Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate utilisation patterns of prescribed analgesics before, during, and after an exercise therapy and patient education program among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. This cohort study is based on data from the nationwide Good Life with osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) patient-register linked with national health registries including data on prescribed analgesics. GLA:D® consists of 8–12 weeks of exercise and patient education. We included 35,549 knee/hip osteoarthritis patients starting the intervention between January 2013 and November 2018. Utilisation patterns the year before, 3 months during, and the year after the intervention were investigated using total dispensed defined daily doses (DDDs) per month per 1000 population as outcome. During the year before the intervention, use of prescribed paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids increased with 85%, 79% and 22%, respectively. During the intervention, use of paracetamol decreased with 16% with a stable use the following year. Use of NSAIDs and opioids decreased with 38% and 8%, respectively, throughout the intervention and the year after. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prescription of most analgesics changed over time. For paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids, 10% of analgesic users accounted for 45%, 50%, and 70%, respectively, of the total DDDs dispensed during the study period. In general, analgesic use increased the year before the intervention followed by a decrease during the intervention and the year after. A small proportion of analgesic users accounted for half or more of all paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids dispensed during the study period.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Analgesics are traditionally used to reduce pain among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. However, analgesics can have negative side effects. For example, long-term paracetamol use can lead to liver damage [1,2,3], non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular events [4,5,6], and opioids may lead to addiction, and adverse events, such as falls and premature mortality [7,8,9,10,11,12]. It is, therefore, important to consider the risks relative to the no to small benefit of analgesics in the long-term management of osteoarthritis [1, 2, 13, 14].
Exercise therapy can reduce osteoarthritis-related pain and improve physical function [15, 16], and is a safe treatment alternative to analgesics [17, 18]. Exercise therapy for osteoarthritis-related pain has been reported to be at least as effective as paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids [14, 19,20,21], and is therefore commonly recommended as a core treatment for knee and hip osteoarthritis [13, 22]. Despite this, exercise therapy is only offered to 30–40% of patients with osteoarthritis, highlighting the suboptimal implementation of clinical guidelines [23,24,25]. Exercise therapy may have the potential to reduce analgesic use and associated side effects among patients already using analgesics [26]. For example, data from randomized controlled trials have indicated a 30–40% decreased risk of taking analgesics 12 months after a multimodal non-surgical treatment program including exercise therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis [27, 28]. Also, early physical therapy (i.e., exercise and/or manual therapy within 90 days of diagnosis) has been reported to be associated with a 10% reduced opioid use among patients with knee pain [29]. Furthermore, we recently reported that the 3-months prevalence of self-reported analgesic use decreased from 62% before starting a standardised exercise therapy and patient education program to 44% after the intervention (i.e., at 3 months follow up) among Danish primary care patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis [26]. Among all analgesic users, 52% changed to an analgesic with a lower risk profile (e.g., from opioids to paracetamol) or stopped using analgesics after the intervention [26]. These results indicate that analgesic use may decrease after exercise therapy and patient education, but the study relied on self-reported analgesic use, which is prone to recall bias and has limited possibility to quantify changes in the amount of analgesics used. Fundamental knowledge about what types of analgesics that are used among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, how much, and if the use changes in relation to a treatment program in primary care (i.e., utilisation patterns) is scarce. Such knowledge is important for clinicians treating these patients, and for decision-makers developing and planning health care.
The aim of this study was to investigate utilisation patterns of prescribed analgesics before, during, and after a standardised exercise therapy and patient education program among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis using data from a nationwide osteoarthritis patient-register linked with national register-based prescription data.
Methods
Data sources
We used data from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark register (GLA:D®; collected consecutively from inception in January 2013) [30] linked on an individual level with routinely collected health data. The GLA:D® register contains patients with clinical signs of knee or hip osteoarthritis who have participated in GLA:D®, a standardised primary care program for knee and hip osteoarthritis. GLA:D® consists of supervised neuromuscular exercises (1 h twice a week for six weeks) and group-based patient education (two 1.5-h sessions) delivered by a certified physiotherapist over 8–12 weeks. The physiotherapist supervised groups of 6–12 patients in the exercises, which were individualised to each patient’s ability (e.g., starting level, progression rate). To sustain long-term treatment effects, patients were encouraged to continue with the exercises and being physically active. The treatment program has been described in detail elsewhere [30].
