Abstract
One gram-negative strain designated Bb-Pol-6 T was isolated from birch (Betula pendula) pollen at Giessen area, Germany. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenies indicated the next-relative genera were Robbsia, Chitinasiproducens, Pararobbsia and Paraburkholderia (96–95.6%). Further comparative genome analysis and phylogenetic tree-based methods revealed its phylogenetic position under the genus Robbsia. The genome of strain Bb-Pol-6 T was 5.04 Mbp with 4401 predicted coding sequences and a G + C content of 65.31 mol%. Average amino acid identity, average nucleotide identity, digital DNA–DNA hybridization and percentage of conserved proteins values to Robbsia andropogonis DSM 9511 T were 68.0, 72.5, 22.7 and 65.85%, respectively. Strain Bb-Pol-6 T was rod-shaped, non-motile, facultative anaerobic and grew optimally at 28 °C and pH 6–7. Ubiquinone 8 was the major respiratory quinone and the major cellular fatty acids were C16:0, C19:0 cyclo ω7c, C17:0 cyclo ω7c and C17:1 ω6c. The dominant polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified aminophospholipid. Based on the genomic physiological and phenotypic characteristics, strain Bb-Pol-6 T was considered a novel species under the genus Robbsia, for which the name Robbsia betulipollinis sp. nov. was proposed. The type strain is Bb-Pol-6 T (= LMG 32774 T = DSM 114812 T).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The monotypic genus Robbsia belongs to the class Betaproteobacteria [1] and the family Burkholderiaceae [2], which harbors highly diverse environmental bacteria including saprophytic bacteria, and a variety of pathogens that infect plants, animals and humans [2]. The phylogenetically separated species and single species in the genus, Robbsia andropogonis, was isolated from sorghum with strip disease and first described by Smith as Bacterium andropogoni [3]. The DNA G + C content ranges from 59 to 61.3 mol% [4], and is 58.92 mol% for the type strain DSM9511T [5]. After initial description, R. andropogonis has been reclassified several times into the genus Pseudomonas [6], Burkholderia [4], Paraburkholderia [7], and eventually Robbsia proposed by Lopes-Santos et al. [8]. It is a globally distributed phytopathogen that infects a wide range of hosts including some agriculturally important crops such as maize, sorghum, common bean and tomato [9,10,11,12]. Infected leaves can develop water-soaked lesions of pale yellow or greenish white that can enlarge and collapse to involve a larger area [10]. Distinct from most phytopathogens, R. andropogonis strains possess a single polar sheathed flagellum [13] and are capable to produce rhizobitoxine [14]. In this study, we isolated one bacterial strain from birch (Betula pendula) pollen designated as Bb-Pol-6 T. Based on genomic and phenotypic characterization, the strain is proposed to represent a novel species within the genus Robbsia.
Methods and Materials
Strain Isolation
The pollen sample from a birch was collected from the Giessen area, Hesse state, Germany (50° 34′ 10.755″ N 8° 40′ 17.859″ E) in February 2016. The details of sample collection and strain isolation procedure were carried out according to Ambika Manirajan et al. [15]. In brief, pollen grains were collected from dissected anthers and stored in sterile tubes. The pollen sample was then suspended in 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 and 0.18% (w/v) Na4P2O7, and serially diluted with 0.02% (v/v) Tween 80 and 0.085% (w/v) NaCl to 10–5. Dilution was plated on 1:10 AC agar medium (Sigma Aldrich), and aerobically incubated at 25 °C for one week. Strain Bb-Pol-6 T was isolated by subculturing in the same medium and the purity was confirmed under light microscope. The pure culture was stored in 20% glycerol at −80 °C.
16S rRNA Phylogeny
Genomic DNA of strain Bb-Pol-6 T was extracted from a late-log phase axenic culture according to Pitcher et al. [16]. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the primers 9bfm from Mühling et al. [17] and 1512uR from Weisburg et al. [18], and sequenced in both directions by LGC genomics. A consensus sequence of 1408 bp was constructed with MEGA X [19]. The retrieved 16S rRNA gene was proved to be non-chimeric using software DECIPHER 2.20.0 [20]. Next relative species and conspecific species to Bb-Pol-6 T were identified by searching against the quality-controlled 16S rRNA sequence database in EzBioCloud [21] and Genbank (NCBI).
