Abstract
The objective of this research was to investigate the presence of residual lignin in cellulose fibers on the efficiency and energy consumption during nanofibers processing. Four kinds of lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNFs) from switchgrass, yellow poplar, hybrid poplar, and pine, respectively, were isolated via organosolv fractionation coupling mechanical grinding. Nanofibrils were observed after organosolv fractionation. The details of their morphological features, chemical structures, water retention value (WRV), and thermal degradation characteristics were revealed and compared. Mean diameters of nanofibers separated from switchgrass, yellow poplar, hybrid poplar, and pine were 27.9 nm, 25.4 nm, 24.6 nm, and 21.5 nm, respectively. The presence of lignin for the four types of LCNFs led to a decrease in energy consumption and an increase in WRV, among which pine nanofibers show the best with an average energy consumption of 0.511 kWh/kg and a WRV of 537%. It was also demonstrated that increasing lignin content for LCNFs could contribute to the sample’s thermal stability. In conclusion, exact benefits of residual lignin for nanofiber will facilitate its preparation process and extend its application.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohyd Polym 99:649–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069
Abe K, Iwamoto S, Yano H (2007) Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 8:3276–3278. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm700624p
Adel AM, Elwahab ZHA, Ibrahim AA, Alshemy MT (2011) Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from lignocellulosic materials. Part II: Physicochemical properties. Carbohyd Polym 83:676–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.03
Astner AF, Young TM, Bozell JJ (2015) Lignin yield maximization of mixed biorefinery feedstocks by organosolv fractionation using Taguchi Robust Product Design. Biomass Bioenerg 73:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.12.021
Bian H, Chen L, Dai H, Zhu JY (2017) Integrated production of lignin containing cellulose nanocrystals (LCNC) and nanofibrils (LCNF) using an easily recyclable di-carboxylic acid. Carbohyd Polym 167:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.050
Boeriu CG, Bravo D, Gosselink RJA, Van Dam JEG (2004) Characterisation of structure-dependent functional properties of lignin with infrared spectroscopy. Ind Crop Prod 20:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.022
Boufi S, Chaker A (2016) Easy production of cellulose nanofibrils from corn stalk by a conventional high speed blender. Ind Crop Prod 93:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.030
Bozell JJ, Olenick CJ, Warwick S (2011) Biomass fractionation for the biorefinery: heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence-nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of lignin isolated from solvent fractionation of switchgrass. J Agric Food Chem 59:9232–9242. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201850b
Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hai Y (2011a) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 83:1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.040
Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Hai Y, Zhang M, Chen P (2011b) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 18:433–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9497-z
Chen C, Yang C, Li S, Li D (2015) A three-dimensionally chitin nanofiber/carbon nanotube hydrogel network for foldable conductive paper. Carbohyd Polym 134:309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.004
Chen Y, He Y, Fan D, Han Y, Li G, Wang S (2017) An efficient method for cellulose nanofibrils length shearing via environmentally friendly mixed cellulase pretreatment. J Nanomater 2017:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1591504
Chen H, Wang X, Bozell JJ, Feng X, Huang J, Li Q, Ragauskas AJ, Wang S, Mei C (2019) Effect of solvent fractionation pretreatment on energy consumption of cellulose nanofabrication from switchgrass. J Mater Sci 54:8010–8022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03413-y
Cheng Q (2007) Fabrication and analysis of polymeric nanocomposites from cellulose fibrils. Dissertation, University of Tennessee
Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials T, Lee S-H (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol and polypropylene composite materials reinforced with fibril aggregates isolated from regenerated cellulose fibers. Cellulose 14:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9141-0
Cheng Q, Wang J, Mcneel JF, Jacobson PM (2010) Water retention value measurements of cellulosic materials using a centrifuge technique. Bioresources 5:1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.5.3.1945-1954
Delgado-Aguilar M, Gonzalez I, Tarres Q, Pelach MA, Alcala M, Mutje P (2016) The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres for papermaking applications. Ind Crop Prod 86:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010
Desmaisons J, Boutonnet E, Rueff M, Dufresne A, Bras J (2017) A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohyd Polym 174:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032
Diop CIK, Tajvidi M, Bilodeau MA, Bousfield DW, Hunt JF (2017) Evaluation of the incorporation of lignocellulose nanofibrils as sustainable adhesive replacement in medium density fiberboards. Ind Crop Prod 109:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.004
Ferrer A, Quintana E, Filpponen I, Solala I, Vidal T, Rodriguez A, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2012) Effect of residual lignin and heteropolysaccharides in nanofibrillar cellulose and nanopaper from wood fibers. Cellulose 19:2179–2193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9788-z
