Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), a sensitive method for detecting EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer specimens; comparison with direct sequencing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several sensitive assays, including the PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), have been used to detect EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, validation has not been reported. We assessed the detection rate of EGFR mutation by the PCR-invader method and direct sequencing using same clinical specimens.

Patients and methods

EGFR mutations were analyzed with the PCR-invader method and compared with direct sequencing using paraffin tissues and pleural and pericardial effusions from NSCLC patients. The relationships between the treatment responses and mutations were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

Fifty-four samples from 42 NSCLC patients were studied. EGFR mutations were identified in 52% of the patients and 52% of the samples with the PCR-invader method, but only in 43% of the patients and in 35% of the samples by direct sequencing. In the samples obtained from the same patients at different sites and different times, EGFR mutations were coincident in nine out of ten patients by the PCR-invader method but in six out of ten patients by direct sequencing. Seventeen patients with EGFR mutations were treated with gefitinib; the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 41 and 94%, and median treatment duration was more than 6 months. Seven EGFR mutation-negative patients were treated with gefitinib; the RR and DCR were 0 and 14%, and median treatment duration was 1 month.

Conclusion

The PCR-invader method was useful for detecting EGFR mutations in clinical lung cancer specimens and is more sensitive than direct sequencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA et al (2008) Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 455:1069–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naoki K, Chen TH, Richards WG et al (2002) Missense mutations of the BRAF gene in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 62:7001–7003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC et al (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304:1497–1500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New Engl J Med 350:2129–2139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. New Engl J Med 361:947–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C et al (2009) Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 361:958–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takano T, Ohe Y, Tsuta K et al (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation detection using high-resolution melting analysis predicts outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res 13:5385–5390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawada I, Soejima K, Watanabe H et al (2008) An alternative method for screening EGFR mutation using RFLP in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol 3:1096–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura H, Fujiwara Y, Sone T et al (2006) High sensitivity detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the pleural effusion of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci 97:642–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun et al (2005) Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res 65:7276–7282

  11. Yasuda H, Soejima K, Nakayama S et al (2010) Bronchoscopic microsampling is a useful complementary diagnostic tool for detecting lung cancer. Lung Cancer Aug 31 [Epub ahead of print]

  12. Eberhard DA, Giaccone G, Johnson BE (2008) Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group: standardization for use in the clinical trial setting. J Clin Oncol 26:983–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olivier M (2005) The Invader® assay for SNP genotyping. Mutat Res 573:103–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyamichev V, Mast AL, Hall JG et al (1999) Polymorphism identification and quantitative detection of genomic DNA by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes. Nat Biotechnol 17:292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall JG, Eis PS, Law SM et al (2000) Sensitive detection of DNA polymorphisms by the serial invasive signal amplification reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8272–8277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mashima Y, Nagano M, Funayama T et al (2004) Rapid quantification of the heteroplasmy of mutant mitochondrial DNAs in Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy using the Invader technology. Clin Biochem 37:268–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tadokoro K, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi T et al (2006) Classification of hepatitis B virus genotypes by the PCR-invader method with genotype-specific probes. J Virol Methods 138(1–2):30–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakachi I, Naoki K, Soejima K et al (2010) The combination of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor overcomes erlotinib resistance in lung cancer cell lines through c-Met inhibition. Mol Cancer Res 8:1142–1151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T et al (2006) Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 24:3340–3346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida K, Yatabe Y, Park JY et al (2007) Prospective validation for prediction of gefitinib sensitivity by epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sunaga N, Tomizawa Y, Yanagitani N et al (2007) Phase II prospective study of the efficacy of gefitinib for the treatment of stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations, irrespective of previous chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 56:383–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Asahina H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I et al (2006) A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Br J Cancer 95:998–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutani A, Nagai Y, Udagawa K et al (2006) Gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations screened by peptide nucleic acid-locking nucleic acid PCR clamp. Br J Cancer 95:1483–1489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamura K, Okamoto I, Kashii T et al (2008) Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403). Br J Cancer 98:907–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thyagarajan B, Anderson KE, Kong F et al (2005) New approaches for genotyping paraffin wax embedded breast tissue from patients with cancer: the Iowa women’s health study. J Clin Pathol 58:955–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Greulich H, Chen TH, Feng W et al (2005) Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med 2:e313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitsudomi T, Yatabe Y (2007) Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci 98:1817–1824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:121–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mr Toshikazu Yamaguchi of BML Inc. for his technical support with the mutation analyses. This work was presented in part at the 33rd European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress in Stockholm, Sweden, 12–16 September 2008. This study was partly supported by a 33rd ESMO Congress travel grant.

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhiko Naoki.

About this article

Cite this article

Naoki, K., Soejima, K., Okamoto, H. et al. The PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5′ nuclease-based method), a sensitive method for detecting EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer specimens; comparison with direct sequencing. Int J Clin Oncol 16, 335–344 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0187-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0187-5

Keywords

Navigation