Skip to main content
Log in

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Organ-Sparing Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are rare neoplasms associated with a long life expectancy after resection. In this setting, patients may benefit from laparoscopic organ-sparing resection. Studies of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for PNENs are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for PNENs.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed for patients with PNENs who underwent laparoscopic organ-sparing pancreatectomy between March 2005 and May 2018. The patients’ demographic data, operative results, pathological reports, hospital courses and morbidity, mortality, and follow-up data (until August 2018) were analysed.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis. There were 9 male and 26 female patients, with a median age of 46 years (range 25–75 years). The mean BMI was 24.6 ± 3.3 kg/m2. Nine patients received laparoscopic enucleation (LE), 20 received laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP), and 6 received laparoscopic central pancreatectomy. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative hospital stay were 186.4 ± 60.2 min, 165 ± 73.0 ml, 0 days, and 9 days (range 5–23 days), respectively. The morbidity rate, grade ≥ III complication rate, and grade ≥ B pancreatic fistula rate were 34.2%, 11.4%, and 8.7%, respectively, with no mortality. The rate of follow-up was 94.3%, and the median follow-up time was 55 months (range 3–158 months). One patient developed recurrence 36 months after LE and was managed with surgical resection. The other patients survived without metastases or recurrence during the follow-up. One patient had diabetes after LSPDP, and no patients had symptoms of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Nineteen patients who underwent LSPDP (16 with the Kimura technique and 3 with the Warshaw technique) were followed. Normal patency of the splenic artery and vein was observed in 14 and 14 patients within 1 month of surgery and in 15 and 14 patients 6 months or more after the operation, respectively. Partial splenic infarction was observed in 3 patients within 1 month of surgery and in no patients 6 months or more after the operation. Three patients eventually developed collateral venous vessels around the gastric fundus and reserved spleen, with one case of variceal bleeding.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for selected cases of PNENs is safe and feasible and has favourable short- and long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halperin DM, Kulke MH, Yao JC (2015) A tale of two tumors: treating pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Annu Rev Med 66:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reid MD, Balci S, Saka B et al (2014) Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies. Endocr Pathol 25(1):65–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D et al (2017) Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Jama Oncol 3(10):1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aranha GV, Shoup M (2005) Nonstandard pancreatic resections for unusual lesions. Am J Surg 189(2):223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S et al (2010) Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(6):782–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S et al (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(8):1197–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Kurd A, Chapchay K, Grozinsky-Glasberg S et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 20(17):4908–4916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haugvik SP, Marangos IP, Røsok BI et al (2013) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Surg 37(3):582–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1893-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cienfuegos JA, Salguero J, Núñez-Córdoba JM et al (2017) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 31(10):3847–3857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moekotte AL, Lof S, White SA et al (2020) Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 34(3):1301–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M et al (2009) A central pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1659–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization (2006) Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF Consultation

  15. Yoon YS, Lee KH, Han HS et al (2009) Patency of splenic vessels after laparoscopic spleen and splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 96(6):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang HK, Chung YE, Kim KA et al (2012) Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels. Surg Endosc 26(6):1765–1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang RC, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc 30(7):2657–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang RC, Yan JF, Xu XW et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol 19(37):6272–6277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan JF, Xu XW, Jin WW et al (2014) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasms: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 20(38):13966–13972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang R, Xu X, Yan J et al (2013) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy: preliminary experience with 8 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(11):912–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang RC, Zhang B, Mou YP et al (2017) Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc 31(11):4756–4763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosman FT: WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system; 2010.

  23. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449(4):395–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6):1051–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cherif R, Gaujoux S, Couvelard A et al (2012) Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2045–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi SH, Mi AS, Hwang HK et al (2012) Is it worthwhile to preserve adult spleen in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. Surg Endosc 26(11):3149–3156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song KB, Kim SC, Park KM et al (2015) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant lesions in the pancreatic neck and proximal body. Surg Endosc 29(4):937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no funding contributions to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Ping Mou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ren-Chao Zhang, Jun Ma, Yi-Ping Mou, Yu-Cheng Zhou, Wei-Wei Jin, and Chao Lu have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The Institutional Review Board of each institute approved this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ren-Chao Zhang and Jun Ma have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, RC., Ma, J., Mou, YP. et al. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Organ-Sparing Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. World J Surg 44, 3795–3800 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05707-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05707-8

Navigation