Abstract
The selectivity of the sodium channel has been the subject of numerous experimental and theoretical studies. In this work, this problem is approached from a theoretical point of view based on a model built from the Selective Filter (SF) of the open structure of the voltage-activated channel of the bacterium Magnetococcus marinus. This approach has allowed us to calculate the interaction energies of the system (cation-water-SF-fragment), both for the sodium cation and the potassium cation. The results have highlighted the importance of differential dehydration of cations, as well as the environment where it occurs. Semi-empirical and ab initio methods have been applied to analyze and quantify the interaction energies when the cations are in the SF of the sodium channel, with the DFT (ab initio) methods giving us the key to the distribution of the interaction energies and therefore how dehydration occurs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
There are several types of sodium channels: the voltage-gated (Na\(_v\)s) channels are involved in the generation and propagation of action potentials in excitable cells [1, 2], and another family of genes encodes for the denominated epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)/degenerin(DEG) discovered at the beginning of the 1990 [3, 4].
The ENaC is found in the apical membrane of polarized epithelial cells, where it mediates Na\(^+\) transport across tight epithelia. In contrast to other Na\(^+\) selective channels involved in the generation of electrical signals in excitable cells, the basic function of ENaC in polarized epithelial cells is to allow the vectorial transcellular transport of Na\(^+\) [5]. The degenerins that form a sub-group of the ENaC/DEG family play a critical role in touch sensation and proprioception [5].
The Na\(_v\)s are transmembrane proteins whose activity is regulated by the membrane potential of the cell; when the channel is open, the movement of ions is allowed along an electrochemical gradient across cellular membranes. There are nine sub-types named Na\(_v\)1.1 through Na\(_v\)1.9. Several sub-types have been identified as key players in nociceptive signaling. Hence, many studies have focused on the search for therapeutic targets and have tested the effect of different toxins [6,7,8,9].
The transmembrane eukaryotic Na\(_v\) channel is formed by a pseudo-tetrameric protein that comprises a pore-forming alpha sub-unit and auxiliary beta sub-units (one or two) that facilitate membrane localization and modulate channel properties [6, 10]. The alpha sub-unit defines the distinct sub-types and contain the receptor sites for drugs and toxins that act on Na\(_v\) channels. It is a large, single-chain polypeptide composed of approximately 2000 amino acid residues organized in four domains. Each domain comprises six transmembrane helical segments named S1–S6 [6]. The S5 and S6 segments enclose the central pore domain, and their intervening sequences constitute the Selective Filter (SF) [10].
Several prokaryotic sodium channels from different bacteria have been observed by X-ray crystallography, which has allowed us to visualize them in different functional configurations, such as inactive (close) or active (open) [11,12,13,14]. These channels, in contrast to eukaryotic channels, are true tetrameric structures composed of four identical sub-units, each one equivalent to a single eukaryotic region on Na\(_v\)s [13]. Prokaryotic orthologues have a range of sequence identities with human Na\(_v\)s between 25–30%. On Na\(_v\), from Magnetococcus marinus, it has been shown to have similar kinetic and affinity to the human Na\(_v\)1.1 when using inhibitors of this channel [15]. The non-voltage-dependent sodium channels, which make up the ENaC/DEG family, present more heterogeneity; possible structural organizations have been described in heterotetrameric form, composed of alpha, beta, and gamma sub-units [16] or, in the case of the human sodium channel, as a heterotrimer [17].
The Selective Filter (SF) has been analyzed in several studies of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic Na\(_v\) channels. Theoretical studies have been carried out using molecular mechanical and molecular dynamics [18,19,20].
The most recent explanations of selectivity focus on ion-protein interactions and ion hydration [18, 19]. However, ion hydration or ion-protein interactions taken in isolation are not enough to explain the selectivity of the potassium and sodium channels.
The aim of this work, together with the one on the potassium channel [21], is to clarify the different ion selectivity shown in the sodium channel, analyzing the interaction between the cation, water, and the protein using quantum-chemical calculations. An ab initio study of these interactions with our current means of calculation is not possible due to the size of the system. Similar to the study on the potassium channel, the problem has been modeled on the assumption that the SF is responsible for this selection, allowing the permeation of the Na\(^+\) ion and excluding the other cations. The SF vestibule of prokaryotic organisms has been conserved among the different bacterial Na\(_v\) channels described, but it is different from the eukaryotic SF vestibule in relation to the composition of the residual side chains, although some of the amino acid residues are conserved, such as glutamic (E) [10, 22].
