Skip to main content
Log in

Regeneration of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) by a cyclic organogenic system

  • Cell Biology and Morphogenesis
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a five-step procedure, plants were regenerated from meristematic tissue initiated from nodal tissue in four pea cultivars (‘Espace’, ‘Classic’, ‘Solara’, and ‘Puget’). In step 1, stem tissue with one node (1-cm size) was subcultured on medium containing thidiazuron. As a result multiple shoots were produced, appearing normal or swollen at their bases. The multiple shoots were subcultured in the same medium, resulting in the formation of a green hyperhydric tissue in the swollen bases of the multiple shoots, which is fully covered with small buds [bud-containing tissue (BCT)]. In step 2, BCT fragments were isolated and subcultured in the same medium and, as a result, they were able to reproduce themselves in a cyclic fashion. In step 3, subculture of BCT on medium supplemented with a combination of gibberelic acid, 6-benzyladenine and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), resulted in the formation of shoots, which were rooted in step 4 on medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/l NAA, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) or indole-3-butyric acid. In step 5, in vitro plants were transferred to the greenhouse for acclimatisation and further development. The four varieties tested were all able to produce meristematic tissue, suggesting that its production is genotype independent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–f

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean SJ, Gooding PS, Mullineaux PM, Davies DR (1997) A simple system for pea transformation. Plant Cell Rep 16:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou P (1997) Biotechnology applied to grain legumes. Field Crop Res 53:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MA, Park JI, Polito VS, Leslie CA, Uratsu SL, McGranahan GH, Dandekar AM (2000) Using GFP as a scorable marker in Walnut somatic embryo transformation. Ann Bot 85:831–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg O, Miller R, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JE, Cooper PA, McAra AE, Frew TJ (1995) Transformation of peas (Pisum sativum L.) using immature cotyledons. Plant Cell Rep 15:254–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JE, Cooper PA, Gilpin BJ, Hoglund SJ, Reader JK, Pither-Joyce MD, Timmerman-Vaughan GM (1998) Kanamycin is effective for selecting transformed peas. Plant Sci 139:159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JE, Thomson LMJ, Pither-Joyce MD, Dale TM, Cooper PA (2003) Influence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain on the production of transgenic peas (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Rep 21:1207–1210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griga M (1998) Direct somatic embryogenesis from shoot apical meristems of pea, and thidiazuron-induced high conversion rate of somatic embryos. Biol Plant 41:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griga M (2002) Morphology and anatomy of Pisum sativum somatic embryos. Biol Plant 45:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiseau J, Michaux-Ferriere N, Le Deunff Y (1998) Histology of somatic embryogenesis in pea. Plant Physiol Biochem 36:683–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen MH, Nauerby B, Frederiksen CG, Wyndaele R (1998) Regeneration of pea (Pisum sativum L.) by the thin cell layer nodal system: influence of explant culture media on rooting and plantlet formation. Acta Agric Scand Sect B: Soil Plant Sci 48:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadolska-Orczyk A, Orczyk W (2000) Study of the factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Mol Breed 6:185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt SJ, Pontecaille C, Rancillac M (2000) The growth regulators used for bud regeneration and shoot rooting affect the competence for flowering and seed set in regenerated plants of protein peas. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:188–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polowick PL, Quandt J, Mahon JD (2000) The ability of pea transformation technology to transfer genes into peas adapted to western Canadian growing conditions. Plant Sci 153:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popiers D, Flandre F, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1997) Intensification de la regeneration du pois (Pisum sativum L.), par le thidiazuron, via la formation de structures caulinaires organogenesis. Can J Bot 75:492–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemakers K, Schreuder M, Pereira I, Munyikwa T, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF (2001) Progress made in FEC transformation of cassava. Euphytica 120:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanago MHM, Shattuck VI, Strommer J (1996) Rapid plant regeneration of pea using thidiazuron. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 45:165–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder HE, Schotz AH, Wardley-Richardson T, Spencer D, Higgins TJV (1993) Transformation and regeneration of two cultivars of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Physiol 101:751–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank STW for financing this project as part of the PROFETAS program, and Adriaan van Aelst for performing the LT-SEM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krit Raemakers.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Lörz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzitzikas, E.N., Bergervoet, M., Raemakers, K. et al. Regeneration of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) by a cyclic organogenic system. Plant Cell Rep 23, 453–460 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0865-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0865-0

Keywords

Navigation