Abstract
The wetland is an important ecosystem for purifying pollutants and circulating nutrients. Numerous microorganisms contribute to maintaining this function. We obtained Flavobacterium enshiense R6S-5-6 which was isolated from Ungok (Ramsar) Wetland and conducted whole-genome sequencing to investigate what contribution R6S-5-6 could make to the wetland community. The complete genome sequence of R6S-5-6 has a size of 3,251,289 bp with 37.68% of GC content. Gene annotation revealed that R6S-5-6 has several pathways to break down pollutants, including denitrification, assimilatory sulfate reduction (ASR), and polyphosphate-accumulating process. Furthermore, R6S-5-6 has genes that can have a positive effect on plants living in wetlands, such as storing essential nutrients, promoting plant growth, and protecting plants against pathogens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems on the planet. They are often referred to as “Earth’s kidneys” because they play a crucial role in managing greenhouse gas emissions, controlling floods and droughts, and purifying pollutants from water [1]. Also, they usually provide a nutrient-rich habitat for living things, which results in unique biodiversity [2]. In particular, the members of the wetlands bacterial ecosystem include sulfate-reducing, nitrogen-fixing, denitrifying, and methanotrophic bacteria [3]. These bacteria are involved in several biogeochemical cycles, including carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur, affecting vegetation ecology [4].
The genus Flavobacterium, a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae, was first proposed by Bergey et al. [5]. Flavobacterium is widely distributed in the environment, including activated sludge [6], stream sediment [7], glacier [8], and rhizosphere [9]. Flavobacterium not only has a wide range of habitats but also has a wide range of characteristics, such as pathogenicity, which causes fatal damage to both wild and cultured fish, and plant growth-promoting properties [10, 11].
Flavobacterium enshiense was first reported by Dong et al. in 2013 and consists of only one type strain, designated DK69T [12]. F. enshiense DK69T is a Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, yellow-pigmented, and rod-shaped bacterium isolated from soil collected from the wastewater treatment plant in Enshi, Hubei province, China. In the chemotaxonomic data, F. enshiense DK69T contained menaquinone-6 and phosphatidylethanolamine as the major quinone and polar lipid, respectively. In the whole-genome analysis of F. enshiense DK69T, no pathogenic genes were found [13].
Here, we report the complete genome of a novel strain of F. enshiense, designated R6S-5-6, for a better understanding of the species F. enshiense and bacteria in wetlands. The complete genome sequence of R6S-5-6 is expected to broaden our understanding of the genomic features of F. enshiense and the characteristics of wetland bacteria.
Materials and Methods
Sample Preparation and Genome Sequencing
From the National Institute of Biological Resources Culture Collection (NIBR), we obtained the strain R6S-5-6 which was isolated from Ungok (Ramsar) Wetland located in Gochang, Jeollabuk-do province, the Republic of Korea in 2011 (NIBRBA0000113315). According to the sample details provided, a wetland sample from Gochang was preserved in a 50-ml conical tube in 2011. The sample was serially diluted and plated onto R2A agar. After inoculation, appeared colonies were moved to the same fresh medium at 25 ºC. A purified single colony was confirmed with PCR amplification using universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers 27F and 1492R (GenBank accession: JQ928689). The selected colony was termed strain R6S-5-6. The strain was preserved at − 80 ºC until conducting whole-genome sequencing.
A genomic DNA was extracted using RBC DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer instruction. The genomic DNA was purified, sheared, and normalized for PacBio SMRTbell 20 kb Library [14]. Continuous long reads (CLR) were produced by sequencing the SMRTbell library onto the PacBio Sequel platform.
Genome Assembly
We used Samtools (v1.13) to convert PacBio BAM file to FASTA and removed short reads under 1000 bp that could affect assembly quality. De novo genome assembly was conducted using Flye (v2.8.3) with –meta option as suggested to be effective for controlling any contamination or artifacts. After excluding contigs of less than 10,000 bp that were suspected of contamination or artifacts, the errors of long circular contig were polished using pbmm2 (v1.4.0) and GCpp (2.0.2) with Arrow algorithm until no more variants were identified (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/GenomicConsensus). The dnaA gene in the genome was rotated to the starting point using Circlator (v1.5.5). CheckM (v1.1.3) and BUSCO (v5.2.2) with flavobacteriales_odb10 dataset were used to evaluate the quality of assembly.
Phylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic analysis of R6S-5-6 was carried out using 16S rRNA gene, gyrB gene, and orthologs. The 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequence for type strain of Flavobacterium spp. were retrieved from GenBank [15]. For 16S rRNA gene, sequences were aligned using SINA Aligner (v1.2.11) and trimmed using trimAl (v1.4.rev15) with ‘-gappyout’ option. The sequences of the gyrB gene and single-copy orthologs were obtained using Prokka (v1.14.6) and OrthoFinder (v2.5.4). Multiple sequence alignment for gyrB and orthologs was performed using MAFFT-linsi (v7.487), and they were trimmed using ClipKIT (v.1.3.0) with ‘kpic-smart-gap’ mode. All of alignments were used for a maximum-likelihood tree construction using IQTREE (v2.1.4 beta) under model testing with 1000 ultrafast bootstraps. Protein sequence identity for gyrB gene was calculated through VectorBuilder’s Sequence Alignment tool (https://www.vectorbuilder.com/tool/sequence-alignment.html). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were calculated using pyani (v0.2.12) and Genome to Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC; v3.0), respectively. For further confirmation of the taxonomic assignment, the whole-genome was submitted to the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS), the Microbial Genome Atlas (MiGA), and the fast bacterial genome identification platform (fIDBAC). Whole-genome-based taxonomic assignment was also conducted using GTDB-Tk (v1.6.0).
Genome Annotation
Functional annotation was carried out using Prokka, Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server, eggNOG-mapper (v2.1.6) with eggNOG 5.0 database, and MicrobeAnnotator (v2.0.5). Other genomic features were investigated using dbCAN2 for Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZymes), PHASTER for prophage sequences, and IslandViewer4 for genomic islands. Secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters were identified using antiSMASH (v6.0) with “loose” detection strictness. Operons and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) were predicted with Operon-mapper and CRISPRCasFinder, respectively. Enzyme commission number (EC number) was predicted by DeepEC (v0.4.0). Metabolic pathway of enzymes was visualized by iPATH3. Virulence genes were identified using ABRicate (v1.0.1) (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) with VFDB.
Results
Genome Features of R6S-5-6
A total of 411,483 PacBio reads with the N50 length of 7432 bp were used for genome assembly. Of the four contigs generated under the “meta” option, two were simple repeat sequences and another one was a small assembly artifact of unknown origin, so we eliminated them and used only the remaining contig. Polishing was performed only once because no further corrections were observed. We eventually obtained a complete circular genome with lengths of 3,251,289 bp (759X coverage). The GC content was accounting for 37.68% of the whole-genome. The genome completeness and contamination were determined to be 99.65% and 0.47%, respectively. BUSCO evaluation using flavobacteriales_odb10 showed 100% completeness with no duplicated, fragmented, or missing BUSCOs, revealing high-quality genome can be derived from only using PacBio reads. A total of 3034 genes were predicted, comprising 2940 coding DNA sequences (CDSs), three complete rRNA operons, 33 misc RNAs, 51 tRNAs, and one tmRNA. gltX gene, the origin of replication, was located at 710,681–712,192 bp, corresponding to the region where the GC skew converts negative to positive (Fig. 1). The complete genome contained two prophage sequences. There are no CRISPR and virulence genes. Seven genomic islands were identified, of which the GC content decreased sharply between 2.75 and 2.87 M. Figure 2 shows all metabolic pathway of R6S-5-6.
