Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fungal Assemblages Associated with Roots of Halophytic and Non-halophytic Plant Species Vary Differentially Along a Salinity Gradient

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structure of fungal communities is known to be influenced by host plants and environmental conditions. However, in most cases, the dynamics of these variation patterns are poorly understood. In this work, we compared richness, diversity, and composition between assemblages of endophytic and rhizospheric fungi associated to roots of two plants with different lifestyles: the halophyte Inula crithmoides and the non-halophyte I. viscosa (syn. Dittrichia viscosa L.), along a spatially short salinity gradient. Roots and rhizospheric soil from these plants were collected at three points between a salt marsh and a sand dune, and fungi were isolated and characterized by ITS rDNA sequencing. Isolates were classified in a total of 90 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), belonging to 17 fungal orders within Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Species composition of endophytic and soil communities significantly differed across samples. Endophyte communities of I. crithmoides and I. viscosa were only similar in the intermediate zone between the salt marsh and the dune, and while the latter displayed a single, generalist association of endophytes, I. crithmoides harbored different assemblages along the gradient, adapted to the specific soil conditions. In the lower salt marsh, root assemblages were strongly dominated by a single dark septate sterile fungus, also prevalent in other neighboring salt marshes. Interestingly, although its occurrence was positively correlated to soil salinity, in vitro assays revealed a strong inhibition of its growth by salts. Our results suggest that host lifestyle and soil characteristics have a strong effect on endophytic fungi and that environmental stress may entail tight plant–fungus relationships for adaptation to unfavorable conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clay K, Holah J (1999) Fungal endophyte symbiosis and plant diversity in successional fields. Science 285(5423):1742–1744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout RG, Rodriguez RJ, Henson JM (2002) Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science 298(5598):1581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Herre EA, Mejía LC, Kyllo DA, Rojas E, Maynard Z, Butler A, Van Bael SA (2007) Ecological implications of anti-pathogen effects of tropical fungal endophytes and mycorrhizae. Ecology 88(3):550–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez RJ, Redman RS (2008) More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can't make it on their own: plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. J Exp Bot 59(5):1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold AE, Mejía LC, Kyllo D, Rojas EI, Maynard Z, Robbins N, Herre EA (2003) Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(26):15649–15654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182(2):314–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clay K, Schardl C (2002) Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160(4):S99–S127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulz B, Boyle C (2005) The endophytic continuum. Mycol Res 109(6):661–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Sinsabaugh RL, Odenbach K, Lowrey T, Natvig DO (2008) Novel root fungal consortium associated with a dominant desert grass. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(9):2805–2813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roda JJ, Díaz G, Torres P (2008) Spatial distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of the salt marsh plant Inula crithmoides L. along a salinity gradient. Arid Land Res Manag 22(4):310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sieber TN (2002) Fungal root endophytes. In: Waisley Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 887–917

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mandyam K, Jumpponen A (2005) Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Stud Mycol 53(1):173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Baldauf SL, Leyval C, Straczek J, Young JPW (2002) Extensive fungal diversity in plant roots. Science 295(5562):2051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrow JR, Aaltonen RE (2001) Evaluation of the internal colonization of Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt roots by dark septate fungi and the influence of host physiological activity. Mycorrhiza 11(4):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curadi M, Graifenberg A, Magnani G, Giustiniani L (2005) Growth and element allocation in tissues of Inula viscosa in sodic-saline conditions: a candidate for programs of desertification control. Arid Land Res Manag 19(3):257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maciá-Vicente JG, Jansson H-B, Abdullah SK, Descals E, Salinas J, Lopez-Llorca LV (2008) Fungal root endophytes from natural vegetation in Mediterranean environments with special reference to Fusarium spp. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64(1):90–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Donnell K, Cigelnik E, Nirenberg HI (1998) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90(3):465–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2(2):113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16(6):276–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform 9(4):286–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arnold AE, Henk DA, Eells RL, Lutzoni F, Vilgalys R (2007) Diversity and phylogenetic affinities of foliar fungal endophytes in loblolly pine inferred by culturing and environmental PCR. Mycologia 99(2):185–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson RH, Bok G, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Hallenberg N (2009) A software pipeline for processing and identification of fungal ITS sequences. Source Code Biol Med 4(1). doi:10.1186/1751–0473–4–1

