Abstract
The objective of this study is to elucidate the basic biological properties and function of TC0668 in vitro. Laser confocal microscopy and immune-electron microscopy were used to detect localization of TC0668 in Chlamydia-infected human epithelial cells, while the expression phase was investigated by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis. Protein array technology was employed to evaluate differences in cytokine secretion between cells infected with tc0668 single mutants and those infected with tc0668 null mutants. We found that TC0668 is restricted to the chlamydial inclusion. Translation and transcription of TC0668 were detected at 4 h and peaked at 16 h during the life cycle of Chlamydia in vitro. The cytokines produced by tc0668 single mutant infected cultures compared with tc0668 null mutant group indicated that 36 cytokines were downregulated, while 10 were up-regulated significantly. C. muridarum bearing a single tc0668 gene mutation have decreased urogenital pathogenicity that is explained by the effects of the mutation on the regulation of inflammation-related cytokine secretion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chlamydia is an intracellular, parasitic, prokaryotic microorganism with a unique biphasic developmental cycle [1, 2]. Various pathological symptoms can occur in hosts colonized by different species of Chlamydia [3,4,5]. Human genitourinary system disease caused by Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), with more than 100 million infections worldwide each year [6]. Without treatment, genitourinary C. trachomatis infection can result in serious complications including infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and cervical cancer [7]. Chlamydia muridarum is a separate species of the genus Chlamydia, but both C. trachomatis and C. muridarum are highly conserved in terms of their basic biology and their genomes. Thus, C. muridarum is used as a model of urogenital disease resulting from sexually transmitted C. trachomatis [8].
Chlamydia exists in two different forms during its growth cycle: the infectious elementary body (EB) and the reproductive form known as the reticulate body (RB) [9]. During the invasion of host cells, EBs are encapsulated by membranes to form inclusion bodies, then, converted into RBs during the early post-infection stages (0 to 8 h). During proliferation, RBs multiply by binary fission in the middle phase of the infection (8 to 16 h), during the late phase of infection (16 to 24 h), RBs develop into mature EBs released from the host cells to repeat the cycle [10].
Several studies have investigated the chromosomal gene tc0668 of C. muridarum, which plays a role in genital tract inflammatory disease in mice [11]. The standard C. muridarum strain (CMG0) was serially sub-cultured under special conditions in vitro, and a resulting attenuated strain (CMG28, tc0668 mutant) with markedly reduced pathogenicity was found to have a mutation in the tc0668 gene [12]. Moreover, Shao et al. demonstrated that vaginal inoculation of mice with wild-type C. muridarum not only caused upper genital tract infection but also spread to and established stable colonization of the gastrointestinal tract [13]. The gene tc0668 is approximately 1227 bp in length and encodes a highly conserved, hypothetical protein of 408 amino acids that contains a single domain of unknown function [1207 (DUF1207) motif, TC0668]. The TC0668 tertiary structure is homologous to that of the eukaryotic integrins fibronectin receptor (α5β1/αIIbβ3) and vitronectin receptor (α5β3), which are involved in numerous biological processes in eukaryotic cells [11].These observations further demonstrate the correlation between TC0668 and chlamydial pathogenicity, but the basic biological properties of TC0668 and the specific mechanisms that are involved have yet to be elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the localization, expression, and role of TC0668, providing a new idea for the treatment and prevention of diseases caused by Chlamydia infection.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains, Cell Line and Other Materials
The C. muridarum Nigg II strains, C. trachomatis D strains, HeLa cells (ATCC, CCL-2.1, USA), vectors pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ), and E. coli BL21/T7E strains were all preserved by the Institute of Pathogenic Biology at the University of South China. C. muridarum tc0668 wild and mutant monoclonal strains were prepared by our research group during the early stage [14, 15].
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins
The primers of tc0668 were synthesized by Sangon Biotech of Shanghai (F: ATGATGGAACCTTTACGTTTCGGT, R: CTAAAAGCCATAACTTAATCTAAAACCATAGT). The template DNA of C. muridarum was extracted with Tiangen bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the instructions. The PCR amplification products were purified included with the OMEGA PCR kit (Bio-tek, America). The DNA fragment was subcloned into the pGEX-4T-1 vector using restriction enzyme digestion and ligating reaction to generate the recombinant plasmid pGEX-4T-tc0668. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21/T7E bacterial. After induction by IPTG (Isopropyl-β-d-Thiogalactoside), the bacterial cells were lysed by ultrasonic to release the target protein, and finally, the recombinant protein was purified by GST-Agarose Resin (G4510, MERCK). The purified recombinant protein fluid was screened by a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and antibody specificity was confirmed by an indirect immunofluorescence assay [16].
Production of Polyclonal Antibodies (Mouse-Derived and Rabbit-Derived)
The purified protein of TC0668 was injected into BALB/c mice and New Zealand white rabbits to produce polyclonal antibodies, according to the routine method (Experimental vaccine induces Th1-driven immune responses and resistance to Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a murine model.). With the aid of Freund's adjuvant, rabbits needed to undergo subcutaneous immunization three times (2 weeks apart) and 1 booster immunization (1 week after third time). The dose of antigen for each immunization was 1000 μg. A week later, rabbits’ serum was separated by centrifugation and stored [17]. The preparation of polyclonal antibodies in mice is basically the same as that in rabbits. But, the dose of antigen for each immunization was 100 μg. All animals were treated according to the regulations of Chinese law and the local Ethical Committee. The antisera from the rabbits and mice were then collected and the antibody titer (> 1:64,000) was determined using an ELISA kit (Cloud-Clone, Inc. USA).
Co-localization of the TC0668 Protein
The localization of the TC0668 protein was analyzed using laser confocal microscopy with a Leica TCS SP5 SMD at 24 h post-infection using specific mouse antibodies (anti-HSP60, anti-PGP3 (primary antibodies)), and a goat anti-mouse IgG (secondary antibody) conjugated to Cy3 dye (red, Jackson Immuno-Research Laboratories) with co-staining with anti-rabbit TC0668 antibody (primary antibody) and goat anti-rabbit IgG (secondary antibody) conjugated to 488 dye (green; Jackson Immuno-Research Laboratories) mixed with DAPI dye (for nuclear staining).
Immuno-electron Microscopy (IEM)
After infected with C. muridarum Nigg II strains for 12 h and 24 h, HeLa cells were harvested with trypsin. Then, cells were fixed in fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde, 0.06% picric acid, 0.1 M PBS), rinsed with PBS (phosphate-buffer saline solution, pH 7.6), dehydrated (50%, 70%, 85%, and 95% alcohol), and infiltrated (95% alcohol LR). The entire process was performed on ice and the cells were gently handled to maintain them in clumps as described previously [18]. Then, ultrathin (90–100 nm) thick sections of cells were prepared using a Lycao UC6 ultrathin microtome. The TC0668 rabbit-derived primary antibody and the 10 nm gold-labeled secondary antibody were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After drying, the cells were subject to immune-electron microscopy using an H-7650 transmission electron microscope.
Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA)
HeLa cells infected with C. muridarum at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature followed by permeabilization with 0.1% TritonX-100 for an additional 30 min. After washing and blocking, the cell samples were subjected to antibody and chemical staining. Notably, a specific rabbit anti-MoPn antibody was produced as described previously (Guangming et al. 1994). The purified Chlamyida muridarum EBs were used to infect BALB/c mice (4 weeks old) three times. After the final injection, spleens were removed aseptically, and a single-cell suspension was made. The monoclonal antibodies were isotyped with an Immunopure, monoclonal antibodies isotyping kit and purified with the Immunopure (A/G) immunoglobulin G (IgG) purification kit. The amount of TC0668 protein was measured at different time points post-infection using a specific rabbit anti-MoPn antibody that was used to detect expression in Chlamydia organisms in combination with a goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to 488 dye (green; Jackson Immuno-Research Laboratories); the cells were co-stained with specific mouse antibodies (TC0668, HSP60, and PGP3) and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Cy3 dye (red; Jackson Immuno-Research Laboratories). Observation and imaging using a fluorescent inverted microscope was performed after the cells were incubated with the primary and secondary antibodies for 1 h and then washed with PBS.
Real-time Quantitative PCR
After infected with C. muridarum Nigg II strains at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h, cells were collected with TRizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), RNA was extracted while a minuscule amount of DNA was removed. According to the instructions included in the RNA extraction kit, the primers of the tc0668, pgp8, and 16S rRNA genes of C. muridarum Nigg II are shown in Table S1. For each gene, primers for conserved sequences were synthesized by Sangon Biotech of Shanghai and further tested using NCBI blast to ensure the specificity of these primers. The Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μL, which included 1 μL of cDNA; 1 μL of forward primer, and 1 μL of reverse primer for target gene; 12.5 μL of 2 × superReal PreMix Plus; 9.5 μL deionized water was added to make a total volume of 25 μL. The PCR amplification program has a total of 40 cycles, cycling condition included pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min; denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s; annealing at 60 °C for 1 min; extension at 60 °C for 1 min. The relative mRNA expression of tc0668 was determined using pgp8 as a control. The stable expression of 16S rRNA was used as an internal reference to determine the relative expression of C. muridarum tc0668 and pgp8 mRNA. The Real-time Quantitative PCR data (slopes and y intercepts) of calibration curves for tc0668, pgp8, and 16S rRNA are shown in supplementary Table 4. Analysis of relative gene expression data used the 2−ΔΔCT method, 2−ΔΔT = 2(CT-target gene−CT-reference gene).
