Skip to main content
Log in

Highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR by employing serial invasive reaction as a sequence identifier for quantifying EGFR mutation abundance in cfDNA

  • Paper in Forefront
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is beneficial to monitor the therapeutic effect, tumor progression, and drug resistance in real time. However, it requires that the mutation detection method has the ability to quantify the mutation abundance accurately. Although the next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR showed high sensitivity for quantifying mutations in cfDNA, the use of expensive equipment and the high-cost hampered their applications in the clinic. Herein, we propose a highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR by employing serial invasive reaction as a sequence identifier for quantifying EGFR mutation abundance in cfDNA (termed as qPCR-Invader). The mutation abundance can be quantified by using the difference of Ct values between mutant and wild-type targets without the need of making a standard curve. The method can quantify a mutation level as lower as 0.1% (10 copies/tube). Thirty-six tissue samples from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were detected by our method and 14/36 tissues gave EGFR L858R mutation-positive results, whereas ARMS-PCR just identified 12 of L858R mutant samples. The two inconsistent samples were confirmed as L858R mutant by pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization method, indicating that qPCR-Invader is more sensitive than ARMS-PCR for mutation detection. The L858R mutation abundances of 19 cfDNA samples detected by qPCR-Invader were close to that from NGS, indicating our method can precisely quantify mutation abundance in cfDNA. The qPCR-Invader just needs a common real-time PCR device to accomplish quantification of EGFR mutations, and the fluorescence probes are universal for any target detection. Therefore, it could be used in most laboratories to analyze mutations in cfDNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004;304:1497–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koyama N, Uchida Y. Clinical significance of erlotinib monotherapy for gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:5083–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitsudomi T, Yatabe Y. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1817–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu HL, Zhong C, Xue GL, Liang XJ, Wang J, Liu YX, et al. Direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:2311–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Montgomery J, Wittwer CT, Palais R, Zhou LM. Simultaneous mutation scanning and genotyping by high-resolution DNA melting analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nosho K, Kawasaki T, Ohnishi M, Suemoto Y, Kirkner GJ, Zepf D, et al. PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer detected by pyrosequencing: relationship with genetic and epigenetic alterations. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10:601–1.

  9. Thoma C. Prostate cancer: analysis of circulating tumour DNA could guide therapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:659–9.

  10. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008;14:985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao ZR, Wang JF, Lin YB, Wang F, Fu S, Zhang SL, et al. Mutation abundance affects the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor readministration in non-small-cell lung cancer with acquired resistance. Med Oncol. 2014;31:810–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brychta N, Krahn T, Ahsen OV. Detection of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA by digital PCR in early stages of pancreatic cancer. Clin Chem. 2016;62:1482–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanmamed MF, Fernández-Landázuri S, Rodríguez C, Zarate R, Lozano MD, Zubiri L, et al. Quantitative cell-free circulating BRAFV600E mutation analysis by use of droplet digital PCR in the follow-up of patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitors. Clin Chem. 2015;61:297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aravanis AM, Lee M, Klausner RD. Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA for early cancer detection. Cell. 2017;168:571–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lih CJ, Sims DJ, Harrington RD, Polley EC, Zhao YD, et al. Analytical validation and application of a targeted next-generation sequencing mutation-detection assay for use in treatment assignment in the NCI-MPACT trial. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18:51–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:426–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, Fukuyama S, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non–small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7276–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo JD, Chan EC, Shih CL, Chen TL, Liang Y, Hwang TL, et al. Detection of rare mutant K-ras DNA in a single-tube reaction using peptide nucleic acid as both PCR clamp and sensor probe. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e12–2.

  19. Hall JG, Eis PS, Law SM, Reynaldo LP, Prudent JR, Marshall DJ, et al. Sensitive detection of DNA polymorphisms by the serial invasive signal amplification reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:8272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Naoki K, Soejima K, Okamoto H, Hamamoto J, Hida N, Nakachi I, et al. The PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), a sensitive method for detecting EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer specimens; comparison with direct sequencing. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011;16:335–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Zou B, Ma Y, Ma X, Sheng N, Rui J, et al. Closed-tube PCR with nested serial invasion probe visualization using gold nanoparticles. Clin Chem. 2017;63:852–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zou B, Ma Y, Wu H, Zhou G. Ultrasensitive DNA detection by cascade enzymatic signal amplification based on Afu flap endonuclease coupled with nicking endonuclease. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:7395–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Q, Sommer SS. Pyrophosphorolysis-activatable oligonucleotides may facilitate detection of rare alleles mutation scanning and analysis of chromatin structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:598–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Madic J, Piperno-Neumann S, Servois V, Rampanou A, Milder M, Trouiller B, et al. Pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization detects circulating tumor DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3934–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 81673390, 81603219, 21475151, 81603196]; the Jiangsu Provincial key research and development program [grant number BE2016745]; the Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [grant number BK20151445]; the Open Project Program of MOE Key Laboratory of Drug Quality Control and Pharmacovigilance [grant number DQCP2017MS01]; Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province (2015-WSN-085); Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent program (No. QNRC2016889) and sponsored by Qing Lan Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guohua Zhou or Qinxin Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 828 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, Z., Wan, R., Zou, B. et al. Highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR by employing serial invasive reaction as a sequence identifier for quantifying EGFR mutation abundance in cfDNA. Anal Bioanal Chem 410, 6751–6759 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1316-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1316-z

Keywords

Navigation