In this work, the structure of the open-form Na\(_v\) channel from the bacteria Magnetococcus marinus MC1 [13] has been chosen as a model.
The method of calculation with this model is similar to that used previously in the study of potassium channel selectivity [21]. The structure of the Selective Filter has been considered fixed, the cation (Na\(^+\) or K\(^+\)) has been placed in different positions to simulate its passage through the SF (see Fig. 2), the water positions have been optimized with a semi-empirical method, and the variation of the interactions between cation, water, and SF of the protein, calculated with an it ab initio method, has been determined, and the results have been analyzed, showing the relevance of the solvation energy for the approximation of a cation to the cone of this channel.
2 Methods
The protein used in this study, as indicated above, is the open form of voltage-gated sodium from Magnetococcus marinus MC [13] (NavMm) (protein ID in the RSC Protein Data Bank: 5HVX) (Fig. 1). This study explores the interactions of Na\(^+\) and K\(^+\) ions with the SF fragment (Fig. 1c) including the amino acid residues, Met175 to Val185 (MTLESWSMGIV). This structure has been chosen in the open form as a model because it is not intended to emulate the non-conducting Na\(^+\) or collapsed conformation, and logically, the four chains that make up the protein have been considered.
Although the channel structure is flexible (see [23, 24]), we are interested in analyzing the transition of the cation through the SF, which occurs in the open form. This is why the open structure will be kept fixed throughout the simulation.
In all cases, the zero distance is set as the position of the cation (Na\(^+\) or K\(^+\)) in the same plane as the oxygen of Glu178, a zone designated in other works as the S2 site (Fig. 2) [25].
The water molecules have been inserted into the entry of the SF using the Amber20 package [26] considering a semi-sphere with a radius of 12 Å. The result is 85 water molecules at the top of the SF (Figs. 1, 2) (quantum-chemical calculations reduce the size to about 10 Å). Since our focus is on the approach of the cation to the SF of the channel, possible molecules at the end of the SF, and also contained within the channel, are not considered.
Therefore, for each set of coordinates of the cation in the protein fragment, the geometry of the water molecules and the hydrogen belonging to the protein fragment has been optimized, keeping fixed the coordinates of the X-ray data of the open SF structure.
The system was considered a closed shell, so a \(-3\) negative charge has been set, which is distributed among the atoms belonging to the SF of the protein. All calculations were carried out at the restricted level for both, the potassium and the sodium cations.
The optimization calculations have been performed considering the cation at several distances from the center of the SF (the point S2), specifically in the range \(-9\) Å to \(+9\) Å at intervals of 1 Å (Fig. 2). These points include the five (S0–S4) occupied binding sites in the SF indicated by Eichmann et al. [25] for the KcsA potassium channel and used by us in the study of K\(^+\) channel [21]. This optimization has been carried out by means of semi-empirical calculations, using the PM6 method [27]. The criterion for considering geometry to be optimized was that the maximum force was less than 0.0025 hartrees/bohr.
Using the geometries optimized with PM6, single-point DFT (ab initio) calculations have been performed to obtain more accurate values of the interaction between the components of the system: the protein fragment, the cation, and the water. These calculations have been made using the hybrid method with Becke exchange and the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional (B3LYP) [28, 29], one of the most widely tested methods, and a method that we have used in previous works, together with the balanced basis sets of split valence Def2-SVPP [30], which give correct results at the DFT level, while its size allows for carrying out the calculations.
The importance of the basis set superposition error (BSSE) has been evaluated by performing calculations for each of the fragments analyzed (SF, water, and cation) using the basis set of the full system (Counterpoise correction [31]), showing the results with the—CP suffix.
Although the aim of this work is not to carry out a comparative analysis of the density functional methods for use in this type of problem, it does seem pertinent to analyze the variation of these interactions when other functionals are used. For this purpose, calculations have been carried out with one of the functionals of the Truhlar group, the M062X [32] functional, evaluating its BBSE and comparing it with the results of the B3LYP functional.
The software packages Amber20 [26] for the selection of amino acid residues and the inclusion of the water molecules, and Gaussian16 [33] for the ab initio calculations have been used. The results and the data were visualized with the Molden [34], JMol [35], Pymol [36], and Xmgrace [37] programs.
3 Results
In order to calculate the interaction energy of the system (SF-cation-water), Eq. (1) has been used:
where \(E_{\mathrm System}\) is the total energy of the system (SF-cation-water), \(E_{\mathrm SF}\) is the energy of the SF protein fragment, \(E_{\mathrm water}\) is the energy of the water molecules, and \(E_{\mathrm cat}\) is the energy of the cation (K\(^+\) or Na\(^+\)). This equation was applied in all positions studied. The calculated interaction energies, using several quantum-chemical methods, are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3.
Interaction energies of the total system [see Eq. (1)]. Calculations were performed using the PM6, B3LYP/Def2-SVPP (B3LYP) and the counterpoise correction with the B3LYP/Def2-SVPP (B3LYP-CP) and M062X/Def2-SVPP (M062X-CP) methods
These results show two things:
-
(i)
The base overlap error correction modifies the value of the interaction, but shows the same behavior with respect to cation position as without the base overlap correction.
-
(ii)
The use of the M062X functional, obtained with very different assumptions to those used for the B3LYP functional, although, as expected, it shows different values for the interaction energy, again, its behavior with respect to the position of the cation is analogous to that of the B3LYP functional.
Figure 4 shows the relative energy, with respect to point S2, which is the position furthest from the zero position of the SF, of the interaction energies between their components: water with cation \((E_{\text {Water-C}})\), SF protein channel with water (\(E_{\text {SF-water}}\)), and SF with cation \((E_{\text {SF-C}})\), calculated with the BSSE-corrected B3LYP/Def2-SVPP (B3LYP-CP) method.
Relative interaction energies between the SF protein channel with cation \((E_{\text {SF-C}})\), SF protein channel with water (\(E_{\text {SF-water}}\)), and water with cation \((E_{\text {Water-C}})\) with respect to the S2 position. Calculations were performed using the BSSE-corrected B3LYP/Def2-SVPP (B3LYP-CP) method
The interaction between the channel and the ions can be observed, as well as the loss of water by the ions as more enter the SF.
An important reason why water molecules do not enter the SF is the potential barrier provided by the oxygens of Met175 and Glu176; the representation of which for two of the four chains forming the SF is shown in Fig. 5.
Table 2 shows the distribution of the interaction energy, at the different sites, between the S0 and S2 positions.
4 Discussion
The differences in the distribution of water in the solvation shell of sodium and potassium without the presence of a protein have been the subject of several studies [38, 39]. Such differences can increase when a protein is present, as we described in the case of a halophilic protein [40]; this phenomenon is also observed in the interaction of cations with the potassium channel, being reflected in the variation of the interaction energy of the cation with the water as it enters the channel [21].
Structural [7, 12, 15], mutagenesis [18, 41, 42], and simulation [18, 20, 43] studies have been carried out on the Nav sodium channels of both mammals and bacteria that have allowed us to identify the amino acid residues that are key in sodium selectivity. In mammals, there are four residues involved in cation selectivity in the SF (DEKA), while in NavMm and other bacteria, they are other four (TLES). These residues are involved in the dehydration of sodium and its stabilization as it moves through the SF channel [18, 43].
Our simulations using the ab initio B3LYP-CP calculation showed that at the vestibule of SF, a zone designated as S0 (\(-9\) and \(-7\) Å), the interaction energy of Na\(^+\)-water is stronger than that of K\(^+\)-water at 18 kcal/mol (Table 2), which agrees with studies carried out previously that describe the interaction of Na\(^+\) and K\(^+\) ions with water and proteins [21, 43]; these studies show that the normal behavior is for potassium to retain water with less energy than sodium. At the beginning of the zone designated as S1 (\(-6\) Å), (Met175), the interaction of sodium with water decreases and becomes lower than the interaction of potassium and water (Table 2). Simultaneously, we found that in the channel-water interaction from the initial site in S0, the interaction energy remains stable with small variations of between 3 and 10 kcal/mol, whether it is analyzed in the presence of sodium or potassium. However, from S1 to S2, the interaction channel-water with the sodium cation is present at \(-5\) Å, and the energy increases (becoming less negative), reaching a maximum even below the interaction that was observed in S2 for both cations. While channel-water with potassium cations is present, the channel’s interaction with the solvation water is weaker than when sodium cations are present.