Confirmation on Taxonomic Status
To investigate the phylogenetic position of R6S-5-6, we first calculated the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity against type strains. The sequences of all three 16S rRNA genes in R6S-5-6 were identical, and the closest species was F. enshiense DK69T (99.65% similarity) (Fig. 3A). The gyrB gene, which was proposed as a phylogenetic marker for genus Flavobacterium [16], had a 99.69% protein sequence similarity with that of F. enshiense DK69T (Fig. 3B). In the tree based on 912 single-copy orthologs with 21 phylogenetic neighbors, F. enshiense DK69T was also the closest species to R6S-5-6 (Fig. 3C). The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of strain R6S-5-6 exceeded the species delineation threshold of 98.7%, and protein sequence similarity of the gyrB gene also exceeded the intraspecies minimum values of 97.2% [16]. However, with the emergence of high-throughput sequencing technologies, single phylogenetic markers are no longer sufficient for delineating a species. For taxonomic delineation, the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity should only be used as an initial screening and reliable analysis based on whole-genome sequence is required [17]. Therefore, we first performed TYGS, MiGA, fIDBAC, and GTDB-Tk to assign taxonomic status based on the type strain or representative strain genome. TYGS and GTDB-Tk assigned strain R6S-5-6 as a novel species of the genus Flavobacterium. fIDBAC identified strain R6S-5-6 as F. enshiense but showed that whole-genome based ANI (gANI) was below the threshold value of 96.5%. MiGA showed an average amino acid identity (AAI) value of 96.58% against F. enshiense and concluded that strain R6S-5–6 possibly even belongs to the species F. enshiense.
ANI and dDDH, which are in silico genomic metrics, were calculated. The relationship between strain R6S-5-6 and F. enshiense DK69T revealed that ANI based on MUMmer (ANIm) value was 91.01%, dDDH value was 69.3% (C.I. 65.4–72.9%) at formula d0, and 40.4% at d4, and GC content differed by 0.05% (Table 1). Since the threshold values for species delineation of ANI and dDDH are 95% ~ 96% and 70%, respectively, the unmet values contradicted the conclusions for the 16S rRNA and gyrB gene sequence similarity results. As 95–96% of ANI value is established as ‘the golden standard,’ strain R6S-5-6 is considered a novel species.
Metabolic Pathways of R6S-5–6 Contributing to the Wetland Ecosystem
Some bacteria found in wetlands can contribute positively to the wetland ecosystem in the following ways: (1) purifying wastewater, (2) reducing eutrophication, or (3) promoting plant growth. We highlight genomic properties of R6S-5-6 that have potential for sustaining wetland ecosystems.
Wastewater contains nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur, which can cause eutrophication. Wetland ecosystems have the ability to purify water, and bacteria have been found to play a major role in this process [18]. In this sense, R6S-5-6 has genes that can contribute to purification (Fig. 4).
Denitrifying
Denitrifiers in wetlands can control greenhouse effects by removing greenhouse gas N2O [19]. R6S-5-6 has the denitrification pathway that is mainly used to remove nitrogen from wastewater [20]. The process consists of four steps: NO3− to NO2− by nitrate reductase (Nar), NO2− to NO by nitrite reductase (Nir), NO to N2O by nitric oxide reductase (Nor), and N2O to N2 by nitrous oxide reductase (Nos) [21]. R6S-5-6 has denitrifying gene clusters which contain Nir (NirA, NirK, NirS, and NirV), Nor (NorBC, NorE, NorQ, and NorD), and Nos (NosL, NosD, NosF, NosY, and NosZ) (Fig. S1).
Polyphosphate-Accumulating
Excess phosphorus discharged from agriculture and industry adversely affects the ecosystem and causes eutrophication. Accumulating polyphosphate plays an important role in removing soluble phosphorus in wastewater [22]. The ability of bacteria to accumulate poly-p is related to polyphosphate kinases (PPK), exopolyphosphatase (PPX), and phosphate transport systems (pstSCAB and pit) [23]. R6S-5-6 has PPK (EC 2.7.4.1), PPX (EC 3.6.1.11), and phosphate transport (pstA, pstB, pstC, pstS, and pitA).
Sulfate-Reducing
Sulfate present in wastewater is removed through assimilatory sulfate reduction (ASR) pathway [24]. Sulfate is reduced to sulfide through the ASR metabolic pathway that proceeds over four steps: SO42− → adenosine-5-phosphosulfate (APS) → 3′-phospho-5′-adenylyl sulfate (PAPS) → SO32− → S2− [25]. R6S-5-6 has the genes cysN/cysD, cysD, cysH, and cysJ/cysI encoding enzymes associated with the ASR pathway (Fig. S2).