Western Blotting
The whole protein of cells extracted by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (PIRA) buffer (Beyotime, China) was used for western blotting analysis according to the standard protocol. Equal amounts of protein were loaded and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. After locking with 5% skim milk for 2 h at room temperature, PVDF membranes were incubated overnight with our own primary antibodies. The primary antibody was probed using an HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and visualized with using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Expression of the chlamydial plasmid proteins PGP3 and HSP60 was detected using GAPDH as a control. Three times Western Blotting data of proteins are shown in supplementary Fig. 4. As there are almost no miscellaneous bands, the representative original images are shown in supplementary Fig. 5.
Protein Arrays
The tc0668 single mutant and null mutant C. muridarum strains were used to infect the cells at an MOI of 1 after culture for 16–18 h. At 24-h post-infection, the cell supernatants and protein lysates from the two strains were collected. The 0.5 mL of supernatant was pipetted, then 200 µg of lysed total protein was added, and the total volume was brought up to 1.5 mL volume using Array Buffer 6 (R&D, Ary022B); the solution was then incubated with 106 detection antibodies on the membrane. The chemiluminescence reagent was incubated in the presence of the antibodies for 1 to 10 min and exposed for 2 to 5 min, and then, the cytokines were detected according to the instructions included with the antibody chip kit (R&D, Ary022B).
Analysis of Data
Quantitative data from qRT-PCR experiments are presented as mean ± SD of experiments repeated at least three times in triplicate. The data obtained from western blotting during three independent experiments are calculated as the relative expression using the U-test. Comparisons between groups of data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the results of the experiments were analyzed using independent sample t tests. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. GraphPad Prism software was used for the statistical analysis of the data.
Results
Localization of TC0668 During the Developmental Cycle of Chlamydia: Transmembrane Structural Protein
TC0668 is a pathogenic factor of rat chlamydia discovered by our research group earlier. Since there is no antibody product of TC0668 in the market, we first prepared rabbit and mouse polyclonal antibodies for the following experiments. To determine the localization of TC0668 protein during the chlamydial life cycle, the co-localization with specific Chlamydia markers were conducted using the IFA method. Chlamydia structural heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) is restricted to the chlamydial inclusion, and Chlamydia plasmid-encoded protein 3 (PGP3) is secreted into the inclusion lumen and the host cell cytosol [19,20,21]. After being infected for 24 h, it was observed that TC0668 (green) was surrounded by PGP3 (red) (Fig. 1A). The distribution range of the PGP3 signal extended outside the inclusion membrane. But in the HSP60 co-localizations, the TC0668 (green) and HSP60 (red) were completely overlapped (Fig. 1A). It was indicated that TC0668 was not secreted into the host cytosol.
To further analyze the localization of TC0668, we performed Immuno-electron Microscopy [18]. Cells were infected with C. muridarum Nigg II wild-type strains and collected by trypsin digestion at 12 and 24 h. At the mid-developmental stage (12 h post-infection), metabolically active chlamydial forms multiply within inclusion bodies as RBs. At 24 h post-infection, RBs have developed into mature EBs already. Interestingly, it was found that immunogold particles labeled TC0668 were predominantly distributed in the membrane of the RBs/EBs and were also located within the lumen of the inclusion body (Fig. 1B). Based on these results, it was suggested that the TC0668 protein is restricted to chlamydial inclusion and is predominantly associated with EBs and RBs. Next, the tertiary structure of TC0668 protein (containing 408 amino acids) was analyzed by I-TASSER (Fig. 2). This analysis further supported the above results. Amino acids 1 to 6 of TC0668 protein were located inside the membrane, 7 to 24 were within the transmembrane region, and 25 to 408 were located outside the membrane (Fig. 2A, B). Tied Mixture Hidden Markov Model (TMHMM) is a software which uses Hidden Markov Models to predict the transmembrane structure of proteins. We obtain the transmembrane spiral of TC0668 protein by TMHMM analysis. The abscissa axis represents the amino acid residue serial number corresponding to the submitted protein sequence, the value of the vertical axis is the probability at the inside of the membrane, outside the membrane, and the transmembrane helix region (TMHelix)of each amino acid. It was further validated that TC0668 is a structural transmembrane protein rather than a secretory protein.
Up-regulated Expression of TC0668 During the C. muridarum Growth Cycle
We had known that TC0668 is a structural protein, but we still need to study the expression changes during infection. To investigate the expression changes of TC0668 proteins during the C. muridarum growth cycle, we designed 6 gradient time points within 24 h of infection (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h). Through IFA, we began to observe the expression of TC0668 protein in cells infected with C. muridarum Nigg II strains at approximately 8 h post-infection (Fig. 3A). The expression of TC0668 protein showed an upward trend with the increase of infection time. Moreover, it can be clearly observed that the TC0668 protein is mainly localized inside inclusion bodies (Fig. 3A). Next, we further studied the changes of TC0668 at the transcriptional level.
