Skip to main content
Log in

Caregivers in a communally nesting bird do not consistently synchronize nest visits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several hypotheses propose that parent birds might synchronize their visits to the nest, but field studies have historically overlooked the temporal pattern of parental care. Either synchrony or asynchrony could provide adaptive benefits; alternatively, any observed synchrony could simply be a byproduct of other coordinated behavior among caregivers. Few studies have quantified visit synchrony in cooperatively breeding birds with multiple caregivers. We tested whether visits to the nest are more or less synchronized than expected by chance in the communally nesting greater ani (Crotophaga major), a tropical bird that breeds in groups of four to eight adult caregivers. Across 27 breeding groups, anis did not consistently synchronize nest visits more than expected by chance; however, six groups (22%) did exhibit significant synchrony (up to 44% of visits). Nest visit synchrony was not associated with fledging success or brood size, as would be predicted by two common adaptive hypotheses, and instead might be a byproduct of synchronized foraging.

Significance statement

Various hypotheses may explain why birds either synchronize or evenly space their visits to the nest. Such coordination could increase fitness; however, its prevalence and consequences remain poorly understood, particularly in cooperative breeders. We tested whether nest visits were more or less synchronized than expected by chance in a communally nesting bird, the greater ani, which forms breeding groups of four to eight adults. While some breeding groups synchronized nest visits more than expected, most did not. Further, groups with more synchronized visits did not have increased fledging success, suggesting that the synchrony we observed might not provide a fitness benefit but rather could be a byproduct of adult social behavior away from the nest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Danielle Almstead, Luke Carabbia, Christa Morris, Zachariah Smart, Meghan Strong, and Oliver Whang for assistance in the field and Prabhanjana Acharya and Willow Dalehite for contributing to video coding. We thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, especially Melissa Cano, for logistical support in the field. Merlijn Staps and David Weber provided useful insights on data analysis, and Breanna Bennett, Trey Hendrix, Severine Hex, Joshua LaPergola, Joel Pick, and an anonymous reviewer provided feedback that greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship Program Grants No. DGE-2039656 and DGE-1656466, IOS-1755279, IOS-184543). Additional funding was provided by the American Ornithological Society, the American Philosophical Society, and Princeton University (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Program in Latin American Studies, and High Meadows Environmental Institute).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria G. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All methods were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Princeton University (2114F-17-19) and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (2015-0601-2018, 2018-0403-2021). All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Leonard

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1515 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 305 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, M.G., Savagian, A.G. & Riehl, C. Caregivers in a communally nesting bird do not consistently synchronize nest visits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 77, 84 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03361-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03361-3

Keywords

Navigation