Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Anti-tumor activity can often be enhanced with combination therapy in managing patients with metastatic cancer. However, dose sequence and schedule of delivery can alter the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and anti-tumor response. Therefore, attention to drug–drug interactions which may be sequence or schedule-dependent are necessary. Docetaxel and topotecan are non-cross-resistance cytotoxic agents with activity in a variety of malignancies. The goal of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan using two sequences of administration.

Experimental design

Patients were randomized to schedule A or B and enrolled in four escalating-dose cohorts. On schedule A, docetaxel was administered over 1 h and followed by topotecan administered over 72 h. On schedule B, topotecan was given as a 72 h continuous infusion followed by a 1 h infusion of docetaxel. While the doses for the docetaxel and topotecan were the same for schedule A and schedule B, the toxicities, and thus the determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), were assessed independently. The plasma pharmacokinetic disposition of topotecan and docetaxel were evaluated during the first cycle of each sequence to assess drug interactions.

Results

Thirty patients, 20 males and 10 females were evaluable for toxicity and response. Four patients were chemonaive. Mean number cycles given were 3. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were comparable on both schedules, as was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for both schedules. There were no apparent differences in absolute neutrophil count or platelet nadirs between schedules A and B for three of the four cohorts. The principal non-hematologic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. The time of overlap of topotecan lactone or total concentrations and docetaxel concentrations were greater on schedule A as compared with schedule B and was associated with reduced clearance of docetaxel on schedule A as compared to schedule B. However, the mean clearance for docetaxel (18∀16 L h−1 m−2 and 29∀28 L h−1 m−2 on schedules A and B, respectively, and topotecan 16∀10 L h−1 m−2 and 7∀6 L h−1 m−2 on schedules A and B, respectively) were not statistically different (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The observed toxicity was not sequence-dependent, despite the observed change in kinetics. Docetaxel and topotecan can be administered with acceptable toxicity at the recommended phase-II dose of docetaxel 60 mg m−2 and topotecan 0.85 mg m−2 day−1×3 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

MTD:

Maximum tolerated dose

DLT:

Dose-limiting toxicity

PBS:

Phosphate-buffer solution

AEs:

Adverse events

NLIN:

Non-linear

ROI:

Region of interest

ANC:

Absolute neutrophil count

References

  1. Boisdron-Celle M, Gamelin E (2000) Pharmacology of platinum analogs–taxanes interactions. Bull Cancer 87(Spec No):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke SJ, Rivory LP (1999) Related articles, links [abstract] clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Clin Pharmacokinet 36(2):99–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Argenio DZ, Schmuitzky A (1990) ADAPT II user’s guide: biomedical simulations resource

  4. Dumez H, Louwerens M, Pawinsky A, Planting AS, de Jonge MJ, Van Oosterom AT, Highley M, Guetens G, Mantel M, de Boeck G, de Bruijn E, Verweij J (2002) The impact of drug administration sequence and pharmacokinetic interaction in a phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 13(6):583–593

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenhauer EA, Vermorken JB (1998) The taxoids. Comparative clinical pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Drugs 55(1):5–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG (2002) Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res 8(3):641–661

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grant DS, Williams TL, Zahaczewsky M, Dicker AP (2003) Related articles, links [abstract] comparison of antiangiogenic activities using paclitaxel (taxol) and docetaxel (taxotere). Int J Cancer 104(1):121–129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong WK (2002) The current status of docetaxel in solid tumors. An M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Review. Oncology (Huntingt) 16(6 Suppl 6):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huncharek M, Caubet JF, McGarry R (2001) Single-agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3273 patients from 20 randomized trials. Melanoma Res 11(1):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufmann SH, Peereboom D, Buckwalter CA, Svingen PA, Grochow LB, Donehower RC, Rowinsky EK (1996) Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(11):734–741

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lilenbaum RC, List M, Desch C (1999) Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B randomized trial. Semin Oncol 26(5 Suppl 15):52–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loos WJ, Verweij J, Nooter K et al (1997) Sensitive determination of docetaxel in human plasma by liquid–liquid extraction and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 693:437

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miles D, von Minckwitz G, Seidman AD (2002) Combination versus sequential single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 7(Suppl 6):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Philip PA (2002) Gemcitabine and platinum combinations in pancreatic cancer. Cancer 95(4 Suppl):908–911

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pizzolato JF, Saltz LB (2003) The camptothecins. Lancet 361(9376):2235–2242

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosing H, Doyle E, Davites BE et al (1997) High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of the novel antitumor drug topotecan and topotecan as the total of the lactone plus carboxylate forms in human plasma. J Chromatogr Biol Biomed Appl 668:107

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, Berlin JD, Marshall JL, Ramanathan RK, Hart LL, Gupta S, Garay CA, Burger BG, Le Bail N, Haller DG (2003) Related articles, links [abstract] superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil–leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil–leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 21(11):2059–2069

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sederholm C (2002) Gemcitabine versus gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary findings in a phase III trial of the Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group. Semin Oncol 3(Suppl 9):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ulukan H, Swaan PW (2002) Camptothecins: a review of their chemotherapeutic potential. Drugs 62(14):2039–2057

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zamboni WC, Egorin MJ, Van Echo DA, Day RS, Meisenberg BR, Brooks SE, Doyle LA, Nemieboka NN, Dobson JM, Tait NS, Tkaczuk KH (2000) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the combination of docetaxel and topotecan in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18(18):3288–3294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Special thanks to Sherron Thornton for manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Posey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Posey, J.A., Wang, H., Hamilton, J. et al. Phase-I dose escalation and sequencing study of docetaxel and continuous infusion topotecan in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56, 182–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-004-0925-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-004-0925-8

Keywords

Navigation