Abstract
Despite increased attention to the aquaculture environment, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the significance of water quality. To address this knowledge gap, this study utilized high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA to examine microbial communities (bacteria and eukaryotes) in coastal water over different months through long-term observations. The goal was to explore interaction patterns in the microbial community and identify potential pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms. The results revealed significant differences in composition, diversity, and richness of bacterial and eukaryotic operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across various months. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) demonstrated distinct temporal variations in bacterial and eukaryotic communities, with significant differences (P = 0.001) among four groups: F (January-April), M (May), S (June–September), and T (October-December). Moreover, a strong association was observed between microbial communities and months, with most OTUs showing a distinct temporal preference. The Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05) indicated significant differences in dominant bacterial and eukaryotic taxa among months, with each group exhibiting unique dominant taxa, including potential pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms. These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring changes in potentially harmful microorganisms in aquaculture. Network analysis highlighted positive correlations between bacteria and eukaryotes, with bacteria playing a key role in network interactions. The key bacterial genera associated with other microorganisms varied significantly (P < 0.05) across different groups. In summary, this study deepens the understanding of aquaculture water quality and offers valuable insights for maintaining healthy aquaculture practices.
Key points
• Bacterial and eukaryotic communities displayed distinct temporal variations.
• Different months exhibited unique potential pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms.
• Bacteria are key taxonomic taxa involved in microbial network interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Large-scale aquaculture has emerged as the predominant approach for offshore fish production, while pond and reclamation culture remain the dominant modes of aquaculture, relying on the importation of seawater from offshore sources. The quality of the water, encompassing its biological composition and physicochemical properties, plays a critical role in ensuring the health and sustainability of aquaculture operations. In recent years, frequent environmental calamities have significantly impacted the aquaculture industry, underscoring the importance of maintaining high-quality water in aquaculture.
Microorganisms play an important role in aquaculture, as they play a pivotal role not only in material circulation and energy flow but also in maintaining the stability of the culture environment (Moriarty 1997; Zorriehzahra et al. 2016). Bacteria, in particular, exert a distinctive influence on the intestinal development, nutrition, immune response, and disease resistance of host animals (Balcázar et al. 2006). However, pathogenic bacteria may also reside in the intestinal tract of animals, and their proliferation may disturb the balance of intestinal microbiota, thus leading to compromised host immunity or damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier (Round and Mazmanian 2009). In severe cases, such an imbalance can cause animal diseases and fatalities, which cause substantial losses for aquaculture. Meanwhile, red tides caused by planktonic eukaryotes in the water supply may also impose severe impact on aquaculture (Sun et al. 2020b). Presently, red tide constitutes one of the most common marine calamities and poses a grave threat to aquaculture activities. Certain red tide species may secrete toxins or decompose into toxic substances, thereby altering the community structure of the marine ecosystem and harming the ecological environment of mariculture and fisheries (Fleming et al. 2011; Matsuyama and Shumway 2009). Hence, it is of great importance to investigate the microbial composition of the aquaculture environment, particularly for preventing the outbreak of pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms.
To date, the significance of water quality remains insufficiently understood, with the composition of microorganisms and pathogens in water sources often overlooked during practical production. Addressing this issue, the present study aims to investigate a seawater reclamation area by conducting long-term observations of microbial communities in nearshore water (i.e., aquaculture water source). The study aims to analyze temporal variations in bacterial and eukaryotic community compositions, the characteristics of potentially pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms, and the interaction patterns and key taxa among microbes in different months. The study's outcomes will serve as a scientific reference for aquaculture health.
Materials and methods
Study area and sample collection
Water samples were collected from an aquaculture zone in Putian city, China, during different months: May to December 2019, January to December 2021, and January to May 2022. All culture ponds in this area shared the same seawater source, entering the system through an inlet (Sun et al. 2019). The samples were taken in the nearshore water area close to the culture zone, at a depth of 0.5 m, using a plexiglass water sampler. Specifically, 1000 ml of water samples underwent filtration with polycarbonate membranes featuring a pore size of 0.2 μm (EMD Millipore, USA). The filtration membranes were then placed in 1.5 ml sterile centrifuge tubes and stored in liquid nitrogen. Samples DNA extraction was performed using the PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio, United States). The extraction process adhered to the DNA extraction protocol, conducted under sterile conditions to prevent contamination.
