Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying a new paradigm for assessing irrigation system performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many definitions of irrigation system efficiency that are applied over a range of scales. Many traditional definitions considered only the water diverted as the water volume of concern. Considering also the water consumed in defining effective irrigation efficiency is a shift from the classical definition of system efficiency. In this paper, equations are derived for calculating the following system performance measures: the irrigation consumptive use coefficient, irrigation system efficiency, irrigation water and soil salinities, relative yield, and productivity of consumed, diverted and beneficially used water. The expressions are based on quite general assumptions and are valid for systems with a single water source and layouts composed of (or simplified to) irrigation units arranged in a row. The aim of these expressions is to illustrate how system performance is affected by the reuse of water which depends on the system’s hydraulic connections and the irrigation unit performance. Illustrations of the model are provided for systems in series and in parallel. Testing and refinement by removing some of the general assumptions underlying the model will be needed to develop practical applications that can be more confidently applied for comparison and improvement of irrigation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ρ 1 :

fraction of the non-consumed water that is reincorporated into the line source (main channel)

ρ 2 :

fraction of the non-consumed water that circulates to the next unit downstream in the row

ρ b :

fraction of non-consumed water that is both reused and beneficial

B o :

decrease in relative yield per unit of increase in soil salinity above CSth

CC:

line source (main channel) water salinity

CD:

drainage water salinity

CI:

irrigation water salinity

CS:

soil salinity

CSth :

threshold of soil salinity above which yield is reduced

CU:

consumptive use

f :

fraction of non-consumed water that is beneficial

F :

water flow in the line source (main channel)

g :

fraction of non-consumed water that is lost as a result of percolation

h :

fraction of consumed water that is beneficial

I :

irrigation water

IB:

irrigation water that is beneficially used

ICUC:

irrigation consumptive use coefficient

IE:

irrigation efficiency

j :

order of the irrigation unit in the system

k :

fraction of the main channel water flow derived to irrigation unit 1

LF:

leaching fraction

n :

number of irrigation units in the irrigation system

RY:

relative yield

WP2:

water productivity per unit of water diverted

WP3:

water productivity per unit of irrigation water consumed

WP4:

water productivity per unit of irrigation water beneficially used

Y max :

maximum yield achievable in the environment under consideration

1, 2, …, j :

the order of the irrigation unit in the system

n :

the number of irrigation units in the irrigation system

p :

parallel arrangement of the irrigation units

s :

series arrangement of the irrigation units

u :

irrigation unit

References

  • Burt CM, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Solomon KH, Bliesner RD, Hardy LA, Howell TA, Eisenhauer DE (1997) Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 123:423–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israelsen OW (1950) Irrigation principles and practices. Wiley, New York, p 471

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME (1993) Impacts of irrigation and drainage on the environment. In: 5th N.D. Gulhati Lecture, The Hague, French and English, 8 September 1993, p 26

  • Jensen ME (2007) Beyond irrigation efficiency. Irrigation Sci 25:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME, Harrison DS, Korven HC, Robinson FE (1980) The role of irrigation in food and fibre production. In: Jensen ME (ed) Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. Am Soc Agric Eng 15–41 (revised printing, 1983, 841 p)

  • Keller AA, Keller J, Seckler D (1996) Integrated water resource systems: theory and policy implications. Res Rept No 3 International Water Management Institute, Colombo, 14 p

  • Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 103:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos L, Young CA, Wallender WW, Carlson HL (2000) Simulating spatially distributed water and salt balances. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 126:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry CJ (1999) The IWMI water resources paradigm—definitions and implications. Agric Water Manage 80:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playán E, Mateos L (2006) Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agric Water Manage 80:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seckler D, Molden D, Sakthivadivel R (2003) The concept of efficiency in water resources management and policy. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CABI Publishing, UK, pp 37–51 (in association with IWMI, Colombo, Sri Lanka)

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KH, Davidoff B (1999) Relating unit and subunit irrigation performance. Trans ASAE 42:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Willardson LS, Allen RG, Fredericksen HD (1994) Elimination of irrigation efficiencies. In: 13th Technical Conference on USCID. Denver, 17 p

Download references

Acknowledgment

The analysis in this paper is one result of the research carried out as part of the project ‘participatory multi-level EO-assisted tools for irrigation water management and agricultural decision-support’ Contract no. 037095, Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 6 (sustainable development, global change and ecosystems), European Commission. The author would like to thank F·V. Villalobos for his comments to the first manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Mateos.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Trooien.

Appendix

Appendix

Irrigation consumptive use coefficient

The ICUC is the fraction of the irrigation water (I) destined for consumptive use (CU) (Burt et al. 1997). For the irrigation unit (denoted by subscript u):

$$ {\text{ICUC}}_{u} = \frac{{{\text{CU}}_{u} }}{{I_{u} }} $$
(16)

For simplicity, in the successive derivations it will be assumed that I u , CU u and therefore ICUC u are constant for all units in the parallel system and that ICUC u is constant in the series system.

For a system composed of n (1, 2, …) units (number of units indicated by the first subscript) arranged in series (series denoted by the second subscript, s):

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{ICUC}}_{{n ,s}} = \frac{{\sum_{{i = 1}}^{n} {{\text{CU}}_{i} } }}{{I_{1} }} = \frac{{I_{1} {\text{ICUC}}_{u} + I_{1} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} ){\text{ICUC}}_{u} + \cdots + I_{1} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{{n - 1}} {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{I_{1} }} \hfill \\ = {\text{ICUC}}_{u} \frac{{1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{n} }}{{1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)}} = 1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{n} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(17)

When the units are in parallel (parallel denoted by the second subscript, p), if n = 1:

$$ {\text{ICUC}}_{{1,p}} = {\text{ICUC}}_{u} $$
(18)

If n = 2:

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{ICUC}}_{{2,p}} = \frac{{2{\text{CU}}_{u} }}{{I_{u} + \left[ {I_{u} - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )I_{u} } \right]}} = \frac{{2I_{u} {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{2I_{u} - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )I_{u} }} \hfill \\ = \frac{{2{\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{2 - 1\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(19)

For n units:

$$ {\text{ICUC}}_{n}^{p} = \frac{{n{\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{n - (n - 1)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )}} $$
(20)

In the parallel system, the unit irrigation water results from adding water from the main channel to the return flow coming from the upstream irrigation unit (fraction ρ 2), till obtaining an amount of water I u .

Irrigation efficiency

The IE is the fraction of the irrigation water that is beneficially used (IB) (Burt et al. 1997). For the irrigation unit (irrigation unit denoted by subscript u):

$$ {\text{IE}}_{u} = \frac{{{\text{IB}}_{u} }}{{I_{u} }} $$
(21)

For a system composed of n units in series:

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{IE}}_{{n ,s}} = \frac{{h\sum_{{i = 1}}^{n} {{\text{CU}}_{i} } + I_{1} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{n} f}}{{{\text{I}}_{1} }} = \frac{{hI_{1} \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{n} } \right] + I_{1} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{n} f}}{{{\text{I}}_{1} }} \hfill \\ = h\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{n} } \right] + f\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{n} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(22)

If the units are in parallel and n = 1:

$$ {\text{IE}}_{{1,p}} = {\text{IE}}_{u} $$
(23)

For n = 2:

$$ {\text{IE}}_{{2,p}} = \frac{{I_{u} {\text{IE}}_{u} + {\text{I}}_{u} {\text{IE}}_{u} - \rho _{b} I_{u} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}}{{I_{u} + \left[ {I_{u} - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} ){\text{I}}_{u} } \right]}} = \frac{{2{\text{IE}}_{u} - 1\rho _{b} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}}{{2 - 1\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )}} $$
(24)

For n units in parallel:

$$ {\text{IE}}_{{n,p}} = \frac{{n{\text{IE}}_{u} - (n - 1)\rho _{b} (1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}}{{n - (n - 1)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )}}. $$
(25)

Equations 24 and 25 contain the assumption that if water is considered beneficial once, even if not consumed, it cannot be considered beneficial again. Otherwise, IE could take values greater than unity.

Irrigation water salinity

We assumed a steady state regime and no internal input from soil salts, i.e. the salts leaving an irrigation unit are those that entered it.

