Skip to main content
Log in

Zimmer’s conjecture for actions of \(\mathrm {SL}(m,\pmb {\mathbb {Z}})\)

  • Published:
Inventiones mathematicae Aims and scope

Abstract

We prove Zimmer’s conjecture for \(C^2\) actions by finite-index subgroups of \(\mathrm {SL}(m,{\mathbb {Z}})\) provided \(m>3\). The method utilizes many ingredients from our earlier proof of the conjecture for actions by cocompact lattices in \(\mathrm {SL}(m,{\mathbb {R}})\) (Brown et al. in Zimmer’s conjecture: subexponential growth, measure rigidity, and strong property (T), 2016. arXiv:1608.04995) but new ideas are needed to overcome the lack of compactness of the space \((G \times M)/\Gamma \) (admitting the induced G-action). Non-compactness allows both measures and Lyapunov exponents to escape to infinity under averaging and a number of algebraic, geometric, and dynamical tools are used control this escape. New ideas are provided by the work of Lubotzky, Mozes, and Raghunathan on the structure of nonuniform lattices and, in particular, of \(\mathrm {SL}(m,{\mathbb {Z}})\) providing a geometric decomposition of the cusp into rank one directions, whose geometry is more easily controlled. The proof also makes use of a precise quantitative form of non-divergence of unipotent orbits by Kleinbock and Margulis, and an extension by de la Salle of strong property (T) to representations of nonuniform lattices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. After this work was completed, Brown-Damjanovic-Zhang showed that some modifications of our arguments also give a proof for \(C^1\) diffeomorphisms [3].

References

  1. Athreya, J.S.: Quantitative recurrence and large deviations for Teichmuller geodesic flow. Geom. Dedic. 119, 121–140 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Billingsley, P.: Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, A., Damjanovic, D., Zhang, Z.: \(C^1\) actions on manifolds by lattices in Lie groups. Preprint (2018). arXiv:1801.04009

  4. Brown, A., Fisher, D., Hurtado, S.: Zimmer’s conjecture: subexponential growth, measure rigidity, and strong property (T). Preprint (2016). arXiv:1608.04995

  5. Brown, A., Rodriguez Hertz, F.: Smooth ergodic theory of \({\mathbb{Z}}^d\)-actions part 1: Lyapunov exponents, dynamical charts, and coarse Lyapunov manifolds. Preprint (2016). arXiv:1610.09997

  6. Brown, A., Rodriguez Hertz, F., Wang, Z.: Invariant measures and measurable projective factors for actions of higher-rank lattices on manifolds. Preprint (2016). arXiv:1609.05565

  7. Burger, M., Monod, N.: Continuous bounded cohomology and applications to rigidity theory. Geom. Funct. Anal. 12, 219–280 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. de la Salle, M.: Strong (T) for higher rank lattices (2017). arXiv:1711.01900

  9. Eskin, A., McMullen, C.: Mixing, counting, and equidistribution in Lie groups. Duke Math. J. 71, 181–209 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskin, A., Mirzakhani, M.: Counting closed geodesics in moduli space. J. Mod. Dyn. 5, 71–105 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, D., Margulis, G.A.: Local rigidity for cocycles. In: Surveys in Differential Geometry, Vol. VIII (Boston, MA, 2002), Volume 8 of Surveys in Differential Geometry, pp. 191–234. International Press, Somerville (2003)

  12. Franks, J., Handel, M.: Distortion elements in group actions on surfaces. Duke Math. J. 131, 441–468 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghys, É.: Actions de réseaux sur le cercle. Invent. Math. 137, 199–231 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kadyrov, S., Kleinbock, D.Y., Lindenstrauss, E., Margulis, G.A.: Singular systems of linear forms and non-escape of mass in the space of lattices. Preprint (2016). arXiv:1407.5310

  15. Kleinbock, D.Y., Margulis, G.A.: Flows on homogeneous spaces and Diophantine approximation on manifolds. Ann. Math. (2) 148, 339–360 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinbock, D.: An extension of quantitative nondivergence and applications to Diophantine exponents. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 360, 6497–6523 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lubotzky, A., Mozes, S., Raghunathan, M.S.: Cyclic subgroups of exponential growth and metrics on discrete groups. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 317, 735–740 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lubotzky, A., Mozes, S., Raghunathan, M.S.: The word and Riemannian metrics on lattices of semisimple groups. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 2000, 5–53 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Margulis, G.A.: Explicit constructions of expanders. Probl Peredači Inf. 9, 71–80 (1973)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Margulis, G.: Problems and conjectures in rigidity theory. In: Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives, pp. 161–174. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000)

  21. Polterovich, L.: Growth of maps, distortion in groups and symplectic geometry. Invent. Math. 150, 655–686 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ratner, M.: Invariant measures and orbit closures for unipotent actions on homogeneous spaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 4, 236–257 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ratner, M.: On Raghunathan’s measure conjecture. Ann. Math. (2) 134, 545–607 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah, N.A.: Limit distributions of polynomial trajectories on homogeneous spaces. Duke Math. J. 75, 711–732 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Shalom, Y.: Rigidity of commensurators and irreducible lattices. Invent. Math. 141, 1–54 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Witte, D.: Arithmetic groups of higher \({ Q}\)-rank cannot act on \(1\)-manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 122, 333–340 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dave Witte Morris for his generous willingness to answer questions of all sorts throughout the production of this paper and [4]. We also thank to Shirali Kadyrov, Jayadev Athreya and Alex Eskin for helpful conversations, particularly on the material in Sect. 1.5 and Mikael de la Salle for many helpful conversations regarding strong property (T). We also thank the anonymous referee for a very careful reading and numerous comments which helped improve the exposition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fisher.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

David Fisher was partially supported by NSF Grants DMS-1308291 and DMS-1607041. David Fisher was also partially supported by the University of Chicago, and by NSF Grants DMS 1107452, 1107263, 1107367, “RNMS: Geometric Structures and Representation Varieties” (the GEAR Network) during a visit to the Isaac Newton Institute in Cambridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, A., Fisher, D. & Hurtado, S. Zimmer’s conjecture for actions of \(\mathrm {SL}(m,\pmb {\mathbb {Z}})\). Invent. math. 221, 1001–1060 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-020-00962-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-020-00962-x

Navigation