This would mean that the channel interacts more efficiently with the sodium solvation water, which would allow sodium to lose water before potassium; although at the S0 site of the vestibule, the energy with which the sodium cation retains the solvation water is greater than the energy with which the potassium cation retains water. In S2, the cation-channel, channel-water, and cation-water interactions are similar; this is because the cations have already lost their solvation water and present a similar behavior within the SF. According to these results, the sodium cation is more prone to water loss because the interaction of water with the channel increases, and the interaction of water with the cation decreases. These facts indicate that the solvation water of the cation is completely lost from S1 to S2, specifically between \(-4\) and 0 Å, Met175 and Glu176. However, the opposite occurs with potassium: The interaction of water with the cation is reinforced, and the interaction of water with the channel is decreased, which implies that the cation found in the SF vestibule is not dehydrated. The complete dehydration of the cation was already suggested. Dudev and Lim [18] indicate that lower cations hydration number inside the pore would help to select Na\(^+\) over K\(^+\).
On the other hand, when analyzing the number of water molecules that are at a smaller distance than 3.5 Åfrom the cation, in the course of the cation’s travel through SF, which are shown in Fig. 6, we can see that, between S0 and S1, the number of water molecules in the vicinity of Na\(^+\) is greater than for K\(^+\), decreasing considerably as one passes from S1 to S2, where the cations are completely dehydrated.
These results explain quantitatively (in terms of energy) that in the SF environment of the NavMm channel and, by extension, in bacteria, which have the same TLES sequence. Sodium gives up water more easily than potassium, while when it interacts in the potassium channel, the opposite is the case [21].
5 Conclusion
The selection of sodium versus potassium in the NavMm sodium channel is dominated by the same parameters that allow the selection of potassium vs. sodium in the potassium channel. These parameters are the dehydration of cations and the protein environment. However, in the sodium channel, the protein environment is more important because of the different interaction energies of potassium and sodium with the solvation water, changing the normal behavior in dehydration. Sodium, which normally retains water with a higher interaction energy, is destabilized in the SF medium and loses water more easily than potassium when it enters into the SF.
In general, this study quantifies how the differential dehydration of cations occurs in the protein environment. Quantification has been possible thanks to the use of an ab initio method since the distribution of interaction energies with semi-empirical or molecular mechanics methods cannot be clarified.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG (2005) International union of pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol Rev 57(4):397–409. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.57.4.4
Ahern CA, Payandeh J, Bosmans F, Chanda B (2015) The Hitchhiker’s guide to the voltage-gated sodium channel galaxy. J Gen Physiol 147(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201511492
Canessa CM, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC (1993) Epithelial sodium channel related to proteins involved in neurodegeneration. Nature 361(6411):467–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/361467a0
Tavernarakis N, Driscoll M (1997) Molecular modeling of mechanotransduction in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu Rev Physiol 59:659–689. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.659
Kellenberger S, Schild L (2002) Epithelial sodium channel/degenerin family of ion channels: A variety of functions for a shared structure. Physiol Rev 82(3):735–767. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00007.2002. (PMID: 12087134)
Lera Ruiz M, Kraus RL (2015) Voltage-gated sodium channels: structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications. J Med Chem 58(18):7093–7118. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm501981g. (PMID: 25927480)
Clairfeuille T, Cloake A, Infield DT, Llongueras JP, Arthur CP, Li ZR, Jian Y, Martin-Eauclaire M-F, Bougis PE, Ciferri C, Ahern CA, Bosmans F, Hackos DH, Rohou A, Payandeh J (2019) Structural basis of \(\alpha\)-scorpion toxin action on Na\(_v\) channels. Science 363(6433):8573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav8573
Ahuja S, Mukund S, Deng L, Khakh K, Chang E, Ho H, Shriver S, Young C, Lin S, Johnson JP, Wu P, Li J, Coons M, Tam C, Brillantes B, Sampang H, Mortara K, Bowman KK, Clark KR, Estevez A, Xie Z, Verschoof H, Grimwood M, Dehnhardt C, Andrez J-C, Focken T, Sutherlin DP, Safina BS, Starovasnik MA, Ortwine DF, Franke Y, Cohen CJ, Hackos DH, Koth CM, Payandeh J (2015) Structural basis of inhibition by Nav1.7 an isoform-selective small-molecule antagonist. Science 350(6267):5464. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac5464