Other Organic Pollutants
Analysis of the genome using dbCAN showed 72 genes encoding for CAZymes, including glycoside hydrolases (GHs) (n = 13), glycosyltransferases (GTs) (n = 44), carbohydrate esterases (CEs) (n = 12), carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) (n = 1), and auxiliary activities (AAs) (n = 2). GTs are most abundant, accounting for 61% of the total number of predicted CAZymes. GT families are involved in the biosynthesis of compounds such as oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and glycoconjugates. The role of this enzyme is important in that it converts potential toxic organic pollutants into low-molecular-weight intermediates or harmless terminal products [26]. As a related study, GT families are known to help remove total dissolved solids (TDS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) loading macronutrients [27].
R6S-5–6 Affects the Plant Ecosystem in Wetlands
Recent studies have shown that some Flavobacterium spp. have a positive effect on plants. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) contribute to plants as follows: (1) storage of essential nutrients for plants, (2) promotion of plant growth, and (3) plant protection. Considering this, several genes of R6S-5-6 emphasize some useful effects on plant ecology in wetlands.
Storage of Essential Nutrients for Plant Growth
Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for plants but they are limited in the rhizosphere [28]. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria have nitrogenase genes, mainly nif genes [29]. In this sense, R6S-5-6 contains Nif gene (nifU), nitrogen fixation regulation protein (FixK), and Global nitrogen regulator (NtcA) associated with nitrogen-fixing.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) converts organic phosphorus to available phosphorus for plants [30]. However, ALP is mainly produced by soil microbes [31]. R6S-5-6 has an ALP (EC 3.1.3.1), through which organic phosphorus is mineralized. The solubilization of inorganic phosphorus occurs by the action of organic acids such as gluconic acid [32]. PyrroloQuinoline Quinone (PQQ) catalyzes gluconic acid [33]. R6S-5-6 has pqqL gene predicted to be related to PQQ production [34].
Promotion of Plant Growth
Auxin is a plant hormone that promotes plant growth and development [35]. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which is a representative auxin, is synthesized with tryptophan as a precursor [36]. R6S-5-6 has a tryptophan (trp) biosynthesis pathway, which contains trp synthase alpha chain (EC 4.2.1.20), trp synthase beta chain (EC 4.2.1.20), anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.18), and phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase (EC 5.3.1.24) (Fig. S3).
Bacteria with 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase absorb some of the ACC synthesized by plants. ACC is decomposed by ACC deaminase and easily metabolized in bacteria. Lowering ACC in plants reduces the amount of ethylene. This prevents the effect of stress ethylene generated in stressful situations and helps plants grow [36]. R6S-5–6 has ACC deaminase (EC 3.5.99.7).
Plant Protection
The nonribosomal peptide synthetase and polyketide synthase (NRPS-PKS) gene cluster of Flavobacterium isolated from plants is known to be involved in the biosynthesis of compounds that inhibit plant pathogens [37]. R6S-5-6 has twenty NRPS-PKS gene clusters, of which it has the highest homogeneity with the NRPS-PKS gene cluster of Aquimarina sp. BL5 at 40%.
The antiSMASH results indicated that R6S-5-6 has gene clusters for flexirubin and APE Vf. Flexirubin which are widely distributed in the genus Flavobacterium. They are pigments that form a yellow colony and are composed of a 2–5 dialkylresorcinol (DAR) with a non-isoprenoid aryl-polyene carboxylic acid ester [38, 39]. Although their ecological roles are unknown, DAR compounds are known to have antibacterial properties in Pseudomonas sp. [40].
Cell wall dissolving enzymes produced by PGPB can break down the cell walls of plant pathogens. R6S-5-6 has cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4), glucanase (EC 3.2.1.21), and β-1,3-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.39) which are known to contribute to plant defense by degrading the cell walls of plant pathogens [41, 42].
