Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomical and surgical considerations of the sacrotuberous ligament and its relevance in pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In view of the paucity of literature, this study was undertaken to reappraise the gross anatomy of the sacrotuberous ligament (STL), with the objective of providing an accurate anatomical basis for clinical conditions involving the STL. We studied the gross anatomy of the STL in 50 formalin fixed cadavers (100 sides) during the period of 2004–2005. All specimens exhibited an STL with a ligamentous part and (87%) of specimens exhibited a membranous (falciform) segment, which extended towards the ischioanal fossa. The variations of the falciform extensions were classified into three types. In Type I (69%), the falciform process extended towards and along the ischial ramus to terminate at the obturator fascia. In Type II (108%), the falciform process extended along the ischial ramus, fused with the obturator fascia and continued towards the ischioanal fossa. In addition, the medial border of the falciform process descended to fuse with the anococcygeal ligament, forming a continuous membrane. Lastly, in Type III (13%), the falciform process of the STL was absent. The above mentioned data could have an important implication to the understanding of the relationship between the pudendal nerve and the sacrotuberous ligament and their relevance to pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antolak SJ, Hough DM, Pawlina W, Spinner RJ (2002) Anatomical basis of chronic pelvic pain syndrome: the ischial spine and pudendal nerve entrapment. Med Hypotheses 59:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes AR (1921) Pelvic fascia. Anat Rec 21:36–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemente CD (1985) Gray’s anatomy—American edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 724–726

    Google Scholar 

  4. Derry DE (1907) On the real nature of the so-called pelvic fascia. J Anat Physiol 42:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hough DM, Wittenberg KH, Pawlina W, Maus TP, King BF, Vrtiska TJ, Farrell MA, Antolak SJ Jr (2003) Chronic perineal pain caused by pudendal nerve entrapment: anatomy and CT-guided perineural injection technique. AJR 181:561–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawanishi Y, Lee KS, Kimura K, Kojima K, Yamamoto A, Numata A (2001) Feasabilty of multi-slice computed tomography in the diagnosis of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction. BJU Intl 88:390–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Loukas M, Hullett J, Wagner T (2005) The clinical anatomy of the inferior phrenic artery. Clin Anat 18:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mauillon J, Thoumas D, Leroi AM, Freger P, Michot F, Denis P (1999) Results of pudendal nerve neurolysis-transposition in twelve patients suffering from pudendal neuralgia. Dis Colon Rectum 42:186–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore KL, Dalley AF (1999) Clinically oriented anatomy. 4th edn. Lippincott Willimas & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 340–341

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prescher A, Bohndorf K (1993) Anatomical and radiological observations concerning ossification of the sacrotuberous ligament: is there a relation to spinal diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)? Skeletal Radiol 22:581–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robert R, Prat-Pradal D, Labat JJ, Bensignor M, Raoul S, Rebai R, Leborgne J (1998) Anatomic basis of chronic perianal pain: role of the pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 20:93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts RO, Lieber MM, Bostwick DG, Jacobsen SJ. (1997) A review of clinical and pathological prostatits syndromes. Urology 49:809–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shafik A (1994) Pudendal canal decompression in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Arch Androl 32:141–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafik A (1997) Role of pudendal canal syndrome in the etiology of fecal incontinence in rectal prolapse. Digestion 58:489–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafik A, el-Sherif M, Youssef A, Olfat ES (1995) Surgical anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 8:110–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinnatamby CS (1999) Last’s anatomy regional and applied. 10th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 315–316

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith GE (1908) Studies in the anatomy of the pelvis, with special reference to the fasciae and visceral supports. J Anat Physiol 42:198–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Standring S, Ellis H, Healy C, Johnson D, Williams A (eds) (2005) Gray’s Anatomy Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, pp 1428, 1439

  19. Townsend CM (2001) Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. WB Saunders. Philadelphia, pp 939–940

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marios Loukas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loukas, M., Louis, R.G., Hallner, B. et al. Anatomical and surgical considerations of the sacrotuberous ligament and its relevance in pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat 28, 163–169 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0082-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0082-3

Keywords:

Navigation