  26. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ (2006) Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples. Biometrics 62(2):361–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58(3):626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Griffiths RI, Whiteley AS, O'Donnell AG, Bailey MJ (2000) Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA-and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(12):5488–5491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Maciá-Vicente JG, Rosso LC, Ciancio A, Jansson H-B, Lopez-Llorca LV (2009) Colonisation of barley roots by endophytic Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia: effects on plant growth and disease. Ann Appl Biol 155(3):391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Edel V, Steinberg C, Gautheron N, Alabouvette C (1997) Populations of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum associated with roots of four plant species compared to soilborne populations. Phytopathology 87(7):693–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen Y, Wang W, Ben-Daniel BH, Ben-Daniel Y (2006) Extracts of Inula viscosa control downy mildew of grapes caused by Plasmopora viticola. Phytopathology 96(4):417–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao J, Li Y, Liu Q, Gao K (2010) Antimicrobial activities of some thymol derivatives from the roots of Inula hupehensis. Food Chem 120(2):512–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Donovan TM, Jones PW, Annand EM, Thompson FR (1997) Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78(7):2064–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wacquant JP, Picard JB (1992) Nutritional differentiation among populations of the Mediterranean shrub Dittrichia viscosa (Asteraceae) in siliceous and calcareous habitats. Oecologia 92(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Putten WH, Klironomos JN, Wardle DA (2007) Microbial ecology of biological invasions. ISME J 1(1):28–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Caravaca F, Alguacil MM, Torre P, Roldán A (2005) Microbial activities and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization in the rhizosphere of the salt marsh plant Inula crithmoides L. along a spatial salinity gradient. Wetlands 25(2):350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohamed DJ, Martiny JBH (2011) Patterns of fungal diversity and composition along a salinity gradient. ISME J 5(3):379–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gamboa MA, Laureano S, Bayman P (2003) Measuring diversity of endophytic fungi in leaf fragments: does size matter? Mycopathologia 156(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Götz M, Nirenberg H, Krause S, Wolters H, Draeger S, Buchner A, Lottmann J, Berg G, Smalla K (2006) Fungal endophytes in potato roots studied by traditional isolation and cultivation-independent DNA-based methods. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58(1):404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. El-Morsy E-SM (2000) Fungi isolated from the endorhizosphere of halophytic plants from the Red Sea Coast of Egypt. Fungal Divers 5:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  43. Girlanda M, Ghignone S, Luppi AM (2002) Diversity of sterile root-associated fungi of two Mediterranean plants. New Phytol 155(3):481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Girlanda M, Perotti S, Luppi AM (2006) Molecular diversity and ecological roles of mycorrhiza-associated sterile fungal endophytes in the Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Schulz B, Boyle C, Sieber T (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 207–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Jumpponen A, Trappe JM (1998) Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol 140(2):295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Green LE, Porras-Alfaro A, Sinsabaugh RL (2008) Translocation of nitrogen and carbon integrates biotic crust and grass production in destert grasslands. J Ecol 96(5):1076–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Natvig DO, Lipinski K, Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland. Mycologia 103(1):10–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Herrera J, Khidir HH, Eudy DM, Porras-Alfaro A, Natvig DO, Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Shifting fungal endophyte communities colonize Bouteloua gracilis: effect of host tissue and geographical distribution. Mycologia 102(5):1012–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Khidir HH, Eudy DM, Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Natvig DO, Sinsabaugh RL (2010) A general suite of fungal endophytes dominate the roots of two dominant grasses in a semiarid grassland. J Arid Environ 74(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Y, Wang HK, Fournier J, Crous PW, Jeewon R, Pointing SB, Hyde KD (2009) Towards a phylogenetic clarification of Lophiostoma/Massarina and morphologically similar genera in the Pleosporales. Fungal Divers 38:225–251

