Skip to main content
Log in

Cutaneous sensory feedback plays a critical role in agonist–antagonist co-activation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of cutaneous feedback in the agonist–antagonist co-activation mechanism during maximum voluntary force (MVF) production by the fingers. Seventeen healthy male subjects (age: 23.8 ± 1.0 years) were asked to press with maximal effort at their fingertips. Finger forces at the fingertips and muscle activities of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS, agonist) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC, antagonist) were recorded using force sensors and electromyography, respectively. There were two experimental conditions: with and without administration of a ring block to the fingers (i.e., anesthesia and normal conditions, or AC and NC, respectively). The ring block was used to deprive cutaneous feedback. Consistent with previous studies, finger MVF decreased significantly in AC compared with NC. Moreover, the force production of non-task fingers significantly increased in AC. Muscle activity of the EDC was significantly lower in AC than in NC; no significant changes in the FDS muscle were observed. The findings of this study show that cutaneous feedback not only increases MVF and force accuracy, but facilitates agonist–antagonist co-activation by increasing antagonist muscle activation. The results of this study imply that cutaneous feedback is linked to both primary and adjacent motor neurons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acsády L, Görcs TJ, Freund TF (1996) Different populations of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-immunoreactive interneurons are specialized to control pyramidal cells or interneurons in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 73:317–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augurelle AS, Smith AM, Lejeune T, Thonnard JL (2003) Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. J Neurophysiol 89:665–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck S, Hallett M (2011) Surround inhibition in the motor system. Exp Brain Res 210:165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brasilneto JP, Vallssole J, Pascualleone A, Cammarota A, Amassian VE, Cracco R, Maccabee P, Cracco J, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1993) Rapid modulation of human cortical motor outputs following ischemic nerve block. Brain 116:511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canedo A (1997) Primary motor cortex influences on the descending and ascending systems. Prog Neurobiol 51:287–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Capaday C, Devanne H, Bertrand L, Lavoie BA (1998) Intracortical connections between motor cortical zones controlling antagonistic muscles in the cat: a combined anatomical and physiological study. Exp Brain Res 120:223–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DF, Knight B, Prochazka A (1999) Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp. J Neurophysiol 81:2215–2225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danion F, Li S, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2002) Relations between surface EMG of extrinsic flexors and individual finger forces support the notion of muscle compartments. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:185–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danion F, Latash ML, Li S (2003) Finger interactions studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation during multi-finger force production tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1445–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiDomenico A, Nussbaum MA (2008) Estimation of forces exerted by the fingers using standardised surface electromyography from the forearm. Ergonomics 51:858–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duque J, Vandermeeren Y, Lejeune TM, Thonnard JL, Smith AM, Olivier E (2005) Paradoxical effect of digital anaesthesia on force and corticospinal excitability. NeuroReport 16:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernberg M, Serra E, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P (2009) Influence of topical anaesthesia on the corticomotor response to tongue training. Arch Oral Biol 54:696–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier C, Brizzi L, Giguere D, Capaday C (2007) Corticospinal control of antagonistic muscles in the cat. Eur J Neurosci 26:1632–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evrard HC, Craig AD (2008) Retrograde analysis of the cerebellar projections to the posteroventral part of the ventral lateral thalamic nucleus in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 508:286–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1981) Precis of Gallistel the organization of action. Behav Brain Sci 4:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandevia SC, Macefield VG, Biglandritchie B, Gorman RB, Burke D (1993) Motoneuronal output and gradation of effort in attempts to contract acutely paralyzed leg muscles in man. J Physiol-Lond 471:411–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijing PA, Baan GC (2003) Myofascial force transmission: muscle relative position and length determine agonist and synergist muscle force. J Appl Physiol 94:1092–1107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA, Piateski E (2006) Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force. Exp Brain Res 168:298–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbreath SL, Refshauge K, Gandevia SC (1997) Differential control of the digits of the human hand: evidence from digital anaesthesia and weight matching. Exp Brain Res 117:507–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koerber HR, Brown PB (1995) Quantitative-analysis of dorsal horn cell receptive-fields following limited deafferentation. J Neurophysiol 74:2065–2076

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolelis MAL, Lin RCS, Woodward DJ, Chapin JK (1993) Induction of immediate spatiotemporal changes in thalamic networks by peripheral block of ascending cutaneous information. Nature 361:533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otis TS, Mody I (1992) Modulation of decay kinetics and frequency of Gaba-a receptor-mediated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in hippocampal-neurons. Neuroscience 49:13–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson DD (1996) Changes in the response properties of neurons in the ventroposterior lateral thalamic nucleus of the raccoon after peripheral deafferentation. J Neurophysiol 75:2441–2450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi S, Pasqualetti P, Tecchio F, Sabato N, Rossini PM (1998) Modulation of corticospinal output to human hand muscles following deprivation of sensory feedback. Neuroimage 8:163–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossini PM, Rossi S, Tecchio F, Pasqualetti P, Finazzi-Agrò A, Sabato A (1996) Focal brain stimulation in healthy humans: motor maps changes following partial hand sensory deprivation. Neuroscience Lett 214:191–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider C, Devanne H, Lavoie BA, Capaday C (2002) Neural mechanisms involved in the functional linking of motor cortical points. Exp Brain Res 146:86–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Olafsdottir H, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) The emergence and disappearance of multi-digit synergies during force-production tasks. Exp Brain Res 164:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Karol S, Kim YS, Seo NJ, Kim YH, Kim Y, Yoon BC (2012) Tactile feedback plays a critical role in maximum finger force production. J Biomech 45:415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinoura N, Suzuki Y, Yamada R, Kodama T, Takahashi M, Yagi K (2005) Fibers connecting the primary motor and sensory areas play a role in grasp stability of the hand. Neuroimage 25:936–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stinear CM, Byblow WD (2003) Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation. J Neurophysiol 89:2014–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takei T, Seki K (2010) Spinal interneurons facilitate coactivation of hand muscles during a precision grip task in monkeys. J Neurosci 30:17041–17050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamas G, Somogyi P, Buhl EH (1998) Differentially interconnected networks of GABAergic interneurons in the visual cortex of the cat. J Neurosci 18:4255–4270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson C, Lalonde D (2006) Randomized double-blind comparison of duration of anesthesia among three commonly used agents in digital nerve block. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:429–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wall JT, Kaas JH, Sur M (1986) Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. J Neurosci 6:218–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Hyo Young Pyeon, PT, MHSc for his advice and help during the experiments. This study was supported by a Korea University grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bum Chul Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Shim, J.K., Hong, YK. et al. Cutaneous sensory feedback plays a critical role in agonist–antagonist co-activation. Exp Brain Res 229, 149–156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3601-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3601-6

Keywords

Navigation