The analysis of 16S rRNA-based phylogenies was performed in ARB (version 7.0) [22] and the sequence of strain Bb-Pol-6 T was aligned with related taxa and merged with the pre-aligned 16S rRNA gene database LPT_12_2021 (February 2021) [23]. Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences were reconstructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum-parsimony (MP), and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods integrated in the ARB program with 1000 replicates. The filters termini and Gap95_q0_to_q5 were applied in all tree calculations and the neighbor-joining tree was calculated with an additional Jukes-Cantor correction model and a termini filter between positions 101 and 1229 (Escherichia coli numbering) [24]. Maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood trees were calculated using the algorithms Phylip DNAPARS and RAxML 8, respectively.
Genome Sequencing and Analysis
Extracted genomic DNA was further sequenced with the Illumina Miseq V3 (2 × 300 bp) service from LGC Genomics. The draft genome assembly was performed using SPAdes 3.15.4 [25] and open reading frame determination and gene annotation were performed using the GenDB platform [26]. Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP 6.0 [27] and CheckM was used to estimate the genome completeness and contamination [28]. The copy number of 16S rRNA gene was estimated using acn.sh tool [29]. The digital DNA-DNA hybridization between strain Bb-Pol-6 T genome and the genome of the reference strain (GCA_902833845.1) was performed using formula 2 of the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 3.0 with the recommended BLAST + alignment tool (https://ggdc.dsmz.de/ggdc.php) [30, 31]. Comparative genome analysis including percentage of conserved proteins (POCP), average amino acid identity (AAI), average nucleotide identity (ANI) and the calculation of genomic subsets was performed at the online platform EDGAR [32] with default settings. Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters were identified using antiSMASH 6.1.1 with strict detection strictness [33]. Resistome was predicted by CARD with default settings [34]. Plant interaction factors were detected using PIFAR-Pred on PLaBAse platform [35].
Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Analyses
Physiological characteristics of strain Bb-Pol-6 T were determined together with the reference strain R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T. The Gram-staining was conducted as described in Gerhardt et al. [36]. Morphology of cells at late-log phase was assessed using Leica DM1000 light microscope under × 1000 magnification. Presence of flagellum was examined according to Heimbrook et al. [37] while cell motility was examined using the hanging-drop method. Catalase and oxidase activities were assessed by bubble production in 3% (v/v) H2O2 and oxidase test strips (Roth), respectively. Bacterial growth was tested on different media including R2A agar (Roth), Luria–Bertani agar (LB; Roth), trypticase soy agar (TSA; BD), nutrient agar (NA; BD), MacConkey agar (Merck) and AC 1:10 agar (Sigma). The optimal growth conditions were assessed by incubation in AC 1:10 broth at a range of temperatures (4, 15, 20, 28, 33, 37, 45 °C), pH (2.0–11.0, at intervals of 0.5) and salinity (0–5.0% w/v NaCl, at intervals of 0.5%). The broth pH-value was adjusted by 0.2 M Na2HPO4/0.4 M citrate for pH 2.0–8.0, and 0.2 M glycine/0.4 M NaOH for pH 8.5–11.0 with slight modification as described by Lin et al. [38]. Before the growth success was controlled, strain Bb-Pol-6 T and R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T were grown for five and three days respectively, except for inoculants at 4 °C, which were grown for two weeks. Strain Bb-Pol-6 T was incubated on AC 1:10 agar medium anaerobically using Anaerocult A system (Merck) to examine its oxygen requirement. Hypersensitive response was examined on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi) and birch (Betula pendula) according to Klement and Goodman [39]. Rhizobitoxine production bioassay was performed based on Ruan and Peters [40]. Biochemical characteristics including enzyme activities and assimilation of carbon sources were determined with API ZYM, API 20 NE and API 50 CH strips (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As strain Bb-Pol-6 T is a slow-grower, the incubation time of assimilation tests on API 20 NE and API 50 CH strips for strain Bb-Pol-6 T was extended to five days for a clear result. The assimilation of acetate, succinate, malonate and propionate that are not involved in API system was also tested on API AUX medium.