Ghaemi F, Abdullah LC, Kargarzadeh H, Abdi MM, Azli NFWM, Abbasian M (2018) Comparative study of the electrochemical, biomedical, and thermal properties of natural and synthetic nanomaterials. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2508-3
Hosseinaei O, Harper DP, Bozell JJ, Rials TG (2016) Role of physicochemical structure of organosolv hardwood and herbaceous lignins on carbon fiber performance. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:5785–5798. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01828
Iakovlev M, Van Heiningen A (2012) Efficient fractionation of spruce by SO2–ethanol–water treatment: closed mass balances for carbohydrates and sulfur. ChemSusChem 5:1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100600
Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0
Josset S, Orsolini P, Siqueira G, Tejado A, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T (2014) Energy consumption of the nanofibrillation of bleached pulp, wheat straw and recycled newspaper through a grinding process. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:167–175. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32932
Kerekes RJ (2005) Characterizing refining action in PFI mills. Tappi J 4:9–13
Kim H, Ralph J (2010) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6/pyridine-d5. Org Biomol Chem 8:576–591. https://doi.org/10.1039/B916070A
Kim H, Ralph J (2014) A gel-state 2D-NMR method for plant cell wall profiling and analysis: a model study with the amorphous cellulose and xylan from ball-milled cotton linters. RSC Adv 4:7549–7560. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA46338A
Li Y, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang Q, Liu Y, Li J, Yu H (2016) Facile extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from wood using ethanol and peroxide solvothermal pretreatment followed by ultrasonic nanofibrillation. Green Chem 18:1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02576A
Lin SY, Dence CW (1992) Methods in lignin chemistry. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74065-7
Liu C, Li B, Du H, Lv D, Zhang Y, Yu G, Mu X, Peng H (2016) Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods. Carbohyd Polym 151:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.025
Liu X, Li Y, Ewulonu CM, Ralph J, Xu F, Zhang Q, Wu M, Huang Y (2019) Mild alkaline pretreatment for isolation of native-like lignin and lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNF) from crop waste. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:14135–14142. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02800
Mansfield SD, Kim H, Lu F, Ralph J (2012) Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR. Nat Protoc 7:1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.064
Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn JA, Simonsen J, Youngblood JP (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
Nair SS, Zhu JY, Deng Y, Ragauskas AJ (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanofibrillation by micro grinding. J Nanopart Res 16:2349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2349-7
Postek MT, Moon RJ, Rudie AW, Bilodeau MA (2013) Production and applications of cellulose. Tappi Press, Peachtree Corners
Rojo E, Peresin MS, Sampson WW, Hoeger I, Vartiainen J, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2015) Comprehensive elucidation of the effect of residual lignin on the physical, barrier, mechanical and surface properties of nanocellulose films. Green Chem 17:1853–1866. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC02398F
Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z
Tao J, Hosseinaei O, Delbeck L, Kim P, Harper DP, Bozell JJ, Rials TG, Labbe N (2016) Effects of organosolv fractionation time on thermal and chemical properties of lignins. RSC Adv 6:79228–79235. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16296G
Tayeb AH, Amini E, Ghasemi S, Tajvidi M (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials-binding properties and applications: a review. Molecules 23:2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102684
Tejado A, Pena C, Labidi J, Echeverria JM, Mondragon I (2007) Physico-chemical characterization of lignins from different sources for use in phenol-formaldehyde resin synthesis. Bioresour Technol 98:1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.042
Visanko M, Sirvio JA, Piltonen P, Sliz R, Liimatainen H, Illikainen M (2017) Mechanical fabrication of high-strength and redispersible wood nanofibers from unbleached groundwood pulp. Cellulose 24:4173–4187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1406-7
Wang S, Cheng Q (2009) A novel process to isolate fibrils from cellulose fibers by high-intensity ultrasonication, Part 1: process optimization. J Appl Polym Sci 113:1270–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30072
Wang X, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Song Y, Zhou Z, Zhao H (2017) Tert-butyl alcohol used to fabricate nano-cellulose aerogels via freeze-drying technology. Mater Res Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa72bc
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by SDSU Sungrant Regional Program (A18-0659), Tennessee Experimental Station Project (#TEN00510), the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (201504603), Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University of China (163020772).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest for all authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Chen, H., Feng, X. et al. Isolation and characterization of lignocellulosic nanofibers from four kinds of organosolv-fractionated lignocellulosic materials. Wood Sci Technol 54, 503–517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01167-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01167-4