Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Currently, the risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation remain incomplete and controversial. To provide clinicians with accurate information for developing a preventive strategy, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of previously controversial and unexplored risk factors.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in lumbar spine who received vertebral augmentation between January 2019 and December 2020. Based on whether refracture occurred, patients were assigned to refracture and non-refracture group. The clinical characteristics, imaging parameters (severity of vertebral compression, spinal sagittal alignment, degeneration of paraspinal muscles), and surgical indicators (cement distribution and leakage, correction of spinal sagittal alignment) were collected and analyzed.

Results

There were 128 patients and 16 patients in non-refracture and refracture group. The incidence of previous fracture, multiple fractures, and cement leakage were notably higher, relative cross-sectional area of psoas (r-CSAPS) was significantly smaller, CSA ratio, fatty infiltration of erector spinae plus multifidus (FIES+MF), FIPS, postoperative lumbar lordosis (post-LL), correction of body angel (BA), and LL were significantly greater in refracture group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were independent risk factors. According to the ROC curve, correction of BA showed the highest prediction accuracy, and the critical value was 3.45°.

Conclusions

The occurrence of subsequent fracture might be the consequence of multiple factors. Previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were identified as independent risk factors. Furthermore, the correction of BA should not exceed 3.45°, especially in patients with risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OVCF:

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

PVP:

Percutaneous vertebroplasty

PKP:

Percutaneous kyphoplasty

IVC:

Intravertebral cleft

BA:

Body angle

CA:

Cobb’s angle

SS:

Sacral slope

LL:

Lumbar lordosis

PS:

Psoas

ES:

Erector spinae

MF:

Multifidus

CSA:

Cross-sectional area

FI:

Fatty infiltration

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

References

  1. Odén A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H. Burden of high fracture probability worldwide: secular increases 2010–2040. Osteoporosis Int. 2015;26:2243–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3154-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo CM, Park KB, Hwang SH, Kang DH, Jung JM, Park IS. The analysis of patterns and risk factors of newly developed vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;52:339–45. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.4.339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang SK, Lee CW, Park NK, Kang TW, Lim JW, Cha KY, Kim JH. Predictive risk factors for refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35:844–51. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Cahill P, Stanley T, Park D, Singh K. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of complications. Spine. 2009;34:1228–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a3c742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Song C, Lin H, Sun J, Liu W. Does prophylactic vertebral augmentation reduce the refracture rate in osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06899-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KA, Hong SJ, Lee S, Cha IH, Kim BH, Kang EY. Analysis of adjacent fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: does intradiscal cement leakage really increase the risk of adjacent vertebral fracture? Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:1537–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1139-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. He D, Lou C, Yu W, Zhu K, Wu Z, Liu F, Chen M, Zheng L, Chen Z, Fan S. Cement distribution patterns are associated with recompression in cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective study. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen WJ, Kao YH, Yang SC, Yu SW, Tu YK, Chung KC. Impact of cement leakage into disks on the development of adjacent vertebral compression fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:35–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181981843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YJ, Lee JW, Kim KJ, Chung SK, Kim HJ, Park JM, Kang HS. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for intravertebral cleft: analysis of therapeutic effects and outcome predictors. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:757–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0866-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Syed MI, Patel NA, Jan S, Harron MS, Morar K, Shaikh A. Intradiskal extravasation with low-volume cement filling in percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2397–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Liu T, Yin P, Wang Y, Liao S, Zhang S, Su Q, Hai Y. The therapeutic effects of percutaneous kyphoplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with or without intravertebral cleft. Int Orthop. 2019;43:359–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4007-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bae JS, Park JH, Kim KJ, Kim HS, Jang IT. Analysis of risk factors for secondary new vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li YA, Lin CL, Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH, Lai SC. Subsequent vertebral fracture after vertebroplasty: incidence and analysis of risk factors. Spine. 2012;37:179–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f72b05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin WC, Cheng TT, Lee YC, Wang TN, Cheng YF, Lui CC, Yu CY. New vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: retrospective analysis of risk factors. J Vasc Intervent Radiol: JVIR. 2008;19:225–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ji C, Rong Y, Wang J, Yu S, Yin G, Fan J, Tang P, Jiang D, Liu W, Gong F, Ge X, Cai W. Risk factors for refracture following primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician. 2021;24:E335-e340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng YY, Yang TC, Tu PH, Lo YL, Yang ST. Repeated and multiple new vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty. Spine. 2009;34:1917–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac8f07.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB, Licata A, Benhamou L, Geusens P, Flowers K, Stracke H, Seeman E. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285:320–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.3.320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:721–39. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee WS, Sung KH, Jeong HT, Sung YS, Hyun YI, Choi JY, Lee KS, Ok CS, Choi YW. Risk factors of developing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patients. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1777–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0151-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine. 2006;31:1983–2001. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000229254.89952.6b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun HB, Jing XS, Liu YZ, Qi M, Wang XK, Hai Y. The optimal volume fraction in percutaneous vertebroplasty evaluated by pain relief, cement dispersion, and cement leakage: a prospective cohort study of 130 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the thoracolumbar vertebra. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e677–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward SR, Kim CW, Eng CM, Gottschalk LJt, Tomiya A, Garfin SR, Lieber RL. Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 2009;91:176-185. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01311.

  23. Kim JY, Chae SU, Kim GD, Cha MS. Changes of paraspinal muscles in postmenopausal osteoporotic spinal compression fractures: magnetic resonance imaging study. J Bone Metabol. 2013;20:75–81. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2013.20.2.75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katsu M, Ohba T, Ebata S, Haro H. Comparative study of the paraspinal muscles after OVF between the insufficient union and sufficient union using MRI. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2064-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lamartina C, Berjano P. Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1177–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3227-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo PJ, Tang YC, Zhou TP, Guo HZ, Guo DQ, Mo GY, Ma YH, Liu PJ, Zhang SC, Liang D. Risk factor analysis of the incidence of subsequent adjacent vertebral fracture after lumbar spinal fusion surgery with instrumentation. World Neurosurg. 2020;135:e87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen C, Fan P, Xie X, Wang Y. Risk factors for cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures in kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33:E251-e255. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenge Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards and approved by our Institutional Review Board, as it was a retrospective study using anonymized data, so the requirement for informed consent and formal ethics approval was waived. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Yao, Z., Wu, C. et al. Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1623–1630 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04009-5

Keywords

Navigation