Increased unilateral or bilateral tonus of the quadratus lumborum frequently occurs in patients with lower back pain. Chronic contraction of the muscle within the lower back contributes to the transfer of the tonus via the thoracodorsal fascia to the shoulder girdle and neck. Postural defects such as hyperkyphosis may cause an increase in the tonus of the paravertebral muscles, such as the quadratus lumborum, multifidus, erector spinae, or levator scapulae muscles. This is due to the tendency of the body to restore and maintain the correct center of gravity [9].
The quadratus lumborum is of relevance in anesthesiology. The quadratus lumborum block was first described as late as in 2007 by Dr. Rafael Blanco. A local anesthetic can be administered into the anterolateral (type I) or posterior (type II) edges of the quadratus lumborum, resulting in a wide distribution of the drug into the paravertebral space, providing a long-term analgesia after surgical treatment in the abdominal area [4, 18]. The quadratus lumborum block allows anesthesia of the area covered by dermatomes T4 to L2 [6]. The anesthetic passes into the paravertebral space or is distributed along the surrounding blood vessels, lymphatics, and nerves [26].
In this study, we demonstrated that in terms of morphometric parameters, the quadratus lumborum did not demonstrate any sex or right–left differences. Of note, neither sex nor right–left differences were found by the authors dealing with quantitative anatomy of other skeletal muscles in the human foetus, i.e., triceps brachii [10], biceps brachii [23], trapezius [1], deltoid [22], biceps femoris [24], semimembranosus [2], and semitendinosus [3] muscles. It should be emphasized that both the length and width of the growing quadratus lumborum grew proportionately, since the width-to-length ratio was relatively constant, reaching the value of 0.32 ± 0.04. The length of the quadratus lumborum muscle in adults was evaluated on autopsy material by Delp et al. [8]. These authors measured the total (musculotendinous) length and the muscle length of the anterior and posterior layers that were 11.7 ± 1.7, 9.3 ± 1.3, 10.7 ± 1.3, and 8.1 ± 1.2 cm, respectively. However, the aforementioned study was conducted in a small group, consisting of five subjects only. Regrettably, basing on these literature data, we could not calculate the width-to-length ratio, because the article in question had solely been focused on the length of the quadratus lumborum muscle in five adult individuals, without taking into account the muscle width. In their study, the authors observed that the anterior section of the quadratus lumborum consisted of both iliocostal and iliothoracic fibers, the middle section consisted of lumbocostal fibers, while the posterior section comprised both iliolumbar and iliocostal fibers. Moreover, the authors found the quadratus lumborum to primarily function as an expiratory muscle, since more than half of its fibers referred to costal ones. The quadratus lumborum muscle is also to stabilize rib XII and to affect the static parameters of the diaphragm. Stark et al. [21] measured the length of the muscular and tendinous sections of the quadratus lumborum; however, these authors obtained lower values than those achieved by Delp et al. [8]. The muscle and tendon lengths were 6.0 ± 2.1 and 5.5 ± 2.3 cm on the right and 3.2 ± 1.4 and 3.3 ± 1.6 cm on the left, respectively.
Since the quadratus lumborum is a typical quadrangular muscle, its anatomical cross-sectional area obtained in the present study is equal to the so-called physiological cross-sectional area. Of note, the physiological cross-sectional area of any skeletal muscle prerequisites its forces generated. It is widely accepted that the maximum force that can be produced by a muscle is directly proportionate to its physiological cross-sectional area. Since the cross-sectional area of the quadratus lumborum muscle calculated in this study followed logarithmically, the force potentially exerted by the growing quadratus lumborum muscle must indubitably increase according to a natural logarithmic function. Regrettably, the professional literature is devoid of any numerical data concerning the cross-sectional area of quadratus lumborum in the foetus, thus limiting comprehensive discussion in this subject. However, some authors measured the cross-sectional area in adults with the use of MRI and CT. This was exemplified by Ranson et al.
