape varieties to berry abscission. Sci Hortic 304:111280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111280
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2021JJ30377).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mingtao Zhu, Shuiqin Pi, Linfeng Kang, and Qian Tan performed and analyzed the experiments. Jun Yu and Mingtao Zhu designed the research. Mingtao Zhu wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Raul Herrera.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, J., Pi, S., Kang, L. et al. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Postharvest Increased Abscission of Seeded Table Grape After Seedless-Inducing Treatment. J Plant Growth Regul (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11288-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11288-w