Illumina MiSeq Sequencing of bacteria and eukaryote
DNA from the above samples underwent amplification using specific primers: 515F (5’–GTG CCA GCM GCC GCGGTA A–3’) and 806R (5’–GGA CTA CHV GGG TWTCTA AT–3’) (Caporaso et al. 2011) for the 16S rRNA gene. For eukaryotes, the amplification of 18S rRNA was conducted with the specific V9 primers 1380F (5’-CCCTGCCHTTTGTACACAC-3’) and 1510R (5’-CCTTCYGCAGGTTCACCTAC-3’) (Amaral-Zettler et al. 2009). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) used 15 µL of Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs). PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C (for bacteria) and 57 °C (for eukaryotes) for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. After purifying the PCR products, library preparation was carried out using the TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA). These libraries were then loaded onto an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 Sequencer (Illumina, USA) to generate the sequences.
Sequences data analysis
Paired-end reads obtained from Illumina sequencing underwent removal of barcodes and primers before assembly using FLASH (version 1.2.11). The resulting reads were filtered to remove low-quality reads and chimeric sequences using Chimera Check. High-quality reads were then clustered into OTUs with a sequence similarity of 97% using VSEARCH (version 1.9.6). Representative sequences of the OTUs were classified using the Ribosomal Database Program (RDP) classifier (version 2.2) with a confidence threshold of 0.8, based on the SILVA Database (version 132). The representative sequence was assigned by performing a BLAST search against the Silva_123 16S rRNA database and the V9_PR2 18S rRNA database. Based on taxonomic information derived from species annotations, potential pathogenic bacteria and red tide species associated with aquaculture were identified.
In this study, the R project (version 3.3.1) was used to perform PCoA with unweighted unifrac distances. The resulting data were analyzed to identify significant differences in bacterial and eukaryotic communities between groups, using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Network visualizations depicting bacterial and eukaryotic interactions were generated using Cytoscape software (version 3.7.0). Bacterial genera with Spearman coefficient absolute values ≥ 0.7 and correction P values ≤ 0.05 were selected. Each node represents a genus, and its color represents a phylum. Edges color indicate significant correlations (negative and positive) between nodes.
Results
16S rRNA sequencing data analysis
In this study, a total of 4,400,314 sequences and 23,658 OTUs were extracted from all samples. PCoA and cluster analysis, depicted in Fig. 1a and b, revealed significant differences (ANOSIM, P = 0.001) in bacterial communities among the samples. Based on substantial variations in β diversity, the samples were classified into four distinct groups denoted as F (January-April), M (May), S (June–September), and T (October-December). Furthermore, the F (January-April) and M (May) groups exhibited marked distinctions from the S (June–September) and T (October-December) groups.
Diversity and richness assessments (Fig. 1c and d) revealed notable differences in bacterial diversity of F, M, and S groups, as indicated by the Shannon index, with group F exhibiting the highest value and group S the lowest. Moreover, the Chao index indicated significant richness differences among F, M, S, and T groups, with the highest richness observed in group F and the lowest in group M. The UpSet Venn diagram analysis in Fig. 1e revealed that 4,907 OTUs (21.7%) were common to all four groups. In contrast, 2,309 OTUs (10.2%) were exclusively observed in group F, 927 OTUs (4.1%) were specific to group M, 2,223 OTUs (9.8%) were unique to group S, and 3,706 OTUs (16.4%) were identified solely in group T.
Bacterial community composition and potential pathogenic bacteria
The investigation involved a comparison of bacterial taxa abundance among different groups, based on taxonomic information. Analysis of the bacterial taxa present in the water revealed a higher abundance of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes (Fig. 2a). Kruskal–Wallis H test (P < 0.05, Fig. 2b) revealed that the F group had a significantly higher abundance of Proteobacteria (61.5%) and Desulfobacterota (2.4%) compared to the other groups. On the other hand, the M group had significantly higher levels of Firmicutes (7.4%), Chloroflexi (4.2%), and Acidobacteriota (1.7%) compared to other groups. The S group, however, was found to have a higher abundance of Actinobacteriota (12.5%) and Cyanobacteria (10.4%).
