Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autoaugmentation mastopexy using the double-flap technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Breast drooping usually results from two concomitant factors: breast parenchymal involution, which leads to volume loss, altogether with a progressive laxity of the skin envelope which becomes inelastic and flabby (means so loose). The authors propose a double-flap technique which includes transposition of inferiorly based dermoglandular tissue underneath a superiorly based flap to achieve a central projection and upper fullness altogether with raising the inframammary crease.

Methods

From May 2016 to November 2018, 25 patients underwent a double-flap autoaugmentation mammoplasty performed by the authors. Ages ranged from 25 to 45 years. All patients were nonsmokers and had body mass indexes (BMI) of less than 30. The mean follow-up period was 18 months All cases have had grade III breast ptosis with a broad-base, flappy breasts with deficient central projection. All patients aimed at having an augmented, elevated breast without insertion of a silicon implant.

Results

A total of 23 cases showed a significant improvement in breast contour and central projection, with overall satisfaction to both patient and surgeon. Two cases progressed to an implant augmentation subsequent to the mastopexy. One patient had postoperative seroma that were managed with frequent aspirations. The nipple areola complex (NAC) wounds passed smoothly in all cases without any complications regarding the vascularity or wound infection.

Conclusions

The double-flap autoaugmentation mastopexy is a method of breast reshaping that adopts a concept of glandular rearrangement. In properly selected patients with adequate breast volume and moderate skin elasticity, with mild to moderate ptosis, who refuse a prosthetic implant insertion, this procedure safely and adequately restores the youthful conical breast appearance.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aufricht G (1949) Mammaplasty for pendulous breasts: empiric and geometric planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 4:13–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erol O, Spira M (1980) A mastopexy technique for mild to moderate ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:603–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peter K, Kenneth K, Casas LA (2010) Superior pedicle autoaugmentation mastopexy: a review of 34 consecutive patients. Aesthetic Surg J 30(2):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Vertical breast reduction with a medially based pedicle. Aesthetic Surg J 22:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramo AC, Lucena TW, Sgarbi RG et al (2019) Mastopexy autoaugmentation by using vertical and triangular flaps of mammary parenchyma through a vertical ice cream cone-shaped approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg.

  9. Hammond DC Atlas of aesthetic breast surgery chapter 5, 85–87

  10. Rubin JP (2006) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: dermal suspension and total parenchymal reshaping. Aesthetic Surg J 26:214–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurunluoglu R, Kubek E, Arton J (2013) Dual pedicle mastopexy technique for reorientation of volume and shape after subglandular and submuscular breast implant removal. Eplasty. 13:e48

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Araujo Ceraqueira A (1998) Mammoplasty: breast fixation with dermogladular mono upper pedicle flap under the pectoralis muscle. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 22:279–283

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graf R, Biggs TM (2002) In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de la Plaza R, Cruz L, Moreno (2005) Mastopexy utilizing a dermoglandular hammock flap. Aesthetic Surg J 25:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Elnaggar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Ahmed Elnaggar, Rami Makkar and Mohammed Ashraf declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.

Patient consent

Verbal and written informed patient consent were obtained.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research and authorship of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elnaggar, A., Makkar, R. & Ashraf, M. Autoaugmentation mastopexy using the double-flap technique. Eur J Plast Surg 43, 399–406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01635-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01635-x

Keywords

Navigation