We linked the GLA:D® register with national health registries using the national civil registration number given to all individuals residing in Denmark. Specifically, we retrieved individual-level data on (a) dispensed prescriptions of analgesics from the Danish National Prescription Registry [31], (b) migrations and deaths from the Danish Civil Registration System, and (c) diagnostic and procedure codes from secondary health care contacts from the Danish National Patient Registry [32].
Study population
We included patients who started the intervention (index date) from January 14, 2013, until November 30, 2018, to avoid overlap between participants’ follow-up period and the Danish COVID-19-related lockdown starting in March 2020. Study participants were required to have register-data coverage 5 years before (day − 1825 to − 1), 90 days during (day 0 to 89), and 1 year after the intervention (day 90 to 449).
We excluded patients who (a) lacked register-data coverage due to migration or death, (b) had received a cancer diagnosis within the 5 years preceding the index date (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code C00-97, except C44: Other malignant neoplasms of skin), or (c) had received a substance abuse diagnosis within the year preceding the index date (ICD-10 code F11: Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids).
To compare the analgesic use in the study population with the general population in Denmark, we retrieved a random general population sample matched by year of birth, sex, municipality of residence, and being alive at the time of the index date from the Danish Health Data Authority. Each study participant was matched with 20 individuals from the general population. The controls were assigned the same index date as the study participant they were matched to.
Outcome
The outcome was total dispensed defined daily doses (DDDs) per month (i.e., 30 days) per 1000 population. We hence estimated analgesic use based on dispensed prescriptions.
We included oral and transdermal routes of administration of (a) paracetamol, (b) NSAIDs (divided into the following sub-groups: ibuprofen, diclofenac, etodolac, naproxen, coxibs, salicylic acid and derivatives, and other), (c) opioids (sub-groups: tramadol, codeine, oxycodone, morphine, and other), (d) gabapentinoids (sub-groups: gabapentin and pregabalin), (e) serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; sub-groups: venlafaxine and duloxetine), and (f) tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; sub-groups: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, and imipramine). See Supplementary Table S1 for an overview of included analgesics and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification codes. Parenteral, rectal, nasal, and sublingual routes of administration were excluded (Supplementary Table S2).
Statistical analysis
We described the study participants’ characteristics using medians with first and third quartiles and frequencies with percentages. This was done for the full study population and stratified by most symptomatic joint (knee or hip). See Supplementary Table S3 for an overview of variables used for descriptive purposes. We calculated the total number of DDDs per 1000 population for twelve 30-day intervals before the index date, three 30-day intervals during the intervention, and twelve 30-day intervals after the end of the intervention period. For combination analgesics, we calculated DDDs for each substance with an analgetic effect (see Supplementary Text S1 and Table S4 for details). This was done for each analgesic class (i.e., paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentinoids, SNRIs, and TCAs) and their sub-groups. Finally, to investigate any differences in utilisation patterns between patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis, we stratified the analyses by most symptomatic joint (knee or hip).
The use of opioids decreased in Denmark from 2017 and onwards following media attention focussed on tramadol use and risk of addiction, and regulatory actions targeted opioid prescribing [33]. To investigate if these temporal changes influenced our results, we conducted sensitivity analyses in which we (i) compared the total use for each analgesic class in the study population with the corresponding use in the matched general population sample, and (ii) stratified the analgesic use in the study population by calendar year (i.e., year of the index date; 2013–2015 were merged due to lower number of observations).
We described the distribution of the total use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids among analgesic users during the study period (≥ 1 dispensed prescriptions) using Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients. The Gini coefficient reflects the skewness of the Lorenz curve, where 0 reflects no skewness and 1 reflects maximal skewness. Finally, we calculated the total number of analgesic class-specific DDDs during the study period with percentages of the overall grand sum of DDDs.
