Skip to main content
Log in

Keeping your eye on the target: eye–hand coordination in a repetitive Fitts’ task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a cyclical Fitts’ task, hand movements transition from continuous to discrete movements when the Index of Difficulty (ID) increases. Moreover, at high ID (small target), the eyes saccade to and subsequently fixate the targets at every movement, while at low ID (large target) intermittent monitoring is used. By hypothesis, the (periodic) gaze shifts are abandoned for movement times shorter than about 0.350 s due to systemic constraints (i.e., a refractory period and intrinsic latency). If so, the transition in eye and hand movements is independent. To investigate these issues, the present study examined the effects of changing ID via the targets’ width or distance as well as hysteresis in eye–hand coordination. To this aim, 14 participants performed a cyclical Fitts’ task while their hand and eye movements were recorded simultaneously. The results show that the transition in eye–hand synchronization (at 2.87 bit; 0.25 s) and in hand dynamics (at 4.85 bit; 0.81 s) neither co-occurred nor correlated. Some small width vs. distance dissociations and hysteresis effects were found, but they disappeared when eye–hand synchronization was viewed as a function of movement time rather than ID. This confirms that a minimal between-saccade time is the limiting factor in eye–hand synchronization. Additionally, the timing between the start of the hand movement and the saccade appeared to be relatively constant (at 0.15 s) and independent of movement time, implying a constant delay that should be implemented in a dynamical model of eye–hand coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Determining the corresponding eye movement is somewhat arbitrary at low IDs, when only few eye movements are made that are (at best) weakly phase locked to the hand movements only. We chose a limit of MT + 0.2 s for determining which hand movement a saccade belongs to. Thus, if eye movement was initiated more than 0.2 s after the hand had already arrived at the target, the gaze was considered as being early for the next movement, instead of being late for the previous one.

  2. Lazzari et al. (2009) report that for movement times lower than 350 ms, the E/H ratio decreases, but they do not report critical values where E/H ratio = 0.5 as we did here. Visual comparison of the data suggest that our results are similar to those reported by Lazzari and colleagues.

References

  • Abrams RA, Meyer DE, Kornblum S (1989) Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements: characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. J Exp Psychol Human 15(3):529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade JM, Estévez-Pérez MG (2014) Statistical comparison of the slopes of two regression lines: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 838:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Binsted G, Chua R, Helsen W, Elliott D (2001) Eye–hand coordination in goal-directed aiming. Hum Mov Sci 20:563–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Boulard M, Fernandez L, Mottet D (2002) Informational constraints in human precision aiming. Neurosci Lett 333:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Park JH, Shea CH (2004) Systematic scaling of target width: dynamics, planning, and feedback. Neurosci Lett 367:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JJ, Park JH, Shea CH (2006) Target width scaling in a repetitive aiming task: Switching between cyclical and discrete units of action. Exp Brain Res 175:710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez L, Warren WH, Bootsma RJ (2006) Kinematic adaptation to sudden changes in visual task constraints during reciprocal aiming. Hum Mov Sci 25:695–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67:103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gowen E, Abadi RV (2005) Saccadic instabilities and voluntary saccadic behavior. Exp Brain Res 164:29–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guiard Y (1993) On Fitts’ and Hooke’s laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychol 82:139–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guiard Y (1997) Fitts’ law in the discrete vs. cyclical paradigm. Hum Mov Sci 16(1):97–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haken H (1983) Synergetics: An introduction: Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51:347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CM, Wolpert DM (2006) The main sequence of saccades optimizes speed-accuracy trade-off. Biol Cybern 95:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen WF, Elliott D, Starkes JL, Ricker KL (1998) Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. J Motor Behav 30:249–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Studenka BE, Rheaume NL, Zelaznik HN, Jirsa VK (2008) Distinct timing mechanisms produce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Fernandez L, Bootsma RJ, Jirsa VK (2010) Fitts’ law is not continuous in reciprocal aiming. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 277(1685):1179–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Knol H, Sleimen-Malkoun R, Temprado JJ, Jirsa VK (2015) Does changing Fitts’ index of difficulty evoke transitions in movement dynamics? EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys 3:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS (2005) The excitator as a minimal model for the coordination dynamics of discrete and rhythmic movement generation. J Motor Behav 37:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens R, Becker W, Kornhuber HH (1981) Natural and drug-induced variations of velocity and duration of human saccadic eye movements: evidence for a control of the neural pulse generator by local feedback. Biol Cybern 39:87–96F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knol H, Huys R, Sarrazin JC, Spiegler A, Jirsa VK (2017) Ebbinghaus figures that deceive the eye do not necessarily deceive the hand. Sci Rep 7:3111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzari S, Mottet D, Vercher JL (2009) Eye–hand coordination in rhythmical pointing. J Motor Behav 41:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human Comput Interact 7:91–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Keith Smith JE (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mottet D, Bootsma RJ (1999) The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming. Biol Cybern 80:235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mottet D, Guiard Y, Ferrand T, Bootsma RJ (2001) Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. J Exp Psychol Human 27:1275–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2004) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan RS (1979) A reappraisal of Fitts’ law. J Motor Behav 11:179–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz S (1994) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Perseus, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrier R, Forestier N, Berrigan F, Germain-Robitaille M, Lavallière M, Teasdale N (2011) Effect of terminal accuracy requirements on temporal eye–hand coordination during fast discrete and reciprocal pointings. J Neuroeng Rehabil 8:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Mourik AM, Beek PJ (2004) Discrete and cyclical movements: unified dynamics or separate control? Acta Psychol 117:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1968) Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT, Norris AH, Shock NW (1969) Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. Acta Psychol 30:3–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3:1–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CC, Kwon OS, Kowler E (2010) Fitts’s Law and speed/accuracy trade-offs during sequences of saccades: Implications for strategies of saccadic planning. Vis Res 50:2142–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. de Vries.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Vries, S., Huys, R. & Zanone, P.G. Keeping your eye on the target: eye–hand coordination in a repetitive Fitts’ task. Exp Brain Res 236, 3181–3190 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5369-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5369-1

Keywords

Navigation