In patients with a thin soft tissue breast envelope, lower pole implant palpability is a postoperative sequela that concerns patients. Anatomically, the lower aspect of the breast near the inframammary fold lacks sufficient soft tissue to cover the breast implant after augmentation.
A transareolar incision was made, and subcutaneous dissection was performed. The dissection first proceeded caudally to the lower aspect to the breast parenchyma. The dissection then changed direction and moved cephalad to the mid breast or nipple region. The fatty tissue and pectoralis muscle fascia were cut transversely at this level, and the dissection was reversed caudally in a subfascial plane to the new inframammary fold region. This maneuver created a retromammary adipofascial flap.
A total of 368 breast augmentations were performed in 184 patients. Breast implants were inserted in the subfascial plane in 40 patients (21.7%) and in the subpectoral–subfascial plane in 144 patients (78.3%). A total of 368 breast implants were inserted, including 140 smooth cohesive silicone implants (38.0%), 2 textured round implants (0.5%), and 226 anatomic-type implants (61.5%). A cadaveric dissection revealed that a retromammary adipofascial flap measuring 3–4 mm in thickness can be acquired. Capsular contracture occurred in six breasts (1.7%).
During breast augmentation, an inferiorly based retromammary adipofascial flap can be created to help cover the lower pole of the breast from implant palpability. This is helpful especially in patients with thin skin, hypoplastic breasts, or constricted breasts.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Cronin TD, Gerow JF (1963) Augmentation mammoplasty; a new “natural feel” prosthesis. Paper presented at: transactions of the third international congress of plastic surgery, October 13–18. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam
Vazquez B, Given KS, Houston GC (1987) Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesthet Plast Surg 11:101–105
Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521
Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:44–48
Tebbetts JB (2006) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:81S–98S
Graf RM, Bernardes A, Auersvald A, Damasio RC (2000) Subfascial endoscopic transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:216–220
Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LR, Damasio RC, Auersvald A (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908
Goes JC, Landecker A (2003) Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:178–184
Serra-Renom J, Garrido MF, Yoon T (2005) Augmentation mammaplasty with anatomic soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:640–645
Munhoz AM, Fells K, Arruda E et al (2006) Subfascial transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance: technical aspects and outcome. Aesthet Plast Surg 30:503–512
Siclovan HR, Jomah JA (2008) Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:426–431
Stoff-Khalili MA, Scholze R, Morgan WR, Metcalf JD (2004) Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1280–1288
Lee JH, Lee PK, Oh DY, Rhie JW, Ahn ST (2012) Subpectoral–subfascial breast augmentation for thin-skinned patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:115–121
Hunstad JP, Webb LS (2010) Subfascial breast augmentation: a comprehensive experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:365–373
Tijerina VN, Saenz RA, Garcia-Guerrero J (2010) Experience of 1000 cases on subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:16–22
Brown T (2012) Subfascial breast augmentation: is there any advantage over the submammary plane? Aesthet Plast Surg 36:566–569
Aygit AC, Basaran K, Mercan ES (2013) Transaxillary totally subfascial breast augmentation with anatomical breast implants: review of 27 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1149–1156
Yoo G, Lee PK (2010) Capsular flaps for the management of malpositioned implants after augmentation mammoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:111–115
Han HH, Kim KK, Lee KH et al (2015) Transareolar-perinipple (areolar omega) zigzag incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:517e–525e
Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123
Hester TR Jr, Ghazi BH, Moyer HR, Nahai FR, Wilton M, Stokes L (2012) Use of dermal matrix to prevent capsular contracture in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:126S–136S
Kaufman D (2012) Pocket reinforcement using acellular dermal matrices in revisionary breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 39:137–148
Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA (2010) The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1711–1720
Mofid MM, Singh NK (2009) Pocket conversion made easy: a simple technique using alloderm to convert subglandular breast implants to the dual-plane position. Aesthet Surg J 29:12–18
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:932–938
Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI (2013) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33:681–690
Separ SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1140–1148
Spear SL, Wilson HB, Lockwood MD (2005) Fat injection to correct contour deformities in the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1300–1305
Bircoll M (1987) Cosmetic breast augmentation utilizing autologous fat and liposuction techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:267–271
Zheng DN, Li QF, Lei H et al (2008) Autologous fat grafting to the breast for cosmetic enhancement: experience in 66 patients with long-term follow-up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:792–798
Teimourian B (1986) Repair of soft-tissue contour deficit by means of semiliquid fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:123–124
Jinde L, Jianlianq S, Xiaoping C et al (2006) Anatomy and clinical significance of pectoral fascia. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1557–1560
Stecco A, Masiero S, Macchi V, Stecco C, Porzionato A, De Caro R (2009) The pectoral fascia: anatomical and histological study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 13:255–261
Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstein MJ (1995) The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1521–1533
Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney AK, Codner MA (2012) Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J 32:956–963
Jennings DA, Morykwas MJ, Burns WW, Crook ME, Hudson WP, Argenta LC (1991) In vitro adhesion of endogeneous skin microorganisms to breast prostheses. Ann Plast Surg 27:216–220
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and no financial support.
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, H.H., Kim, K.K., Lee, K.H. et al. The Use of a Retromammary Adipofascial Flap in Breast Augmentation for Patients with Thin Soft Tissue. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 1447–1456 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1215-x
- Retromammary adipofascial flap
- Thin soft tissue
- Autologous caudal breast augmentation
- Caudal breast padding