Skip to main content
Log in

Local Energy Bounds and Strong Locality in Chiral CFT

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 22 July 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

A family of quantum fields is said to be strongly local if it generates a local net of von Neumann algebras. There are few methods of showing directly strong locality of a quantum field. Among them, linear energy bounds are the most widely used, yet a chiral conformal field of conformal weight \(d>2\) cannot admit linear energy bounds. In this paper we give a new direct method to prove strong locality in two-dimensional conformal field theory. We prove that if a chiral conformal field satisfies an energy bound of degree \(d-1\), then it also satisfies a certain local version of the energy bound, and this in turn implies strong locality. A central role in our proof is played by diffeomorphism symmetry. As a concrete application, we show that the vertex operator algebra given by a unitary vacuum representation of the \({\mathcal {W}}_3\)-algebra is strongly local. For central charge \(c > 2\), this yields a new conformal net. We further prove that these nets do not satisfy strong additivity, and hence are not completely rational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. This assumption is mainly for simplicity. In general, for applications of e.g. Proposition 3.2—since the field operators always change the eigenvalues by an integer—one could decompose the space V into invariant components where this assumption does hold and then use the fact that the estimate of the cited proposition is independent of the value of h.

  2. The constant r is given in an explicit manner in [FH05, (3.27)]: \(r = -\frac{c}{24}\int _{S^1}\{\gamma , z\}f(z)dz\), where \(\{\gamma , z\}\) is the Schwarz derivative.

  3. This can be proved from the linear enegy bound and induction: The \(n=1\) case is exactly the linear energy bound. Then, \(\Vert T(f_1)\cdots T(f_n) \Psi \Vert \le t\Vert (L_0+{\mathbb {1}})T(f_2)\cdots T(f_n) \Psi \Vert \) and \((L_0+{\mathbb {1}})T(f_2)\cdots T(f_n) \Psi = \sum _{j=2}^n T(f_2)\cdots T(f_j')\cdots T(f_n)\Psi + T(f_2)\cdots T(f_n) (L_0+{\mathbb {1}})\Psi \), and we can apply the assumption of induction to the last expression, as \(\Psi \in C^\infty (L_0)\). For the second claim, we take \(n > s\), then we have \((T(f)+q{\mathbb {1}})^{2n} \le t(L_0+{\mathbb {1}})^{2n}\) for some \(t>0\), and as the function \(f(x) = x^{\frac{s}{n}}\) is an operator monotone [Sim19, Theorem 4.1], we have \((T(f)+q{\mathbb {1}})^{2s} \le (t(L_0+{\mathbb {1}}))^{2s}\) by [Sim19, Theorem 2.9].

  4. Not all nonnegative smooth functions have smooth \((d-1)\)-th root.

References

  1. Arakawa, T., Creutzig, T., Linshaw, A.R.: W-algebras as coset vertex algebras. Invent. Math. 218(1), 145–195 (2019). arXiv:1801.03822

  2. Artamonov, D.V.: Introduction to finite \(W\)-algebras. Bol. Mat. 23(2), 165–219 (2016). arXiv:1607.01697

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchholz, D., Mack, G., Todorov, I.: The current algebra on the circle as a germ of local field theories. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 5B, 20–56 (1988). (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222585851)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouwknegt, P., Schoutens, K.: \({\mathscr {W}}\) symmetry in conformal field theory. Phys. Rep. 223(4), 183–276 (1993). arXiv:hep-th/9210010

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchholz, D., Schulz-Mirbach, H.: Haag duality in conformal quantum field theory. Rev. Math. Phys. 2(1), 105–125 (1990). (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246352668)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpi, S., Hillier, R., Kawahigashi, Y., Longo, R., Feng, X.: \(N=2\) superconformal nets. Commun. Math. Phys. 336(3), 1285–1328 (2015). arXiv:1207.2398

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpi, S., Hillier, R., Kawahigashi, Y., Longo, R.: Spectral triples and the super-Virasoro algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. 295(1), 71–97 (2010). arXiv:0811.4128

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpi, S., Kawahigashi, Y., Longo, R., Weiner, M.: From vertex operator algebras to conformal nets and back. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 254(1213), vi+85 (2018). arXiv:1503.01260

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Carpi, S., Tanimoto, Y., Weiner, M.: Unitary representations of the W3–algebra with \(c\ge 2\), to appear in Transformation Groups. arXiv:1910.08334

  10. Carpi, S., Weiner, M.: Local energy bounds and representations of conformal nets (in preparation)

  11. Carpi, S., Weiner, M.: On the uniqueness of diffeomorphism symmetry in conformal field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 258(1), 203–221 (2005). arXiv:math/0407190

