Skip to main content
Log in

Phosphate Addition and Plant Species Alters Microbial Community Structure in Acidic Upland Grassland Soil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural improvement (addition of fertilizers, liming) of seminatural acidic grasslands across Ireland and the UK has resulted in significant shifts in floristic composition, soil chemistry, and microbial community structure. Although several factors have been proposed as responsible for driving shifts in microbial communities, the exact causes of such changes are not well defined. Phosphate was added to grassland microcosms to investigate the effect on fungal and bacterial communities. Plant species typical of unimproved grasslands (Agrostis capillaris, Festuca ovina) and agriculturally improved grasslands (Lolium perenne) were grown, and phosphate was added 25 days after seed germination, with harvesting after a further 50 days. Phosphate addition significantly increased root biomass (p < 0.001) and shoot biomass (p < 0.05), soil pH (by 0.1 U), and microbial activity (by 5.33 mg triphenylformazan [TPF] g−1 soil; p < 0.001). A slight decrease (by 0.257 mg biomass-C g−1 soil; p < 0.05) in microbial biomass after phosphate addition was found. The presence of plant species significantly decreased soil pH (p < 0.05; by up to 0.2 U) and increased microbial activity (by up to 6.02 mg TPF g−1 soil) but had no significant effect on microbial biomass. Microbial communities were profiled using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Multidimensional scaling plots and canonical correspondence analysis revealed that phosphate addition and its interactions with upland grassland plant species resulted in considerable changes in the fungal and bacterial communities of upland soil. The fungal community structure was significantly affected by both phosphate (R = 0.948) and plant species (R = 0.857), and the bacterial community structure was also significantly affected by phosphate (R = 0.758) and plant species (R = 0.753). Differences in microbial community structure following P addition were also revealed by similarity percentage analysis. These data suggest that phosphate application may be an important contributor to microbial community structural change during agricultural management of upland grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas RM, Bartha R (1997) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bardgett RD, Frankland JC, Whittaker JB (1993) The effects of agricultural management on the soil biota of some upland grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 45:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardgett RD, Hobbs PJ, Frostegard A (1996) Changes in soil fungal:bacterial biomass ratios following reductions in the intensity of management of an upland grassland. Biol Fertil Soils 22:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bardgett RD, McAlister E (1999) The measurement of soil fungal:bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands. Biol Fertil Soils 29:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Edwards S, Hobbs PJ, Rodwell JS, Davies WJ (1999) Plant species and nitrogen effects on soil biological properties of temperate upland grasslands. Funct Ecol 13:650–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blackstock TH, Rimes CA, Stevens DP, Jefferson RG, Robertson HG, Mackintosh J, Hopkins JJ (1999) The extent of semi-natural grassland communities in lowland England and Wales: a review of conservation surveys 1978–96. Grass Forage Sci 54:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolan NS (1991) A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil 134:189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brodie E, Edwards S, Clipson N (2002) Bacterial community dynamics across a floristic gradient in a temperate upland grassland ecosystem. Microb Ecol 44:260–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brodie E, Edwards S, Clipson N (2003) Soil fungal community structure in a temperate upland grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45:105–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke J (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crosby LD, Criddle CS (2003) Understanding bias in microbial community analysis techniques due to rrn operon copy number heterogeneity. Bio Techniques 34:790–802

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Curtin D, Smillie GW (1984) Influence of liming on soluble and labile P in fertilised soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Ann 15:177–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daly K, Jeffrey D, Tunney H (2001) The effect of soil type on phosphorus sorption and capacity and desorption dynamics in Irish grassland soils. Soil Use Manage 17:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dunbar J, Ticknor LO, Kuske CR (2001) Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:190–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Egert M, Friedrich MW (2003) Formation of pseudo-terminal restriction fragments, a PCR-related bias affecting terminal restriction length polymorphism analysis of microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2555–2562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geological Survey of Ireland (2000) http://www.gsi.ie

  20. Gleeson DB, Mc Dermott F, Clipson N (2006) Structural diversity of bacterial communities in a heavy metal mineralized granite outcrop. Environ Microbiol 8:383–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gollotte A, van Tuinen D, Atkinson D (2004) Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising roots of the grass species Agrostis capillaris and Lolium perenne in a field experiment. Mycorrhiza 14:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell C, Edwards A (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grayston SJ, Griffith GS, Mawdsley JL, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD (2001) Accounting for variability in soil microbial communities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 33:533–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grayston SJ, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Clegg CD, Ritz K, Griffiths BS, Rodwell JS, Edwards SJ, Davies WJ (2004) Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Appl Soil Ecol 25:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Green BH (1990) Agricultural intensification and the loss of habitat, species and amenity in British grasslands: a review of historical change and assessment of future prospects. Grass Forage Sci 45:365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ibekwe AM, Kennedy AM, Frohne PS, Papiernik SK, Yang CH, Crowley DE (2002) Microbial diversity along a transect of agronomic zones. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 26:151–163