Chemotaxonomic Characteristics
Cellular fatty acid, respiratory quinones and polar lipid composition of strain Bb-Pol-6 T and the reference strain were analyzed using corresponding DSMZ services. Late-log phase bacterial culture in AC 1:10 medium was harvested and freeze dried. Cellular fatty acids were converted into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) using a modified method of Miller [41] and Kuykendall et al. [42], separated by gas chromatography and detected using Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIDI, Microbial ID). Summed features are resolved and identities of fatty acids are confirmed by a GC–MS-based analysis. Respiratory quinones were extracted using hexane [43, 44], purified by a silica-based solid phase extraction, and analyzed by HPLC. Polar lipids were extracted based on Bligh and Dyer [45], separated by two-dimensional silica gel thin layer chromatography, and detected according to Tindall et al. [46].
Repositories
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Bb-Pol-6 T is KX450422. The whole-genome shotgun BioProject number is PRJNA875284 with the GenBank assembly accession number JAPMXC000000000. The strain has been deposited in the DSMZ under the number DSM 114812, and the BCCM/LMG under the number LMG 32774.
Results and Discussion
Isolation
From the same birch pollen sample where Bb-Pol-6 T was isolated, one gram of sample was found to contain 4.1 ± 3.1 × 105 colony forming units (CFU) [15]. Culture-dependent method revealed 15 bacterial species from four phyla: Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Culture-independent method revealed 441 operational taxonomic units (OTU), and the most dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria [15]. Compared to insect-pollinated pollen species (autumn crocus and rape), birch pollen possesses significantly higher species richness and different communities [15]. Furthermore, it was shown that bacteria and pollen from wind pollinated plants like birch could have a higher allergic potential [47]. This possible higher allergic potential is caused by a high lipopolysaccharide concentration (LPS) concentration of the bacteria on the pollen. Interestingly, strain Bol-Pol-6 T has one of the highest measured LPS concentrations in this study with an LPS concentration of 76.6 ng l−1 [47] and five next relative uncultured bacteria (pairwise similarity values 98.72–99.70%) found in floor dust (FM872738) [48] and on human skin (HM270658, HM270467, JF167742, JF152894) [49] are also associated to allergic reaction in these studies.
16S rRNA Phylogeny
According to the highest pairwise gene similarity results in EzBioCloud (Ez) and ARB (Table S1), R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T (ARB 95.9, Ez 96.23), Chitinasiproducens palmae JS23T (ARB 96, Ez 95.94), Pararobbsia silviterrae DHC34T (ARB 95.7, Ez 95.58) Paraburkholderia elongata 5NT (ARB 95.6, Ez 95.51) were identified as the next-relative species with valid names to strain Bb-Pol-6 T. As the similarity is less than 98.7%, strain Bb-Pol-6 T can be considered a potential novel species [50]. Similarities with five conspecific species range from 98.72% to 99.70%. The ML tree (Fig. S1) showed that strain Bb-Pol-6 T and its conspecific species were clustered with R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T, forming a stable monophyletic group, which was consistently revealed in the NJ and MP trees (Figs. S2 and S3). This indicates the potential phylogenetic position of strain Bb-Pol-6 T under the genus Robbsia.
Genome Sequencing and Analysis
The draft genome assembly of strain Bb-Pol-6 T consisted of 46 contigs with a total size of 5.04 Mbp and the longest contig was 2.68 Mbp which was the N50 length. This genome contained 4401 predicted coding sequences among which 509 sequences were predicted to encode signal peptides, 57 tRNA genes and three rRNA genes, and had a G + C content of 65.31 mol%. Completeness and contamination of the genome was 98.44 and 0.05%, respectively. Although four copies of 16S rRNA gene were predicted only one 16S rRNA gene sequence from the draft genome was partially recovered with a length of 470 bp. R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T has the closest AAI and ANI values to strain Bb-Pol-6 T (72.42% and 72.53%) compared to the other next-relatives (Fig. S4). The dDDH and POCP values of strain Bb-Pol-6 T to R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T were 22.7 and 65.85%, respectively. These values were below the generally accepted species boundary values (AAI and ANI: 95%; dDDH: 70%) [51, 52], and above the proposed genus boundary value (POCP: 50%) [53], thus rendering strain Bb-Pol-6 T a promising novel species. The ML tree calculated from the genome of strain Bb-Pol-6 T and 19 closest-related species using 1307 core genes again revealed the monophyletic group formed by strain Bb-Pol-6 T and R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T, confirming its phylogenetic position within the genus Robbsia (Fig. 1). Comparative genome analysis of strain Bb-Pol-6 T and R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T showed 7221 pan genes, 2720 core genes and 1186 strain Bb-Pol-6 T singleton genes. Identified secondary metabolite gene clusters by antiSMASH included non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), redox-cofactor, phosphonate and terpene (Fig. S5). Two antibiotic resistance ontology terms with antibiotic efflux mechanism, qacG and adeF, were predicted using protein homolog model in CARD. The most abundant genes annotated by PIFAR-Pred were toxin-encoding genes (35%) (Fig. S6). Among these toxin-encoding genes, the majority encode syringomycin, a necrosis-inducing phytotoxin [54], and toxoflavin, a virulence factor of phytopathogens such as Burkholderia glumae in crop diseases [55, 56], indicating the phytopathogenic potential of strain Bb-Pol-6 T.
Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Analyses
Cells of strain Bb-Pol-6 T were rod-shaped (0.4–0.7 µm in width and 0.9–1.6 µm in length) with no flagellum, Gram-stain-negative, facultative anaerobic, non-spore-forming and non-motile. Colonies of strain Bb-Pol-6 T were round, convex, viscous, creamy in color and has entire margin after grown on AC 1:10 agar for five days. The strain grew optimally on AC 1:10 agar and growth was also observed on R2A agar, but not on LB, TSA, NA and MacConkey agar. Strain Bb-Pol-6 T was catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. The temperature, salinity and pH value ranges for growth were 4–28 °C (optimum at 28 °C), 0–1% NaCl (optimum without NaCl) and 5–7.5 pH (optimum at 6–7). Unlike R. andropogonis, strain Bb-Pol-6 T cannot induce hypersensitive response on Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi and Betula pendula (Fig. S7) and does not produce rhizobitoxine. The differential physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain Bb-Pol-6 T and its reference strain were summarized in Table 1.
Chemotaxonomic Characteristics
On AC 1:10 medium, ubiquinone 8 was the major respiratory quinone of both strain Bb-Pol-6 T (96.5%) and R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T (97.7%). The major cellular fatty acids of both strains were C16:0, C19:0 cyclo ω7c, C17:0 cyclo ω7c and C17:1 ω6c (Table S2). Compared to R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T, strain Bb-Pol-6 T contained a higher amount of C12:0 (2.8%), C18:1 ω5c (2.9%) and C16:1 ω7c (8.8%), and a lower amount of C14:0 (0.4%), C17:0 (0.7%) and C18:1 ω7c (0.3%). Strain Bb-Pol-6 T contained trace amount of C10:0, C12:0 3-OH and C18:1 ω7c 11-methyl, which were not detected in R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T, while C15:0 3-OH detected in R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T was not present in strain Bb-Pol-6 T. The major polar lipids in strain Bb-Pol-6 T were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, one unidentified aminolipid, one unidentified aminophospholipid, two unidentified phospholipids and six unidentified lipids (Fig. S8). Glycolipid was identified in R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T but not in strain Bb-Pol-6 T.
Conclusions
In summary, the phylogenetic analysis revealed that strain Bb-Pol-6 T belongs to the genus Robbsia. Further phenotypic and biochemical characterization distinguished strain Bb-Pol-6 T from its next-relative reference strain R. andropogonis DSM 9511 T suggesting it represents a novel species, for which the name Robbsia betulipollinis sp. nov. is proposed.
Description of Robbsia betulipollinis sp. nov
Robbsia betulipollinis (be.tu.li.pol′li.nis L. n. betula birch; L. n. pollen pollen; N.L. gen. n. betulipollinis of pollen from birch).