We used the statistical software R (version 4.2.2, R Core Team [2023]. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/) for all analyses.
Results
We included 35,549 participants in this study (Supplementary Fig. S1). The median age was 66 years, 72% were women, and the median BMI was 28 kg/m2 (Table 1). During the year before the intervention (i.e., pre-intervention period), the use of paracetamol and NSAIDs increased with 85% and 79%, respectively (paracetamol: from 3541 to 6567 DDDs per month per 1000 population, NSAIDs: from 2251 to 4040 DDDs per month per 1000 population; Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S5). During the intervention period, the use of paracetamol decreased with 16% (from 6567 to 5501 DDDs per month per 1000 population). This was followed by a stable use during the year after the intervention (i.e., post-intervention period; mean: 5703 [standard deviation: 78] DDDs per month per 1000 population; Fig. 1). The use of NSAIDs decreased with 38% throughout the intervention and the year after to a level close to that of the early pre-intervention period (from 4040 to 2516 DDDs per month per 1000 population). A considerable increase in the use of opioids (22%) and gabapentinoids (39%) were observed during the pre-intervention- and whole study period, respectively (opioids: from 987 to 1202 DDDs per month per 1000 population, gabapentinoids: from 370 to 514 DDDs per month per 1000 population). The use of opioids decreased about 8% during the intervention and post-intervention period (from 1202 to 1111 DDDs per month per 1000 population). For SNRIs and TCAs, a relatively stable use pattern was observed throughout the study period (SNRIs, mean: 773 [standard deviation: 52] DDDs per month per 1000 population; TCAs, mean: 209 [standard deviation: 15] DDDs per month per 1000 population).
Total use of analgesics per month per 1000 population among 35,549 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis before, during, and after an exercise therapy and patient education program in primary care in Denmark, stratified by analgesic class. The grey area reflects the intervention period. Interval 0 corresponds to the first month of the intervention. DDDs is defined daily doses, NSAIDs is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, SNRIs is serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, TCAs is tri-cyclic antidepressants
The increase in NSAID use during the pre-intervention period was mainly attributed to an increase in the use of ibuprofen, and to a smaller extent diclofenac and naproxen (Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S5). The use patterns varied between the different types of opioids (Supplementary Fig. S3 and Supplementary Table S5). Tramadol use increased during the pre-intervention period followed by a U-shaped use pattern across the intervention period, and a decrease to the initial level at the end of the post-intervention-period. The use of codeine was relatively stable, while the use of oxycodone and morphine slightly increased during the study period.
When we compared the analgesic use between patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis, we found similar utilisation patterns (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S6). However, the relative increase in paracetamol, NSAID, and opioid use during the year before the intervention was larger among patients with hip osteoarthritis (e.g., among knee osteoarthritis patients, paracetamol, NSAID, and opioid use increased 74%, 70%, and 16%, respectively, vs. 124%, 111%, and 38% among hip osteoarthritis patients). The use of gabapentinoids increased throughout the study period in both patient groups, although to a larger extent among hip osteoarthritis patients (i.e., pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention period among knee osteoarthritis patients: 5%, 3%, and 27% vs. 38%, 6%, and 26% among hip osteoarthritis patients).
Total use of analgesics per month per 1000 population among 35,549 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis before, during, and after an exercise therapy and patient education program in primary care in Denmark, stratified by most symptomatic joint (knee or hip). The grey area reflects the intervention period. Interval 0 corresponds to the first month of the intervention. DDDs is defined daily doses, NSAIDs is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, SNRIs is serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, TCAs is tri-cyclic antidepressants. Knee, n = 26,462; hip, n = 9075
In the sensitivity analyses investigating the influence of temporal trends in analgesic dispensing, we observed a gradual increase (27%) in the use of paracetamol in the matched general population sample (n = 675,286) during the study period, while NSAID use decreased (11%), opioid use was stable, and the use of gabapentinoids increased (32%) (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S7). This indicates underlying temporal trends in the dispensing of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and gabapentinoids. When stratified by calendar year, we found temporal trends for most analgesics, although the utilisation patterns during the study period were similar between 2013–2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table S8). Specifically, the DDDs for paracetamol and gabapentinoids increased from 2013–2015 to 2018. For opioids, the DDDs was highest during 2016, and for NSAIDs, the DDDs decreased from 2013–2015 to 2018.
Total use of analgesics per month per 1000 population among 35,549 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and 675,286 matched individuals from the general population, before, during, and after an exercise therapy and patient education program in primary care in Denmark, stratified by analgesic class. The grey area reflects the intervention period. Interval 0 corresponds to the first month of the intervention. DDD is defined daily doses, NSAIDs is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, SNRIs is serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, TCAs is tri-cyclic antidepressants
Total use of analgesics per month per 1000 population among 35,549 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis before, during, and after an exercise therapy and patient education program in primary care in Denmark, stratified by calendar year. Interval 0 corresponds to the first month of the intervention. DDD is defined daily doses, NSAIDs is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, SNRIs is serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, TCAs is tri-cyclic antidepressants. 2013–2015 were collapsed due to low number of observations. 2013–2015, n = 8988; 2016, n = 8697; 2017, n = 9042; 2018, n = 8329
A small proportion of all analgesic users were responsible for a large part of the total use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids dispensed during the study period, where 10% of patients using analgesic accounted for about 45%, 50%, and 70% of the total DDDs, respectively (Gini coefficients 0.53, 0.61, 0.77, respectively; Supplementary Figs. S4, S5 and Fig. 5). Of the total DDDs during the study period, dispensed prescriptions for paracetamol constituted 50%, NSAIDs 26%, opioids 11%, gabapentinoids 4%, SNRIs 7%, and TCAs 2% (Supplementary Table S9).
Lorenz curve illustrating the distribution of opioid use 1 year before, during, and 1 year after an exercise therapy and patient education program among 12,317 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis in primary care in Denmark. Only patients who dispensed an opioid prescription during the study period are included. The Gini coefficient reflects the skewness of the Lorenz curve, where 0 reflects no skewness and 1 reflects maximal skewness. DDD is defined daily doses
Discussion
Among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, we found that the use of prescribed paracetamol and NSAIDs increased during the year before an exercise therapy and patient education program, followed by a decrease during the intervention and the year after. Sensitivity analyses indicated that temporal trends in the use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids, and gabapentinoids likely explain a part of the observed changes in analgesic use. A small proportion of analgesic users was accountable for a large part of the total use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids.
We observed a general increase in the use of analgesics during the year before enrolment in an exercise therapy and patient education program followed by a decrease during the intervention and the year after. Since our study population is aligned by the start of the intervention, the increased use likely reflects a worsening of symptoms over time that triggered health care seeking and enrolment in GLA:D®. Although exercise therapy can improve osteoarthritis-related pain and physical function [15, 16], the observed decrease in analgesic use is likely due to a combination of the actual intervention, natural fluctuation of symptoms (regression to the mean), and temporal trends in prescribing patterns for analgesics. Differentiating treatment effects from the natural course and regression to the mean is difficult, in particular given the lack of a control group and temporal prescription trends occurring during the data collection period. We emphasise that this should be kept in mind when interpreting the current results. From a clinical perspective, a decreased use of analgesics and thereby a lowered risk of adverse events is of value regardless of what drives the change.
We observed similar utilisation patterns before, during, and after the intervention among knee and hip osteoarthritis patients. In line with this, comparable proportions of knee and hip osteoarthritis patients in the GLA:D® register report using paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids, and are also similar across most baseline characteristics, such as age, sex distribution, symptom duration, pain intensity, physical function, and quality of life [34]. However, the relative increase in paracetamol, NSAID, opioid, and gabapentinoid use during the year before the intervention were larger among patients with hip osteoarthritis than knee osteoarthritis. Although speculative, potential explanations for this are differences in the effect of analgesics between knee and hip osteoarthritis patients, as the effect of NSAIDs has been reported to be lower for hip osteoarthritis patients [35], and the clinical notion that hip osteoarthritis tend to progress faster [36, 37].