The results demonstrated that there were noteworthy dissimilarities (P < 0.05) in the dominant genera between the samples (Fig. 2c and d). Specifically, the dominant genera observed in the water samples were HIMB11, Candidatus Actinomarina, SAR11 clade Ia, OM43 clade, NS5 marine group, Lentibacter, and Vibrio. Wallis H test (p < 0.05) determined that Lentibacter (3.3%), Vibrio (2.90%), and Planktomarina (2.4%) exhibited considerably greater prevalence in the F group relative to the other groups. In contrast, the M group exhibited significantly higher abundance of Trichococcus (2.2%), Marivita (2.0%), and Salinisphaera (2.2%) than the other groups. The S group was characterized by a high abundance of HIMB11 (7.6%), NS5 marine group (2.8%), Candidatus Actinomarina (6.8%), and Cyanobium (2.9%). Furthermore, bacterial genera such as SAR11 clade Ia (5.7%), OM43 clade (5.3%), Pseudoalteromonas (2.2%), Candidatus Nitrosopumilus (2.1%), and Bacteroides (2.0%) exhibited significantly higher abundance in the T group when compared to the other groups.
Figure 2e illustrated the significant temporal variations (P < 0.05) in the abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria. The abundance of Vibrio crassostreae was significantly higher in the F group compared to the other groups. In the M group, high abundance of Ralstonia pickettii was observed. Moreover, the abundance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was significantly higher in the S group compared to the other groups. In addition, the T group was characterized by a high abundance of Escherichia coli and Vibrio crassostreae.
18S rRNA sequencing data analysis
In this study, a total of 4,488,534 sequences and 14,562 OTUs were extracted from all the samples. PCoA (Fig. 3a) revealed significant differences (ANOSIM, P = 0.001) in the eukaryotic communities among the samples at the OTU level. These samples were also categorized into four groups based on significant differences in β diversity, denoted as F (January-April), M (May), S (June–September), and T (October-December). Additionally, similar to the bacterial community, the eukaryotic community of groups F (January-April) and M (May) were significantly different from those of groups S (June–September) and T (October-December). Diversity analysis revealed that there were significant differences (P < 0.01) of eukaryotic OTUs in the Shannon index between groups S and T, with group T showing a higher Shannon index than group S (Fig. 3b). Additionally, Ace index demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.05) in eukaryotic OTUs among groups F, M, and S, with group F displaying the highest richness and group M showing the lowest richness (Fig. 3c). Further analysis using the UpSet Veen diagram (Fig. 3d) indicated that 2,785 (20.6%) of the OTUs were common among the four groups, while 3,349 (24.8%), 645 (4.8%), 1,091 (8.1%), and 1,068 (7.9%) of OTUs were unique to groups F, M, S, and T, respectively.
Eukaryotic community composition and potential red tide organisms
According to taxonomic information, the eukaryote present in the aquatic environment exhibited a greater abundance of Bacillariophyta, Spirotrichea, Cryptophyceae, Mamiellophyceae, Syndiniales, Dinophyceae, and MAST (Fig. 4a). The Kruskal–Wallis H test revealed that Cryptophyceae (10.6%), Katablepharidaceae (2.2%), Euglenozoa (2.2%), and Litostomatea (2.1%) had higher abundance in F group, which showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05, Fig. 4b) with other groups. Furthermore, Spirotrichea (18.2%), Mamiellophyceae (6.4%), and Filosa-Thecofilosea (2.7%) exhibited a significantly higher abundance in group M compared to the other groups. Group S was characterized by a high abundance of Syndiniales (9.9%) and Dinophyceae (6.4%), whereas group T was distinguished by a higher abundance of Bacillariophyta (25.0%) and MAST (6.3%).
The results displayed notable dissimilarities (P < 0.05) of dominant genera among the samples (Fig. 4c and d). The principal genera identified in the water samples were Strombidium, Teleaulax, Skeletonema, Thalassiosira, Dino-Group-II-Clade-6, Cyclotella, Ostreococcus, and Micromonas. The Wallis H test (P < 0.05) revealed that Teleaulax (6.7%), Ostreococcus (3.7%), Eutreptiella (1.8%), and Katablepharidales (1.8%) exhibited considerably higher abundance in group F in comparison to other groups. Strombidium (5.6%), Spirotontonia (3.4%), and Minutocellus (1.7%) were notably more abundant in group M than other groups. Additionally, group S was characterized by a high abundance of Dino-Group-II-Clade-6_X (4.8%), Thalassiosira (3.3%), Chaetoceros (3.2%), Parastrombidinopsis (2.9%), Dino-Group-II-Clade-14_X (2.7%), and Pelagostrobilidium (1.7%). Eukaryotic genera, including Strombidinopsis (5.0%), Micromonas (2.85%), Cyclotella (2.6%), Bathycoccus (1.5%), and Picomonas (1.2%), exhibited considerably high abundance in group T.