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hyde KD, Wong WSW, Aptroot A (2002) Marine and estuarine species of Lophiostoma and Massarina. In: Hyde KD (ed) Fungi in marine environments. Fungal Divers Research Series, Hong Kong, pp 93–109

    Google Scholar 

  52. Currah RS, Tsuneda A, Murakami S (1993) Morphology and ecology of Phialocephala fortinii in roots of Rhododendron brachycarpum. Can J Bot 71(12):1639–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodriguez RJ, Henson J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hoy M, Wright L, Beckwith F, Kim Y-O, Redman RS (2008) Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J 2(4):404–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saikkonen A, Ion D, Gyllenberg M (2002) The persistence of vertically transmitted fungi in grass metapopulations. Proc R Soc Lond B 269(1498):1397–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation grants AGL2008–00716/AGR and AGL2011–29297. VF was supported by a grant from the international PhD program “Frotticoltura Mediterranea,” Università di Palermo (Italy). The authors would like to thank Dr. Rusty Rodriguez for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose G. Maciá-Vicente.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Physicochemical variables of soils sampled in this work (PDF 123 kb)

Table S2

Accession numbers, BLAST results, and taxonomy assignments for sequences obtained in this study. Only one of the BLAST best results are shown, for both comparisons with a database with fungal ITS sequences in GenBank (fungalITSdatabase), and with a database with only fully identified ITS sequences (fungalITSdatabaseID). Abbreviations: n.a., not assigned (XLSX 31 kb)

Table S3

Abundance data for all OTUs defined in this study as either endophytes or soil fungi (XLSX 24 kb)

Figure S1

Phylogenetic analysis of 90 ITS-5.8S rDNA sequences from endophytic and soil fungal isolates representing all OTUs found in this study (in bold), and 133 sequences selected among BLAST best matches. Sequences were aligned using fsa v1.15.2 (Fast Statistical Alignment; Bradley RK et al (2009) PLoS Comput Biol 5(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000392.g001), and a Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed from the alignment using raxml v7.0.4 (Stamatakis A (2006) Bioinformatics 22(21):2688), with the General Time Reversible (GTR) model of nucleotide substitution, Gamma model of rate heterogeneity, estimation of proportion of invariable sites, and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences from Chytridium confervae (AY349119), Entomophtora muscae (AY997047) and Glomus intraradices (EF989109) were used as outgroup. The best tree with bootstrap support values was selected and edited with the ape v2.3.2 library for r (Paradis E et al (2004) Bioinformatics 20:289-290). Bootstrap values above 70 % are shown next to each branch. Bars next to OTU sequences indicate their proportion of occurrence as endophytes (E) or soil fungi (S), and brackets delimit either fungal orders or outgroup (PDF 869 kb)

Figure S2

(a) Specificity of primers ME3F and ME3R using DNA from different isolates representative of OTU01 and other OTUs. Each PCR reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 10 ng of fungal DNA as template, or no DNA for a negative control (c-). Amplification products were visualized in a 2 % agarose electrophoresis gel stained with SYBR Green I. (b) Alignment of sequences obtained from direct amplification of root or soil DNA with primers ME3F and ME3R (see Fig. 5b), with a representative rDNA sequence of OTU01. mafft v6.0 was used to perform the alignment (PDF 456 kb)

Figure S3

Distribution of fungal orders of either endophytic or rhizospheric soil fungal communities. Plots show averaged isolation percentages for each order (PDF 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maciá-Vicente, J.G., Ferraro, V., Burruano, S. et al. Fungal Assemblages Associated with Roots of Halophytic and Non-halophytic Plant Species Vary Differentially Along a Salinity Gradient. Microb Ecol 64, 668–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0066-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0066-2

Keywords

Navigation