Discussion
In wetlands where various living things are in harmony, bacteria play a significant role in maintaining the ecosystem, including purifying pollutants and promoting plant growth. However, bacteria and their genomes isolated from wetlands have been scarcely reported. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the genomic characteristics of R6S-5-6 which was isolated from Ungok Wetland by conducting de novo assembly.
We performed several analyses to confirm the taxonomic status of R6S-5-6. Interestingly, all metrics except for ANI concluded that R6S-5-6 belongs to F. enshiense. In this regard, there have been studies that ANI cannot perfectly reflect the evolutionary distance of all members of bacteria, including that the threshold value for ANI was inflated by using highly redundant genomes [43] and that cutoff values should be lowered in some species such as Variovorax paradoxus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [44]. Also, according to a recent paper from Donovan et al. [45], intraspecies ANI values are expected to approach 90%, a 10% diameter cluster with the representative genome. Since there is only one strain in F. enshiense, and it was isolated from the waste liquid treatment facility of the pharmaceutical company, we think it should be discreet in proposing R6S-5-6 as a novel species. Since pharmaceutical waste has mutagenicity and genotoxicity [46], it is thought that many synonymous mutations may have occurred at low ANI value compared to AAI value. Taken together, we cautiously suggest that R6S-5-6 is the strain within the species F. enshiense located at the species boundary with type strain DK69. We expect that the phylogenetic position will be changed more precisely if the study of F. enshiense continues and additional strains are reported, as in the case where the species Lactobacillus gasseri was recently divided into L. gasseri and Lactobacillus paragasseri due to intraspecies heterogeneity [47]. In addition, chemotaxonomic information that can be derived from physiological and biochemical experiments will support the taxonomic status confirmation more reliably. Therefore, fatty acid analysis, biochemical API testing, and microscopic morphological observation should also be conducted in future studies.
To predict the role of F. enshiense R6S-5-6 in the wetland ecosystem, we looked into the pathways related to the purification of wetlands and plant growth. R6S-5-6 has genes involved in denitrifying, polyphosphate-accumulating, and assimilatory sulfate-reducing pathways for wastewater purification. Regarding plant growth in wetland ecosystems, R6S-5-6 has genes that store nitrogen and phosphorus for plant use. R6S-5-6 also has genes encoding tryptophan biosynthesis-related enzymes and ACC deaminase that inhibit plant pathogens. These results suggest that F. enshiense R6S-5-6 has the potential to play a beneficial role in the wetland community.
Conclusion
In this study, we analyzed the role of F. enshiense R6S-5-6 in the wetland ecosystem. Unlike previous investigations of Flavobacterium spp., which mainly focused on pathogenic characteristics, we provided information on how R6S-5-6 is involved in the circulation of wetland and specific pathways in plant ecosystems. The genomic characteristics of R6S-5-6 investigated in this study will broaden understanding of species F. enshiense where only one strain has been reported.
Data Availability
The complete genome sequence of F. enshiense R6S-5-6 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP090376.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Vymazal J (2011) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101403q
Evers S, Yule CM, Padfield R, O’Reilly P, Varkkey H (2017) Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands – implications for policies and management. Glob Change Biol 23(2):534–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13422
Bodelier PLE, Dedysh SN (2013) Microbiology of wetlands. Front Microbiol 4:79–79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00079
Lamers L, Van Diggelen J, Op Den Camp H, Visser E, Lucassen E, Vile M, Jetten M, Smolders A, Roelofs J (2012) Microbial transformations of nitrogen, sulfur, and iron dictate vegetation composition in wetlands: a review. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00156
Bergey D, Harrison F, Breed R, Hammer B, Huntoon F (1923) Genus II Flavobacterium gen. nov. Bergey’s Man Determ Bacteriol 97:117
Liu Q, Siddiqi MZ, Liu Q, Huq MA, Lee SY, Choi K-D, Im W-T (2018) Flavobacterium hankyongi sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(5):1732–1736. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002739
Lee SH, Kim JM, Lee JR, Park W, Jeon CO (2010) Flavobacterium fluvii sp. nov., isolated from stream sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60(2):353–357. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.010850-0
Xu M, Xin Y, Tian J, Dong K, Yu Y, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhou Y (2011) Flavobacterium sinopsychrotolerans sp. nov., isolated from a glacier. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.014126-0