The results presented in Fig. 4e indicate significant temporal variations (P < 0.05) in the abundance of certain red tide species. Myrionecta rubra exhibited significantly higher abundance in group F compared to other groups, while Noctiluca scintillans and Myrionecta rubra were distinguished by its high abundance in group M. Furthermore, the abundance of Noctiluca scintillans, Neoceratium furca, and Scrippsiella trochoidea were significantly greater in group S than in the other three groups. In contrast, group T was characterized by a high abundance of Prorocentrum minimum and Akashiwo sanguinea.
Network analysis of bacteria and eukaryote
The network diagram in Fig. 5 illustrated intricate interactions between eukaryotic and bacterial communities. Through statistical analysis (P < 0.05), the network diagram revealed notable findings in four distinct groups. In group F, there were 56 negative correlations and 190 positive correlations; group M displayed 11 negative correlations and 228 positive correlations; group S showed 73 negative correlations and 335 positive correlations, while group T displayed 109 negative correlations and 182 positive correlations. These observations provided insight into the complex relationships between eukaryotes and bacterial communities.
The key genera that were closely associated with other microorganisms exhibit significant temporal variations and dependent on the group under consideration. Bacteria were the predominant microorganisms in these associations. In group F (Fig. 5a), the top genera most frequently linked with other microorganisms included Sva0996 marine group, unclassified Rhodocyclaceae, Glaciecola, norank Desulfobulbaceae, Cyanobium, NS3a marine group, no rank Ilumatobacteraceae, and Yoonia-Loktanella. In group M (Fig. 5b), the key genera were most closely associated with other microorganisms comprised Paracoccus, Fastidiosipila, Limnobacter, no rank Aminicenantales, Trichococcus, Hyphomicrobium, Syntrophomonas, and Smithella. In group S (Fig. 5c), the top genera that were most frequently linked with other microorganisms included Lactobacillus, Tropicimonas, hgcI clade, Ostreococcus, Hyphomicrobium, Dino-Group-I-Clade-4_X, Dino-Group-II-Clade-14_X, and Bacteroides. Finally, in group T (Fig. 5d), the key genera most commonly associated with other microorganisms were Synechococcus, Candidatus Puniceispirillum, OM43 clade, Porticoccus, Litoricola, Luminiphilus, Tropicimonas, SAR86 clade, and MAST.
Discussion
Temporal patterns of bacterial and eukaryotic communities
The study's findings indicate that both bacteria and eukaryotes display similar temporal variation patterns, which manifested through changes in α diversity, OTU abundance, and β diversity. Notably, the shifts in microbial communities were not continuous, as evidenced by the separation of communities along the first PCoA axis between the periods of January-May and June-December (Figs. 1a and 3a). Previous investigations have consistently reported temporal shifts in marine microbial communities, attributing these changes to environmental factors (Bunse and Pinhassi 2017; Fuhrman et al. 2015; Gilbert et al. 2012).
According to the network analysis presented in Fig. 5, bacteria play a crucial role in the succession of microbial communities regardless of the month. This implies that, among the major interacting groups, bacteria demonstrate the highest levels of activity and responsiveness compared to eukaryotes. However, the specific bacterial genera exhibiting strong associations with each other undergo significant changes in response to months, indicating their sensitivity to environmental factors. Importantly, alterations in the taxa and abundance of key microorganisms can potentially trigger community-wide changes through complex interactions. These observations are consistent with previous studies (Hunt and Ward 2015; Needham and Fuhrman 2016).
Temporal variation of dominant bacteria and potential pathogens and their impact on aquaculture
The study reveals notable temporal variations in the structure of bacterial communities. Each group exhibit unique compositions of dominant bacterial genera and potential pathogens, reflecting the impact of environmental changes.
The dominant bacterial populations identified from January to April include Vibrio, Lentibacter, and Planktomarina. Vibrio crassostreae stands out as a potential dominant pathogenic bacterium. Vibrio, a prevalent group of marine bacteria, showcases metabolic flexibility and plays important roles in utilizing various carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus substrates (Eiler et al. 2007). Lentibacter, observed to exhibit a high level of protein expression in the absorption and metabolism of nitrogenous dissolved organic matter (DOM) metabolites, dominate during the winter season (Han et al. 2021). Planktomarina has the ability to generate supplemental metabolic energy through anaerobic photosynthesis and CO dehydrogenase utilization (Giebel et al. 2019). The months of January to April are relatively cold, and the survival strategies of these bacteria are tailored to their development and nutrient utilization under oligotrophic conditions. As the most prevalent potential pathogenic bacterium, Vibrio has often been detected in the aquaculture environment and in the intestines of healthy and diseased animals (Sun et al. 2020a, 2022; Sun and Xu 2021). Pathogenic Vibrio can lead to significant mortality of cultural animals, causing major losses in revenue. Vibrio crassostreae, part of the Splendidus clade, stands out as one of the primary bacterial pathogens affecting marine bivalves (Le Roux et al. 2016; Travers et al. 2015). It has the potential to cause successive mass mortality in juvenile oysters (Petton et al. 2015). This finding holds crucial implications for disease prevention in the investigated area, which is a significant oyster production region.