Cells are Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic, non-spore-forming, non-motile, rod-shaped (0.4–0.7 µm wide × 0.9–1.6 µm long) and do not have flagellum. Colonies were round, convex, viscous, creamy in color and has entire margin after five days of incubation on AC 1:10 agar. Grows between 4 and 28 °C (optimum at 28 °C), 0–1% NaCl (optimum without NaCl) and 5–7.5 pH (optimum at 6–7). Positive for catalase, esterase (C4), esterase (C8), acid phosphatase, β-galactosidase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-Glucosidase, D-galactose, D-mannitol, D-mannose, D-ribose, L-arabinose, D-arabitol, D-glucose, D-fructose and succinate. Negative for oxidase, nitrate reduction, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, gelatin hydrolysis, esculin hydrolysis, indole production, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, lipase (C 14), β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, α-fucosidase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, adipic acid, amygdalin, arbutin, capric acid, cellobiose, D-fucose, D-gentiobiose, lactose, maltose, melezitose, melibiose, raffinose, sucrose, D-tagatose, turanose, dulcitol, D-xylose, glycerol, inulin, L-arabitol, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, L-Xylose, malic acid, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside, methyl α-D-mannopyranoside, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, phenylacetic acid, potassium 2-ketogluconate, potassium 5-ketogluconate, potassium gluconate, salicin, starch, xylitol, esculin ferric citrate, trehalose, glycogen, erythritol, methyl-ß-D-xylopyranoside, L-sorbose, trisodium citrate, propionate, acetate, D-adonitol, D-lyxose, D-sorbitol, inositol, D-arabinose, malonate, hypersensitive response and rhizobitoxine production. The major respiratory quinone is ubiquinone 8. The major cellular fatty acids are C16:0, C19:0 cyclo ω7c, C17:0 cyclo ω7c and C17:1 ω6c. The major polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, one unidentified aminolipid, one unidentified aminophospholipid, two unidentified phospholipids and six unidentified lipids.
The type strain, Bb-Pol-6 T (= LMG 32774 T = DSM 114812 T), was isolated from pollen of birch in Giessen, Hesse, Germany (50° 34′ 10.755″ N 8° 40′ 17.859″ E). The genome of the type strain has a size of 5.04 Mbp with a G + C content of 65.31 mol%.
Data Availability
The data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Euzéby J (2006) List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64188-0
Coenye T (2014) The family Burkholderiaceae. In: Rosenberg E (ed) The prokaryotes: alphaproteobacteria and betaproteobacteria, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 759–776
Smith EF (1911) Bacteria in relation to plant diseases. Carnegie Institute Publications, Washington, DC
Gillis M, Van TV, Bardin R et al (1995) Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 45(2):274–289. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-274
Lopes-Santos L, Castro DB, Ottoboni LM et al (2015) Draft genome sequence of Burkholderia andropogonis type strain ICMP2807, isolated from Sorghum bicolor. Genome Announc. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00455-15
Stevens FL (1925) Plant disease fungi. MacMillan Co., New York
Sawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta RS (2014) Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 5:429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00429
Lopes-Santos L, Castro DB, Ferreira-Tonin M et al (2017) Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Burkholderia andropogonis and description of Robbsia andropogonis gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110(6):727–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0842-6
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (2022) EPPO Global database. https://gd.eppo.int. Accessed 14 Oct 2022
Borkar SG, Yumlembam RA (2017) Bacterial diseases of cereal crops. Bacterial diseases of crop plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 17–54
Morales-Galván O, Nigam D, Young AJ et al (2022) Molecular, phenotypical, and host-range characterization of Robbsia andropogonis strains isolated from Bougainvillea spp. Mexico Plant Dis 106(2):603–611. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-21-1254-RE
Cui X, Cai Y, Chen R, Liu Q (2022) First report of bacterial leaf spot disease on Pueraria montana var. thomsonii caused by Robbsia andropogonis in China. Plant Dis 106(11):2985. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2848-PDN
Fuerst JA, Hayward AC (1969) The sheathed flagellum of Pseudomonas stizolobii. J Gen Microbiol 58(2):239–245. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-58-2-239
Mitchell RE (1994) Dihydrorhizobitoxine, a minor product of Pseudomonas andropogonis. Phytochemistry 37(2):373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(94)85062-3
Ambika Manirajan B, Ratering S, Rusch V et al (2016) Bacterial microbiota associated with flower pollen is influenced by pollination type, and shows a high degree of diversity and species-specificity. Environ Microbiol 18(12):5161–5174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13524
Pitcher DG, Saunders NA, Owen RJ (1989) Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 8(4):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1989.tb00262.x
Mühling M, Woolven-Allen J, Murrell JC, Joint I (2008) Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. ISME J 2(4):379–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.97
Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173(2):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M et al (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Wright ES, Yilmaz LS, Noguera DR (2012) DECIPHER, a search-based approach to chimera identification for 16S rRNA sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(3):717–725. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06516-11
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S et al (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67(5):1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R et al (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32(4):1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh293
Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J et al (2008) The all-species living tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 31(4):241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001
Brosius J, Palmer ML, Kennedy PJ, Noller HF (1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 75(10):4801–4805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.10.4801
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D et al (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19(5):455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC et al (2003) GenDB—an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31(8):2187–2195. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg312