In the Danish general population, most tramadol users have a sporadic or short-term use while few have a heavy or long-term use [33]. However, long-term opioid use is about four times more prevalent among individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis than in the general population [38,39,40,41], and the distribution of analgesic use could therefore be different in an osteoarthritis population. In agreement with this, we found a skewed distribution of opioid use where 10% of all opioid users accounted for 70% of all opioids dispensed during the study period (Gini coefficient: 0.77). In comparison, 10% of tramadol users in the Danish general population used about 50% of all dispensed tramadol in 2019 (Gini coefficient: 0.70) [33]. Furthermore, the use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids was generally higher in the study population compared to the Danish general population [33, 42, 43]. The high use of analgesics is not in agreement with the most recent international clinical guidelines for knee and hip osteoarthritis [13, 22]. To reduce the total use of analgesics and, thereby, the risk of adverse events among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, one potential strategy is to target ‘heavy’ or long-term users of paracetamol, NSAIDs, or opioids in deprescribing interventions and regulatory actions. However, the role of exercise therapy and patient education in deprescribing strategies requires further investigation.
Strengths and limitations
Paracetamol, NSAIDs, and codeine combination drugs sold over the counter and analgesics used during hospital admissions are not included in our analyses. In Denmark, 22% of the total paracetamol and NSAID sales, respectively, are sold over the counter [42, 43]. However, over the counter analgesics have sales restrictions (e.g., small package sizes) and are not reimbursed, which makes individuals with chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis more likely to rely on prescription-based analgesics [31, 43]. Therefore, the potential influence of not including over the counter analgesics on our results is likely small. Common to all studies using register-based prescription data, we do not know whether the dispensed analgesics were consumed and if so when it was consumed. Also, we do not know the specific pain indication for the prescribed analgesics. However, all study participants had signed up for a standardised primary care program for patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, which suggests the knee or hip pain to be their main pain complaint. The main indication for SNRIs and TCAs is depression and not pain. Since the prevalence of depression was 4% (based on ICD-10 codes F32-33 within the year before the intervention, or self-reported in the GLA:D® baseline questionnaire), we judged the potential influence of this on the results to be low and did not investigate this further. Since we used data from a large nationwide patient database linked with national prescription registry data covering all dispensed prescriptions in Denmark, we consider the generalizability of these results to similar patient populations to be good.
Conclusions
Among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, the use of several analgesics increased during the year before an exercise therapy and patient education program, followed by a decrease during the intervention and the year after. The observed changes in analgesic use are likely due to a combination of the actual intervention, natural fluctuation of symptoms (including regression to the mean), and temporal trends in prescribing patterns for analgesics. A small proportion of analgesic users accounted for half or more of all paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids dispensed during the study period. Deprescribing initiatives and regulatory actions may be needed to reduce the high use of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids and thereby the risk of adverse events among Danish patients with osteoarthritis. The role of exercise therapy and patient education in deprescribing requires further investigation.
Data availability
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to potentially identifiable or sensitive information (General Data Protection Regulation, European Union). Data may be accessed by contacting GLA:D® (https://gladinternational.org/contact/).
