Skip to main content
Log in

On the arithmetic of a family of superelliptic curves

  • Published:
manuscripta mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let p be a prime, let r and q be powers of p, and let a and b be relatively prime integers not divisible by p. Let \(C/{\mathbb {F}}_{r}(t)\) be the superelliptic curve with affine equation \(y^b+x^a=t^q-t\), and let J be the Jacobian of C. By work of Pries and Ulmer (Trans Am Math Soc 368(12):8553–8595, 2016), J satisfies the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture (BSD). Generalizing work of Griffon and Ulmer (Pacific J Math 305(2):597–640, 2020) , we compute the L-function of J in terms of certain Gauss sums. In addition, we estimate several arithmetic invariants of J appearing in BSD, including the rank of the Mordell–Weil group \(J({\mathbb {F}}_{r}(t))\), the Faltings height of J, and the Tamagawa numbers of J in terms of the parameters abq. For any p and r, we show that for certain a and b depending only on p and r, these Jacobians provide new examples of families of simple abelian varieties of fixed dimension and with unbounded analytic and algebraic rank as q varies through powers of p. Under a different set of criteria on a and b, we prove that the order of the Tate–Shafarevich group grows exponentially fast in q as \(q \rightarrow \infty \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. [28] proves this when \(p>2g+1\). In our case, we can remove the hypothesis on p as follows. J becomes trivial after a degree ab field extension. Over this extension, the action of inertia is trivial, so descending back to K gives that the ramification degree must divide ab. But ab is prime to p, so the ramification must be tame.

References

  1. Berger, L., Hall, C., Pannekoek, R., Park, J., Pries, R., Sharif, S., Silverberg, A., Ulmer, D.: Explicit arithmetic of Jacobians of generalized Legendre curves over global function fields. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 266(1295) (2015)

  2. Baker, A., Wüstholz, G.: Logarithmic forms and group varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 442(12), 19–62 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cassels, J.W.S.: Arithmetic on curves of genus 1. vi. the Tate–Safarevic group can be arbitrarily large. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1964(214–215), 65–70 (1964)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Casillejo, P.: Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula for \(\ell \)-adic sheaves. Master’s thesis, Freie Universitat Berlin (2016)

  5. Cohen, H.: Number Theory. Volume I: Tools and Diophantine Equations. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Creutz, B.: Potential Sha for abelian varieties. J. Number Theory 131(11), 2162–2174 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, P., Sharif, S.: Period, index and potential Sha. Algebra Number Theory 4(2), 151–174 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Deligne, P.: Cohomologie étale, vol. 569 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1977). Séminaire de géométrie algébrique du Bois-Marie SGA \(4\frac{1}{2}\)

  9. Deligne, P.: La conjecture de Weil : II. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 52 (1980)

  10. Dokchitser, T.: Models of curves over DVRs. Duke Math. J. 170(11), 2519–2574 (2020)

  11. Flynn, E.V.: Arbitrarily large 2-torsion in Tate–Shafarevich groups of abelian varieties. Acta Arith. 191(2), 101–114 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffon, R., de Wit, G.: Elliptic curves with large Tate–Shafarevich groups over \({\mathbb{F}} _q(t)\). In: Arithmetic, geometry, cryptography and coding theory, 151–183, Contemp. Math., 770, Amer. Math. Soc (2021)

  13. Griffon, R.: Analogues du théorème de Brauer–Siegel pour quelques familles de courbes elliptiques. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7) (2016)

  14. Griffon, R.: Analogue of the Brauer–Siegel theorem for Legendre elliptic curves. J. Number Theory 193, 189–212 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffon, R.: Bounds on special values of \(L\)-functions of elliptic curves in an Artin–Schreier family. Eur. J. Math. 5(2), 476–517 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffon, R., Ulmer, D.: On the arithmetic of a family of twisted constant elliptic curves. Pacific J. Math., 305(2), 597–640 (2020)

  17. Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52. Springer, New York (1977)

  18. Hindry, M., Pacheco, A.: An analogue of the Brauer–Siegel theorem for abelian varieties in positive characteristic. Moscow Math. J. 16(1), 45–93 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz, N.: Crystalline cohomology, Dieudonné modules, and Jacobi sums. In: Automorphic Forms, Representation Theory and Arithmetic, pp. 165–246. Springer (1981)

