Abstract
Group size, predation risk and habituation are key drivers of behaviour and evolution in gregarious prey animals. However, the extent to which they interact in shaping behaviour is only partially understood. We analyzed their combined effects on boldness and vigilance behaviour in juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis) by observing individuals in groups of one, two, three and five faced with four different levels of predation risk in a repeated measures design. The perch showed an asymptotic increase in boldness with increasing group size and the highest per capita vigilance in groups of two. With increasing predation risk, individuals reduced boldness and intensified vigilance. The interaction between group size and predation risk influenced vigilance but not boldness. In this context, individuals in groups of two elevated their vigilance compared to individuals in larger groups only when at higher risk of predation. Further, as only group size, they significantly reduced vigilance at the highest level of risk. With increasing habituation, solitary individuals became considerably bolder. Also, predation risk affected boldness only in the more habituated situation. Hence, repeated measures may be essential to correctly interpret certain relationships in behaviour. Our results suggest that perch may adjust boldness behaviour to group size and predation risk independently. This is rather unexpected since in theory, natural selection would strongly favour an interactive adjustment. Finally, vigilance might be particularly effective in groups of two due to the intense monitoring and detailed response to changing levels of risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan JR, Pitcher TJ (1986) Species segregation during predator evasion in cyprinid fish shoals. Freshw Biol 16:653–659
Apfelbeck B, Raess M (2008) Behavioural and hormonal effects of social isolation and neophobia in a gregarious bird species, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Horm Behav 54:435–441
Baird TA, Ryer CH, Olla BL (1991) Social enhancement of foraging on an ephemeral food source in juvenile walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma. Environ Biol Fish 31:307–311
Banks PB (2001) Predation-sensitive grouping and habitat use by eastern grey kangaroos: a field experiment. Anim Behav 61:1013–1021
Bean CW, Winfield IJ (1995) Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecol Freshw Fish 4:37–46
Beeck P, Tauber S, Kiel S, Borcherding J (2002) 0+ perch predation on 0+ bream: a case study on a eutrophic gravel pit lake. Freshw Biol 47:2359–2369
Benhaiem S, Delon M, Lourtet B et al (2008) Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Anim Behav 76:611–618
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57:289–300
Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Evans CS (2001) Yellow-footed rock-wallaby group size effects reflect a trade-off. Ethology 107:655–664
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J Theor Biol 132:337–356
Brown C, Jones F, Braithwaite V (2005) In situ examination of boldness-shyness traits in the tropical poeciliid, Brachyraphis episcopi. Anim Behav 70:1003–1009
Budaev SV (2010) Using principal pomponents and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines. Ethology 116:472–480
Chivers DP, Mirza RS, Bryer PJ, Kiesecker JM (2001) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information. Can J Zool 79:867–873
Christensen B, Persson L (1993) Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:1–9
Coleman SL, Mellgren RL (1994) Neophobia when feeding alone or in flocks in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 48:903–907
Croft DP, James R, Thomas POR, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650
Dehn MM (1990) Vigilance for predators:detection and dilution effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:337–342
Development Core Team R (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Downes S, Hoefer AM (2004) Antipredatory behaviour in lizards: interactions between group size and predation risk. Anim Behav 67:485–492
Dugatkin LA, Alfieri M (1991) Guppies and the tit-for-tat strategy: preference based on past interaction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:243–246
Dyer JRG, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Krause J (2009) Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behav Ecol 20:165–171
Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds:a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos 64:13–33
Ellenberg U, Mattern T, Seddon PJ (2009) Habituation potential of yellow-eyed penguins depends on sex, character and previous experience with humans. Anim Behav 77:289–296
Fernandez-Juricic E, Erichsen JT, Kacelnik A (2004) Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 19:25–31
Ferrari MCO, Sih A, Chivers DP (2009) The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus. Anim Behav 78:579–585
Flury B (1988) Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York
Frid A (1997) Vigilance by female Dall’s sheep: interactions between predation risk factors. Anim Behav 53:799–808
Galef BG, Laland KN (2005) Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience 55:489–499
Gerlai R, Hogan JA (1992) Learning to find the opponent: an ethological analysis of the behavior of paradise fish (Macropodus oopercularis) in intraspecific and interspecific encounters. J Comp Psychol 106:306–315
Godin JGJ, Davis SA (1995) Who dares, benefits: predator approach behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) deters predator pursuit. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:193–200
Gomez-Laplaza LM, Morgan E (2000) The effect of time spent in isolation on the response to novel nonsocial stimulation in the angelfish Pterophyllum scalare. Can J Zool 78:530–537
Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 58:443–451
Häberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M (2005) Sticklebacks benefit from closer predator inspection: an experimental test of risk assessment. Ethol Ecol Evol 17:249–259
Hake M, Ekman J (1988) Finding and sharing depletable patches: when group foraging decreases intake rates. Ornis Scand 19:275–279
Harcourt JL, Ang TZ, Sweetman G, Johnstone RA, Manica A (2009) Social feedback and the emergence of leaders and followers. Curr Biol 19:248–252
Hellström G, Heynen M, Oosten J, Borcherding J, Magnhagen C (2011) The effect of group size on risk taking and social conformity in Eurasian perch. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:499–502
Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin JGJ, Krause J (2004) Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Anim Behav 67:155–164
Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307
Jackson DA (1993) Stopping rules in principal components-analysis: a comparison of heuristic and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204–2214
Kim JW, Brown GE, Dolinsek IJ, Brodeur NN, Leduc A, Grant JWA (2009) Combined effects of chemical and visual information in eliciting antipredator behaviour in juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 74:1280–1290