In a series system, the irrigation water for a unit is the return flow from the upstream unit. Thus, the evapo-concentration of the irrigation water of unit j determines the salinity of the irrigation water for unit j + 1. Denoting irrigation salinity by CI, using subscript (1, 2,…, j,…, n) to indicate the order of the irrigation unit in the system layout and a second subscript, s, to denote arrangement in series, for a generic irrigation unit, j:

$$ \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,s}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \left( {\frac{1}{{1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}} \right)^{{j - 1}} . $$
(26)

For calculating the same ratio in a system in parallel (arrangement in parallel denoted by subscript p), first we need to calculate the channel flow (F). If we express I u as a fraction (k) of the head flow (F 1), then the flow in the channel upstream irrigation unit j is:

$$ \begin{gathered} F_{j} = F_{1} - (j - 1)I_{u} + (j - 1)(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )\rho _{1} I_{u} + (j - 2)(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )\rho _{2} I_{u} \hfill \\ = F_{1} \left[ {1 - \left( {j - 1} \right)k + \left( {j - 1} \right)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{1} k + \left( {j - 2} \right)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} k} \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(27)

The salinity of the water in the channel (CC) at the entrance to irrigation unit j is:

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{CC}}_{j} = \frac{{\left\{ {F_{{j - 1}} - \left[ {I_{u} - I_{u} \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]} \right\}{\text{CC}}_{{j - 1}} + I_{u} \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{1} \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j - 1}} }}{{1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}}}{{F_{j} }} \hfill \\ = \frac{1}{{F_{j} }}\left\{ {F_{{j - 1}} - F_{1} k\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]} \right\}{\text{CC}}_{{j - 1}} + \frac{1}{{F_{j} }}\left\{ {F_{1} k\rho _{1} } \right\}{\text{CI}}_{{j - 1}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(28)

where \( CI_{{j - 1}} \) is the salinity of the irrigation water at unit − 1. The salinity of the irrigation water at unit j is:

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{CI}}_{j} = \frac{{\left[ {I_{u} - I_{u} \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]{\text{CC}}_{j} + I_{u} \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j - 1}} }}{{1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}}}{{I_{u} }} \hfill \\ = \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]{\text{CC}}_{j} + \rho _{2} {\text{CI}}_{{j - 1}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(29)

If ρ 1 = 0, then the ratio \( \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} \) becomes independent of CI1 and F 1:

$$ \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = 1. $$
(30)
$$ \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{ 2,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \frac{1}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}\left[ {(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )\rho _{2} \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}{{(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}} + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]{\text{CI}}_{1} } \right] = \rho _{2} + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]. $$
(31)
$$ \begin{gathered} \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{3,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \frac{1}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}\left[ {(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )\rho _{2} \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{2} }}{{(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}} + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]{\text{CI}}_{1} } \right] \hfill \\ = \frac{1}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}\left[ {\rho _{2} {\text{CI}}_{1} \left\{ {\rho _{2} + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]} \right\} + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]{\text{CI}}_{1} } \right] \hfill \\ = \rho _{2}^{2} + \rho _{2} \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right] + \left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right] = \rho _{2}^{2} + (\rho _{2} + 1)\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(32)
$$ \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \rho _{2}^{{j - 1}} + \left( {\rho _{2}^{{j - 2}} + \rho _{2}^{{j - 3}} + \cdots + \rho _{2} + 1} \right)\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right] = \rho _{2}^{{j - 1}} + \left( {\frac{{1 - \rho _{2}^{{j - 1}} }}{{1 - \rho _{2} }}} \right)\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]. $$
(33)

Soil salinity

The assumptions for calculating soil salinity (CS) are: (1) the salinity of the soil solution is the mean of the irrigation and drainage (CD) water salinities, (2) drainage occurs when soil water content is greater than field capacity and (3) soil water content at field capacity is half the soil water content at saturation.

