Abstract
Background: Identifying patients who are at risk for conversion from laparoscopic (LC) to open cholecystectomy (OC) has proven to be difficult. The purpose of this review was to identify factors that may be predictive of cases which will require conversion to laparotomy for completion of cholecystectomy.
Methods: We reviewed 581 LCs initiated between July 1990 and August 1993 at a university medical center and recorded reasons for conversion to OC. Statistical analysis was then performed to identify factors predictive of increased risk for conversion.
Results: Of the 581 LC initiated, 45 (8%) required OC for completion. Reasons for conversion included technical and mandatory reasons and equipment failure. By multivariate analysis, statistically significant risk factors for conversion included increasing age, acute cholecystitis, a history of previous upper abdominal surgery, and being a patient at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Factors not increasing risk of conversion included gender and operating surgeon.
Conclusions: We conclude that no factor alone can reliably predict unsuccessful LC, but that combinations of increasing age, acute cholecystitis, previous upper abdominal surgery, and VAMC patient result in high conversion rates. Patients with the defined risk factors may be counseled on the increased likelihood of conversion. However, LC can be safely initiated for gallbladder removal with no excess morbidity or mortality should conversion be required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 211: 60–62
Ferzli G, Kloss D (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in both chronic and acute cholecystitis. Contemp Surg 40: 17–19
Flowers J, Bailey R, Scovill W, Zucker K (1991) The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 161: 388–392
Frazee R, Roberts J, Symmonds R, Snyder S, Hendricks J, Smith R, Custer M (1992) What are the contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 164: 491–495
Fried GM, Barkun JS, Sigman HH, Joseph L, Clas D, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Meakins JL (1994) Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 167: 35–41
Hugh T, Kelly M, Li B (1992) Laparoscopic anatomy of the cystic artery. Am J Surg 163: 593–595
Miller R, Kimmelstiel F (1992) Surgical laparoscopic experience during the first year on a teaching service. Surg Obstet Gynecol 175: 523–527
Peters J, Ellison C, Innes J, Liss J, Nichols K, Lomano J, Roby S, Front M, Carey L (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213: 3–12
Peters JH, Krailadsiri W, Incarbone R, Bremner CG, Froes E, Ireland AP, Crookes P, Ortega AE, Anthone GA, Stain SA (1994) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in an urben teaching hospital. Am J Surg 168: 555–559
Phillips E, Berci G, Carroll B, Daykhovsky L, Sackier J, Paz-Partlow M (1990) The importance of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 56: 792–795
Rattner D, Ferguson C, Warshaw A (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217: 233–236
Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Croxford R, Strasberg SM (1994) Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 179: 696–704
Schirmer B, Dix J, Edge S, Hyser M, Hanks J, Aguilar M (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the obese patient. Ann Surg 216: 146–152
Scott-Conner C, Hall T (1992) Variant arterial anatomy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 163: 590–592
Soper N, Stockmann P, Dunnegan D, Ashley S (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new gold standard. Arch Surg 127: 917–923
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiebke, E.A., Pruitt, A.L., Howard, T.J. et al. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10, 742–745 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193048
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193048