References
Leopoldino AO, Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Pinheiro MB, Day R, McLachlan AJ et al (2019) Paracetamol versus placebo for knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2(2):Cd013273
Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, Pinheiro MB, Lin CW, Day RO et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ 350:h1225
Wei G, Bergquist A, Broomé U, Lindgren S, Wallerstedt S, Almer S et al (2007) Acute liver failure in Sweden: etiology and outcome. J Intern Med 262(3):393–401
Bhala N, Emberson J, Merhi A, Abramson S, Arber N, Baron JA et al (2013) Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 382(9894):769–779
McGettigan P, Henry D (2011) Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies. PLoS Med 8(9):e1001098
Leonard CE, Freeman CP, Newcomb CW, Reese PP, Herlim M, Bilker WB et al (2012) Proton pump inhibitors and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of acute interstitial nephritis and acute kidney injury. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 21(11):1155–1172
Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, Hall K, Stein CM (2016) Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic noncancer pain. JAMA 315(22):2415–2423
Zeng C, Dubreuil M, LaRochelle MR, Lu N, Wei J, Choi HK et al (2019) Association of tramadol with all-cause mortality among patients with osteoarthritis. JAMA 321(10):969–982
Vowles KE, McEntee ML, Julnes PS, Frohe T, Ney JP, van der Goes DN (2015) Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain 156(4):569–576
Els C, Jackson TD, Kunyk D, Lappi VG, Sonnenberg B, Hagtvedt R et al (2017) Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10):Cd012509
Fuggle N, Curtis E, Shaw S, Spooner L, Bruyère O, Ntani G et al (2019) Safety of opioids in osteoarthritis: outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drugs Aging 36(Suppl 1):129–143
Yoshikawa A, Ramirez G, Smith ML, Foster M, Nabil AK, Jani SN et al (2020) Opioid use and the risk of falls, fall injuries and fractures among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gerontol Ser A 75(10):1989–1995
Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA et al (2019) OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 27(11):1578–1589
Thorlund JB, Simic M, Pihl K, Berthelsen DB, Day R, Koes B et al (2022) Similar effects of exercise therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids for knee osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 52(4):207–216
Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL (2015) Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub3
Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, Reichenbach S (2014) Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007912.pub2
Quicke JG, Foster NE, Thomas MJ, Holden MA (2015) Is long-term physical activity safe for older adults with knee pain?: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 23(9):1445–1456
Bricca A, Juhl CB, Steultjens M, Wirth W, Roos EM (2018) Impact of exercise on articular cartilage in people at risk of, or with established, knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 53:940–947
Cepeda MS, Camargo F, Zea C, Valencia L (2006) Tramadol for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005522
da Costa BR, Nuesch E, Kasteler R, Husni E, Welch V, Rutjes AW et al (2014) Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD003115
McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al (2014) OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(3):363–388
Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J et al (2020) 2019 American College of Rheumatology/arthritis foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol 72(2):220–233
Basedow M, Esterman A (2015) Assessing appropriateness of osteoarthritis care using quality indicators: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 21(5):782–789
Healey EL, Afolabi EK, Lewis M, Edwards JJ, Jordan KP, Finney A et al (2018) Uptake of the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines in primary care: a survey of older adults with joint pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):295
Hagen KB, Smedslund G, Østerås N, Jamtvedt G (2016) Quality of community-based osteoarthritis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68(10):1443–1452
Thorlund JB, Roos EM, Goro P, Ljungcrantz EG, Grønne DT, Skou ST (2020) Patients use fewer analgesics following supervised exercise therapy and patient education: an observational study of 16,499 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101265
Skou ST, Rasmussen S, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O et al (2015) The efficacy of 12 weeks non-surgical treatment for patients not eligible for total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Osteoarthr Cartil 23(9):1465–1475
Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O et al (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med 373(17):1597–1606
Sun E, Moshfegh J, Rishel CA, Cook CE, Goode AP, George SZ (2018) Association of early physical therapy with long-term opioid use among opioid-naive patients with musculoskeletal pain. JAMA Netw Open 1(8):e185909
Skou ST, Roos EM (2017) Good life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D™): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):72
Pottegård A, Schmidt SAJ, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sørensen HT, Hallas J, Schmidt M (2016) Data resource profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol 46(3):798-f
Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT (2015) The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 7:449–490