Previous studies have shown that pgp8 is essential for plasmid maintenance and is stably maintained during the chlamydial development cycle [22]. Therefore, pgp8 was used as a positive control in RT-PCR experiment. The highest mRNA expression level of Tc0668 gene was at 16 h after infection (Fig. 3B). The ratio of tc0668 to pgp8 showed a gradual upward trend from 0 to 16 h and stabilized 16 h post-infection (Fig. 3C). The protein level of TC0668 could be visualized at 4 h post-infection and increased in intensity over time (Fig. 3D). TC0668 protein reached its peak at 16 h after infection, which was the stage of mass reproduction of chlamydial RBs.
From the early to the middle phase of the infection cycle, the expression of TC0668 changed rapidly, and this stage corresponded to the critical phase when intracellular bacteria must switch from EB to RB production. It could regulate the maturation of their vacuoles to create a replicative niche that can sustain efficient bacterial growth [1]. Thus, the role of TC0668 is closely correlated with C. muridarum growth and development.
Alignment of DUF1207 Domain-Containing Protein Sequences from TC0668 in Various Bacterial Species
The protein sequences of the TC0668 hypothetical protein that contains the DUF1207 motif were retrieved from the Swiss-Prot database and aligned using ClustalW (http://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw). The DUF1207 domain-containing proteins were derived from Chlamydia muridarum (WP_010231168.1), Chlamydia trachomatis (WP_009871741.1), Chlamydia psittaci (WP_041460208.1), Chlamydia pneumoniae (WP_010883129.1), Simkania negevensis (WP_013943876.1), Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila (WP_039357161.1), Criblamydia sequanensis (WP_053331828.1), and Oceanibaculum pacificum (WP_084462656.1). Shading indicates areas where there is high conservation (red), and moderate conservation (blue and pink, Fig. 2C), the conservation of pink is slightly higher than blue. The domain of unknown function 1207 motif is shared by chlamydial organisms. TC0668 shares 97% protein identity with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar D CT389 and TC0668 protein also contains a single DUF1207 motif. Thus, further evaluation of DUF1207-containing homologs may lead to a better understanding to combat highly prevalent urogenital C. trachomatis disease in humans [11, 12].
Tc0668 Single Mutants and tc0668 Null Mutants Induced Cytokines Production
C. muridarum TC0668 is a crucial virulence factor in the murine upper genital tract as evidenced by the fact that tc0668 null mutants produce attenuated infections with decreased organismal loads that result in reduced inflammatory responses and hydrosalpinx development [11]. The gene tc0668 encodes a highly conserved hypothetical protein that shares ~ 90% amino acid identity with CT389, its homolog from C. trachomatis serovar D [12]. Tertiary structure prediction and comparison of TC0668 and CT389 using the I-TASSER suite revealed that the tertiary structures of these two proteins were markedly similar (Fig. 2D). EBs from C. trachomatis serovar D wild-type strain, the C. muridarum tc0668 single mutant strain, and the C. muridarum tc0668 null mutant strain were subjected to SDS-PAGE using a polyclonal antibody to detect TC0668. A ~ 47-kDa band representing the CT389 and TC0668 protein was observed from C. trachomatis serovar D and C. muridarum tc0668 null mutant strains, respectively (Fig. 4A). However, no trace of TC0668 was observed for the C. muridarum tc0668 single mutant strain (Fig. 4B). The supernatants of cells infected with tc0668 single mutant and tc0668 null mutant strains were collected separately at 24 h after infection. The solution was then incubated with 106 detection antibodies, and then, the cytokines were detected with the antibody chip kit (Fig. 5). Comparison between the tc0668 single mutant and tc0668 null mutant strains showed that the expression of 36 cytokines was downregulated, while 10 cytokines were up-regulated (P < 0.05) in the tc0668 single mutant infected cultures (Tables S2, S3). We selected 11 cytokines associated with inflammation, as shown in Table 1 below, including the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 and -6 (IL-1, 6), Th17 cytokine IL-17. It is clear from the results that C. muridarum tc0668 mutants are attenuated in inducing secretion of inflammatory-related molecules.
