Abstract
Haptic guidance has been shown to have both facilitatory and interfering effects on motor learning. Interfering effects have been hypothesized to result from the particular dynamic environment, which supports a passive role of the learner, and they should be attenuated by fading guidance. Facilitatory effects, in particular for dynamic movement characteristics, have been hypothesized to result from the high-quality information provided by haptic demonstration. If haptic demonstration provides particularly precise information about target movements, the motor system’s need for such information should more likely increase in the course of motor learning, in which case growing guidance should be more beneficial for learning. We contrasted fading and growing guidance in the course of learning a spatio-temporal motor pattern. To stimulate an active role of the learner, practice trials consisted of three phases, a visual demonstration of the target movement, a guided reproduction, and a reproduction without haptic guidance. Performance was assessed in terms of variable duration errors, relative-timing errors, variable path-length errors, and shape errors. Motor learning with growing and fading guidance turned out to be largely equivalent, so that the notion of an increasing optimal precision of haptic demonstrations, which matches a demand of increasingly precise information on the target movement, found no support. Duration errors declined only with fading, but not with growing guidance. Relative timing revealed a benefit of immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but learning was not different between the two practice protocols. This contrast between absolute and relative timing adds to other evidence according to which acquisition of these two aspects of motor timing involves different learning mechanisms. Whereas relative timing gained from immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but revealed no practice-related improvement in the presence of haptic guidance, the opposite pattern of results was found for the shape error. This finding is consistent with the claim that haptic demonstration is particularly efficient with respect to relative timing, but not with respect to spatial movement characteristics.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00221-014-3914-0/MediaObjects/221_2014_3914_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00221-014-3914-0/MediaObjects/221_2014_3914_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00221-014-3914-0/MediaObjects/221_2014_3914_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00221-014-3914-0/MediaObjects/221_2014_3914_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basteris A, Bracco L, Sanguineti V (2012) Robot-assisted intermanual transfer of handwriting skills. Hum Mov Sci 31:1175–1190
Bluteau J, Coquillart S, Payan Y, Gentaz E (2008) Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories. PLoS ONE 3(3):e1775
Casadio M, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, Giannoni P (2009) Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement. Exp Brain Res 194:219–231
Chen X, Agrawal SK (2013) Assisting versus repelling force-feedback for learning of a line following task in a wheelchair. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21:959–968
Di Brina C, Niels R, Overvelde A, Levi G, Hulstijn W (2008) Dynamic time warping: a new method in the study of poor handwriting. Hum Mov Sci 27:242–255
Emken JL, Benitez R, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2007) Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-neede. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:8
Feygin D, Keehner M, Tendick F (2002) Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. Proc of the 10th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems 40–47
Fitts PM (1964) Perceptual-motor skill learning. In: Melton AW (ed) Categories of human learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 243–285
Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human Performance. Prentice/Hall, London
Franks IM, Wilberg RB (1982) The generation of movement patterns during the acquisition of a pursuit tracking task. Hum Mov Sci 1:251–272
Grindlay G (2008) Haptic guidance benefits musical motor learning. Proc of the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems 397–404
Guadagnoli M, Lee T (2004) Challenge point: a framework for conceptualiting the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 36:334–345
Heuer H, Rapp K (2011) Active error corrections enhance adaptation to a visuo-motor rotation. Exp Brain Res 211:97–108
Heuer H, Rapp K (2012) Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect. Exp Brain Res 218:129–140
Heuer H, Rapp K (2014) Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction. Exp Brain Res 232:675–684
Heuer H, Schmidt RA (1988) Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:241–252
Heuer H, Sülzenbrück S (2012) A progression of approximations to internal models of complex visuo-motor transformations. Hum Mov Sci 31:1056–1070
Holding DH, Macrae AW (1964) Guidance, restriction and knowledge of results. Ergonomics 7:289–295
Jäncke L, Loose R, Lutz K, Specht K, Shah NJ (2000) Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. Cogn Brain Res 10:51–66
Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2006) Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 3:12
Keogh E, Ratanamahatana CA (2005) Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowl Inf Syst 7:358–386
Lüttgen J, Heuer H (2012a) Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics. Exp Brain Res 222:1–9
Lüttgen J, Heuer H (2012b) The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns. Hum Mov Sci 31:519–528
Lüttgen J, Heuer H (2013) The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing. J Mot Behav 45:249–258
Magill RA, Hall KG (1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci 9:241–289
Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2008) Haptic guidance can enhance motor learning of a steering task. J Mot Behav 40:545–556
Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2009) Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6:20
Marchal-Crespo L, Furumasu J, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2010) A robotic wheelchair trainer: design overview and a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:40
Marchal-Crespo L, Van Raai M, Rauter G, Wolf P, Riener R (2013) The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task. Exp Brain Res 231:277–291
Marteniuk RG, Romanow SKE (1983) Human movement organization and learning as revealed by variability of movement, use of kinematic information, and Fourier analysis. In: Magill RA (ed) Memory and control of action. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 167–197
Merchant H, Zarco W, Prado L (2008) Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks. J Neurophysiol 99:939–949
Milot M-H, Marchal-Crespo L, Green CS, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2010) Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Exp Brain Res 201:119–131
Novakovic V, Sanguineti V (2011) Adaptation to constant-magnitude assistive forces: kinematic and neural correlates. Exp Brain Res 209:425–436
Prange GP, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens H, Ijzerman J (2006) Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43:171–184
Rabiner L, Rosenberg A, Levinson S (1978) Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition. IEEE Trans Acoust 26:575–582
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Patton JL (2009) Can robots help the learning of skilled actions? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 37:43–51
Reinkensmeyer J, Emken K, Cramer SC (2004) Robotics, motor learning, and neurological recovery. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 6:497–525
Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical appraisal. Psychol Bull 95:355–386
Stanley ML, Franks IM (1990) Learning to organize the frequency components of a perceptual motor skill. Hum Mov Sci 9:291–323
Takahashi CD, Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC (2007) Robot based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 131:425–437
Van Asseldonk EHF, Wessels M, Stienen AHA, Van der Helm FCT, Van der Kooij H (2009) Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task. J Physiol (Paris) 103:276–285
Vergaro E, Casadio M, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V (2010) Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:13
Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R (1994) Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Res Q Exerc Sport 65:316–323
Wulf G, Schmidt RA, Deubel H (1993) Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19:1134–1150
Wulf G, Lee TD, Schmidt RA (1994) Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. J Mot Behav 26:362–369
Acknowledgments
We thank Andreas Volgmann and Hanno Mussmann for software support and Sarah Jacob and Sarah Längler for support in running the experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heuer, H., Lüttgen, J. Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance. Exp Brain Res 232, 2229–2242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0