Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 236, Issue 3, pp 459–472 | Cite as

Migration of mineral oil from printed paperboard into dry foods: survey of the German market. Part II: advancement of migration during storage

  • Maurus Biedermann
  • Jan-Erik Ingenhoff
  • Giovanna Dima
  • Michael Zurfluh
  • Sandra Biedermann-Brem
  • Lydia Richter
  • Thomas Simat
  • Antje Harling
  • Koni Grob
Original Paper

Abstract

In April 2010, 119 samples of dry foods packed in paperboard boxes and stored at ambient temperature were collected from the German market. The migration of mineral oil from the recycled paperboard and printing ink was analyzed for the first time immediately after collection and reported in Vollmer et al. (Eur Food Res Technol 232:175–182, 2011). It frequently exceeded 10–100 times the 0.6 mg/kg limit for mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) derived from the WHO/JECFA evaluation published in 2002. As most samples were far from the end of the shelf life, analyses were repeated 4 months later and a third time either at the expiry date or after 16 months. The average MOSH concentration in the foods increased from 8.9 to 14.3 mg/kg (by 60 %), which indicates a rapid migration during the first months of storage, but also a further increase up to the end of the shelf life. The maximum migration reached 101 mg/kg. In the third measurement, the average concentration of the migrated mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons was 2.2 mg/kg, with a maximum at 13.2 mg/kg. Most types of food behaved similarly, differences mostly reflecting the types of packaging rather than the food properties. Exceptions were table salt (hardly any migration) and noodles (low migration). Internal bags with an aluminum foil or PET layer were complete barriers. Migration through plastic with vapor-deposited aluminum or acrylate-coated polypropylene was reduced, but still sometimes exceeded 0.6 mg/kg. Internal bags of polyethylene had a weak effect on slowing migration, but acted as a sink for mineral oil: Although on average they only constituted 1.1 % of the total mass of the packs, they absorbed nearly 40 % of the migrating hydrocarbons. Polypropylene was a similar sink. In addition, it strongly slowed migration, but at the third measurement the 0.6 mg/kg limit was nevertheless exceeded in 11 of 16 samples. Polyolefin oligomeric saturated hydrocarbons (POSH) from the plastic or heat-sealable layer, largely branched hydrocarbons similar to MOSH, often migrated in the range of 1–5 mg/kg.

Keywords

Paperboard boxes Printing inks Mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) Barrier against migration of mineral oil Polyolefins as sink for mineral oil Polyolefin oligomeric saturated hydrocarbons (POSH) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was partly financed by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) via the Federal Agency of Agriculture and Nutrition (BLE) (project 2809HS012).

References

  1. 1.
    Vollmer A, Biedermann M, Grundböck F, Ingenhoff JE, Biedermann-Brem S, Altkofer W, Grob K (2011) Eur Food Res Technol 232:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). Übergänge von Mineralöl aus Verpackungsmaterialien auf Lebensmittel. Stellungnahme Nr. 008/2010 des BfR vom 09. Dezember 2009, http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/216/uebergaenge_von_mineraloel_aus_verpackungsmaterialien_auf_lebensmittel.pdf
  3. 3.
    Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA; 2002) 59th report, 11–20; WHO Technical Report Series 913, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_913.pdf
  4. 4.
    Biedermann M, Grob K (2010) Eur Food Res Technol 230:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biedermann M, Uematsu Y, Grob K (2011) Packaging Technol Sci 24:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), 7. Sitzung der BfR-Kommission für Bedarfsgegenstände, Protokoll der Sitzung vom 14. April 2011, p. 9. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/7_sitzung_der_bfr_kommission_fuer_bedarfsgegenstaende.pdf
  7. 7.
    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) “Scientific Opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons in Food”, EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2704; http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2704.htm
  8. 8.
    Concin N, Hofstetter G, Plattner B, Tomovski C, Fiselier K, Gerritzen K, Fessler S, Windbichler G, Zeimet A, Ulmer H, Siegl H, Rieger K, Concin H, Grob K (2008) Food Chem Toxicol 46:544–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorenzini R, Fiselier K, Biedermann M, Barbanera M, Braschi I, Grob K (2010) Food Addit Contam A 27:1765–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piringer O, Franz R, Huber M, Begley TH, McNeal TP (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:1532–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franz R, Huber M, Piringer OG (1997) Food Addit Contam 14:627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johns SM, Gramshaw JW, Castle L, Jickells SM Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 91:69–73Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johns SM, Jickells SM, Read WA, Gramshaw JW, Castle L (1996) Dtd Lebensm Rundsch 92:273–278Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feigenbaum A, Dole P, Aucejo S, Dainelli D, z Garcia C, Hankemeier T, N’Gono Y, Papaspyrides CD, Paseiro P, Pastorelli S, Pavlidou S, Pennarun PY, Saillard P, Vidal L, Vitrac O, Voulzatis Y (2005) Food Addit Contam 22:956–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fiselier K, Grob K (2012) Packaging Technol Sci 25:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biedermann M, Grob K (2009) J Agric Food Chem 57:8711–8721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Biedermann M, Grob K (2012) J Chromatogr A 1255:56–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biedermann M, Grob K (2012) J Chromatogr A 1255:76–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grob K (1991) On-line coupled LC-GC. Hüthig, Heidelberg. ISBN 3-7785-1872-0Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Barbanera M, Garbini D, Grob K (2011) Packaging Technol Sci 24:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harling A, Grob K, Helling R, Simat T (2012) Report on “Extent of migration of contaminants from packaging materials made of recycled paper and board into food”, German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), http://download.ble.de/09HS012.pdf
  22. 22.
    Biedermann-Brem S, Kasprick N, Simat T, Grob K (2012) Food Addit Contam A 29:449–460Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurus Biedermann
    • 1
  • Jan-Erik Ingenhoff
    • 1
  • Giovanna Dima
    • 1
  • Michael Zurfluh
    • 1
  • Sandra Biedermann-Brem
    • 1
  • Lydia Richter
    • 3
  • Thomas Simat
    • 3
  • Antje Harling
    • 2
  • Koni Grob
    • 1
  1. 1.Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of ZürichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Stuttgart.FellbachGermany
  3. 3.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations