Abstract
Purpose
Previous research indicated that engineered cartilage was soft and fragile due to less extracellular matrix than native articular cartilage. Consequently, the focus of this study was mostly confined to application in vitro function. In order to generate 3D engineered cartilage resembling native articular cartilage, we developed a recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor to simulate the motion of a native diarthrodial joint by offering shear stress and hydrodynamic pressure simultaneously.
Materials
The bioreactor we developed offers steady oscillating laminar flow (maximum shear stress of 250 dyne/cm2) and hydrodynamic pressure (increased from 0 to 15 psi) simultaneously. The periosteal explants were harvested from the proximal medial tibiae of rabbits and fixed onto PCL scaffold with four corner sutures and cambium layer facing upward, then these periosteal composites (periosteum/ PCL) were placed into the culture chamber of our bioreactor for six weeks in vitro culture.
Results
The cartilage yield in our recirculating bioreactor was 75–85%. The outcome was better than the 65–75% in the spinner flask bioreactor (shear stress only) and 17% in static culture. In addition, there was a significant difference in the cell morphology and zonal organisation among the three methods of culture; the engineered cartilage in the recirculating bioreactor presented many more characteristics of native articular cartilage.
Conclusions
If the environment of culture provides the shear stress and hydrodynamic pressure simultaneously, the composition of the engineered cartilage resembles native articular cartilage, including their ECM composition, cell distribution, zonal organisation and mechanical properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: tissue design and chondrocyte–matrix interactions. Instr Course Lect 47:477–486, Review
Alford JW, Cole BJ (2005) Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med 33:295–306
Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47:487–504, Review
Pecina M, Vukicevic S (2007) Biological aspects of bone, cartilage and tendon regeneration. Int Orthop 31(6):719–720
Borovecki F, Pecina Slaus N, Vukicevic S (2007) Biological mechanisms of bone and cartilage remodelling–genomic perspective. Int Orthop 31(6):799–805
Butler DL, Goldstein SA, Guilak F (2000) Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 122:570–575, Review
Guilak F, Butler DL, Goldstein SA (2001) Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics in articular cartilage repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:S295–S305
Butler DL, Hunter SA, Cordray MJ et al (2009) Using functional tissue engineering and bioreactors to mechanically stimulate tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng Part A 15:741–749
Tarng YW, O’Driscoll SW, Reinholz GG et al (2010) Directional fluid flow enhances in vitro periosteal tissue growth and chondrogenesis on poly-e-caprolactone scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 95:156–163
O’Driscoll SW, Fitzsimmons JS (2001) The role of periosteum in cartilage repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(suppl):S190–S207
O’Driscoll SW, Recklies AD, Poole AR (1994) Chondrogenesis in periosteal explants. An organ culture model for in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 76:1042–1051
O’Driscoll SW (1999) Articular cartilage regeneration using periosteum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367(Suppl):186–203
Ivkovic A, Pascher A, Hudetz D et al (2010) Articular cartilage repair by genetically modified bone marrow aspirate in sheep. Gene Ther 17(6):779–789
Saris DB, Fitzsimmons JS, O’Driscoll SW et al (1999) Periosteum responds to dynamic fluid pressure by proliferating in vitro. J Orthop Res 17:668–677
Mukherjee N, An KN, O’Driscoll SW et al (2001) The enhancement of periosteal chondrogenesis in organ culture by dynamic fluid pressure. J Orthop Res 19:524–530
Darling EM, Athanasiou KA (2003) Articular cartilage bioreactors and bioprocesses. Tissue Eng 9:9–26
Rosenberg L (1971) Chemical basis for the histological rise of safranin O in the study of articular cartilage. Journal Bone J Surgery Am 53(1):69–82
O’Driscoll SW, Fitzsimmons JS, Beaton DE (1999) Method for automated cartilage histomorphometry. Tissue Eng 5:13–23
O’Driscoll SW, Beaton DE, Fitzsimmons JS et al (2001) Validation of a simple histological-histochemical cartilage scoring system. Tissue Eng 7:313–320
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Gregory G. Reinholz, Shawn W. O’Driscoll, and Kai-Nan An for excellent technical assistance and valuable comments from the Mayo Clinic. This work was supported by the grant of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (Grants VGHKS96-117 and VGHKS99-117).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarng, YW., Huang, BF. & Su, FC. A novel recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor for periosteal chondrogenesis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 863–868 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1291-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1291-x