Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of pancreatic cystic lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: efficacy of standards in reducing inter-observer variability

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess inter-observer variability in the measurement of pancreatic cystic lesions with MRI and to determine the impact of measurement standards.

Materials and methods

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study with waiver of informed consent, 144 MRI examinations, containing pancreatic cystic lesions measuring between 5 and 35 mm, were reviewed independently by two radiology attendings and two abdominal imaging fellows. Measurements were repeated by the same reviewers 12 weeks later after the introduction of measurement standards. Results were analyzed using within-subject standard deviation, intraclass correlation coefficient, and kappa.

Results

Prior to standardization, the within-subject standard deviation, showing measurement variability in each cyst, was 4.0 mm, which was reduced to 3.3 mm after introduction of measurement standards (p < 0.01). Overall inter-observer agreement, kappa, improved from 0.59 to 0.65 (p = 0.04). The frequency of all four reviewers agreeing on size category increased from 51% to 60%. The intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.81 to 0.86.

Conclusions

There is significant and frequent inter-observer variability in the measurement of pancreatic cystic lesions with MRI which could affect clinical management. Implementation of measurement standards reduces measurement variability and aids in preventing erroneous reporting of growth and potentially unwarranted changes in management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, et al. (2010) Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 105:2079–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, et al. (2008) Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas < or = 3 cm in size: is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastrointest Surg 12:234–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy P, Jouannaud V, Otoole D, et al. (2006) Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: actuarial risk of malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kimura W, Nagai H, Kuroda A, et al. (1995) Analysis of small cystic lesions of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 18:197–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. (2006) International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 6:17–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. (2012) International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:183–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7:754–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maimone S, Agrawal D, Pollack MJ, et al. (2010) Variability in measurements of pancreatic cyst size among EUS, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc 71:945–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Das A, Wells CD, Nguyen CC (2008) Incidental cystic neoplasms of pancreas: what is the optimal interval of imaging surveillance? Am J Gastroenterol 103:1657–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ip IK, Mortele KJ, Prevedello LM, Khorasani R (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists’ management recommendations. Radiology 259:136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Macari M, Megibow AJ (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: variability in radiologists’ recommendations for follow-up imaging. Radiology 259:20–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Jong K, Nio CY, Mearadji B, et al. (2012) Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas 41:278–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Do RKG, Katz SS, Gollub MJ, et al. (2014) Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas on MDCT. AJR 203:973–979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Van Slyke MA, et al. (1996) Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements. AJR 167:851–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McErlean A, Panicek DM, Zabor EC, et al. (2013) Intra- and interobserver variability in CT measurements in oncology. Radiology 269:451–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dell P. Dunn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, D.P., Brook, O.R., Brook, A. et al. Measurement of pancreatic cystic lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: efficacy of standards in reducing inter-observer variability. Abdom Radiol 41, 500–507 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0588-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0588-4

Keywords

Navigation