Abstract
Variants and congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries are usually asymptomatic, but may present with severe chest pain or cardiac arrest. The introduction of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCT-CA) allows the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis. Improved performance with isotropic spatial resolution and higher temporal resolution provides a valid alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in many patients. MDCT-CA is now considered the ideal tool for three-dimensional visualization of the complex and tortuous anatomy of the coronary arteries. With multiplanar and volume-rendered reconstructions, MDCT-CA may even outperform CCA in determining the relative position of vessels, thus providing a better view of the coronary vascular anatomy. The purpose of this review is to describe the normal anatomy of the coronary arteries and their main variants based on MDCT-CA with appropriate reconstructions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cademartiri F, Malago R, La Grutta L et al (2007) Coronary variants and anomalies: methodology of visualisation with 64-slice CT and prevalence in 202 consecutive patients. Radiol Med 112:1117–1131
Cademartiri F, Palumbo AA, Maffei E et al (2007) Non invasive imaging of coronary arteries with 64-slice CT and 1.5T MRI: challenging invasive techniques. Acta Biomed 78:6–15
Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al (2003) Non-invasive angiography of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography: state of the art and future prospects. Radiol Med 106:284–296
Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malago R et al (2008) Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:781–791
Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Notarangelo F et al (2008) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world. Radiol Med 113:163–180
Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al (2003) Spiral CT-angiography with one, four, and sixteen slice scanners. Technical note. Radiol Med (Torino) 106:269–283
Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268
Malago R, D’Onofrio M, Baglio I et al (2009) Choice strategy of different dose-saving protocols in 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography. Radiol Med 114:1196–1213
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121
Tomanek RJ (1996) Formation of the coronary vasculature: a brief review. Cardiovasc Res 31 Spec No:E46–E51
Danias PG, Stuber M, McConnell MV et al (2001) The diagnosis of congenital coronary anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. Coron Artery Dis 12:621–626
Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S (2002) Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation 105:2449–2454
Cademartiri F, Marano R, Luccichenti G et al (2004) [Normal anatomy of the vessels of the heart with 16-row multislice computed tomography]. Radiol Med (Torino) 107:11–21, quiz 22–3
Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML et al (1975) Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 52:979–986
James TN (1965) Anatomy of the coronary arteries in health and disease. Circulation 32:1020–1033
Malago R, D’Onofrio M, Brunelli S et al (2010) Anatomical variants and anomalies of the coronary tree studied with MDCT coronary angiography. Radiol Med 115:679–92
Levin DC, Fallon JT (1982) Significance of the angiographic morphology of localized coronary stenoses: histopathologic correlations. Circulation 66:316–320
Dodge JT Jr, Brown BG, Bolson EL et al (1992) Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation 86:232–246
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malagò, R., Pezzato, A., Barbiani, C. et al. Coronary artery anatomy and variants. Pediatr Radiol 41, 1505–1515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2218-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2218-9