Skip to main content
Log in

Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomy (PSP), including enucleation and central pancreatectomy, has been investigated as an alternative to standard resection for pancreatic endocrine neoplasm, but the benefit/risk of these procedures remains little known.

Methods

From 1998 to 2010, among 197 patients operated for well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 67 underwent PSP (45 enucleations and 22 central pancreatectomies) and 66 standard resections (35 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 31 distal pancreatectomies) for a tumor below 4 cm, without synchronous distant metastasis. Groups were compared regarding postoperative morbidity, mortality, long-term pancreatic function, and survival calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Tumors operated by PSP had a median size of 15 mm, were mainly incidentally diagnosed (n = 46, 69 %), and nonfunctioning (n = 55, 82 %). Overall morbidity rate was higher after PSP than standard resection (SR) (76 vs 58 %, p = 0.0028), including more frequent pancreatic fistulas (69 vs 42 %, p = 0.003). Postoperative diabetes was less frequent following PSP than pancreaticoduodenectomy (5 vs 21 %; p = 0.022) but equivalent to the one observed after distal pancreatectomy (4 %, p = 1). Exocrine insufficiency was significantly less frequent after PSP than SR (3 vs 32 %; p < 0.0001). The overall and recurrence-free 5-year survival after PSP for nonfunctioning tumors was 96 and 98 %, respectively.

Conclusion

In selected patients, with small and low-grade tumors, PSP are associated with excellent overall and recurrence-free survivals. These procedures are associated with an increased postoperative morbidity but an excellent postoperative pancreatic function. Therefore, they should be considered as a valid therapeutic option in selected well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiology

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CP:

Central Pancreatectomy

EN:

Enucleation

ENETS:

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society

ISGPS:

International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery

PNET:

Pancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors

PSP:

Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatectomy

SR:

Standard Resection

TNM:

Tumor Node Metastasis staging system

UICC:

Union Internationale Contre le Cancer

WDNET:

Well-Differentiated neuroendocrine Tumor

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Metz DC, Jensen RT. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5):1469-92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Falconi M, Plockinger U, Kwekkeboom DJ, et al. Well-differentiated pancreatic nonfunctioning tumors/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 2006; 84(3):196-211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulke MH, Anthony LB, Bushnell DL, et al. NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas 2010; 39(6):735-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oberg K, Eriksson B. Endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 19(5):753-81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Allendorf JD, Schrope BA, Lauerman MH, et al. Postoperative glycemic control after central pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. World J Surg 2007; 31(1):164-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Efron DT, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, et al. Central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy for benign pancreatic pathology. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8(5):532-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo CY, Lam KY, Kung AW, et al. Pancreatic insulinomas. A 15-year experience. Arch Surg 1997; 132(8):926-30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crippa S, Bassi C, Salvia R, et al. Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 2007; 94(10):1254-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconi M, Zerbi A, Crippa S, et al. Parenchyma-preserving resections for small nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(6):1621-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Casadei R, Ricci C, Rega D, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? a single-center experience. Pancreas 2010; 39(6):825-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Falconi M, Bettini R, Boninsegna L, et al. Surgical strategy in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. JOP 2006; 7(1):150-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iacono C, Bortolasi L, Facci E, et al. The Dagradi-Serio-Iacono operation central pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11(3):364-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):205-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138(1):8-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142(5):761-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31 Suppl 1:S12-54.

  17. Rindi G, Kloppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 2006; 449(4):395-401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reber HA. Middle pancreatectomy: why I rarely do it. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11(6):730-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ocuin LM, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, et al. Comparison of central and extended left pancreatectomy for lesions of the pancreatic neck. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15(8):2096-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haynes AB, Deshpande V, Ingkakul T, et al. Implications of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: short-term and long-term patient outcomes. Arch Surg 2011; 146(5):534-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 2007; 246(2):246-53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, et al. Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011.