Pan X, Li Z, Jin X, Zhao Y, Huang G, Huang X, Shen Z, Cao Y, Dong M, Lei J, Yan N (2021) Comparative structural analysis of human Na\(_v\)1.1 and Na\(_v\)1.5 reveals mutational hotspots for sodium channelopathies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(11):2100066118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100066118
Shen H, Zhou Q, Pan X, Li Z, Wu J, Yan N (2017) Structure of a eukaryotic voltage-gated sodium channel at near-atomic resolution. Science 355(6328):4326. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4326
Payandeh J, Scheuer T, Zheng N, Catterall WA (2011) The crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature 475(7356):353–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10238
Payandeh J, Gamal El-Din TM, Scheuer T, Zheng N, Catterall WA (2012) Crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel in two potentially inactivated states. Nature 486(7401):135–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11077
Sula A, Booker J, Ng LCT, Naylor CE, DeCaen PG, Wallace BA (2017) The complete structure of an activated open sodium channel. Nat Commun 8(1):14205. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14205
Han S, Vance J, Jones S, DeCata J, Tran K, Cummings J, Wang S (2023) Voltage sensor dynamics of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel NavAb reveal three conformational states. J Biol Chem 299(3):102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102967
Bagnéris C, DeCaen PG, Naylor CE, Pryde DC, Nobeli I, Clapham DE, Wallace BA (2014) Prokaryotic NavMs channel as a structural and functional model for eukaryotic sodium channel antagonism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(23):8428–8433. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406855111
Firsov D, Gautschi I, Merillat A-M, Rossier BC, Schild L (1998) The heterotetrameric architecture of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). EMBO J 17(2):344–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.2.344
Noreng S, Posert R, Bharadwaj A, Houser A, Baconguis I (2020) Molecular principles of assembly, activation, and inhibition in epithelial sodium channel. Elife 9:59038. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59038
Dudev T, Lim C (2010) Factors governing the Na+ vs K+ selectivity in sodium ion channels. J Am Chem Soc 132(7):2321–2332. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja909280g
Zhang X, Xia M, Li Y, Liu H, Jiang X, Ren W, Wu J, DeCaen P, Yu F, Huang S, He J, Clapham DE, Yan N, Gong H (2013) Analysis of the selectivity filter of the voltage-gated sodium channel NavRh. Cell Res 23(3):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.173
Xia M, Liu H, Li Y, Yan N, Gong H (2013) The mechanism of Na+/K+ selectivity in mammalian voltage-gated sodium channels based on molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys J 104(11):2401–2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.035
Ferrer J, Simó-Cabrera L, San-Fabián E (2021) Energy calculations for potassium vs sodium selectivity on potassium channel: an ab initio study. Theoret Chem Acc 140(2):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02710-z
Finol-Urdaneta RK, Wang Y, Al-Sabi A, Zhao C, Noskov SY, French RJ (2014) Sodium channel selectivity and conduction: prokaryotes have devised their own molecular strategy. J Gen Physiol 143(2):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311037
Zhao S, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2001) Analysis of a data set of paired uncomplexed protein structures: new metrics for side-chain flexibility and model evaluation. Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf 43(3):271–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.1038 (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/prot.1038)
Boiteux C, Vorobyov I, Allen TW (2014) Ion conduction and conformational flexibility of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(9):3454–3459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320907111 (https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1320907111)
Eichmann C, Frey L, Maslennikov I, Riek R (2019) Probing ion binding in the selectivity filter of the KcsA potassium channel. J Am Chem Soc 141(18):7391–7398. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b01092
Case DA, Belfon K, Ben-Shalom IY, Brozell SR, Cerutti DS, III TEC, Cruzeiro VWD, Darden TA, Duke RE, Giambasu G, Gilson MK, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, Harris R, Izadi S, Iz-mailov SA, Kasavajhala K, Kovalenko A, Krasny R, Kurtzman T, Lee TS, LeGrand S, Li P, Lin C, Liu J, Luchko T, Luo R, Man V, Merz KM, Miao Y, Mikhailovskii O, Monard G, Nguyen H, Onufriev A, Pan F, Pantano S, Qi R, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Sagui C, Schott-Verdugo S, Shen J, Simmerling CL, Skrynnikov NR, Smith J, Swails J, Walker RC, Wang J, Wilson L, Wolf RM, Wu X, Xiong Y, Xue Y, York DM, Kollman PA (2020) AMBER 2020. University of California. San Francisco
