Abstract
In stroke survivors, motor impairment is frequently associated with degraded proprioceptive and/or somatosensory functions. Here we address the question of how to use robots to improve proprioception in these patients. We used an ‘assist-as-needed’ protocol, in which robot assistance was kept to a minimum and was continuously adjusted during exercise. To specifically train proprioceptive functions, we alternated blocks of trials with and without vision. A total of nine chronic stroke survivors participated in the study, which consisted of a total of ten 1-h exercise sessions. We used a linear mixed-effects statistical model to account for the effects of exercise, vision and the degree of assistance on the overall performance, and to capture both the systematic effects and the individual variations. Although there was not always a complete recovery of autonomous movements, all subjects exhibited an increased amount of voluntary control. Moreover, training with closed eyes appeared to be beneficial for patients with abnormal proprioception. Our results indicate that training by alternating vision and no-vision blocks may improve the ability to use proprioception as well as the ability to integrate it with vision. We suggest that the approach may be useful in the more general case of motor skill acquisition, in which enhancing proprioception may improve the ability to physically interact with the external world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT (1997) The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 54:443–446
Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C (1991) Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 337:1521–1526
Bates DM, Pinheiro JC (1998) lme and nlme—mixed-effects methods and classes for S and S-PLUS, Version 3.0. In: Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Battig WF (1954) The effect of kinesthetic, verbal, and visual cues on the acquisition of a lever-positioning skill. J Exp Psychol 47:371–380
Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67:206–207
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756
Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE (1993) Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:602–611
Casadio M, Morasso PG, Sanguineti V, Arrichiello V (2006) Braccio di Ferro: a new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation. Technol Health Care 13:1–20
Casadio M, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V (2009) A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physio-therapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil (in press)
Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G (2005) Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13:311–324
Dechaumont-Palacin S, Marque P, De Boissezon X, Castel-Lacanal E, Carel C, Berry I, Pastor J, Albucher JF, Chollet F, Loubinoux I (2007) Neural correlates of proprioceptive integration in the contralesional hemisphere of very impaired patients shortly after a subcortical stroke: an fMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(2):154–165
Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2007) Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol 97:3997–4006
Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N (2003) Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:477–482
Franklin DW, So U, Burdet E, Kawato M (2007) Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLoS ONE 2:e1336
Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE (2002) The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16:232–240
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI (2007) Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(2):111–121
Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974
Levin MF (1996) Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 119(Pt 1):281–293
Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227
Murdoch IE, Morris SS, Cousens SN (1998) People and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 82:971–973
Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2004) Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:636–646
Patton JL, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2006a) Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 43:643–656
Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2006b) Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res 168:368–383
Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G (2005) Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 19:404–411
Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ (2006) Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43:171–184
Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297–8304
Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224
Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DD, van Beers RJ, Brenner E (2006) Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18781–18786
Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2005) Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8:490–497
Takahashi CD, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2003) Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Exp Brain Res 149:131–140
Trombly (1995) Occupational therapy for dysfunction. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Tyson S, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC (2007) Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(2):166–172
van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1996) How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111:253–261
van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122:367–377
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1994) Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98:153–156
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by two Research Projects of National Relevance (PRIN) grants awarded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research to P. Morasso and V. Sanguineti. We thank Ms. Liliana Zerbino, PT, for the help in the selection of the patients and the evaluation of the FMA score.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casadio, M., Morasso, P., Sanguineti, V. et al. Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement. Exp Brain Res 194, 219–231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1680-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1680-6