Sørensen AMS, Rasmussen L, Ernst MT, Mogensen SH, Laursen MV, Jimenez-Solem E et al (2021) Use of tramadol and other analgesics following media attention and risk minimization actions from regulators: a Danish nationwide drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 77(4):617–624
Roos EM, Grønne DT, Thorlund JB, Skou ST (2022) Knee and hip osteoarthritis are more alike than different in baseline characteristics and outcomes: a longitudinal study of 32,599 patients participating in supervised education and exercise therapy. Osteoarthr Cartil 30(5):681–688
Svensson O, Malmenäs M, Fajutrao L, Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2006) Greater reduction of knee than hip pain in osteoarthritis treated with naproxen, as evaluated by WOMAC and SF-36. Ann Rheum Dis 65(6):781–784
Gustafsson K, Kvist J, Zhou C, Eriksson M, Rolfson O (2022) Progression to arthroplasty surgery among patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis : a study from the Swedish BOA register. Bone Joint J. 104-b(7):792–800
Dabare C, Le Marshall K, Leung A, Page CJ, Choong PF, Lim KK (2017) Differences in presentation, progression and rates of arthroplasty between hip and knee osteoarthritis: observations from an osteoarthritis cohort study-a clear role for conservative management. Int J Rheum Dis 20(10):1350–1360
Thorlund JB, Turkiewicz A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Englund M (2020) Inappropriate opioid dispensing in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study. Osteoarthr Cartil 28(2):146–153
Hansen CA, Inacio MCS, Pratt NL, Roughead EE, Graves SE (2017) Chronic use of opioids before and after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 32(3):811–7.e1
Oh G, Abner EL, Fardo DW, Freeman PR, Moga DC (2019) Patterns and predictors of chronic opioid use in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 14(1):e0210341
Svendsen K, Skurtveit S, Romundstad P, Borchgrevink PC, Fredheim OM (2012) Differential patterns of opioid use: defining persistent opioid use in a prescription database. Eur J Pain 16(3):359–369
Wastesson JW, Martikainen JE, Zoëga H, Schmidt M, Karlstad Ø, Pottegård A (2018) Trends in use of paracetamol in the Nordic countries. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 123(3):301–307
Gaster N, Hallas J, Pottegård A, Friis S, Schmidt M (2021) The validity of danish prescription data to measure use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and quantification of bias due to non-prescription drug use. Clin Epidemiol 13:569–579
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge all clinicians and patients involved in collecting data for the GLA:D® register.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University Library of Southern Denmark. This work was supported by Pfizer Inc. through the Global Awards for Advancing Chronic Pain Research (ADVANCE) competitive grants program (grant number: 55029541 to JBT). The funding body had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSJ and JBT conceived the study. MSJ and JBT developed the analysis plan with critical input from AP, JS, ME, DTG, STS, and EMR. MSJ conducted the analyses. MSJ and JBT performed the initial data interpretation and drafted the first version of the manuscript. AP, JS, ME, DTG, STS, and EMR critically revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. Data was stored at a secured server managed by the Danish Health Data Authority. MSJ had full access to all the data in the study through an institutional authorization and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
EMR and STS are co-founders of GLA:D®, a not-for profit initiative hosted at University of Southern Denmark, aimed at implementing clinical guidelines for osteoarthritis in clinical practice. The Danish Physiotherapist Association’s fund for research, education, and practice development; the Danish Rheumatism Association; and the Physiotherapy Practice Foundation supported the start-up phase of GLA:D®. STS is currently funded by a program grant from Region Zealand (Exercise First) and two grants from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, one from the European Research Council (MOBILIZE, grant agreement number: 801790) and the other under grant agreement number 945377 (ESCAPE). The funders were not involved in the conduct of the study or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. EMR is deputy editor of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, the developer of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and several other freely available patient-reported outcome measures. STS is associate editor of the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, has received grants from The Lundbeck Foundation, personal fees from TrustMe-Ed and Munksgaard, all of which are outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethics approval of GLA:D® was waived by the ethics committee of the North Denmark Region. The GLA:D® register and the current analyses have been registered at The Danish Data Protection Agency (registration no.: SDU; 10.084 and SDU; 10.124, respectively). According to the Danish Data Protection Act, patient consent was not required since personal data was processed for research and statistical purposes only.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, M.S., Pottegård, A., Søndergaard, J. et al. Use of prescribed analgesics before and after exercise therapy and patient education in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 44, 319–328 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05432-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05432-0