  24. Brown KM, Shoup M, Abodeely A, et al. Central pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic lesions. HPB (Oxford) 2006; 8(2):142-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zerbi A, Falconi M, Rindi G, et al. Clinicopathological features of pancreatic endocrine tumors: a prospective multicenter study in Italy of 297 sporadic cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105(6):1421-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. King J, Kazanjian K, Matsumoto J, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: incidence of postoperative diabetes. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12(9):1548-53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andersen HB, Baden H, Brahe NE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179(5):545-52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 2008; 95(1):85-91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemaire E, O'Toole D, Sauvanet A, et al. Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg 2000; 87(4):434-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pitt SC, Pitt HA, Baker MS, et al. Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13(9):1692-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, et al. Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery 2002; 132(5):836-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. DiNorcia J, Lee MK, Reavey PL, et al. One hundred thirty resections for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: evaluating the impact of minimally invasive and parenchyma-sparing techniques. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14(10):1536-46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cataldegirmen G, Schneider CG, Bogoevski D, et al. Extended central pancreatic resection as an alternative for extended left or extended right resection for appropriate pancreatic neoplasms. Surgery 2010; 147(3):331-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Menegaux F, Schmitt G, Mercadier M, et al. Pancreatic insulinomas. Am J Surg 1993; 165(2):243-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dedieu A, Rault A, Collet D, et al. Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasm. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(2):572-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Muller MW, Friess H, Kleeff J, et al. Middle segmental pancreatic resection: An option to treat benign pancreatic body lesions. Ann Surg 2006; 244(6):909-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95(2):120-34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sikdar KC, Wang PP, MacDonald D, et al. Diabetes and its impact on health-related quality of life: a life table analysis. Qual Life Res 2010; 19(6):781-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Currie CJ, Peters JR, Tynan A, et al. Survival as a function of HbA(1c) in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2010; 375(9713):481-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pomianowska E, Gladhaug IP, Grzyb K, et al. Survival following resection of pancreatic endocrine tumors: importance of R-status and the WHO and TNM classification systems. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45(7-8):971-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nikfarjam M, Warshaw AL, Axelrod L, et al. Improved contemporary surgical management of insulinomas: a 25-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg 2008; 247(1):165-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, et al. Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg 2008; 247(3):490-500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hochwald SN, Zee S, Conlon KC, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(11):2633-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ferrone CR, Tang LH, Tomlinson J, et al. Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: can the WHO classification system be simplified? J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(35):5609-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Adham M, Giunippero A, Hervieu V, et al. Central pancreatectomy: single-center experience of 50 cases. Arch Surg 2008; 143(2):175-80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S, et al. Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010; 17(6):782-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewis RB, Lattin GE, Jr., Paal E. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: radiologic-clinicopathologic correlation. Radiographics 2010; 30(6):1445-64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fritscher-Ravens A. Endoscopic ultrasound and neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. JOP 2004; 5(4):273-81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Massironi S, Sciola V, Peracchi M, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(35):5377-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tucker ON, Crotty PL, Conlon KC. The management of insulinoma. Br J Surg 2006; 93(3):264-75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Doherty GM, Doppman JL, Shawker TH, et al. Results of a prospective strategy to diagnose, localize, and resect insulinomas. Surgery 1991; 110(6):989-96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Park BJ, Alexander HR, Libutti SK, et al. Operative management of islet-cell tumors arising in the head of the pancreas. Surgery 1998; 124(6):1056-61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Thom AK, Norton JA, Axiotis CA, et al. Location, incidence, and malignant potential of duodenal gastrinomas. Surgery 1991; 110(6):1086-91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sperti C, Beltrame V, Milanetto AC, et al. Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies for benign or border-line tumors of the pancreas. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2(6):272-81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vagefi PA, Razo O, Deshpande V, et al. Evolving patterns in the detection and outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience from 1977 to 2005. Arch Surg 2007; 142(4):347-54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bettini R, Partelli S, Boninsegna L, et al. Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor. Surgery 2011; 150(1):75-82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Piani C, Franchi GM, Cappelletti C, et al. Cytological Ki-67 in pancreatic endocrine tumours: an opportunity for pre-operative grading. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008; 15(1):175-81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Figueiredo FA, Giovannini M, Monges G, et al. EUS-FNA predicts 5-year survival in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70(5):907-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Couvelard A, Sauvanet A. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: indications for and pitfalls of frozen section examination. Virchows Arch 2008; 453(5):441-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. d'Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. Radiology 2009; 250(2):407-16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang Y, Chen ZE, Yaghmai V, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(5):1071-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Garin E, Le Jeune F, Devillers A, et al. Predictive value of 18 F-FDG PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastatic endocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 2009; 50(6):858-64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any financial or any other kind of personal conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Sauvanet.

Additional information

Rim Cherif and Sébastien Gaujoux contributed equally to the work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental data 1

Number of node-positive patients (excluding all patients with Nx status) and WHO grade distribution according to size and secreting status (DOC 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cherif, R., Gaujoux, S., Couvelard, A. et al. Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 2045–2055 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2002-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2002-7

Keywords

Navigation