Krause J, Godin JGJ (1996) Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behav Ecol 7:264–271
Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford Univ, Press, Oxford
Lehtiniemi M (2005) Swim or hide: predator cues cause species specific reactions in young fish larvae. J Fish Biol 66:1285–1299
Licht T (1989) Discriminating between hungry and satiated predators: the response of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from high and low predation sites. Ethology 82:238–243
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–664
Magnhagen C (2006) Risk-taking behaviour in foraging young-of-the-year perch varies with population size structure. Oecologia 147:734–743
Magnhagen C (2007) Social influence on the correlation between behaviours in young-of-the-year perch. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:525–531
Magnhagen C, Borcherding J (2008) Risk-taking behaviour in foraging perch: does predation pressure influence age-specific boldness? Anim Behav 75:509–517
Magnhagen C, Bunnefeld N (2009) Express your personality or go along with the group: what determines the behaviour of shoaling perch. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3369–3375
Magnhagen C, Staffan F (2005) Is boldness affected by group composition in young-of-the-year perch (Perca fluviatilis)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:295–303
Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1983) Foraging, timidity and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:147–152
Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behavior in minnow shoals. Proc R Soc Lond B 229:439–465
Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1990) Population differences in predator recognition and attack cone avoidance in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 40:443–452
Martin JGA, Reale D (2008) Temperament, risk assessment and habituation to novelty in eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Anim Behav 75:309–318
Martin CW, Fodrie FJ, Heck KL, Mattila J (2010) Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators. Oecologia 162:893–902
Milinski M (1997) How to avoid seven deadly sins in the study of behavior. Adv Stud Behav 26:159–180
Milinski M, Pfluger D, Kulling D, Kettler R (1990) Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:17–21
Newey P (2007) Foraging behaviour of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) in relation to vigilance and group size. Emu 107:315–320
Olsson J, Svanback R, Eklov P (2007) Effects of resource level and habitat type on behavioral and morphological plasticity in Eurasian perch. Oecologia 152:48–56
Packer C (1986) Whatever happened to reciprocal altruism. Trends Ecol Evol 1:142
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2011) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-100, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Pitcher T (1992) Who dares, wins: the function and evolution of predator inspection behavior in shoaling fish. Neth J Zool 42:371–391
Pitcher TJ, Turner JR (1986) Danger at dawn: experimental support for the twilight hypothesis in shoaling minnows. J Fish Biol 29:59–70
Pitcher TJ, Green DA, Magurran AE (1986) Dicing with death: predator inspection behavior in minnow shoals. J Fish Biol 28:439–448
Probst WN, Thomas G, Eckmann R (2009) Hydroacoustic observations of surface shoaling behaviour of young-of-the-year perch Perca fluviatilis (Linnaeus, 1758) with a towed upward-facing transducer. Fish Res 96:133–138
Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077–1086
Rodriguez-Prieto I, Martin J, Fernandez-Juricic E (2011) Individual variation in behavioural plasticity: direct and indirect effects of boldness, exploration and sociability on habituation to predators in lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:266–273
Saxby A, Adams L, Snellgrove D, Wilson RW, Sloman KA (2010) The effect of group size on the behaviour and welfare of four fish species commonly kept in home aquaria. Appl Anim Behav Sci 125:195–205
Seghers BH (1981) Facultative schooling behavior in the spottail shiner (Notropis hudsonius): possible costs and benefits. Environ Biol Fish 6:21–24
Snickars M, Sandstrom A, Mattila J (2004) Antipredator behaviour of 0+ year Perca fluviatilis: effect of vegetation density and turbidity. J Fish Biol 65:1604–1613
Soma M, Hasegawa T (2004) The effect of social facilitation and social dominance on foraging success of budgerigars in an unfamiliar environment. Behaviour 141:1121–1134
Treves A (2000) Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav 60:711–722
Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philos T Roy Soc B 357:1549–1557
Walling CA, Dawnay N, Kazem AJN, Wright J (2004) Predator inspection behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus): body size, local predation pressure and cooperation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:164–170
Wanzenböck J, Mikheev VN, Pasternak AF (2006) Modification of 0+perch foraging behaviour by indirect cues of predation risk. Ecol Freshw Fish 15:118–124
Ward AJW, Sumpter DJT, Couzin LD, Hart PJB, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6948–6953
Webster MM, Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2007) Boldness is influenced by social context in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behaviour 144:351–371
Wilson DS, Coleman K, Clark AB, Biederman L (1993) Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): an ecological study of apsychological trait. J Comp Psychol 107:250–260
Acknowledgments
We thank U. König, S. Gertzen, A. Hertel, C. Schiavo and J. Harrandt for their assistance during the fieldwork and M. Volpers who programmed the computer software to record behaviour. We also thank C. Magnhagen, G. Hellström and J. Oosten for their valuable comments on the study design. Further, we thank M. Teichert, P. Albers, the associate editor D. Croft and five anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. The study was financially supported by the German Research Foundation to JB (BO 1507/6-3).
Ethical Standards
After the experimental period, adult perch were released at their capture site. The tested juvenile perch were used in a consecutive study (MH, SUG and JB, unpublished data) and afterwards killed using an overdose of anaesthetic (MS222) for later morphological analyses. The experiments complied with the current laws of Germany and were approved by the ethic commission of the University of Cologne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. P. Croft
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 380 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldenberg, S.U., Borcherding, J. & Heynen, M. Balancing the response to predation—the effects of shoal size, predation risk and habituation on behaviour of juvenile perch. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 989–998 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1711-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1711-1