Abstract
Background
In the presence of cholecystitis or portal hypertension, hemorrhage is common during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) because the vessels of Calot’s triangle are fragile and tortuous. Bleeding can obstruct surgical field visibility and increase conversion rates and risk of common bile duct injury. The Pringle maneuver is a simple occlusion approach that could limit blood flow from the hepatic pedicle, thus controlling bleeding to provide a clear surgical field to reduce conversion rate. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of hepatic pedicle occlusion with the Pringle maneuver during difficult LC.
Methods
From 2011 to 2015, LC with hepatic pedicle occlusion by the Pringle maneuver was performed in 67 patients (Pringle group). Another group of 67 cases with matched clinical parameters where LC was performed without the Pringle maneuver (non-Pringle group) was retrieved from a database to serve as the control group.
Results
The Pringle group had a significantly lower conversion rate (1.49% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.038), less blood loss (37.5 ± 24.1 mL vs. 94.5 ± 67.8 mL; P = 0.002), shorter postoperative hospitalization (2.5 ± 1.4 days vs. 3.5 ± 2.5 days; P = 0.005), and lower cost ($1343 ± $751 USD vs. $1674 ± $609 USD; P = 0.024) than non-Pringle group. There was one case each of bile duct injury and readmission within 30 days because of bile leakage in the non-Pringle group, but none in the Pringle group.
Conclusions
Hepatic pedicle occlusion could provide a clear surgical field and enable the recognition of structures during LC. The Pringle maneuver offers a feasible and safe approach to lower conversion rates in difficult LC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Pertl AM, Stettner HM (1995) Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221(4):381–386
Vander Velpen GC, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1993) Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach. Gut 34(10):1448–1451
Hamad MA, Nada AA, Abdel-Atty MY, Kawashti AS (2011) Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 25(12):3747–3751
Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe? Surg Endosc 15(10):1187–1192
Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 390(5):373–380
Laurence JM, Tran PD, Richardson AJ, Pleass HC, Lam VW (2012) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy in cirrhosis: a systematic review of outcomes and meta-analysis of randomized trials. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 14(3):153–161
Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 6(6):800–805
Pringle JH (1908) V. Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg 48(4):541–549
Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stephan F, Bensaid S et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232(6):753–762
Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J, Goergen M, Ceuterick M, Morino M et al (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236(1):90–97
Go PM, Dirksen CD (1995) Five years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The Netherlands. Int Surg 80(4):304–306
Rotellar F, Pardo F, Bueno A, Marti-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G (2012) Extracorporeal tourniquet method for intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping during laparoscopic liver surgery: an easy, cheap, and effective technique. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 397(3):481–485
Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr et al (1996) Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. An analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 10(7):742–745
Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184(3):254–258
Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L et al (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203(5):723–728
Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y, Doi T, Sato K, Yukumi S, Yoshida M et al (2008) Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions. Surg Endosc 22(12):2720–2723
Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Jani K, Shetty AR, Sendhilkumar K, Senthilnathan P et al (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: the role of subtotal cholecystectomy and its variants. J Am Coll Surg 203(2):145–151
Henneman D, da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM (2013) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27(2):351–358
Ghahreman A, McCall JL, Windsor JA (1999) Cholecystostomy: a review of recent experience. Aust N Z J Surg 69(12):837–840
Delva E, Camus Y, Nordlinger B, Hannoun L, Parc R, Deriaz H et al (1989) Vascular occlusions for liver resections. Operative management and tolerance to hepatic ischemia: 142 cases. Ann Surg 209(2):211–218
Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Taylor MG, Hamdan K, Elberm H, Pearce NW (2010) Bleeding and hemostasis in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 24(3):572–577
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602910) and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (No. 2017SCU11045).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YGW, BL, and RCZ contributed to the design of this study; RCZ, KFC, and CYJ contributed to the data collection; FL, KFC, JHC, and RCZ contributed to the data analysis; FL and RCZ contributed to writing the text; BL and YGW contributed to the revision of this article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, R., Liu, F., Jia, C. et al. Hepatic Pedicle Occlusion with the Pringle Maneuver During Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Reduces the Conversion Rate. World J Surg 43, 207–213 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4770-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4770-z