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson D, Vandenkoornhuyse PJ, Leake JR, Gilbert L, Booth RE, Grime JP, Young JPW, Read DJ (2003) Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms. New Phytol 161:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy N, Connolly J, Clipson N (2004) Impact of lime, nitrogen and plant species on fungal community structure in grassland microcosms. Environ Microbiol 7:780–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kennedy NM, Gleeson DE, Connolly J, Clipson NJW (2005) Seasonal and management influences on bacterial community structure in an upland grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Klein DA, Paschke MW (2000) A soil microbial community structural-functional index: the microscopy-based total/active fungal/bacterial (TA/AFB) biovolumes ratio. Appl Soil Ecol 14:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kucey RMN, Janzen HH, Leggett ME (1989) Microbiologically mediated increases in plant-available phosphorus. In: Brady NC (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic, New York, pp 199–228

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuske CR, Ticknor LO, Miller ME, Dunbar JM, Davis JA, Barns JA, Belnap J (2002) Comparison of soil bacterial communities in rhizospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1854–1863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lima JA, Nahas E, Gomes AC (1996) Microbial populations and activities in sewage sludge and phosphate fertilizer-amended soil. Appl Soil Ecol 4:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lovell RD, Jarvis SC, Bardgett RD (1995) Soil microbial biomass and activity in long-term grassland: effects of management changes. Soil Biol Biochem 27:969–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lueders T, Friedrich MW (2003) Evaluation of PCR amplification bias by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of small-subunit rRNA and mcrA genes by using defined template mixtures of methanogenic pure cultures and soil DNA extracts. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:320–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Marschner P, Yang CH, Lieberei R, Crowley DE (2001) Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1437–1445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Met Eireann (2003) http://www.met.ie

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Molla MAZ, Chowdhury AA (1984) Microbial mineralization of organic phosphate in soil. Plant and Soil 78:393–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Normand P, Ponsonnet C, Nesme X, Neyra M, Simonet P (1996) ITS analysis of prokaryotes. In: Akkermans AD, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn EI (eds) Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  42. Paterson E (2003) Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity. Eur J Soil Sci 54:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ranjard L, Poly F, Lata JC, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Nazaret S (2001) Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints, biological and methodological variability. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4479–4487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rodwell JS (1992) British plant communities: grasslands and montane communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rooney DC, Kennedy N, Deering L, Gleeson D, Clipson N (2006) Effect of sheep urine deposition on bacterial community structure in an upland acidic grassland soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(11):7231–7237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Scheublin TR, Ridgway KP, Young JP, van der Heijden MGA (2004) Nonlegumes, legumes, and root nodules harbor different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6240–6246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sessitch A, Weilharter A, Gerzabek MH, Kirchmann H, Kandeler E (2006) Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4215–4224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith SE, Read DJ (eds) (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sparks DL, Hlemke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA (eds) (1996) Methods of soil analysis: chemical methods, part 3. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manag 63:337–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Thalmann A (1968) Zur methodik ber Bestimmung der dehydrogenaseactivitat im Boden mittels triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). Landwirtsch Forsch 21:249–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Treseder KK, Allen MF (2002) Direct nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a model and field test. New Phytol 155:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Troeh FR, Thompson LM (eds) (1993) Soils and soil fertility. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Husband R, Daniell TJ, Watson IJ, Duck JM, Fitter AH, Young JPW (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in a grassland ecosystem. Mol Ecol 11:1555–1564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Ridgway KP, Watson IJ, Fitter AH, Young JPW (2003) Co-existing grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. Mol Ecol 12:3085–3095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. West AW, Starling GP (1986) Modifications to the substrate-induced respiration method to permit measurement of microbial biomass in soils of differing water contents. J Microbiol Methods 5:177–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Westover KM, Kennedy AC, Kelley SE (1997) Patterns of rhizosphere microbial community structure associated with co-occurring plant species. J Ecol 85:863–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, New York, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  60. Withers PJA, Edwards AC, Foy RH (2001) Phosphorus cycling in UK agriculture and implications for phosphorus loss from soil. Soil Use Manage 17:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yannerell AC, Kent AD, Lauster GH, Kratz TK, Triplett EW (2003) Temporal patterns in bacterial communities in three temperate lakes of different trophic status. Microb Ecol 46:391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency grant 2002-PHD2-16 under the Environmental Research Technological Development and Innovation (ERTDI) program. The authors would like to thank Deirdre Gleeson for statistical guidance and Mary Murphy for technical assistance and acknowledge valuable discussions with Nabla Kennedy and Lorraine Muckian. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and advice on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deirdre C. Rooney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rooney, D.C., Clipson, N.J.W. Phosphate Addition and Plant Species Alters Microbial Community Structure in Acidic Upland Grassland Soil. Microb Ecol 57, 4–13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-008-9399-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-008-9399-2

Keywords

Navigation