Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the prevalence of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) v2018 categories reported on CT or MRI performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included all reports for CT and MRI exams performed for HCC screening patients between 8/2018 and 4/2020. Patients with ultrasound, CT, or MRI of the abdomen within two years of the index exam were excluded. From each radiology report, we extracted number of reported liver observations, and LI-RADS v2018 category for each observation.

Results

There were 329 patients (170 [52%] male, mean age 59 years [SD 12]), of whom 177 (54%) had MRI with gadoxetate, 72 (22%) had MRI with extracellular contrast, 7 (2%) had MRI with unspecified contrast, and 73 (22%) had CT. Of 329 patients, 199 (60%) had no reported observations; 130 patients had 166 reported observations: 114 (68.7%) LR-1, 8 (4.8%) LR-2, 21 (12.6%) LR-3, 6 (3.6%) LR-4, 13 (7.8%) LR-5, 3 (1.8%) LR-M, and 1 (0.6%) LR-TIV. Of 114 LR-1 observations, 78 (68%) were cysts, 17 (15%) were hemangiomas, 12 (11%) were vascular shunts, 3 (3%) were focal nodular hyperplasia, 2 (2%) were siderotic nodules, 1 (1%) was a lipoma, and 1 (1%) was biliary hamartoma. There were 23 observations with probably or definitely malignant categories (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR- TIV), reported in 20/329 (6%) of patients.

Conclusion

In a cohort of at-risk patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT/MRI for HCC screening, 60% of had no liver observations, and 6 % had probably or definitely malignant observations.

Implications for patient care

The prevalence of LI-RADS v2018 categories on CT or MR exams used for HCC screening can help develop screening criteria and assess cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies with CT and MRI.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abbreviations

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

APHE:

Arterial phase hyperenhancement

CT:

Computed tomography

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LI-RADS:

Liver imaging reporting and data system

LR:

Liver imaging reporting and data system

MF:

Major feature

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

TG:

Threshold growth

v2018:

Version 2018

WO:

Washout appearance

iCCA:

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

References

  1. Flusberg M, Ganeles J, Ekinci T, Goldberg-Stein S, Paroder V, Kobi M, et al. Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of CT and MRI Reports for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2017;14(9):1206-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mueller C, Waldburger N, Stampfl U, Kauczor HU, Schirmacher P, Sommer CM, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma revisited. Gut. 2018;67(5):991-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, Kielar AZ, Elsayes KM, Bashir MR, et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology. 2018;289(3):816-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee S, Kim YY, Shin J, Son WJ, Roh YH, Choi JY, et al. Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2023:220646.

  7. De Toni EN, Schlesinger-Raab A, Fuchs M, Schepp W, Ehmer U, Geisler F, et al. Age independent survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without metastases at diagnosis: a population-based study. Gut. 2020;69(1):168-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang Y, Wallace MC, Adams LA, MacQuillan G, Garas G, Ferguson J, et al. Rate of Nonsurveillance and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Diagnosis in Chronic Liver Disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(6):551-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simmons O, Fetzer DT, Yokoo T, Marrero JA, Yopp A, Kono Y, et al. Predictors of adequate ultrasound quality for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2017;45(1):169-77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, et al. Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1706-18.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu NC, Chaudhari V, Raman SS, Lassman C, Tong MJ, Busuttil RW, et al. CT and MRI improve detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with ultrasound alone, in patients with cirrhosis. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2011;9(2):161-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim BR, Lee JM, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Hur BY, Suh KS, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology. 2017;285(1):134-46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pocha C, Dieperink E, McMaken KA, Knott A, Thuras P, Ho SB. Surveillance for hepatocellular cancer with ultrasonography vs. computed tomography -- a randomised study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38(3):303-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SY, An J, Lim YS, Han S, Lee JY, Byun JH, et al. MRI With Liver-Specific Contrast for Surveillance of Patients With Cirrhosis at High Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):456-63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. King MJ, Lee KM, Rosberger S, Huang HH, Meza GH, Lewis S, et al. HCC screening with ultrasound: assessment of quality using ultrasound LI-RADS score. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(1):263-70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiyarattanachai T, Fetzer DT, Kamaya A. Multicenter Study of ACR Ultrasound LI-RADS Visualization Scores on Serial Examinations: Implications for Surveillance Strategies. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2022;219(3):445-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kambadakone AR, Fung A, Gupta RT, Hope TA, Fowler KJ, Lyshchik A, et al. LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(1):56-74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chernyak V, Kobi M, Flusberg M, Fruitman KC, Sirlin CB. Effect of threshold growth as a major feature on LI-RADS categorization. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(8):2089-100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fowler KJ, Bashir MR, Fetzer DT, Kitao A, Lee JM, Jiang H, et al. Universal Liver Imaging Lexicon: Imaging Atlas for Research and Clinical Practice. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.;43(2):e239001.

  20. Andersson KL, Salomon JA, Goldie SJ, Chung RT. Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2008;6(12):1418-24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015;61(3):1056-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fetzer DT, Browning T, Xi Y, Yokoo T, Singal AG. Associations of Ultrasound LI-RADS Visualization Score With Examination, Sonographer, and Radiologist Factors: Retrospective Assessment in Over 10,000 Examinations. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2022;218(6):1010-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Millet JD, Kamaya A, Choi HH, Dahiya N, Murphy PM, Naveed MZ, et al. ACR Ultrasound Liver Reporting and Data System: Multicenter Assessment of Clinical Performance at One Year. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2019;16(12):1656-62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sevco TJ, Masch WR, Maturen KE, Mendiratta-Lala M, Wasnik AP, Millet JD. Ultrasound (US) LI-RADS: Outcomes of Category US-3 Observations. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2021;217(3):644-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanna RF, Miloushev VZ, Tang A, Finklestone LA, Brejt SZ, Sandhu RS, et al. Comparative 13-year meta-analysis of the sensitivity and positive predictive value of ultrasound, CT, and MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41(1):71-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Pol CB, McInnes MDF, Salameh JP, Levis B, Chernyak V, Sirlin CB, et al. CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2022;302(2):326-35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Chernyak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

V. Chernyak: Consultant, Bayer. CB Sirlin: Dr. Sirlin reports research grants from ACR, Bayer, Foundation of NIH, GE, Gilead, Pfizer, Philips, Siemens; lab service agreements with Enanta, Gilead, ICON, Intercept, Nusirt, Shire, Synageva, Takeda; institutional consulting for BMS, Exact Sciences, IBM-Watson, Pfizer; Personal consulting for Altimmune, Ascelia Pharma, Blade, Boehringer, Epigenomics; and Guerbet; receipt of royalties and/or honoraria from Medscape and Wolters Kluwer; ownership of stock options in Livivos; unpaid advisory board position in Quantix Bio. Dr. Sirlin serves as Chief Medical Officer for Livivos (unsalaried position with stock options), an appointment approved by his university.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahbazian, H., Birnbaum, J., Burns, P.J. et al. Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol 48, 3696–3702 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04040-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04040-7

Keywords

Navigation