May stand out as a distinctive month, marking the transition between seasons and exhibiting a bacterial composition significantly different from other months. The prominent bacterial genera included unclassified_f__Rhodobacteraceae, Salinisphaera, Trichococcus, and Marivita, with Ralstonia pickettii, a potential pathogen, showing the highest abundance. These bacteria are closely related to algae in marine and aquaculture environment. The Rhodobacteraceae family is known for its diverse metabolic activities, encompassing aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis, sulfur oxidation, carbon monoxide oxidation, and DMSP demethylation (Brinkhoff et al. 2008). This family likely played a crucial role in maintaining the health of the culture system (Lin et al. 2017). Marivita, frequently observed in high abundance in aquaculture environments (Sun et al. 2020b, 2021, 2019), may contribute to nitrogen transformation and removal. Ralstonia pickettii has been identified as a potential pathogen affecting hybrid striped bass (Fowler et al. 2021). Moreover, it is a significant human pathogen associated with infections such as osteomyelitis and meningitis, potentially posing a threat to seafood safety (Ryan and Adley 2014).
The predominant bacteria genera observed from June to September were HIMB11, NS5_marine_group, Candidatus Actinomarina, OM60, and Cyanobium_PCC-6307. Notably, Vibrio parahaemolyticus was the pathogenic bacteria with the highest abundance during this period. The composition of these dominant bacteria mirrors the characteristics of intense sunlight and high temperatures typical of summer. The elevated contribution of members such as HIMB11 and OM60 in warmer months could be attributed to their utilization of alternative energy supply pathways, such as bacterial chlorophylls and protein rhodopsins (Durham et al. 2014; Spring and Riedel 2013). The discovery of a novel rhodopsin in Candidatus Actinomarina suggests a photoheterotrophic lifestyle, which could significantly impact carbon cycling (Ghai et al. 2013). The NS5 marine group encodes a variety of degraded CAZymes, indicating their capacity to degrade high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (DOM) (Bennke et al. 2016; Priest et al. 2022). The presence of these bacteria plays a crucial role in carbon cycling. Cyanobium_PCC-6307 is abundant in June–September, while other months are very low abundance. Cyanobium_PCC-6307 is sensitive to increased temperature and sufficient light, potentially leading to cyanobacterial blooms. Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a Gram-negative bacterium found in marine and estuarine environments worldwide. Food poisoning caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus typically occurs in summer (June–October) and is positively correlated with water temperature, primarily related to various types of seafood including crabs, shrimps, shellfishes, lobsters, fish, and oysters (Wang et al. 2015).
During the 10–12-month observation period, the predominant bacterial genera included HIMB11, SAR11 clade Ia, OM43 clade, Candidatus_Nitrosopumilus, and AEGEAN-169_marine_group. Noteworthy findings identified Escherichia coli and Vibrio crassostreae as potential pathogens due to their elevated abundance. The SAR11 clade exhibits optimized nutrient uptake even under extremely low nutrient concentrations (Eiler et al. 2009). The OM43 clade of Betaproteobacteria, crucial in C1 metabolism and carbon cycling (Jimenez-Infante et al. 2016; Morris et al. 2006), is ubiquitously present in marine environments. Escherichia coli, recognized as common Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens in both human and animal gut environments (Mariani et al. 2021), serves as an indicator of water pollution. Pathogenic Escherichia coli can induce diseases in various aquatic animals, leading to significant economic losses in the aquaculture industry. Furthermore, the abundance of Vibrio crassostreae remained higher over the 10–12-month period, consistent with observations from 1 to 4 months. This suggests that cooler periods of the year contribute to an increase in the abundance of this bacteria.
