Skip to main content
Log in

Maternity of replacement queens in the thelytokous Cape honey bee Apis mellifera capensis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike workers of all other honey bee (Apis mellifera) subspecies, workers of the Cape honey bee of South Africa (A. mellifera capensis) reproduce thelytokously and are thus able to produce female offspring that are pseudoclones of themselves. This ability allows workers to compete with their queen over the maternity of daughter queens and, in one extreme case, has led to a clonal lineage of workers becoming a social parasite in commercially managed populations of A. mellifera scutellata. Previous work (Jordan et al., Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:345, 2008) showed that, in A. mellifera capensis, 59% of queen cells produced during swarming events contained the offspring of workers and that, of these, 65% were the offspring of non-natal workers. Here, we confirm that a substantial proportion (38.5%) of offspring queens is worker-laid. We additionally show that: (1) Although queens produce most diploid female offspring sexually, we found some homozygous or hemizygous queen offspring, suggesting that queens also reproduce by thelytoky. These parthenogenetic individuals are probably nonviable beyond the larval stage. (2) Worker-laid offspring queens are viable and become the resident queen at the same frequency as do sexually produced queen-laid offspring queens. (3) In this study, all but one of the worker-derived queens were laid by natal workers rather than workers from another nest. This suggests that the very high rates of social parasitism observed in our previous study were enhanced by beekeeping manipulations, which increased movement of parasites between colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baudry E, Solignac M, Garnery L, Gries M, Cornuet J-M, Koeniger N (1998) Relatedness among honeybees (Apis mellifera) of a drone congregation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:2009–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry E, Kryger P, Allsopp M, Koeniger N, Vautrin D, Mougel F, Cornuet J-M, Solignac M (2004) Whole genome scan in thelytokous-laying workers of the Cape honey bee (Apis mellifera capensis): central fusion, reduced recombination rates and centromere mapping using half-tetrad analysis. Genetics 167:243–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman M, Oldroyd BP (2008) When workers disunite: intraspecific parasitism in eusocial bees. Annu Rev Entomol 53:19–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman M, Allsopp MH, Jordan LA, Lim J, Oldroyd BP (2009) A quantitative study of worker reproduction in queenright colonies of the Cape honey bee, Apis mellifera capensis. Mol Ecol 18:2722–2727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi G, Ratnieks FLW, Rand E (2000) Effect of “spraying” by fighting honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.) on the temporal structure of fights. Insect Soc 47:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Omholt SW (2003) The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114:419–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boot WJ, Calis JNM, Allsopp M (2008) Selection for reproductive workers in the Cape honeybee population, Apis mellifera capensis, leads to social parasitism in bee colonies from the savanna. Proc Neth Entomol Soc Meet 19:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Châline N, Ratnieks FLW, Raine NE, Badcock NS, Burke T (2004) Non-lethal sampling of honey bee, Apis mellifera, DNA using wing tips. Apidologie 35:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe R, Allsopp M (1994) Sex and the single queen: recent experiments with capensis and scutellata queens. S Afr Bee J 66:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Dade HA (1977) Anatomy and dissection of the honeybee. International Bee Research Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • deGrandi-Hoffman G, Watkins JC, Collins AM, Loper GM, Martin JH, Arais MC, Sheppard WS (1998) Queen development time as a factor in the Africanization of European honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) populations. Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau MJ, van Leeuwen P (1990) Early sex determination in larvae of Bombus terrestris. Insect Soc 37:232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JD, Wheeler DE (1999) Differential gene expression between developing queens and workers in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:5575–5580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher DJC (1978) The African bee, Apis mellifera adansonii, in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol 23:151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley DC (2001) The behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) during queen duels. Ethology 107:601–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley DC, Tarpy DR (2005) Three mechanisms of queen elimination in swarming honey bee colonies. Apidologie 36:461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeff JM (1996) Effects of thelytokous worker reproduction on kin-selection and conflict in the Cape honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:617–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi Y, Lo N, Miyata H, Kitade O (2007) Sex-linked genetic influence on caste determination in a termite. Science 318:985–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2008) Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:5150–5153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jay SC (1966) Drifting of honeybees in commercial apiaries. II Effect of various factors when hives are arranged in rows. J Apic Res 5:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Myerscough M, Graham S, Oldroyd BP (2004) Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science 305:402–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan LA, Allsopp MH, Oldroyd BP, Wossler TC, Beekman M (2008) Cheating honeybee workers produce royal offspring. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WE, Nielsen RA (1966) Evidences that genetically determined Melipona queens can become workers. Genetics 54:859–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317:362–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Kryger P, Allsopp MH (1996) Competition for royalty in bees. Nature 384:31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Beye M, Hepburn HR (1998) Estimating the contribution of laying workers to population fitness in African honeybees (Apis mellifera) with molecular markers. Insectes Soc 45:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH (2007) Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Smolenski AJ, Cornuet J-M, Wongsiri S, Estoup A, Rinderer TE, Crozier RH (1996) Levels of polyandry and intracolonial genetic relationships in Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 89:276–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Allsopp MH, Gloag RS, Lim J, Jordan LA, Beekman M (2008) Thelytokous parthenogenesis in unmated queen honey bees (Apis mellifera capensis): central fusion and high recombination rates. Genetics 180:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne KE, Oldroyd BP (1999) Possible causes of reproductive dominance during emergency queen rearing by honeybees. Anim Behav 58:267–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Erickson EH (1986) Kin recognition during emergency queen rearing by worker honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:460–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK (1989) Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honey-bee colonies. Nature 338:576–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Aron S, Doums C, Keller L (2004) Conditional use of sex and parthenogenesis for worker and queen production in ants. Science 306:1780–1783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Hardy O, Aron S (2006) Thelytokous parthenogenesis and its consequences on inbreeding in an ant. Heredity 96:377–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am Nat 132:217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genpop (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SS, Painter-Kurt S, de Grandi-Hoffman G (2001a) The role of the vibration signal during queen competition in colonies of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 61:1173–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SS, Painter-Kurt S, DeGrandi-Hoffman G (2001b) The role of the vibration signal during queen competition in colonies of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 61:1173–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solignac M, Vautrin D, Loiseau A, Mougel F, Baudry E, Estoup A, Garnery L, Haberl M, Cornuet J-M (2003) Five hundred and fifty microsatellite markers for the study of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genome. Mol Ecol Notes 3:307–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solignac M, Vautrin D, Baudry E, Mougel F, Loiseau A, Cornuet J-M (2004) A microsatellite-based linkage map of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Genetics 167:253–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner S, Keller L (2008) Social evolution: reincarnation, free-riding and inexplicable modes of reproduction. Curr Biol 18:R206–R207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarpy DR, Hatch S, Fletcher DJC (2000) The influence of queen age and quality during queen replacement in honeybee colonies. Anim Behav 59:97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley CA, Oldroyd BP (1997) Unequal representation of subfamilies among queen and worker brood of queenless honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Anim Behav 54:1483–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma LR, Ruttner F (1983) Cytological analysis of the thelytokous parthenogenesis in the Cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis Escholtz). Apidologie 14:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex (R)100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:507

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW, Billen J (2003) Caste fate conflict in social Hymenoptera: an inclusive fitness analysis. J Evol Biol 10:647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW, Quezada-Euan JJG (2004) Queen execution and caste conflict in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii. Ethology 110:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the Australian Research Council to BPO and MB. We thank Christian Fransman for his outstanding assistance in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin P. Oldroyd.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Rueppell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allsopp, M.H., Beekman, M., Gloag, R.S. et al. Maternity of replacement queens in the thelytokous Cape honey bee Apis mellifera capensis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 567–574 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0872-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0872-9

Keywords

Navigation