Discussion
As a microorganism that depends on the host cell for survival, Chlamydia not only imports nutrients and exchanges metabolic intermediates with host cells, but also secretes virulence factors into host cells [23,24,25]. Chlamydia has a unique biphasic developmental cycle and exhibits distinct functions during its two forms of existence (EB/RB). EBs and RBs are characterized by profound differences in membrane composition and structure that play critical roles in the efficiency of host–pathogen interactions [9]. Differentiation of infectious EBs into metabolically active RBs is not yet fully understood but renders the chlamydial developmental cycle unique. Infectious EBs adhere to epithelial cells and induce cytoskeletal rearrangement by secreting effector molecules into host cells to promote invasion [26]. Chlamydia utilizes effector molecules to interfere directly or indirectly with intracellular processes. For example, effector proteins secreted into the host cell via the chlamydial type III secretion system (T3SS) during infection are used to reconstitute the inclusion membrane [23]. Recently, identification and characterization of TC0668 protein, a predicted chlamydial virulence factor, have become an area of intense investigation [11,12,13]. In the current study, IFA was employed in HeLa cells infected with C. muridarum Nigg II strains to demonstrate that TC0668 protein was not secreted into the cytoplasm of HeLa cells. Co-localization of TC0668 and control proteins (HSP60and PGP3) using IFA showed that distribution of the TC0668 protein was markedly similar to that of HSP60, which was previously found to be restricted to the chlamydial inclusion [19, 27]. IEM further revealed that TCO668 immunogold particles were mainly present on the membranes of RBs or EBs at different stages of chlamydial development (at 12 and 24 h post-infection for RBs and EBs, respectively). Gold particles were also present in the lumen of inclusion bodies. Accordingly, excluding the possibility of non-specific binding by antibodies, TC0668 may be a protein that is not only located in EBs and RBs but can also be secreted into the inclusion lumen and serves as an effector protein involved in pathogenesis. This finding could explain the mechanism of interaction of TC0668 with host cells and appears consistent with results indicating that TC0668 has a critical role in urogenital pathology induced by C. muridarum in a mouse model [11, 12]. If this hypothesis is not observed, it will be interesting to verify how TC0668 interacts with host cells and is involved in oviduct lesions. In either case, TC0668 was confirmed to be predominantly distributed within the membranes of EBs and RBs during the chlamydial developmental cycle, but it was not possible to determine whether TC0668 interacted with host cells directly as a secreted effector or indirectly as a component.
Gene transcription levels and protein expression of C. muridarum TC0668 during the replicative cycle of C. muridarum were investigated. To exclude interference due to chlamydial multiplication and variations in bacterial load, the number of C. muridarum 16S rRNA gene transcripts was used to reflect bacterial growth [28] and act as an optimal internal control during detection of the relative transcriptional expression of the tc0668 gene in the replicative cycle. DNA replication, transcription, translation, and protein processing occurred in the early stage of the replicative cycle [29]. In the current study, TC0668 was detected in the early stage of infection (4 h post-infection) but peaked during a later stage. IFA confirmed that TC0668 could be detected at 8 h post-infection, while qRT-PCR and western blotting showed that a small amount of TC0668 could be detected at 4 h and reached a peak at 16 h after infection. Substances produced by microorganisms are associated with biological activities controlled by multiple mechanisms and are defined by protein synthesis and degradation, which vary with the physiological status of the bacteria during the growth/developmental cycle [9]. The Chlamydia growth cycle begins with the lag phase, which characterized by the differentiation of EBs into RBs. Genes expressed during primary differentiation (EB conversion into RBs) are mainly involved in establishing a system of nutrient acquisition and modifying inclusions to protect them from entering the endocytic pathway and undergoing lysosomal fusion [30, 31]. RBs have proliferative activity and experience exponential growth, which in C. muridarum is observed from 4 to 16 h after infection. During the exponential phase of chlamydial development, RBs proliferate by splitting and inclusion bodies continue to expand. Finally, the Chlamydia growth cycle enters stationary phase between 16 and 24 h post-infection, and this corresponds to the re-differentiation of RBs into EBs [30]. The EB membrane has a cholesterol content that is 8% higher than that of the RB and a high elasticity modulus, which makes the membrane stronger and is beneficial for penetration of host cells [32]. EBs require proteins for central and glucose catabolism, while RBs accumulate proteins required for ATP generation and nutrient transport in order to convert into EBs [33]. RBs synthesize proteins for multiplication and secrete them into the inclusion lumen. It can be speculated that the greatest expression of TC0668 at 16 h in the current study coincides with RB multiplication and chlamydial differentiation from RBs into EBs suggesting involvement in membrane reformation during re-differentiation of RBs into EBs, as well as the processes of chlamydial binary fission and inclusion body ripening. However, findings from the current study prevent a definitive conclusion being made due to variation between conditions and replicates in the absence of more specific time points.