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Driessler, W., Fröhlich, J.: The reconstruction of local observable algebras from the euclidean green’s functions of relativistic quantum field theory. Annales de L’Institut Henri Poincare Section Physique Theorique 27, 221–236 (1977). (https://eudml.org/doc/75959)

  13. Fewster, C.J., Hollands, S.: Quantum energy inequalities in two-dimensional conformal field theory. Rev. Math. Phys. 17(5), 577–612 (2005). arXiv:math-ph/0412028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedan, D., Qiu, Z., Shenker, S.: Details of the nonunitarity proof for highest weight representations of the Virasoro algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. 107(4), 535–542 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Glimm, J., Jaffe, A.: The \(\lambda \phi _{2}^{4}\) quantum field theory without cutoffs. IV. Perturbations of the Hamiltonian. J. Math. Phys. 13, 1568–1584 (1972)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Glimm, J., Jaffe, A.: Quantum Physics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1987). (https://books.google.com/books?id=VSjjBwAAQBAJ)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Goddard, P., Kent, A., Olive, D.: Unitary representations of the Virasoro and super-Virasoro algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 103(1), 105–119 (1986). (https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104114626)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gui, B.: Categorical extensions of conformal nets. Comm. Math. Phys. 383, 763–839 (2021)

  19. Gui, B.: Unbounded field operators in categorical extensions of conformal nets (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03095

  20. Haag, R.: Local Quantum Physics. Texts and Monographs in Physics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1996). (https://books.google.com/books?id=OlLmCAAAQBAJ)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kac, V.: Vertex Algebras for Beginners, Volume 10 of University Lecture Series, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998). (https://books.google.com/books?id=e-jxBwAAQBAJ)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kawahigashi, Y., Longo, R., Müger, M.: Multi-interval subfactors and modularity of representations in conformal field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 219(3), 631–669 (2001). arXiv:math/9903104

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kac, V.G., Raina, A.K.: Bombay Lectures on Highest Weight Representations of Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., Teaneck (1987). (https://books.google.com/books?id=0P23OB84eqUC)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Longo, R., Xu, F.: Topological sectors and a dichotomy in conformal field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 251(2), 321–364 (2004). arXiv:math/0309366

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Morinelli, V., Tanimoto, Y., Weiner, M.: Conformal covariance and the split property. Commun. Math. Phys. 357(1), 379–406 (2018). arXiv:1609.02196

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson, E.: Analytic vectors. Ann. Math. (2), 70, 572–615 (1959)

  27. Nelson, E.: Time-ordered operator products of sharp-time quadratic forms. J. Functional Analysis 11, 211–219 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. Academic Press, New York (1975). (https://books.google.com/books?id=Kz7s7bgVe8gC)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon, B.: Loewner’s Theorem on Monotone Matrix Functions, Volume 354 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Cham (2019)

  30. Streater, R.F., Wightman, A.S.: PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That. Princeton Landmarks in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000).. (Corrected third printing of the 1978 edition)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanimoto, Y.: Bound state operators and wedge-locality in integrable quantum field theories. SIGMA Symmetry Integr. Geom. Methods Appl. 12, 100 (2016). arXiv:1602.04696

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Tener, J.E.: Fusion and Positivity in Chiral Conformal Field Theory (2019). arXiv:1910.08257

  33. Toledano Laredo, V.: Integrating unitary representations of infinite-dimensional Lie groups. J. Funct. Anal. 161(2), 478–508 (1999). arXiv:math/0106195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Weiner, M.: Conformal Covariance and Related Properties of Chiral qft. (2005). Ph.D. thesis, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”. arXiv:math/0703336

  35. Weiner, M.: Local equivalence of representations of \({\rm Diff}^+(S^1)\) corresponding to different highest weights. Commun. Math. Phys. 352(2), 759–772 (2017). arXiv:1606.00344

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referees for helpful comments. SC and MW are supported in part by the ERC advanced Grant 669240 QUEST “Quantum Algebraic Structures and Models”. SC is also supported by GNAMPA-INDAM. YT was supported until February 2020 by Programma per giovani ricercatori, anno 2014 “Rita Levi Montalcini” of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. MW is supported also by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (NRDI) via the research Grant K124152, KH129601 and K132097 and the Bolyai János Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, the ÚNKP-21-5 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology. SC and YT acknowledge the MIUR Excellence Department Project awarded to the Department of Mathematics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” CUP E83C18000100006 and the University of Rome “Tor Vergata” funding scheme “Beyond Borders” CUP E84I19002200005. We are also grateful to Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach and Simons Center for Geometry and Physics, where parts of this work have been done.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoh Tanimoto.

Additional information

Communicated by Y. Ogata

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carpi, S., Tanimoto, Y. & Weiner, M. Local Energy Bounds and Strong Locality in Chiral CFT. Commun. Math. Phys. 390, 169–192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04291-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04291-9

Navigation