  20. Lorenzini, D.: Groups of components of Néron models of Jacobians. Compos. Math. 73(2), 145–160 (1990)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Milne, J.S.: Étale cohomology. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 33. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1980)

  22. Mumford, D.: Abelian Varieties, vol. 5 of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics. Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay; by Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi (2008). With appendices by C. P. Ramanujam and Yuri Manin, Corrected reprint of the second (1974) edition

  23. Poonen, B.: Lectures on rational points on curves. https://math.mit.edu/~poonen/papers/curves.pdf (2006)

  24. Pries, R., Ulmer, D.: Arithmetic of abelian varieties in Artin–Schreier extensions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 368(12), 8553–8595 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Serre, J.P.: Facteurs locaux des fonctions zêta des variétés algébriques (définitions et conjectures). Séminaire Delange-Pisot-Poitou. Théorie des nombres, 11(19), 1–15 (1969–1970)

  26. Shioda, T.: An explicit algorithm for computing the Picard number of certain algebraic surfaces. Am. J. Math. 108, 415–432 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Shioda, T.: Some remarks on elliptic curves over function fields. Astérisque 209(12), 99–114 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Serre, J.P., Tate, T.: Good reduction of abelian varieties. Ann. Math. 2(88), 492–517 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. The Stacks project authors. The stacks project. https://stacks.math.columbia.edu (2021)

  30. Tate, J.: On the conjectures of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer and a geometric analog. Séminaire Bourbaki 9(306), 415–440 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tate, J., Shafarevich, I.R.: The rank of elliptic curves. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 175(4), 770–773 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ulmer, D.: Elliptic curves with large rank over function fields. Ann. Math. 155, 295–315 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ulmer, D.: L-functions with large analytic rank and abelian varieties with large algebraic rank over function fields. Invent. Math. 167, 379–408 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ulmer, D.: CRM lectures on curves and Jacobians over function fields. In: Arithmetic Geometry Over Global Function Fields, pp. 281–337. Springer (2014)

  35. Ulmer, D.: On the Brauer–Siegel ratio for abelian varieties over function fields. Algebra Number Theory 13(5), 1069–1120 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Washington, L.: Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the AMS and the organizers of the 2019 Mathematics Research Communities workshop on Explicit Methods in Characteristic p for creating a productive working environment in which this project was started. We thank Douglas Ulmer warmly for his guidance, encouragement and support throughout the realization of this project, and for his fruitful comments on a previous draft. Thanks are also due to Daniel Litt for providing help with the proof in Appendix A, to Baptiste Peaucelle and Abel Lacabanne for helpful discussions, and to Rachel Pries and Dino Lorenzini for their careful reading and helpful comments. We also thank the anonymous referee for their detailed reading of the first version of the manuscript: they made a number of constructive comments and suggested some improvements, for which we are grateful. The second author was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation through the SNSF Professorship #170565 awarded to Pierre Le Boudec, and received additional funding from ANR project ANR-17-CE40-0012 (FLAIR). The third author was supported by an NSF graduate research fellowship. The fourth author thanks the National Science Foundation Research Training Group in Algebra, Algebraic Geometry, and Number Theory at the University of Georgia [grant DMS-1344994] for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Griffon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Conductor computations

Conductor computations

Recall that \(N_{J} \in \text {Div}(\mathbb {P}^1)\) is the conductor divisor of J/K.

Proposition A.1

We prove the statement from Theorem 4.1 regarding the global degree b(J) of the L-function L(JT):

$$\begin{aligned} b(J) = \deg (N_J) - 4g. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

We begin by defining the conductor divisor \(N_J\) as a divisor on the base \(\mathbb {P}^1\). The action of inertia \(I_v\) on the \(\ell \)-adic Tate module \(V_\ell \) is tame.Footnote 1 For any place v of K, define

$$\begin{aligned} f(v):=\dim (V_\ell ) - \dim (V_\ell ^{I_v}), \end{aligned}$$

and let the conductor of J be the divisor \(N_J:=\sum _{v}f(v)v\) on \(\mathbb {P}^1\). By [25], \(f(v)=0\) whenever v is a place of good reduction for J. Plugging in \(\dim (V_\ell )=2g\) gives

$$\begin{aligned} \deg (N_J)= \sum _{v \text { bad reduction}}(2g - \dim (V_\ell ^{I_v})) \deg v, \end{aligned}$$

where the sum is over places v of K where J has bad reduction. Now, we investigate the L-function and see how its global degree relates to \(\deg N_J\). Begin with the definition:

$$\begin{aligned} L(J,T):= \prod _{v}\det (1 - T\textrm{Fr}_v^{-1}|V_\ell ^{I_v})^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$

This product can be split up into products over good and bad places of C:

$$\begin{aligned} L(J,T):= \prod _{\text {good }v}\det (1 - T\text {Fr}_v^{-1}|V_\ell ^{I_v})^{-1}\prod _{\text {bad }v}\det (1 - T\text {Fr}_v^{-1}|V_\ell ^{I_v})^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$

Let \({\tilde{L}}(J,T):= \underset{\text {good }v}{\prod }\det (1 - T\text {Fr}_v^{-1}|V_\ell ^{I_v})^{-1}\). This gives a decomposition of the global degree:

$$\begin{aligned} \deg (L(J,T)) = \deg ({\tilde{L}}(J,T)) - \underset{\text {bad }v}{\sum }\dim (V_\ell ^{I_v}). \end{aligned}$$

Since L(JT) is rational, and since the sum \(\underset{\text {bad }v}{\sum }\dim (V_\ell ^{I_v})\) is finite, the “complement” \({\tilde{L}}(J,T)\) is also rational. From here, we need a more precise formula for \(\deg ({\tilde{L}}(J,T))\). Let U denote the affine open subset of \(\mathbb {P}^1\) above which J has good reduction. Since U is a punctured \(\mathbb {P}^1\), by the étale-singular cohomology comparison theorem, we have

$$\chi (U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}_\ell }):=\dim H^0(U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}}_\ell )-\dim H^1(U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}}_\ell )+\dim H^2(U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}}_\ell )=2-2g(\mathbb {P}^1)-r,$$

where \(g(\mathbb {P}^1)\) is the genus of \(\mathbb {P}^1\) and r is the number of geometric points over which J has bad reduction. That is, r is the sum of the degrees of places of bad reduction for J, namely \(r=\underset{\text {bad }v}{\sum } \deg v\). Therefore \(\chi (U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}_\ell })=2-r\).

The Grothendieck–Ogg–Shafarevich formula (see [4]) yields that

$$\begin{aligned} \chi (U,\mathcal {F})=\chi (U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}_\ell })\cdot {{\,\textrm{rank}\,}}(\mathcal {F})-\sum _{x\in \mathbb {P}^1\setminus U}({{\,\textrm{rank}\,}}(\mathcal {F})+Sw_x(\mathcal {F})), \end{aligned}$$

where in our case \(\mathcal {F}=V_\ell \), which is a lisse \(\ell \)-adic sheaf of rank \(\dim V_\ell = 2g\) on U. Since the action of inertia on \(V_\ell \) is tame (see [28, Corollary 2, p. 497]), this implies that

$$\begin{aligned} \chi (U,\mathcal {F})=\chi (U,\overline{\mathbb {Q}_\ell })\cdot {{\,\textrm{rank}\,}}(\mathcal {F})=2g(2-r). \end{aligned}$$

Now, since \(\deg {\tilde{L}}(J,T)=-\chi (U,\mathcal {F})\), we deduce that \(\det {\tilde{L}}(J,T) =-2g(2-r)\). Putting this back into the equation for \(\deg L(J,T)\) gives

$$\begin{aligned} \deg (L(J,T))&= \deg ({\tilde{L}}(J,T)) - \sum _{\text {bad } v}\dim (V_\ell ^{I_v}) =-4g + \sum _{\text {bad } v}2g - \sum _{\text {bad } v}\dim (V_\ell ^{I_v})\\&= \sum _{\text {bad } v}(2g -\dim (V_\ell ^{I_v})) - 4g = \deg (N_J)-4g. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arpin, S., Griffon, R., Taylor, L. et al. On the arithmetic of a family of superelliptic curves. manuscripta math. 172, 739–804 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-022-01424-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-022-01424-9

Navigation