Gene and amino acid sequence similarities of C. muridarum TC0668 and C. trachomatis CT389 were 84% and 92%, respectively, while similarities in the amounts of α-helices, random coils, and β-sheets were 17.4%, 60.78%, and 21.81%, respectively (Fig. S1-S3). In addition, the tertiary structures of TC0668 and CT389 were highly similar based on structural comparison using the I-TASSER suite. TC0668 is homologous to C. trachomatis CT389 within a region that includes a 360–380 residue section that is weakly homologous to a mammalian phosphatase signaling molecule [12]. CT389 is enriched in the outer membrane protein complex of C. trachomatis [34, 35]. The homology between TC0668 and CT389, confirmed by previous research, indicates that the TC0668 protein may also exist in the form of components of the outer membrane protein complex and may have a pathogenic role in host cells. Phosphatase activity in pathogens is related to the host inflammatory response [36]. After a pathogen invades the host, it can secrete phosphatase to alter the phosphorylation state in host signal transduction molecules, which regulates the synthesis and activity of inflammatory factors. This process, in turn, regulates the intensity of the inflammatory reaction in certain tissues or organs, and affects pathogenicity in the host [37, 38].
The function of C. muridarum TC0668 as a novel genetic factor involved in chlamydial pathogenicity was explored during the early stage of the chlamydial developmental cycle [12]. A starter population of C. muridarum (CMG0) was passaged in cultured cells for 28 generations. The resultant population, designated CMG28, had markedly low incidence and severity of upper genital tract pathology following intravaginal inoculation into mice compared with that of strain CMG0. Deep sequencing of strains CMG0 and CMG28 revealed novel protein variations in the hypothetical tc0668 gene and a missense mutation in tc0237. To determine the individual contribution of this variant to urogenital pathogenicity in mice lesions, Turner et al.[11] isolated and characterized the tc0668 single and tc0668 null mutants following intravaginal inoculation into mice. Compared with the tc0668 single mutant, the tc0668 null mutant was unable to elicit significant chronic inflammation in the oviduct, failed to induce hydrosalpinx, and was attenuated in inducing secretion of inflammatory cytokines in vivo. This indicated that TC0668 was a key urogenital pathogenicity factor closely related to inflammation. Based on these previous findings, an effort was made to measure the cytokines secreted from cells infected with the tc0668 single mutant and null mutant strains in vitro. Thirty-three cytokines were more highly expressed in cells infected with the tc0668 single mutant than in cells infected with the null mutant strain, and 10 of these cytokines showed a significant difference (P<0.05) in expression. Conversely, 36 out of the 73 cytokines measured were significantly downregulated in cells infected with the tc0668 single mutant compared with those infected with the null mutant. The downregulated cytokines included many immune/inflammation-related molecules, such as the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-2, IL-17, IL-6, Th1-promoting cytokine IL-12, and the chemokine MIP. These results suggest that the tc0668 mutant strain is attenuated in inducing inflammation-associated cytokine secretion, congruent with the findings of previous in vivo studies [11]. Epithelial cells can recognize Chlamydia organisms, leading to the activation of the NF-κB, p38 MAP kinase, and JNK pathways and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and the chemokine MIP, which has been linked to Chlamydia-induced pathology [39,40,41]. In contrast to the other molecules listed above, IL-12 is involved in the differentiation and activities of immune cells, and is especially important in the host defense against intracellular infection via its activation of cellular immunity to kill bacterial and infected cells [42]. During pathogen invasion, IL-17 can activate several signaling cascades, leading to the induction of chemokines. In addition, IL-17 recruits immune cells, such as monocytes and neutrophils, to the site of inflammation and promotes inflammation. Recent animal experiments have shown that IL-17 is also instrumental in defending against intracellular bacterial pathogens and viruses via innate immunity and adaptive immunity [43]. It is axiomatic that a potential Chlamydia vaccine ideally requires activation of protective immunity, stimulation of immune cells, and proper regulation of cytokine production. Appropriate levels of inflammation can promote immune protection, but conversely, overexpression of cytokines or chronic-persistent inflammation causes irreversible damage to the body. Thus, the question of whether TC0668 can be used for vaccine development requires further exploration. It is also necessary to consider that Chlamydia organisms used in in vivo studies are hybrids [11], and thus, the monoclonal strains used in in vitro studies are only partially useful in drawing conclusions. The specific ways in which cytokines induce inflammation remain unclear and may require further work in future studies.
Chen et al. compared live-organism recovery from genital tract tissues harvested from mice on day 14 after infection with CMG0 and CMG28 organisms (tc0668 mutants) [12]. There were no significant differences between the Chlamydia loads in the genital tract tissues after inoculation with CMG0 and CMG28. However, significant differences were detected in some cytokines induced by the two strains in vitro in the present study. It is therefore possible that TC0668 plays a role in regulating the secretion of cytokines in host cells that leads to pathogenicity during Chlamydia growth and development. However, the mechanisms involved in C. muridarum TC0668-induced inflammatory responses that are regulated by cytokines have yet to be elucidated. Biochemical characterization of TC0668, including identification of sub-cellular localization and expression patterns during the developmental cycle, may shed new light on the potential role of TC0668 in chlamydial pathogenesis. It is thought that both intracellular replication and cell-to-cell spread significantly contribute to chlamydial pathogenicity. Chlamydia has evolved strategies for synthesizing proteins and contacting host cells, and these strategies may benefit chlamydial intracellular survival and enhance immunogenicity and corresponding pathogenicity [44].
