Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of drug–drug interactions with fesoterodine

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess drug–drug interactions of fesoterodine with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (ketoconazole), inducer (rifampicin), and substrates (ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel).

Methods

Effects of ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily and rifampicin 600 mg twice daily on fesoterodine 8 mg once daily were investigated in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) based on 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT) pharmacokinetics (principal active fesoterodine metabolite and CYP3A4 substrate). Effects of fesoterodine 8 mg versus placebo once daily on ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were investigated based on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics and on pharmacodynamic effects on progesterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol plasma levels.

Results

Compared with fesoterodine alone, coadministration of fesoterodine with ketoconazole resulted in increases in mean 5-HMT maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax; from 3.0 to 6.0 ng/mL in EMs and from 6.4 to 13.4 ng/mL in PMs) and mean area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC; from 38.2 to 88.3 ng h/mL in EMs and 88.3 to 217.2 ng h/mL in PMs). Coadministration of festerodine with rifampicin resulted in decreases in mean 5-HMT Cmax (from 5.2 to 1.5 ng/mL in EMs and from 6.8 to 1.9 ng/mL in PMs) and mean AUC (from 62.4 to 14.4 ng h/mL in EMs and from 87.8 to 19.6 ng h/mL in PMs). Fesoterodine did not affect oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics or the suppression of ovulation.

Conclusions

Fesoterodine dosage should not exceed 4 mg once daily when taken concomitantly with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Coadministration of CYP3A4 inducers with fesoterodine may produce subtherapeutic 5-HMT exposures. No dose adjustment is necessary for concomitant use of fesoterodine with oral contraceptives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Artibani W, Cardozo L et al (2006) Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: The ongoing debate. Neurourol Urodynam 25:293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61(1):37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wein AJ, Rackley RR (2006) Overactive bladder: a better understanding of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. J Urol 175(3 Pt 2):S5–S10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW et al (2003) Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 20(6):327–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S et al (2006) Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 50(6):1306–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson K-E (2004) Antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder. Lancet Neurol 3(1):46–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Michel MC (2008) Fesoterodine: a novel muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother 9(10):1787–1796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhotra BK, Guan Z, Wood N et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 46(11):556–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilvebrant L (2001) Clinical experiences with tolterodine. Life Sci 68(22–23):2549–2556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole P (2004) Fesoterodine, an advanced antimuscarinic for the treatment of overactive bladder: a safety update. Drugs Future 29(7):715–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xie HG, Kim RB, Wood AJ et al (2001) Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41:815–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toviaz (fesoterodine fumarate) (2007) Full prescribing information. Pfizer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis PJ, Stiller RL, Wilson AS et al (2002) In vitro remifentanil metabolism: the effects of whole blood constituents and plasma butyrylcholinesterase. Anesth Analg 95(5):1305–1307 (table of contents)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosow CE (1999) An overview of remifentanil. Anesth Analg 89[4 Suppl]:S1–S3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beers R, Camporesi E (2004) Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility. CNS Drugs 18(15):1085–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Charasson V, Bellott R, Meynard D et al (2004) Pharmacogenetics of human carboxylesterase 2, an enzyme involved in the activation of irinotecan into SN-38. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76(6):528–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL et al (2008) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 17th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brynne N, Forslund C, Hallen B et al (1999) Ketoconazole inhibits the metabolism of tolterodine in subjects with deficient CYP2D6 activity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48(4):564–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oesch F, Arand M, Benedetti MS et al (1996) Inducing properties of rifampicin and rifabutin for selected enzyme activities of the cytochrome P-450 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase superfamilies in female rat liver. J Antimicrob Chemother 37(6):1111–1119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Hauser S et al (2004) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 16th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olsson B, Landgren BM (2001) The effect of tolterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Clin Ther 23(11):1876–1888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by Schwarz Biosciences and Pfizer Inc. Editorial support was provided by Simon J. Slater, PhD, at Complete Healthcare Communications Inc, and was funded by Pfizer Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimal Malhotra.

Additional information

Funding for this study was provided by Schwarz Biosciences GmbH, and Pfizer Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malhotra, B., Sachse, R. & Wood, N. Evaluation of drug–drug interactions with fesoterodine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65, 551–560 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0648-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0648-1

Keywords

Navigation