[18], who measured the cross-sectional area of the quadratus lumborum in professional cricket fast bowlers. These measurements were done at the four levels, corresponding to the lower edges of vertebrae L1–L4. The cross-sectional area of the right and left muscles was, respectively: 3.78 and 3.61 cm2 at level L1, 5.9 and 5.43 cm2 at level L2, 7.06 and 6.94 cm2 at level L3, and 9.22 and 8.25 cm2 at level L4. Furthermore, Hides et al. [11] assessed the cross-sectional area of the quadratus lumborum at the level of intervertebral disc L3–L4 for the dominant and non-dominant legs in professional football players. The study was conducted at three intervals of several months. The mean cross-sectional areas obtained in the first, second, and third measurements for the dominant and non-dominant legs were: 8.79 ± 0.29 and 9.90 ± 0.31 cm2, 8.84 ± 0.41 and 9.54 cm2, and 8.17 ± 0.22 and 9.31 ± 0.26 cm2, respectively. Surprisingly enough, the three cross-sectional areas of the quadratus lumborum were significantly smaller on the side of the dominant leg. The cross-sectional area of the quadratus lumborum was also measured using MRI by Hsu et al. [12] in healthy young individuals. At the L4 and L5 vertebrae, the muscle cross-sectional areas were 6.31 ± 3.01 and 3.74 ± 3.51 cm2, respectively. Kamaz et al. [14] measured the cross-sectional area of the quadratus lumborum with the use of CT in healthy women and women with chronic lumbar spine pain. The measurements were done both above and below vertebral body L4. The cross-sectional areas of the quadratus lumborum measured above vertebral body L4 in suffering and healthy women were 3.15 ± 0.94 and 3.63 ± 1.05 cm2, respectively, with a statistically significant difference. Of note, the values obtained below the L4 vertebral body were 3.77 ± 1.25 and 3.98 ± 1.17 cm2, respectively, with no statistical difference. Furthermore, Stark et al. [20] in their CT study with a 3D reconstruction of the quadratus lumborum found the mean cross-sectional area of the muscle on the left and right sides to be 2.4 ± 0.9 and 3.3 ± 1.5 cm2, respectively.
As far as the muscle volume is concerned, Sanchis-Moysi et al. [19] in an MRI study measured the volume of the quadratus lumborum in tennis players, football players, and people not practicing sports. The volumes referred to three equal segments (superior, middle, and inferior), spanning the distance from the L1–L2 intervertebral disc to the pubic symphysis. The volumes of the superior segment measured on the dominant and non-dominant sides were, respectively, 13.6 ± 5.8 and 13.0 ± 5.5 cm3 in tennis players, 16.2 ± 3.3 and 16.2 ± 3.3 cm3 in football players, and 12.1 ± 3.8 and 13.3 ± 3.3 cm3 in people not practicing sports. The volumes of the middle segment were, respectively, 22.4 ± 4.2 and 23.5 ± 5.0 cm3 in tennis players, 29.6 ± 5.5 and 29.6 ± 8.8 cm3 in football players, and 17.0 ± 4.5 and 20.5 ± 9.8 cm3 in people not practicing sports. The volumes of the inferior segments were, respectively, as follows: 33.5 ± 7.7 and 35.8 ± 9.3 cm3 in tennis players, 41.2 ± 9.6 and 39.2 ± 10.1 cm3 in football players, and 23.5 ± 5.3 and 27.2 ± 6.6 cm3 in people not practicing sports. Of note, the total volumes on the dominant and non-dominant sides were, respectively: 69.4 ± 14.6 and 72.2 ± 13.2 cm3 in tennis players, 86.9 ± 14.5 and 85.5 ± 19.6 cm3 in football players, and 52.3 ± 12.1 and 60.9 ± 19.1 cm3 in people not practicing sports. As it turned out, hypertrophy of the quadratus lumborum was demonstrated in the subjects practicing sports. According to Stark et al. [21], the mean muscle volumes on the right and left sides were 31.3 and 48.3 cm3, respectively.
It should be emphasized that this has been the first report in the professional literature to compute mathematical models as a function of fetal age for the growing quadratus lumborum. The natural growths were expressed by the following functions: y = −70.397 + 68.501 × ln(age) ± 1.170 for length, y = −20.435 + 8.815 × ln(age) ± 0.703 for width, and y = −48.958 + 20.909 × ln(age) ± 1.100 for cross-sectional area. The surface area of the growing quadratus lumborum increased proportionately to age, in accordance with the function: y = −196.035 + 14.838 × age ± 13.745. Age-specific reference data for normative values of the quadratus lumborum muscle in the human foetus may be conducive in detailed evaluation of both the skeletal system and fetal development, with potential relevance for surgical treatment and anesthesia in neonates. Regrettably, our numerical findings do not seem to be applied to the quadratus lumborum muscle in the adult.