Then, for a system in series:

$$ \frac{{{\text{CS}}_{{j,s}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\left[ {\left( {\frac{1}{{1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}} \right)^{{j - 1}} + \left( {\frac{1}{{1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}} \right)^{j} } \right] = \frac{{2 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{4\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)^{j} }}. $$
(34)

If the system is in parallel, first, we define the ‘leaching fraction’ (LF), assuming a steady state regime, as:

$$ {\text{LF}} = \frac{{g(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}}{{{\text{ICUC}}_{u} + g(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}} = \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CD}}_{{j,p}} }} $$
(35)

where g is the fraction of non-consumed water that goes to percolation. Therefore,

$$ \frac{{{\text{CS}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }} = \frac{1}{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }}\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} + {\raise0.7ex\hbox{${{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} } {{\text{LF}}}}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${{\text{LF}}}$}}}}{2}} \right) = \frac{{{\text{LF}} + 1}}{{4{\text{LF}}}} = \frac{{2g(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} ) + {\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{4{\text{g}}(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )}} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{{{\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{4g\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)}}. $$
(36)

Finally, we can relate soil salinity to the irrigation water salinity at the entrance of the system by multiplying numerator and denominator by CI1 and by making use of the unit’s irrigation water salinity relative to the initial irrigation water salinity derived in the previous section:

$$ \frac{{{\text{CS}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }} = \frac{{{\text{CI}}_{{j,p}} }}{{{\text{CI}}_{1} }}\left[ {\frac{1}{2} + \frac{{{\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{4g\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)}}} \right] = \left[ {\rho _{2}^{{j - 1}} + \left( {\frac{{1 - \rho _{2}^{{j - 1}} }}{{1 - \rho _{2} }}} \right)\left[ {1 - \left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)\rho _{2} } \right]} \right]\left[ {\frac{1}{2} + \frac{{{\text{ICUC}}_{u} }}{{4g\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)}}} \right]. $$
(37)

Relative yield

Maas and Hoffman (1977) proposed a model to estimate relative yield (RY, %) of crops limited by soil salinity. For an irrigation unit j:

$$ {\text{RY}}_{j} = 100,\,{\text{if CS}}_{j} \le {\text{CS}}_{{{\text{th}}}} $$
(38)
$$ {\text{RY}}_{j} = \max \left[ {100 - B_{{\text{o}}} ({\text{CS}}_{j} - {\text{CS}}_{{{\text{th}}}} ) ; 0} \right],\,{\text{if CS}}_{j} > {\text{CS}}_{{{\text{th}}}} $$
(39)

where CSth is the threshold of soil salinity above which yield is reduced and B o is the decrease in relative yield per unit of increase in soil salinity above the threshold. CS j may be calculated from Eq. 34 or 37 if CI1 is known.

Irrigation water productivity

Here we consider three definitions of irrigation water productivity: production per unit of water diverted (WP2), production per unit of irrigation water consumed (WP3) and production per unit of irrigation water beneficially used (WP4):

$$ {\text{WP}}2_{{n,s}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{{j - 1}} {\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} }} $$
(40)
$$ {\text{WP}}2_{{n,p}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {{\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} \left[ {n - \left( {n - 1} \right)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )} \right]}} $$
(41)
$$ {\text{WP}}3_{{n,s}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{{j - 1}} {\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} {\text{ICUC}}_{n} }} $$
(42)
$$ {\text{WP}}3_{{n,p}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {{\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} \left[ {n - \left( {n - 1} \right)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )} \right]{\text{ICUC}}_{n} }} $$
(43)
$$ {\text{WP}}4_{{n,s}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {(1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} )^{{j - 1}} {\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} {\text{IE}}_{n} }} $$
(44)
$$ {\text{WP}}4_{{n,p}} = \frac{{Y_{{\max }} \sum_{{j = 1}}^{n} {{\text{RY}}_{j} } }}{{100I_{u} \left[ {n - \left( {n - 1} \right)\left( {1 - {\text{ICUC}}_{u} } \right)(\rho _{1} + \rho _{2} )} \right]{\text{IE}}_{n} }} $$
(45)

where Y max is the maximum yield achievable in the environment under consideration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mateos, L. Identifying a new paradigm for assessing irrigation system performance. Irrig Sci 27, 25–34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0118-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0118-z

Keywords

Navigation