Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Hemangioma of the Liver: Surgical Therapy or Observation?

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Elective surgery for liver hemangioma is controversial. We reviewed long-term outcomes following elective hepatectomy or observation only for symptomatic and asymptomatic liver hemangioma.

Methods

All patients (n = 307) with liver hemangioma referred to our hospital for surgical evaluation from January 1988 to December 2009 were identified, and imaging results, tumor characteristics, surgical indication, surgical mode, outcome of observation, clinical and/or postoperative outcome, and adverse events were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Complete median follow-up for 246 patients was 124 months. Elective surgery was performed in 103 patients (symptomatic [n = 62] and asymptomatic [n = 41]). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17 % of the patients and was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients (p = 0.002). No perioperative mortality was registered. Surgery relieved complaints in most (88 %) patients. In the observation group (n = 143), 56 % of patients had persistent or new onset of hemangioma-associated symptoms. Major hemangioma-related complications occurred in 12 patients (9 %) during the follow-up period, and 2 patients died after traumatic hemangioma rupture. Overall the rate of adverse events was by trend lower in the surgical group than in the observation group (35 versus 57 %; p = 0.08).

Conclusions

The majority of patients with liver hemangioma can be safely managed by clinical observation. In a subset of patients, especially those with giant hemangioma and/or occurrence of symptoms, surgical treatment could be considered and is justified in high-volume centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishak KG, Rabin L (1975) Benign tumors of the liver. Med Clin North Am 59:995–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trotter JF, Everson GT (2001) Benign focal lesions of the liver. Clin Liver Dis 5:17–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandolfi L, Leo P, Solmi L et al (1991) Natural history of hepatic hemangioma: clinical and ultrasound study. Gut 32:677–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trastek VF, van Heerden JA, Sheedy PF et al (1983) Cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: resect or observe? Am J Surg 145:49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams YG, Huvos AG, Fortner JG (1970) Giant hemangiomas of the liver. Ann Surg 172:239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berliner L, Ferzli G, Gianvito L et al (1983) Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver complicated by abscess and thrombosis. Am J Gastroenterol 78:835–840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawarada Y, Mizumoto R (1984) Surgical treatment of giant hemangioma of the liver. Am J Surg 148:287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon SS, Charny CK, Fong Y et al (2003) Diagnosis, management, and outcome of 115 patients with hepatic hemangiomas. J Am Coll Surg 197:392–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Smoot R et al (2010) Management of giant hemangioma of the liver: resection versus observation. J Am Coll Surg 211:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ott R, Hohenberger W (1998) Focal nodular hyperplasia and liver cell adenoma: resection or observation? Zentralbl Chir 123:145–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Özden I, Emre A, Alper A et al (2000) Long-term results of surgery for liver hemangiomas. Arch Surg 135:978–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietrabissa A, Giulianotti P, Campatelli A et al (1996) Management and follow-up of 78 giant haemangiomas of the liver. Br J Surg 83:915–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamagata M, Kanematsu T, Matsumata T et al (1991) Management of haemangioma of the liver: comparison of results between surgery and observation. Br J Surg 78:1223–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Starzl TE, Koep LJ, Weil R 3rd et al (1980) Excisional treatment of cavernous hemangioma of the liver. Ann Surg 192:25–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brouwers MAM, Peeters PMJG, De Jong KP et al (1997) Surgical treatment of giant hemangioma of the liver. Br J Surg 84:314–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno-Egea A, Del Pozo RM, Vicente CM et al (1996) Indications for surgery in the treatment of hepatic hemangioma. Hepatogastroenterology 43:422–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erdogan D, Busch OR, van Delden OM et al (2007) Management of liver hemangiomas according to size and symptoms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1953–1958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charny CK, Jarnagin WR, Schwartz LH et al (2001) Management of 155 patients with benign liver tumours. Br J Surg 88:808–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. http://www.euroqol.org/

  20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT (1957) The surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105:310–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz SI, Husser WC (1987) Cavernous hemangioma of the liver. Ann Surg 205:456–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gedaly R, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA et al (1999) Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: anatomic resection vs enucleation. Arch Surg 134:407–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Terkivatan T, Vrijland WW, den Hoed PT et al (2002) Size of lesion is not a criterion for resection during management of giant liver haemangioma. Br J Surg 89:1240–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Terkivatan T, De Wilt JHW, De Man RA et al (2001) Indication and long-term outcome of treatment for benign hepatic tumors: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 136:1033–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinmann A, Ringe B, Klempnauer J et al (1997) Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indication for surgery. World J Surg 21:983–991. doi:10.1007/s002689900337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herman P, Costa MLV, Machado MAC et al (2005) Management of hepatic hemangiomas: a 14-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg 9:853–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M et al (2011) Reappraisal of surgical indications and approach for liver hemangioma: single-center experience on 74 patients. Am J Surg 201:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamaloglu E, Altun H, Ozdemir A et al (2005) Giant liver hemangioma: therapy by enucleation or liver resection. World J Surg 29:890–893. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7661-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pichlmayr R, Grosse H, Hauss J et al (1990) Technique and preliminary results of extracorporeal liver surgery and surgery on the in situ perfused liver? Br J Surg 77:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Descottes B, Lachachi F, Durand-Fontanier S et al (2000) Laparoscopic treatment of solid and cystic tumors of the liver. Study of 33 cases. Ann Chir 125:941–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Couinaud C (1954) Anatomic principles of left and right regulated hepatectomy: technics. J Chir (Paris) 70:933–966

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scheele J (2001) Anatomical and atypical liver resections. Chirurg 72:113–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yedibela S, Demir R, Zhang W et al (2009) Surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an 11-year Western single-center experience in 107 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 16:404–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Glinkova V, Shevah O, Boaz M et al (2004) Hepatic hemangiomas: possible association with female sex hormones. Gut 53:1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cobey FC, Salem RR (2004) A review of liver masses in pregnancy and proposed algorithm for their diagnosis and management. Am J Surg 187:181–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirk P, Rubaltelli L, Bazzocchi M et al (1982) Ultrasonographic patterns in hepatic hemangiomas. J Clin Ultrasound 10:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gibney RG, Hendin AP, Cooperberg PL (1987) Sonographically detected hepatic hemangiomas: absence of change over time. AJR 149:953–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Caseiro-Alves F, Brito J, Araujo AE et al (2007) Normal vascular and biliary hepatic anatomy: 3D demonstration by multidetector CT. Surg Radiol Anat 29:575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C et al (2001) Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:397–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S et al (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr.12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Süleyman Yedibela, Volker Müller, Melanie Langheinrich, Clemens Lohmüller, Werner Hohenberger & Aristotelis Perrakis

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr.12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Sedat Alibek

  3. Department of Surgery, University of Gaziantep, Üniversite Bulvari P.K., 27310, Sehitkamil/Gaziantep, Turkey

    Ünal Aydin

Authors
  1. Süleyman Yedibela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sedat Alibek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volker Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ünal Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melanie Langheinrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Clemens Lohmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Werner Hohenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aristotelis Perrakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aristotelis Perrakis.

Additional information

Süleyman Yedibela and Sedat Alibek contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yedibela, S., Alibek, S., Müller, V. et al. Management of Hemangioma of the Liver: Surgical Therapy or Observation?. World J Surg 37, 1303–1312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1904-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1904-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation