Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of hydrocephalus in 157 patients with vestibular schwannoma

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hydrocephalus in patients with vestibular schwannoma. A second objective was to investigate possible etiologies for hydrocephalus in this population by attempting to correlate the incidence and severity of hydrocephalus with tumor volume and extent of fourth ventricular compression. The MRI examinations of 157 adult patients with vestibular schwannoma were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor size was quantified, and the presence of accompanying hydrocephalus was assessed, categorized as communicating type or non-communicating type and then rated as mild, moderate or severe (grades 1–3). Next, the degree of fourth ventricular distortion caused by tumor mass effect was evaluated and categorized as mild, moderate or severe (grades 1–3). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to test the relationships between tumor volume and (1) the extent of fourth ventricular effacement and (2) severity of hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was present in 28/157 (18%) cases and was categorized as mild in 11/28 (39%), moderate in 15/28 (54%) and severe in 2/28 (7%). Communicating-type hydrocephalus was present in 17/28 (61%) and non-communicating type in 11/28 (39%). There was a positive correlation between the grade of non-communicating hydrocephalus and tumor volume (r=0.38; P<0.001) and between the severity of fourth ventricular compression and extent of hydrocephalus in this group(r=0.43; P<0.001). In patients who were classified as having communicating hydrocephalus, the correlation between tumor volume and the severity of hydrocephalus was poor (r=0.19; P=0.02) as was the correlation between the extent of fourth ventricular distortion and the severity of hydrocephalus (r=0.21; P<0.01). There is a high prevalence of hydrocephalus in patients with vestibular schwannoma. In a minority of cases non-communicating type hydrocephalus is present and the severity of hydrocephalus can be attributed to the affect of tumor volume on fourth ventricular compression. More commonly, however, communicating-type hydrocephalus exists and the correlation between the severity of fourth ventricular compression and extent of hydrocephalus is poor. Therefore, other etiologies for hydrocephalus, such as tumor protein sloughing, are likely relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steenerson RL, Payne N (1992) Hydrocephalus in the patient with acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 107:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pappada G, Formaggio G, Regalia F, Panzarasa G, Geuna E (1984) Course of intracranial pressure after extirpation of posterior fossa tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 70:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pirouzmand F, Tator CH, Rutka J (2001) Management of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma and other cerebellopontine angle tumors. Neurosurgery 48:1246–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs RJ, Shelton C, Kwartler JA, Hitselberger W (1993) Management of hydrocephalus resulting from acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 109:1020–1024

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhne D, Schmidt H, Janzen RWC, Lachenmayer L (1977) Kommunizierender hydrocephalus beim acusticusneurinom. Radiologe 17:478–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noren G (1998) Long-term complications following gamma knife radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 70 [Suppl 1]:65–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noren G, Arndt J, Hindmarsh T (1983) Stereotactic radiosurgery in cases of acoustic neurinoma: further experiences. Neurosurgery 13:12–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris PH (1962) Chronic progressive communicating hydrocephalus due to protein transudates from brain and spinal tumors. Dev Med Child Neurol 4:270–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollock BE, Lunsford LD, Noren G (1998) Vestibular schwannoma management in the next century: a radiosurgical perspective. Neurosurgery 43:475–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gammal TE, Allen MB, Brooks BS, Mark EK (1987) MR evaluation of hydrocephalus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:807–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurihara Y, Simonson T, Nguyen H, Fisher D, Lin CS, Sato Y, Yuh WT (1995) MR imaging of ventriculomegaly—a qualitative and quantitative comparison of communicating hydrocephalus, central atrophy, and normal studies. J Magn Reson Imag 5:451–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Atlas MD, Perez de Tagle JR, Cook JA, Sheehy JP, Fagan PA (1996) Evolution of the management of hydrocephalus associated with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 106:204–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirano A, Dembitzer HM, Zimmerman HM (1972) Fenestrated blood vessels in neurilemoma. Lab Invest 27:305–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Rogg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogg, J.M., Ahn, S.H., Tung, G.A. et al. Prevalence of hydrocephalus in 157 patients with vestibular schwannoma. Neuroradiology 47, 344–351 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1363-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1363-y

Keywords

Navigation