Conclusion
This study investigated the basic biological characteristics of the novel virulence factor TC0668 and its ability to induce cytokine production. Findings from the study provide an important basis for further exploration of the pathogenic mechanisms of C. muridarum.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article. All data generated or analyzed in the current study are included in this publication and are available on reasonable request.
References
Abdelrahman YM, Belland RJ (2005) The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2005.03.002
Sixt BS, Valdivia RH (2016) Molecular genetic analysis of chlamydia species. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:179–198. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095539
Menon S, Timms P, Allan JA, Alexander K, Rombauts L, Horner P et al (2015) Human and pathogen factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related infertility in women. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:969–985. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00035-15
Kuo CC, Jackson LA, Campbell LA, Grayston JT (1995) Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR). Clin Microbiol Rev 8:451–461. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.8.4.451
Harkinezhad T, Geens T, Vanrompay D (2009) Chlamydophila psittaci infections in birds: a review with emphasis on zoonotic consequences. Vet Microbiol 135:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.046
Cates W Jr, Rolfs RT Jr, Aral SO (1990) Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update. Epidemiol Rev 12:199–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036054
Wiesenfeld HC (2017) Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. N Engl J Med 376:2198. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1703640
Yang C, Whitmire WM, Sturdevant GL, Bock K, Moore I, Caldwell HD (2017) Infection of hysterectomized mice with Chlamydia muridarum and Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00197-17
Croxatto A, Murset V, Chassot B, Greub G (2013) Early expression of the type III secretion system of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae during a replicative cycle within its natural host cell Acanthamoeba castellanii. Pathog Dis 69:159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12065
Nicholson TL, Olinger L, Chong K, Schoolnik G, Stephens RS (2003) Global stage-specific gene regulation during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 185:3179–3189. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.10.3179-3189.2003
Conrad TA, Gong S, Yang Z, Matulich P, Keck J, Beltrami N et al (2016) The chromosome-encoded hypothetical protein TC0668 is an upper genital tract pathogenicity factor of Chlamydia muridarum. Infect Immun 84:467–479. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01171-15
Chen C, Zhou Z, Conrad T, Yang Z, Dai J, Li Z et al (2015) In vitro passage selects for Chlamydia muridarum with enhanced infectivity in cultured cells but attenuated pathogenicity in mouse upper genital tract. Infect Immun 83:1881–1892. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.03158-14
Shao L, Zhang T, Liu Q, Wang J, Zhong G (2017) Chlamydia muridarum with mutations in chromosomal genes tc0237 and/or tc0668 is deficient in colonizing the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00321-17
Wang Y, Arthur EW, Liu N, Li X, Xiang W, Maxwell A et al (2019) iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis of HeLa cells infected with Chlamydia muridarum TC0668 mutant and wild-type strains. Front Microbiol 10:2553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02553
Zhou Z, Liu N, Wang Y, Emmanuel AW, You X, Liu J et al (2019) A primary study on genes with selected mutations by in vitro passage of Chlamydia muridarum strains. Pathog Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftz017
Yin L, Wang Y, Yan M, Zhang X, Pan H, Xu X et al (2013) Molecular cloning, polyclonal antibody preparation, and characterization of a functional iron-related transcription factor IRO2 from Malus xiaojinensis. Plant Physiol Biochem 67:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.021
Song J, Wang K, Ma B, Wang J, Zhang W (2021) Preparation of rabbit polyclonal antibody against porcine gasdermin D protein and determination of the expression of gasdermin D in cultured cells and porcine tissues. Protein Expr Purif 187:105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2021.105945
Betts HJ, Twiggs LE, Sal MS, Wyrick PB, Fields KA (2008) Bioinformatic and biochemical evidence for the identification of the type III secretion system needle protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 190:1680–1690. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01671-07
Witkin SS, Minis E, Athanasiou A, Leizer J, Linhares IM (2017) Chlamydia trachomatis: the persistent pathogen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00203-17
Li Z, Chen D, Zhong Y, Wang S, Zhong G (2008) The chlamydial plasmid-encoded protein pgp3 is secreted into the cytosol of Chlamydia-infected cells. Infect Immun 76:3415–3428. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01377-07
Soltys BJ, Gupta RS (1996) Immunoelectron microscopic localization of the 60-kDa heat shock chaperonin protein (Hsp60) in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 222:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1996.0003
Ferreira R, Borges V, Nunes A, Borrego MJ, Gomes JP (2013) Assessment of the load and transcriptional dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid according to strains’ tissue tropism. Microbiol Res 168:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.02.001
Coburn B, Sekirov I, Finlay BB (2007) Type III secretion systems and disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:535–549. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00013-07