Teufel F, Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR et al (2022) SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol 40(7):1023–1025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT et al (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25(7):1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114
Pereira-Flores E, Glöckner FO, Fernandez-Guerra A (2019) Fast and accurate average genome size and 16S rRNA gene average copy number computation in metagenomic data. BMC Bioinform 20(1):453. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3031-y
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M (2021) TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50(D1):D801–D807. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab902
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-60
Blom J, Albaum SP, Doppmeier D et al (2009) EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinform 10:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-154
Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM et al (2021) antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49(W1):W29–W35. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab335
Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TT et al (2020) CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 48(D1):D517-d525. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz935
Martínez-García PM, López-Solanilla E, Ramos C, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P (2016) Prediction of bacterial associations with plants using a supervised machine-learning approach. Environ Microbiol 18(12):4847–4861. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13389
Gerhardt P, Murray RG, Wood WA, Krieg NR (1994) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC
Heimbrook ME, Wang WL, Campbell G (1989) Staining bacterial flagella easily. J Clin Microbiol 27(11):2612–2615. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.11.2612-2615.1989
Lin QH, Lv YY, Gao ZH, Qiu LH (2020) Pararobbsia silviterrae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil and reclassification of Burkholderia alpina as Pararobbsia alpina comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70(2):1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003932
Klement Z, Goodman RN (1967) The hypersensitive reaction to infection by bacterial plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 5(1):17–44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.05.090167.000313
Ruan X, Peters NK (1991) Rapid and sensitive assay for the phytotoxin rhizobitoxine. Appl Environ Microbiol 57(7):2097–2100. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.7.2097-2100.1991
Miller LT (1982) Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 16(3):584–586. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.16.3.584-586.1982
Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O’Neill JJ, Devine TE (1988) Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 38(4):358–361. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-38-4-358
Tindall BJ (1990) A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 13(2):128–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80158-X
Tindall BJ (1990) Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 66(1–3):199–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb03996.x
Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37(8):911–917. https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099
Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR (2007) Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In: Reddy CA (ed) Methods for general and molecular microbiology, 3rd edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 330–393
Ambika Manirajan B, Hinrichs AK, Ratering S et al (2022) Bacterial species associated with highly allergenic plant pollen yield a high level of endotoxins and induce chemokine and cytokine release from human A549 cells. Inflammation 45:2186–2201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-022-01684-3
Täubel M, Rintala H, Pitkäranta M et al (2009) The occupant as a source of house dust bacteria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 124(4):834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.045
Kong HH, Oh J, Deming C et al (2012) Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis. Genome Res 22(5):850–859. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.131029.111
Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33(4):152–155
Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A et al (2018) Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(1):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002516
Thompson CC, Chimetto L, Edwards RA et al (2013) Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genom 14:913. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-913
Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY et al (2014) A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 196(12):2210–2215. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01688-14
Xu GW, Gross DC (1988) Evaluation of the role of syringomycin in plant pathogenesis by using Tn5 mutants of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae defective in syringomycin production. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(6):1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.6.1345-1353.1988
Jeong Y, Kim J, Kim S et al (2003) Toxoflavin produced by Burkholderia glumae causing rice grain rot is responsible for inducing bacterial wilt in many field crops. Plant Dis 87(8):890–895. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.8.890
Lee J, Park J, Kim S et al (2016) Differential regulation of toxoflavin production and its role in the enhanced virulence of Burkholderia gladioli. Mol Plant Pathol 17(1):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12262
Acknowledgements
We thank the GenDB-Team of the Institute of Bioinformatics and System Biology (JLU Giessen) for the assembly of the genome and Bernhard Schink, University Konstanz for checking the correctness of the bacterial name.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. H. Shi is funded by a BMWi project (KK5035801SA) of the German government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HS designed the study, performed the phenotypic and biochemical experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the original draft; BAM isolated the bacterium; RGP helped with the phenotypic and biochemical experiments; SR helped with the analysis of taxonomic data, designed and supervised the study, and edited the original draft; SS supervised the study, and edited the original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, H., Ambika Manirajan, B., Ratering, S. et al. Robbsia betulipollinis sp. nov., Isolated from Pollen of Birch (Betula pendula). Curr Microbiol 80, 234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03344-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03344-7