Skip to main content
Log in

Transport Type Metrics on the Space of Probability Measures Involving Singular Base Measures

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics & Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop the theory of a metric, which we call the \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric and denote by \(W_\nu \), on the set of probability measures \({\mathcal {P}}(X)\) on a domain \(X \subseteq \mathbb {R}^m\). This metric is based on a slight refinement of the notion of generalized geodesics with respect to a base measure \(\nu \) and is relevant in particular for the case when \(\nu \) is singular with respect to m-dimensional Lebesgue measure; it is also closely related to the concept of linearized optimal transport. The \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric is defined in terms of an iterated variational problem involving optimal transport to \(\nu \); we also characterize it in terms of integrations of classical Wasserstein metric between the conditional probabilities when measures are disintegrated with respect to optimal transport to \(\nu \), and through limits of certain multi-marginal optimal transport problems. We also introduce a class of metrics which are dual in a certain sense to \(W_\nu \), defined relative to a fixed based measure \(\mu \), on the set of measures which are absolutely continuous with respect to a second fixed based measure \(\sigma \). As we vary the base measure \(\nu \), the \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric interpolates between the usual quadratic Wasserstein metric (obtained when \(\nu \) is a Dirac mass) and a metric associated with the uniquely defined generalized geodesics obtained when \(\nu \) is sufficiently regular (eg, absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue). When \(\nu \) concentrates on a lower dimensional submanifold of \(\mathbb {R}^m\), we prove that the variational problem in the definition of the \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric has a unique solution. We also establish geodesic convexity of the usual class of functionals, and of the set of source measures \(\mu \) such that optimal transport between \(\mu \) and \(\nu \) satisfies a strengthening of the generalized nestedness condition introduced in McCann and Pass (Arch Ration Mech Anal 238(3):1475–1520, 2020). We finally introduce a slight variant of the dual metric mentioned above in order to prove convergence of an iterative scheme to solve a variational problem arising in game theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, in game theory problems derived from spatial economics, \(\nu \) may represent a population of players, parametrized by their location \(y \in \mathbb {R}^2\) [4]; it is often the case that the population is essentially concentrated along a one dimensional subset, such as a major highway or railroad.

  2. In fact, in the case we are most interested in, when there exists a unique optimal transport between \(\nu \) and each of the measures to be compared, the \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric coincides with the metric derived from solving the linear optimal transport problem, denoted by \(d_{LOT,\nu }\) in [22]. They differ slightly for more general measures; in this case, the \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric is in fact only a semi-metric.

  3. In fact, the actual metric used in the proof differs slightly from the dual metric in general, although they coincide under certain conditions.

  4. We have chosen to work on a bounded set X here mostly out of technical convenience and to keep the presentation simple. We expect that most results can be extended to unbounded domains under appropriate hypotheses (for instance, decay conditions on the measures).

  5. Although Theorem 5.20 in [21] is stated only for two marginal problems, the same result may be proven for multi-marginal problems in exactly the same way, using the equivalence between c-cyclical monotonicity and optimality established in [11].

References

  1. Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N., Savaré, G.: Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics, 2nd ed. Birkhäuser, Boston (2004)

  2. Blanchet, A., Carlier, G.: From Nash to Cournot-Nash equilibria via the Monge-Kantorovich problem. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 372(2028):20130398 (2014)

  3. Blanchet, A., Carlier, G.: Remarks on existence and uniqueness of Cournot-Nash equilibria in the non-potential case. Math. Financ. Econ. 8(4), 417–433 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchet, A., Carlier, G.: Optimal transport and Cournot-Nash equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. 41(1), 125–145 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenier, Y.: Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 44(4), 375–417 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlier, G., Galichon, A., Santambrogio, F.: From Knothe’s transport to Brenier’s map and a continuation method for optimal transport. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41(6):2554–2576 (2009/10)

  7. Chiappori, P.-A., McCann, R., Pass, B.: Transition to nestedness in multi- to one-dimensional optimal transport. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 30(6), 1220–1228 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiappori, P.-A., McCann, R.J., Pass, B.: Multidimensional matching. Preprint at arXiv:1604.05771

  9. Chiappori, P.-A., McCann, R.J., Pass, B.: Multi- to one-dimensional optimal transport. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 70(12), 2405–2444 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, L.C., Gariepy, R.F.: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions. Textbooks in Mathematics, revised ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

  11. Griessler, C.: \(C\)-Cyclical monotonicity as a sufficient criterion for optimality in the multimarginal Monge-Kantorovich problem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 146(11), 4735–4740 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, Y.-H., Pass, B., Schneider, D.J.: Optimal transport and barycenters for dendritic measures. Pure Appl. Anal. 2(3), 581–601 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Knothe, H.: Contributions to the theory of convex bodies. Michigan Math. J. 4, 39–52 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McCann, R.J.: A convexity principle for interacting gases. Adv. Math. 128(1), 153–179 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. McCann, R.J.: Polar factorization of maps on Riemannian manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 11(3), 589–608 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. McCann, R.J., Pass, B.: Optimal transportation between unequal dimensions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 238(3), 1475–1520 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nenna, L., Pass, B.: Variational problems involving unequal dimensional optimal transport. J. Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 139, 83–108 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 470–472 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Santambrogio, F.: Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians. Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, vol. 87. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham (2015). Calculus of Variations, PDEs, and Modeling

  20. Villani, C.: Topics in Optimal Transportation. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003)

  21. Villani, C.: Optimal Transport: Old and New, volume 338 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer (2009)

  22. Wang, W., Slepčev, D., Basu, S., Ozolek, J.A., Rohde, G.K.: A linear optimal transportation framework for quantifying and visualizing variations in sets of images. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 101(2), 254–269 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Nenna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

B.P. is pleased to acknowledge the support of National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant Number 04658-2018. He is also grateful for the kind hospitality at the Institut de Mathématiques d’Orsay, Université Paris-Sud during his stay in November of 2019 as a missionaire scientifique invité, when this work was partially completed. L.N. would like to acknowledge the support from the project MAGA ANR-16-CE40-0014 (2016-2020) and the one from the CNRS PEPS JCJC (2021). They are also indebted to two anonymous referees for their many insightful comments on an earlier draft of this work.

Appendix A Hierarchical Metrics with Multiple Reference Measures

Appendix A Hierarchical Metrics with Multiple Reference Measures

The \(\nu \)-based Wasserstein metric can be extended to align with several different probability measures in a hierarchical way. Given \(\nu _1,\dots ,\nu _k \in {\mathcal {P}}(X)\), we define iteratively \(\Pi ^1_{opt} =\Pi _{opt}(\nu _1,\mu _i)\) and \(\Pi ^j_{opt}(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _j, \mu _i) \subseteq {\mathcal {P}}(X^{j+1})\) by

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \Pi ^j_{opt}(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _j, \mu _i) ={\textrm{argmin}}_{\begin{array}{c} \gamma _{y_1,\ldots y_{j-1}x_i} \in \Pi ^{j-1}_{opt}(\nu _1,\ldots , \nu _{j-1},\mu _i) \\ \gamma _{y_j}=\nu _j \end{array}}\\{} & {} \qquad \int _{X^{j+1}}|x_i-y_j|^2d\gamma (y_1,\ldots .,y_j,x_i). \end{aligned}$$

A natural analogue of \(W_\nu \) is then defined by:

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} W^2_{\nu _1,\ldots \nu _k}(\mu _0,\mu _1)=\inf _{\gamma _{y_1...y_kx_i} \in \Pi ^k_{opt}(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _k, \mu _i), i=0,1}\nonumber \\ {}{} & {} \int _{X^{k+2}}|x_0-x_1|^2d\gamma (y_1,\ldots ,y_k,x_0,x_1). \end{aligned}$$
(43)

As before, optimal couplings can be recovered as limits of multi-marginal problems, where the weights on the interaction terms reflect the hierarchy of the measures \(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _k\) in the definition of \(W_{\nu _1,\ldots \nu _k}\):

Proposition 40

Let \(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _k,\mu _{0},\mu _1\) be probability measures on X. Consider the multi-marginal optimal transport problem:

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{X^{k+2}}c_\varepsilon (x_0,x_1,y_1,y_2,\ldots y_k)d\gamma \end{aligned}$$
(44)

where \(c_\varepsilon =\varepsilon ^{n-1}|x_0-x_1|^2 +\varepsilon ^{n-2}(|x_0-y_{n-1}|^2 +|x_1-y_{n-1}|^2)+\varepsilon ^{n-3}(|x_0-y_{n-2}|^2 +|x_1-y_{n-2}|^2)+\cdots +\varepsilon (|x_0-y_2|^2 +|x_1-y_2|^2)+(|x_0-y_1|^2 +|x_1-y_1|^2)\). Then any weak limit \({\overline{\gamma }}\) of solutions \(\gamma _\varepsilon \) is optimal in (43)

Proof

The proof is similar to the proof of the second part of Theorem 12. Letting \(\gamma \in \Pi ^k_{opt}(\nu _1,\ldots ,\nu _k, \mu _i)\) for \(i=0,1\), optimality of \(\gamma _\varepsilon \) in (44) implies

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{X^{k+2}}c_\varepsilon (x_0,x_1,y_1,y_2,\ldots y_k)d \gamma _\varepsilon \le \int _{X^{k+2}}c_\varepsilon (x_0,x_1,y_1,y_2,\ldots y_k)d\gamma . \end{aligned}$$
(45)

Passing to the limit implies that \({\overline{\gamma }} \in \Pi _{opt}^1(\mu _i, \nu )\). Now, combining the fact that \(\gamma \in \Pi _{opt}^1(\mu _i, \nu )\) with (45) implies

$$\begin{aligned}\begin{aligned}&\int _{X^{k+2}}c_\varepsilon (x_0,x_1,y_1,y_2,\ldots y_k) - (|x_0-y_1|^2 +|x_1-y_1|^2)d{\overline{\gamma }}_\varepsilon \\ {}&\quad \le \int _{X^{k+2}}c_\varepsilon (x_0,x_1,y_1,y_2,\ldots y_k)-(|x_0-y_1|^2 +|x_1-y_1|^2)d\gamma . \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

Dividing by \(\varepsilon \) and taking the limit then implies that \({\overline{\gamma }} \in \Pi _{opt}(\nu _1,\nu _2, \mu _i)\) for \(i=0,2\). Continuing inductively in this way yields the desired result. \(\square \)

As a consequence, we easily obtain the following result, which is similar to the main result in [6].

Corollary 41

Let \(k=n-1\), and \(\nu _1,\ldots \mu _{n-1}\) be probability measures concentrated on mutually orthogonal line segments, each absolutely continuous with respect to one dimensional Hausdorff measure. Then solutions \(\gamma _\varepsilon \) to the multi-marginal optimal transport problem (44) converge weakly to \(\gamma \), whose 1, 2 marginal is \((Id,G)_\#\mu _0\), where G is the Knothe–Rosenblatt transport from \(\mu _0\) to \(\mu _1\).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nenna, L., Pass, B. Transport Type Metrics on the Space of Probability Measures Involving Singular Base Measures. Appl Math Optim 87, 28 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-022-09937-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-022-09937-1

Navigation