Stewart JJP (2007) Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. J Mol Model 13(12):1173–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-007-0233-4
Becke AD (1993) Density functional thermochemistry. iii. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98(7):5648–5652. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37(2):785–789. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
Weigend F, Ahlrichs R (2005) Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7(18):3297–3305. https://doi.org/10.1039/B508541A
Boys SF, Bernardi F (1970) The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol Phys 19(4):553–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977000101561
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The m06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four m06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Acc 120(1–3):215–241
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich AV, Bloino J, Janesko BG, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian HP, Ortiz JV, Izmaylov AF, Sonnenberg JL, Williams-Young D, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski VG, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery JA Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark MJ, Heyd JJ, Brothers EN, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith TA, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell AP, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam JM, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Fox DJ (2016) Gaussian 16 Revision C.01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford
Schaftenaar G, Noordik JH (2000) Molden: a pre- and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 14(2):1–23134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008193805436
Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org
Schrödinger, LLC: PyMOL the PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.8, Schrödinger, LLC. https://pymol.org/2/
Grace: grace is a WYSIWYG 2D plotting tool. http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/
Azam SS, Hofer TS, Randolf BR, Rode BM (2009) Hydration of sodium(I) and potassium(I) revisited: a comparative QM/MM and QMCF MD simulation study of weakly hydrated ions. J Phys Chem A 113(9):1827–1834. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8093462
Mancinelli R, Botti A, Bruni F, Ricci MA, Soper AK (2007) Hydration of sodium, potassium, and chloride ions in solution and the concept of structure maker/breaker. J Phys Chem B 111(48):13570–13577. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp075913v
Ferrer J, San-Fabián E (2016) Competition for water between protein (from haloferax mediterranei) and cations \(\text{ Na}^+\) and \(\text{ K}^+\): a quantum approach to problem. Theoret Chem Acc 135(9):228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-016-1983-9
Sun Y-M, Favre I, Schild L, Moczydlowski E (1997) On the structural basis for size-selective permeation of organic cations through the voltage-gated sodium channel: effect of alanine mutations at the DEKA locus on selectivity, inhibition by Ca2+ and H+, and molecular sieving. J Gener Physiol 110(6):693–715. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.110.6.693
Jiang D, Shi H, Tonggu L, Gamal El-Din TM, Lenaeus MJ, Zhao Y, Yoshioka C, Zheng N, Catterall WA (2020) Structure of the cardiac sodium channel. Cell 180(1):122–13410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.041
Chakrabarti N, Ing C, Payandeh J, Zheng N, Catterall WA, Pomès R (2013) Catalysis of Na\(^+\) permeation in the bacterial sodium channel Na\(_V\)Ab. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(28):11331–11336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309452110
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Spanish “Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación” (Grant PID2019-106114GB-I00), AICO/2021/093, PROMETEO/2021/017 (“Generalitat Valenciana”), CIAICO/2021/167 (“Generalitat Valenciana”), and the Universidad de Alicante is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JF and ES conceived the project, designed the simulation, performed the calculations, interpreted and analyzed the data, and prepared and reviewed the manuscript text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no Conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrer, J., San-Fabián, E. Energy calculations for sodium vs. potassium on a prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium channel: a quantum-chemical study. Theor Chem Acc 143, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-024-03132-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-024-03132-x