Skip to main content
Log in

Inside out: high-efficiency plant regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of upland and lowland switchgrass cultivars

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Selection of pre-embryogenic callus from a core structure from mature seed-derived callus is the key for high-efficiency plant regeneration and transformation of switchgrass different cultivars.

Abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has been identified as a dedicated biofuel crop. For its trait improvement through biotechnological approaches, we have developed a highly efficient plant regeneration and genetic transformation protocol for both lowland and upland cultivars. We identified and separated a pre-embryogenic “core” structure from the seed-derived callus, which often leads to development of highly regenerative type II calluses. From the type II callus, plant regeneration rate of lowland cultivars Alamo and Performer reaches 95 %, and upland cultivars Blackwell and Dacotah, 50 and 76 %, respectively. The type II callus was also amenable for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transformation efficiency of 72.8 % was achieved for lowland cultivar Alamo, and 8.0 % for upland cultivar Dacotah. PCR, Southern blot and GUS staining assays were performed to verify the transgenic events. High regenerative callus lines could be established in 3 months, and transgenic plants could be obtained in 2 months after Agrobacterium infection. To our knowledge, this is the first report on successful plant regeneration and recovery of transgenic plants from upland switchgrass cultivars by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The method presented here could be helpful in breaking through the bottleneck of regeneration and transformation of lowland and upland switchgrass cultivars and probably other recalcitrant grass crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

BAP:

6-Benzylaminopurine

CH:

Casein hydrolysate

GA:

Gibberellin

References

  • Aitchison PA, Macleod AJ, Yeoman MM (1977) Growth patterns in tissue (callus) cultures. In: Street HE (ed) Plant tissue and cell culture. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp 267–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong CL, Green CE (1985) Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of l-proline. Planta 164:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojwani SS, Dantu PK (2013) Tissue and Cell Culture. In: Bhojwani SS, Dantu PK (eds) Plant tissue culture: an introductory text. Springer, India, pp 39–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouton JH (2007) Molecular breeding of switchgrass for use as a biofuel crop. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:553–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burris JN, Mann DGJ, Joyce BL, Stewart CN Jr (2009) An improved tissue culture system for embryogenic callus production and plant regeneration in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Bioenergy Res 2:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho CHS, Bohorova N, Bordallo PN, Abreu LL, Valicentle FH, Bressan W, Paiva E (1997) Type II callus production and plant regeneration in tropical maize genotypes. Plant Cell Rep 17:73–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu CX, Xiao XR, Xi YJ, Ge YX, Chen F, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang ZY (2011) Down regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) leads to improved saccharification efficiency in switchgrass. Bioenergy Res 4:153–164. doi:10.1007/s12155-010-9109-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YF, Zhu Z, Xiao GF, Zhu Y, Wu Q, Li XH (1989) Isolation of soybean kunitz trypsin inhibitor gene and its application in plant insect-resistant genetic engineering. Acta Bot Sin 40:405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressel J (2008) Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci 174:246–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guiderdoni E, Demarly Y (1988) Histology of somatic embryogenesis in cultured leaf segments of sugarcane plantlets. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 14:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A (1993) New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res 2:208–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson R (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Bio Rep 5:387–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li RY, Qu RD (2011) High throughput Agrobacterium-mediated switchgrass transformation. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1046–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Vasil IK (1981) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf tissues of Panicum maximum Jacq. Theor Appl Genet 59:275–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin S, Bouton J, Bransby D, Conger B, Ocumpaugh W, Parrish D, Taliaferro C, Vogel K, Wullschleger S (1999) Developing switchgrass as a bioenergy crop. Perspectives on new crops and new uses. In: Janick J (ed) Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 282–299

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin SB, Kiniry JR, Taliaferro CM, De La Torre Ugarte D, Donald LS (2006) Projecting yield and utilization potential of switchgrass as an energy crop. Adv Agron 90:267–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Nageswara-Rao M, Soneji JR, Kwit C, Stewart CN Jr (2013) Advances in biotechnology and genomics of Switchgrass. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:77

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar SS, Sainger M, Chaudhary D, Jaiwal PK (2012) Plant regeneration from mature embryo of commercial Indian bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Physiol and Mol Biol Plants 18:177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy R, Kumar PP (2012) A simplified protocol for genetic transformation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant Cell Rep 31:1923–1931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards HA, Rudas VA, Sun H, McDaniel JK, Tomaszewski Z, Conger BV (2001) Construction of a GFP-BAR plasmid and its use for switchgrass transformation. Plant Cell Rep 20:48–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rueb S, Leneman M, Schilperoort RA, Hensgens LAM (1994) Efficient plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from callus induced on mature rice embryos (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 36:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

  • Somleva MN, Tomaszewski Z, Conger BV (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of switchgrass. Crop Sci 42:2080–2087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somleva MN, Snell DK, Beaulieu JJ, Peoples OP, Garrison BR, Patterson NA (2008) Production of polyhydroxybutyrate in switchgrass, a value-added co-product in an important lignocellulosic biomass crop. Plant Biotechnol J 6:663e78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song GQ, Aaron W, Hancock JF (2012) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 108:445–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Vasil IK (1986) Plant regeneration from friable embryogenic callus and cell suspension cultures of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 124:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK, Vasil V (1994) In vitro cultures of cereals and grasses. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 293–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel KP (2004) Switchgrass. In: Moser LE, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE (eds) Warm-season (C4) grasses. American Society of Agronomy, Washington, pp 561–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel KP, Mitchell RB (2008) Heterosis in switchgrass: biomass yield in swards. Crop Sci 48:2159–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter ME, Clayton DS, Miller MA, Petolino JE (1995) Morphotypes of friable embryogenic maize callus. Plant Cell Rep 14:725–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xi YJ, Fu CX, Ge YX, Nandakumar R, Hisano H, Bouton J, Wang ZY (2009) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass and inheritance of transgenes. Bioenerg Res 2:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Huang LK, Shen ZX, Welbaum GE, Zhang XZ, Zhao BY (2011) Selection and characterization of a new switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) line with high somatic embryogenic capacity for genetic transformation. Sci Hortic 129:854–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Hanna W, Ozias-Akins P (2007) Comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different explants in triploid and tetraploid turf-type bermudagrasses. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 90:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WJ, Dewey RE, Boss W, Phillippy BQ, Qu RD (2013) Enhanced Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiencies in monocot cells is associated with attenuated defense responses. Plant Mol Biol 81:273–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (“863” 2012AA101801) of China, and Chinese Universities Scientific Funds (2012QJ120) to W.J.Z. We are grateful to Dr. Rongda Qu of NCSU for his critical reading and advices on the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan-Jun Zhang.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, YR., Cen, HF., Yan, JP. et al. Inside out: high-efficiency plant regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of upland and lowland switchgrass cultivars. Plant Cell Rep 34, 1099–1108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1769-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1769-x

Keywords

Navigation