Abstract
Background
Secondary revisions due to deflation, flattening, and ptosis have been the major concerns after free-nipple breast reduction procedures. This study used a new modification of the standard technique known as the “bipedicled dermoglandular flap method” to reduce reoperation rates.
Methods
A total of 24 patients were treated with the bipedicled dermoglandular free-nipple method between the years 2004 and 2008. The mean patient age was 45.6 years, and the average body mass index (BMI) was calculated as 27.8 kg/m2. In contrast to the standard technique, the superior dermoglandular flap was fixed as backfolded, whereas the inferior flap was fixed directly to the pectoralis fascia together with the superior flap with polydiaxanone sutures. An average breast tissue volume of 1,736 g was removed.
Results
One case of seroma and one case of partial nipple graft loss (8%) were observed in the follow-up period. The patients were followed for an average of 32.4 months. Complications such as deflation, flattening, and Regnault’s mild (1st degree), moderate (2nd degree), and severe (3rd degree) ptosis were not observed. However minimal glandular ptosis was observed in four cases (16.6%). Central peripheral minimal hypopigmentation was observed in five cases. None of these complications required reoperation.
Conclusion
Bipedicled dermaglandular flap modification of conventional free-nipple reduction mammaplasty is a new option for reducing the probable complications of the standard technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thorek M (1989) Possibilities in the reconstruction of the human form 1922. Aesth Plast Surg 13:55–58
Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367–375
Strombeck JO (1960) Mammoplasty: report of a new technique based on two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg 13:79–90
McKissock PK (1972) Reduction mammoplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:245–252
Hirsowitz B, Moscona AR (1982) Modification of the bipedicled vertical dermal flap technique in reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 8:363–369
Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:64–67
Robbins TH (1987) Reduction mammaplasty by the Robbins technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:308–309
Lejour M, Abboud M, Declety A, Kertesz P (1990) Reduction of mammaplasty scars: from a short inframammary scar to a vertical scar. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 35:369–379
Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P et al (2009) Septum-based mammaplasty: a surgical technique based on Würinger’s septum for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:443–454
Gorgu M, Ayhan M, Aytug Z et al (2007) Maximizing breast projection with combined free-nipple graft reduction mammoplasty and back-folded dermaglandular inferior pedicle. Breast J 13:226–232
Emekli U, Güven E, Ozden BC, Kesim SN (2004) A practical dressing method after nipple–areola reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 27:99–100
Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31–37
Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203
Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesth Plast Surg 28:259–267
Mess SA, Gradinger GP, Spear SL (2006) Breast reduction with the free-nipple technique. In: Spear AL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1172–1188
Jackson IT, Bayramicli M, Gupta M, Yavuzer R (1999) Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:398–400
Aydin H, Bilgin-Karabulut A, Tümerdem B (2002) Free-nipple reduction mammaplasty with a horizontal scar in high risk patients. Aesth Plast Surg 26:457–460
Aydin H, Tümerdem B, Onel D, Cerçi Ozkan A (2003) Reduction mammaplasty using inferior pedicle technique combined with dermal suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1362–1363
Menderes A, Mola F, Vayvada H, Yilmaz M, Baytekin C (2005) Dermal suspension flaps for McKissock’s vertical bipedicule flap vs classical McKissock’s technique: comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Br J Plast Surg 58:209–215
Casas LA, Byun MY, Depoli PA, Gradinger GP (2001) Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:961–964
Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL (2005) Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of 518 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:1633–1639
Mathes SJ, Nahai F, Hester TR (1980) Avoiding the flat breast in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:63–70
Koger KE, Sunde D, Press BH, Hovey LM (1994) Reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia using inferiorly based pedicle and free-nipple transplantation. Ann Plast Surg 33:561–564
Romano JJ, Francel TJ, Hoopes JE (1992) Free-nipple graft reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 28:271–276
Abramson DL (1999) Increasing projection in patients undergoing free-nipple graft reduction mammoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 23:282–284
Isken T, Sen C, Onyedi M, Izmirli H (2008) A new application for increasing greast reduction in free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 32:675–680
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Güven, E., Aydin, H., Başaran, K. et al. Reduction Mammaplasty Using Bipedicled Dermoglandular Flaps and Free-Nipple Transplantation. Aesth Plast Surg 34, 738–744 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9536-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9536-4