Xiao Y-P, Hui W, Lee J-S, Lee KC, Quan Z-X (2011) Flavobacterium dongtanense sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of a wetland reed. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61(2):343–346. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022301-0
Loch TP, Faisal M (2015) Emerging flavobacterial infections in fish: a review. J Adv Res 6(3):283–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2014.10.009
Menon RR, Kumari S, Viver T, Rameshkumar N (2020) Flavobacterium pokkalii sp. nov., a novel plant growth promoting native rhizobacteria isolated from pokkali rice grown in coastal saline affected agricultural regions of southern India Kerala. Microbiol Res 240:126533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126533
Dong K, Chen F, Du Y, Wang G (2013) Flavobacterium enshiense sp. nov., isolated from soil, and emended descriptions of the genus Flavobacterium and Flavobacterium cauense, Flavobacterium saliperosum and Flavobacterium suncheonense. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63(Pt_3):886–892. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.039974-0
Zeng Z, Chen C, Du H, Wang G, Li M (2015) High quality draft genomic sequence of Flavobacterium enshiense DK69T and comparison among Flavobacterium genomes. Stand Genomic Sci 10(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0084-z
Kong N, Ng W, Thao K, Agulto R, Weis A, Kim KS, Korlach J, Hickey L, Kelly L, Lappin S, Weimer BC (2017) Automation of PacBio SMRTbell NGS library preparation for bacterial genome sequencing. Stand Genomic Sci 12(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-017-0239-1
Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, Karsch-Mizrachi I (2021) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 49(D1):D92–D96. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1023
Peeters K, Willems A (2011) The gyrB gene is a useful phylogenetic marker for exploring the diversity of Flavobacterium strains isolated from terrestrial and aquatic habitats in Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Lett 321(2):130–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02326.x
Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu X-W, De Meyer S, Trujillo ME (2018) Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(1):461–466. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002516
Niu H, Leung DY, Wong C, Zhang T, Chan M, Leung FC (2014) Nitric oxide removal by wastewater bacteria in a biotrickling filter. J Environ Sci 26(3):555–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60456-8
Zumft WG (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61(4):533–616. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.61.4.533-616.1997
Lu H, Chandran K, Stensel D (2014) Microbial ecology of denitrification in biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 64:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.06.042
Niu H, Leung D (2010) A review on the removal of nitrogen oxides from polluted flow by bioreactors. Environ Rev 18(NA):175–189. https://doi.org/10.1139/A10-007
Tarayre C, Nguyen H-T, Brognaux A, Delepierre A, De Clercq L, Charlier R, Michels E, Meers E, Delvigne F (2016) Characterisation of phosphate accumulating organisms and techniques for polyphosphate detection: a review. Sensors 16(6):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16060797
Zhong C, Fu J, Jiang T, Zhang C, Cao G (2018) Polyphosphate metabolic gene expression analyses reveal mechanisms of phosphorus accumulation and release in Microlunatus phosphovorus strain JN459. FEMS Microbiol Lett 365(6):fny034. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny034
Kushkevych I, Cejnar J, Treml J, Dordević D, Kollar P, Vítězová M (2020) Recent advances in metabolic pathways of sulfate reduction in intestinal bacteria. Cells 9(3):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030698
Santos AA, Venceslau SS, Grein F, Leavitt WD, Dahl C, Johnston DT, Pereira IA (2015) A protein trisulfide couples dissimilatory sulfate reduction to energy conservation. Science 350(6267):1541–1545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3558
Brooks GT, Roberts T (1999) Pesticide chemistry and bioscience: the food-environment challenge. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Chandran T, Muthunarayanan V, Ravindran B, Nguyen VK, Nguyen XC, Bui X-T, Ngo HH, Nguyen XH, Chang SW, Nguyen DD (2020) Evaluation of efficacy of indigenous acidophile-bacterial consortia for removal of pollutants from coffee cherry pulping wastewater. Bioresour Technol Rep 11:100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100533
De Willigen P (1986) Supply of soil nitrogen to the plant during the growing season. In: Lambers H, Neeteson JJ, Stulen I (eds) Fundamental ecological and agricultural aspects of nitrogen metabolism in higher plants: proceedings of a symposium organized by the department of plant physiology, university of Groningen and the institute for Soil Fertility, Haren, 9–12 April 1985. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 417–432
Hoover T 2000 Control of nitrogen fixation genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Prokaryotic nitrogen fixation: a model system for the analysis of a biological process. 131–147
Richardson AE (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Funct Plant Biol 28(9):897–906. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP01093
Nakas JP, Gould WD, Klein DA (1987) Origin and expression of phosphatase activity in a semi-arid grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 19(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90118-0
Rodriguez H, Gonzalez T, Goire I, Bashan Y (2004) Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum spp. Naturwissenschaften 91(11):552–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0566-0
Van Schie BJ, De Mooy OH, Linton JD, Van Dijken JP, Kuenen JG (1987) PQQ-dependent production of gluconic acid by Acinetobacter, Agrobacterium and Rhizobium species. Microbiology 133(4):867–875. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-133-4-867
Toyama H, Chistoserdova L, Lidstrom ME (1997) Sequence analysis of pqq genes required for biosynthesis of pyrroloquinoline quinone in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and the purification of a biosynthetic intermediate. Microbiology 143(2):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-2-595
Teale WD, Paponov IA, Palme K (2006) Auxin in action: signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(11):847–859. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2020
Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42(3):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1139/m96-032
Carrión VJ, Perez-Jaramillo J, Cordovez V, Tracanna V, De Hollander M, Ruiz-Buck D, Mendes LW, Van Ijcken WF, Gomez-Exposito R, Elsayed SS (2019) Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 366(6465):606–612. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9285
Hudson J, Kumar V, Egan S (2019) Comparative genome analysis provides novel insight into the interaction of Aquimarina sp. AD1, BL5 and AD10 with their macroalgal host. Mar Genom 46:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2019.02.005
Mogadem A, Almamary MA, Mahat NA, Jemon K, Ahmad WA, Ali I (2021) Antioxidant activity evaluation of flexirubin-type pigment from Chryseobacterium artocarpi CECT 8497 and related docking study. Molecules 26(4):979. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26040979
Pohanka A, Levenfors J, Broberg A (2006) Antimicrobial dialkylresorcinols from Pseudomonas sp. Ki19. J Nat Prod 69(4):654–657. https://doi.org/10.1021/np0600595
Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF (2017) Bacillus: a biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00667
Wróbel-Kwiatkowska M, Lorenc-Kukula K, Starzycki M, Oszmiański J, Kepczyńska E, Szopa J (2004) Expression of β-1,3-glucanase in flax causes increased resistance to fungi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 65(5):245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.02.008
Murray CS, Gao Y, Wu M (2021) Re-evaluating the evidence for a universal genetic boundary among microbial species. Nat Commun 12(1):4059. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24128-2
Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K, Turner S, Brover S, Schoch CL, Kimchi A, DiCuccio M (2018) Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(7):2386–2392. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002809
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P (2020) A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol 38(9):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8
Sharif A, Ashraf M, Anjum AA, Javeed A, Altaf I, Akhtar MF, Abbas M, Akhtar B, Saleem A (2016) Pharmaceutical wastewater being composite mixture of environmental pollutants may be associated with mutagenicity and genotoxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(3):2813–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5478-3
Tanizawa Y, Tada I, Kobayashi H, Endo A, Maeno S, Toyoda A, Arita M, Nakamura Y, Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M, Tohno M (2018) Lactobacillus paragasseri sp. nov., a sister taxon of Lactobacillus gasseri, based on whole-genome sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(11):3512–3517. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003020
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Biological Resources funded by the Ministry of Environment (No. NIBR202134204).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization. I-TC: Resources, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. K-EL: Resources, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. YKS: Resources, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. JY: Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. DS: Conceptualization, Validation, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research described herein was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any experimental works with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, A., Cha, IT., Lee, KE. et al. The Role of Flavobacterium enshiense R6S-5-6 in the Wetland Ecosystem Revealed by Whole-Genome Analysis. Curr Microbiol 80, 83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03157-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03157-0