Characteristics of temporal changes in red tide species
As with bacterial communities, eukaryotic communities also have significant temporal characteristics, especially red tide species exhibit month-specific patterns. Although phytoplankton plays a crucial role in marine ecosystems due to its involvement in the material cycle (Arrigo 2004), certain groups of phytoplankton can generate harmful algal blooms (HABs), which can negatively impact both marine ecosystems and human health (Anderson et al. 2002). Compared to other periods, the species Myrionecta rubra exhibited the highest abundance in aquatic environments during the months of January through April. The predominant species, Mesodinium rubrum, is responsible for blooms across numerous coastal ecosystems (Sanders 1995). Despite M. rubrum being recognized as a nontoxic species, its blooms can pose potential risks to aquaculture industries (Hayes et al. 1989).
The dominant red tide species were Myrionecta rubra and Noctiluca scintillans in May, and the dominant red tide species were Noctiluca scintillans in June to September. Noctiluca scintillans influences phytoplankton composition through voracious feeding, particularly on diatoms (Crawford et al. 1997). The excretion of ammonia by Noctiluca scintillans during grazing, particularly the release of intracellular high ammonia concentrations following cell death, may lead to fish mortality and toxicity in other organisms. The widespread negative effects of Noctiluca scintillans and their bloom have made their ecophysiology a prominent area of research (Baliarsingh et al. 2016). The dominant red tide species in 10–12 months were Prorocentrum minimum and Akashiwo sanguinea. Prorocentrum minimum, a common dinoflagellate known for its blooms in coastal environments, is capable of causing harm to humans through shellfish poisoning. The adverse impacts associated with blooms can range from fish to shellfish mortality in aquaculture and may be attributed to indirect biomass effects (e.g., low dissolved oxygen) as well as toxic effects (Heil et al. 2005). Akashiwo sanguinea, a frequent bloom-forming species worldwide (Du et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2012), has been shown to be associated with mortality in laboratory-based abalone larvae (Botes et al. 2003). Changes in estuarine fish communities have also been observed during red tide proliferation of Akashiwo sanguinea, with significant declines in fish density, abundance, and biomass (Amorim Reis-Filho et al. 2012).
In conclusion, the present study examined the changes in the microbial community in the coastal water during distinct months. Furthermore, this study analyzed in detail the interaction patterns between microorganisms, and the potential impact of pathogenic bacteria and red tide organisms on aquaculture. This study significantly advances our knowledge of the microbial ecology in coastal water, enriched our understanding of water safety in aquaculture, thereby offering a valuable reference for the promotion of healthy aquaculture.
Data availability
The data presented in this study were upload to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive Database under the BioProject number PRJNA985906.
References
Amaral-Zettler LA, McCliment EA, Ducklow HW, Huse SM (2009) A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006372
Amorim Reis-Filho J, da Silva EM, de Anchieta Cintra da Costa Nunes J, Barros F (2012) Effects of a red tide on the structure of estuarine fish assemblages in northeastern Brazil. Intl Rev Hydrobiol 97(5):389-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201101457
Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2002) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25(4):704–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804901
Arrigo KR (2004) Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437:349–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04159
Balcázar JL, Blas Id, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL (2006) The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol 114(3):173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009
Baliarsingh SK, Lotliker AA, Trainer VL, Wells ML, Parida C, Sahu BK, Srichandan S, Sahoo S, Sahu KC, Kumar TS (2016) Environmental dynamics of red Noctiluca scintillans bloom in tropical coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 111(1):277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.103
Bennke CM, Krüger K, Kappelmann L, Huang S, Gobet A, Schüler M, Barbe V, Fuchs BM, Michel G, Teeling H, Amann RI (2016) Polysaccharide utilisation loci of Bacteroidetes from two contrasting open ocean sites in the North Atlantic. Environ Microbiol 18(12):4456–4470. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13429
Botes L, Smit AJ, Cook PA (2003) The potential threat of algal blooms to the abalone (Haliotis midae) mariculture industry situated around the South African coast. Harmful Algae 2(4):247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-9883(03)00044-1
Brinkhoff T, Giebel HA, Simon M (2008) Diversity, ecology, and genomics of the Roseobacter clade: a short overview. Arch Microbiol 189(6):531–539
Bunse C, Pinhassi J (2017) Marine bacterioplankton seasonal succession dynamics. Trends Microbiol 25(6):494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.013