Betts HJ, Wolf K, Fields KA (2009) Effector protein modulation of host cells: examples in the Chlamydia spp. arsenal. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2008.11.009
Zhong G (2011) Chlamydia trachomatis secretion of proteases for manipulating host signaling pathways. Front Microbiol 2:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00014
Wesolowski J, Paumet F (2017) Taking control: reorganization of the host cytoskeleton by Chlamydia. F1000Res 6:2058. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12316.1
Gething M-J (1997) Guidebook to molecular chaperones and protein-folding catalysts. OUP, Oxford
Engstrom P, Bailey L, Onskog T, Bergstrom S, Johansson J (2010) A comparative study of RNA and DNA as internal gene expression controls early in the developmental cycle of Chlamydia pneumoniae. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 58:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00631.x
Shaw EI, Dooley CA, Fischer ER, Scidmore MA, Fields KA, Hackstadt T (2000) Three temporal classes of gene expression during the Chlamydia trachomatis developmental cycle. Mol Microbiol 37:913–925. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02057.x
Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J et al (2003) Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8478–8483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1331135100
Fields KA, Hackstadt T (2002) The chlamydial inclusion: escape from the endocytic pathway. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18:221–245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.105845
Lim JB, Klauda JB (2011) Lipid chain branching at the iso- and anteiso-positions in complex Chlamydia membranes: a molecular dynamics study. Biochem Biophys Acta 1808:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.07.036
Saka HA, Thompson JW, Chen YS, Kumar Y, Dubois LG, Moseley MA et al (2011) Quantitative proteomics reveals metabolic and pathogenic properties of Chlamydia trachomatis developmental forms. Mol Microbiol 82:1185–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07877.x
Liu X, Afrane M, Clemmer DE, Zhong G, Nelson DE (2010) Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis outer membrane complex proteins by differential proteomics. J Bacteriol 192:2852–2860. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01628-09
Skipp P, Robinson J, O’Connor CD, Clarke IN (2005) Shotgun proteomic analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proteomics 5:1558–1573. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401044
Kang Y, Wang F, Lu Z, Ying H, Zhang H, Ding W et al (2013) MAPK kinase 3 potentiates Chlamydia HSP60-induced inflammatory response through distinct activation of NF-kappaB. J Immunol 191:386–394. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1300481
Jerchel S, Kaufhold I, Schuchardt L, Shima K, Rupp J (2014) Host immune responses after hypoxic reactivation of IFN-gamma induced persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00043
Claywell JE, Matschke LM, Fisher DJ (2016) The impact of protein phosphorylation on chlamydial physiology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00197
Al-Mously N, Eley A (2007) Interaction of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E with male genital tract epithelium results in secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. J Med Microbiol 56:1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47241-0
Mackern-Oberti JP, Motrich RD, Breser ML, Sanchez LR, Cuffini C, Rivero VE (2013) Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the male genital tract: an update. J Reprod Immunol 100:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2013.05.002
Zheng K, Xu M, Xiao Y, Luo H, Xie Y, Yu J et al (2018) Immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Treponema pallidum in New Zealand rabbits immunized with plasmid DNA encoding flagellin. Emerg Microbes Infect 7:177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0176-0
Chen L, Lei L, Zhou Z, He J, Xu S, Lu C et al (2013) Contribution of interleukin-12 p35 (IL-12p35) and IL-12p40 to protective immunity and pathology in mice infected with Chlamydia muridarum. Infect Immun 81:2962–2971. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00161-13
Li Y, Wei C, Xu H, Jia J, Wei Z, Guo R et al (2018) The immunoregulation of Th17 in host against intracellular bacterial infection. Mediators Inflamm 2018:6587296. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6587296
Personnic N, Barlocher K, Finsel I, Hilbi H (2016) Subversion of retrograde trafficking by translocated pathogen effectors. Trends Microbiol 24:450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.003
Acknowledgements
We thank the Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study (Grant No. 2015-351) for supporting the experiments. We also thank University of South China for providing the guidance of animal treatment and adopting the ethics.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31570179), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2020JJ4084), and the Foundation of the Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control (Grant No. 2014-5). We thank all participants who consented to take part in this trial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NL and XL performed the experiments. NL and HC designed the project. CW, WX, and ST analyzed the data. NL, CS, EA, AM, and DA wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of South China (SYXK2021-002) and all animal treatments were carried out in accordance with the regulations of the institution.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, N., Li, X., Chen, H. et al. Characterization of Chlamydia muridarum TC0668 Protein: Localization, Expression, and Inflammation-Inducing Effects on Host Cell. Curr Microbiol 79, 325 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03018-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03018-w