Abstract
Background
Several sensitive assays, including the PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), have been used to detect EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, validation has not been reported. We assessed the detection rate of EGFR mutation by the PCR-invader method and direct sequencing using same clinical specimens.
Patients and methods
EGFR mutations were analyzed with the PCR-invader method and compared with direct sequencing using paraffin tissues and pleural and pericardial effusions from NSCLC patients. The relationships between the treatment responses and mutations were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
Fifty-four samples from 42 NSCLC patients were studied. EGFR mutations were identified in 52% of the patients and 52% of the samples with the PCR-invader method, but only in 43% of the patients and in 35% of the samples by direct sequencing. In the samples obtained from the same patients at different sites and different times, EGFR mutations were coincident in nine out of ten patients by the PCR-invader method but in six out of ten patients by direct sequencing. Seventeen patients with EGFR mutations were treated with gefitinib; the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 41 and 94%, and median treatment duration was more than 6 months. Seven EGFR mutation-negative patients were treated with gefitinib; the RR and DCR were 0 and 14%, and median treatment duration was 1 month.
Conclusion
The PCR-invader method was useful for detecting EGFR mutations in clinical lung cancer specimens and is more sensitive than direct sequencing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA et al (2008) Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 455:1069–1075
Naoki K, Chen TH, Richards WG et al (2002) Missense mutations of the BRAF gene in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 62:7001–7003
Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC et al (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304:1497–1500
Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New Engl J Med 350:2129–2139
Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. New Engl J Med 361:947–957
Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C et al (2009) Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 361:958–967
Takano T, Ohe Y, Tsuta K et al (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation detection using high-resolution melting analysis predicts outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res 13:5385–5390
Kawada I, Soejima K, Watanabe H et al (2008) An alternative method for screening EGFR mutation using RFLP in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol 3:1096–1103
Kimura H, Fujiwara Y, Sone T et al (2006) High sensitivity detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the pleural effusion of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci 97:642–648
Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun et al (2005) Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res 65:7276–7282
Yasuda H, Soejima K, Nakayama S et al (2010) Bronchoscopic microsampling is a useful complementary diagnostic tool for detecting lung cancer. Lung Cancer Aug 31 [Epub ahead of print]
Eberhard DA, Giaccone G, Johnson BE (2008) Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group: standardization for use in the clinical trial setting. J Clin Oncol 26:983–994
Olivier M (2005) The Invader® assay for SNP genotyping. Mutat Res 573:103–110
Lyamichev V, Mast AL, Hall JG et al (1999) Polymorphism identification and quantitative detection of genomic DNA by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes. Nat Biotechnol 17:292–296
Hall JG, Eis PS, Law SM et al (2000) Sensitive detection of DNA polymorphisms by the serial invasive signal amplification reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8272–8277
Mashima Y, Nagano M, Funayama T et al (2004) Rapid quantification of the heteroplasmy of mutant mitochondrial DNAs in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy using the Invader technology. Clin Biochem 37:268–276
Tadokoro K, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi T et al (2006) Classification of hepatitis B virus genotypes by the PCR-invader method with genotype-specific probes. J Virol Methods 138(1–2):30–39
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
Nakachi I, Naoki K, Soejima K et al (2010) The combination of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor overcomes erlotinib resistance in lung cancer cell lines through c-Met inhibition. Mol Cancer Res 8:1142–1151
Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T et al (2006) Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 24:3340–3346
Yoshida K, Yatabe Y, Park JY et al (2007) Prospective validation for prediction of gefitinib sensitivity by epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:22–28
Sunaga N, Tomizawa Y, Yanagitani N et al (2007) Phase II prospective study of the efficacy of gefitinib for the treatment of stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations, irrespective of previous chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 56:383–392
Asahina H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I et al (2006) A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Br J Cancer 95:998–1004
Sutani A, Nagai Y, Udagawa K et al (2006) Gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations screened by peptide nucleic acid-locking nucleic acid PCR clamp. Br J Cancer 95:1483–1489
Tamura K, Okamoto I, Kashii T et al (2008) Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403). Br J Cancer 98:907–914
Thyagarajan B, Anderson KE, Kong F et al (2005) New approaches for genotyping paraffin wax embedded breast tissue from patients with cancer: the Iowa women’s health study. J Clin Pathol 58:955–961
Greulich H, Chen TH, Feng W et al (2005) Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med 2:e313
Mitsudomi T, Yatabe Y (2007) Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci 98:1817–1824
Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:121–128
Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Mr Toshikazu Yamaguchi of BML Inc. for his technical support with the mutation analyses. This work was presented in part at the 33rd European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress in Stockholm, Sweden, 12–16 September 2008. This study was partly supported by a 33rd ESMO Congress travel grant.
Conflict of interest
No author has any conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Naoki, K., Soejima, K., Okamoto, H. et al. The PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), a sensitive method for detecting EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer specimens; comparison with direct sequencing. Int J Clin Oncol 16, 335–344 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0187-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0187-5