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. P Natl Acad Sci 108(supplement_1):4516–4522. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000080107
Crawford DW, Purdie DA, Lockwood APM, Weissman P (1997) Recurrent red-tides in the Southampton Water Estuary caused by the phototrophic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 45(6):799–812. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0242
Du X, Peterson W, McCulloch A, Liu G (2011) An unusual bloom of the dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea off the central Oregon, USA, coast in autumn 2009. Harmful Algae 10(6):784–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.06.011
Durham BP, Grote J, Whittaker KA, Bender SJ, Luo H, Grim SL, Brown JM, Casey JR, Dron A, Florez-Leiva L, Krupke A, Luria CM, Mine AH, Nigro OD, Pather S, Talarmin A, Wear EK, Weber TS, Wilson JM, Church MJ, DeLong EF, Karl DM, Steward GF, Eppley JM, Kyrpides NC, Schuster S, Rappé MS (2014) Draft genome sequence of marine alphaproteobacterial strain HIMB11, the first cultivated representative of a unique lineage within the Roseobacter clade possessing an unusually small genome. Stand Genomic Sci 9(3):632–645. https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4998989
Eiler A, Gonzalez-Rey C, Allen S, Bertilsson S (2007) Growth response of Vibrio cholerae and other Vibrio spp. to cyanobacterial dissolved organic matter and temperature in brackish water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60(3):411–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00303.x
Eiler A, Hayakawa DH, Church MJ, Karl DM, Rappé MS (2009) Dynamics of the SAR11 bacterioplankton lineage in relation to environmental conditions in the oligotrophic North Pacific subtropical gyre. Environ Microbiol 11(9):2291–2300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01954.x
Fleming LE, Kirkpatrick B, Backer LC, Walsh CJ, Nierenberg K, Clark J, Reich A, Hollenbeck J, Benson J, Cheng YS (2011) Review of Florida red tide and human health effects. Harmful Algae 10(2):224–233
Fowler EC, Poudel P, White B, St-Pierre B, Brown M (2021) Effects of a bioprocessed soybean meal ingredient on the intestinal microbiota of hybrid striped bass. Morone Chrysops x m Saxatilis Microorganisms 9(5):1032
Fuhrman JA, Cram JA, Needham DM (2015) Marine microbial community dynamics and their ecological interpretation. Nat Rev Microbiol 13(3):133–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3417
Ghai R, Mizuno CM, Picazo A, Camacho A, Rodriguez-Valera F (2013) Metagenomics uncovers a new group of low GC and ultra-small marine Actinobacteria. Sci Rep 3(1):2471. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02471
Giebel H-A, Wolterink M, Brinkhoff T, Simon M (2019) Complementary energy acquisition via aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis and carbon monoxide oxidation by Planktomarina temperata of the Roseobacter group. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95(5):fiz050. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz050
Gilbert JA, Steele JA, Caporaso JG, Steinbrück L, Reeder J, Temperton B, Huse S, McHardy AC, Knight R, Joint I, Somerfield P, Fuhrman JA, Field D (2012) Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J 6(2):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.107
Han Y, Jiao N, Zhang Y, Zhang F, He C, Liang X, Cai R, Shi Q, Tang K (2021) Opportunistic bacteria with reduced genomes are effective competitors for organic nitrogen compounds in coastal dinoflagellate blooms. Microbiome 9(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01022-z
Hayes GC, Purdie DA, Williams JA (1989) The distribution of ichthyoplankton in Southampton Water in response to low oxygen levels produced by a Mesodinium rubrum bloom. J Fish Biol 34(5):811–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03363.x
Heil CA, Glibert PM, Fan C (2005) Prorocentrum minimum (Pavillard) Schiller: A review of a harmful algal bloom species of growing worldwide importance. Harmful Algae 4(3):449–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2004.08.003
Hunt DE, Ward CS (2015) A network-based approach to disturbance transmission through microbial interactions. Front Microbiol 6:1182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01182
Jimenez-Infante F, Ngugi DK, Vinu M, Alam I, Kamau AA, Blom J, Bajic VB, Stingl U (2016) Comprehensive genomic analyses of the OM43 clade, Including a novel species from the Red Sea, indicate ecotype differentiation among marine methylotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(4):1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02852-15
Le Roux F, Wegner KM, Polz MF (2016) Oysters and Vibrios as a model for disease dynamics in wild animals. Trends Microbiol 24(7):568–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.03.006
Lin G, Sun F, Wang C, Zhang L, Zhang X (2017) Assessment of the effect of Enteromorpha prolifera on bacterial community structures in aquaculture environment. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0179792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179792
Mariani M, Medici C, Ugolotti E, Losurdo G, Mesini A, Castagnola E (2021) Colonization by Escherichia coli strains with increased minimal inhibitory concentration for cefiderocol: When resistance anticipates drug use. J Infect Public Health 14(6):749–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.03.002
Matsuyama Y, Shumway S (2009) Impacts of harmful algal blooms on shellfisheries aquaculture. In: Burnell G, Allen G (eds) New technologies in aquaculture: improving production efficiency, quality and environmental management. Woodhead Publishing, pp 580–609
Moriarty DJ (1997) The role of microorganisms in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture 151(1):333–349
Morris RM, Longnecker K, Giovannoni SJ (2006) Pirellula and OM43 are among the dominant lineages identified in an Oregon coast diatom bloom. Environ Microbiol 8(8):1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01029.x
Needham DM, Fuhrman JA (2016) Pronounced daily succession of phytoplankton, archaea and bacteria following a spring bloom. Nat Microbiol 1(4) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.5
Petton B, Bruto M, James A, Labreuche Y, Alunno-Bruscia M, Le Roux F (2015) Crassostrea gigas mortality in France: the usual suspect, a herpes virus, may not be the killer in this polymicrobial opportunistic disease. Front Microbiol 6:686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00686
Priest T, Heins A, Harder J, Amann R, Fuchs BM (2022) Niche partitioning of the ubiquitous and ecologically relevant NS5 marine group. ISME J 16(6):1570–1582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01209-8
Round JL, Mazmanian SK (2009) The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9(5):313–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2515
Ryan MP, Adley CC (2014) Ralstonia spp.: emerging global opportunistic pathogens. E J Clin Microbiol 33(3):291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1975-9
Sanders RW (1995) Seasonal distributions of the photosynthesizing ciliates Laboeastrobila and Myrionecta rubra (= Mesodinium rubrum) in an estuary of the Gulf of Maine. Aquat Microbial Ecol 09(3):237–242
Spring S, Riedel T (2013) Mixotrophic growth of bacteriochlorophyll a-containing members of the OM60/NOR5 clade of marine gammaproteobacteria is carbon-starvation independent and correlates with the type of carbon source and oxygen availability. BMC Microbiol 13(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-117
Sun F, Xu Z (2021) Significant differences in intestinal microbial communities in aquatic animals from an aquaculture area. J Mar Sci Eng 9(2):104
Sun F, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhang L, Tu K, Zheng Z (2019) Insights into the intestinal microbiota of several aquatic organisms and association with the surrounding environment. Aquaculture 507:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.04.026
Sun F, Wang C, Chen L, Weng G, Zheng Z (2020a) The intestinal bacterial community of healthy and diseased animals and its association with the aquaculture environment. Appl Microbiol Biot 104(2):775–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10236-z
Sun F, Wang C, Wang Y, Tu K, Zheng Z, Lin X (2020b) Diatom red tide significantly drive the changes of microbiome in mariculture ecosystem. Aquaculture 520:734742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734742
Sun F, Wang C, Yang H (2021) Physicochemical factors drive bacterial communities in an aquaculture environment. Front Environ Sci 9:709541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.709541
Sun F, Wang C, Chen X (2022) Bacterial community in Sinonovacula constricta intestine and its relationship with culture environment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106(13):5211–5220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12048-0
Travers M-A, Boettcher Miller K, Roque A, Friedman CS (2015) Bacterial diseases in marine bivalves. J Invertebr Pathol 131:11–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.010
Wang R, Zhong Y, Gu X, Yuan J, Saeed AF, Wang S (2015) The pathogenesis, detection, and prevention of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front Microbiol 6:144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00144
Yang C, Li Y, Zhou Y, Zheng W, Tian Y, Zheng T (2012) Bacterial community dynamics during a bloom caused by Akashiwo sanguinea in the Xiamen sea area, China. Harmful Algae 20:132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2012.09.002
Zorriehzahra MJ, Delshad ST, Adel M, Tiwari R, Karthik K, Dhama K, Lazado CC (2016) Probiotics as beneficial microbes in aquaculture: an update on their multiple modes of action: a review. Vet Quart 36(4):228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2016.1172132
Funding
The research was supported by the Hainan Provincial Joint Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (2021CXLH0011), the Key Research and Development Program of Hainan Province (ZDYF2021XDNY131), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2023A1515012004 and 2024A1515011203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FS performed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. FS, ZX and CW designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. FS, CW, XS, HC, ZW, ZOY and XF performed investigation, experiments and analyzed data. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or vertebrate animals performed by any of the authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, F., Wang, C., Xu, Z. et al. Temporal variations of bacterial and eukaryotic community in coastal waters—implications for aquaculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108, 388 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13176-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13176-5