Abstract
In this paper, motivated by Chen–Ruan’s stringy orbifold theory on almost complex orbifolds, we construct a new equivariant cohomology ring \({\mathscr {H}}^*_G(X)\) for an equivariant almost complex pair (X, G), where X is a compact connected almost complex manifold, G is a connected compact Lie group which acts on X and preserves the almost complex structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adem, A., Gómez, J.: On the structure of spaces of commuting elements in compact Lie groups. In: Bjorner, A., Cohen, F.R., De Concini, C., Procesi, C., Salvetti, M. (eds.) Configuration Spaces, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Adem, A., Leida, J., Ruan, Y.: Orbifolds and Stringy Topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Becerra, E., Uribe, B.: Stringy product on twisted orbifold K-theory for abelian quotients. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 361, 5781–5803 (2009)
Cieliebak, K., Gaio, A., Salamon, D.: J-Holomorphic curves, moment maps, and invariants of Hamiltonian group actions. IMRN 2000(10), 831–882 (2000)
Cieliebak, K., Gaio, A., Mundet i Riera, I., Salamon, D.: The symplectic vortex equations and invariants of Hamiltonian group actions. J. Symplectic Geom. 1, 543–645 (2002)
Chen, B., Hu, S.: A deRham model of Chen–Ruan cohomology ring of abelian orbifolds. Math. Ann. 336, 51–71 (2006)
Chen, W., Ruan, Y.: Orbifold Gromov–Witten theory. Cont. Math. 310, 25–85 (2002)
Chen, W., Ruan, Y.: A new cohomology theory for orbifold. Commun. Math. Phys. 248, 1–31 (2004)
Chen, B., Wang, B.-L., Wang, R.: \(L^2\)-moduli spaces of symplectic vortices on Riemann surfaces with cylindrical ends. arXiv: 1405.6387 (2014)
Chen, B., Wang, B.-L., Wang, R.: \(L^2\)-symplectic votices and Hamiltonian Gromov–Witten invariants. In preparation
Chen, B., Wang, B.-L., Wang, R.: Augmented symplectic vortices, Hamiltonian equivariant Gromov–Witten invariants and quantization of Kirwan morphisms. In preparation
Du, C.-Y., Li, T.: Chen–Ruan cohomology and stringy orbifold K-theory for stable almost complex orbifolds. To appear in Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, (2017)
Edidin, D., Jarvis, T.J., Kimura, T.: Logarithmic trace and orbifold products. Duke Math. J. 153, 427–473 (2010)
Fantechi, B., Gottsche, L.: Orbifold cohomology for global quotients. Duke Math. J. 117, 197–227 (2003)
Guillemin, V., Ginzburg, V., Karshon, Y.: Moment maps, cobordisms, and Hamiltonian group actions. AMS, Providence (2002)
Gaio, A., Salamon, D.: Gromov–Witten invariants of symplectic quotients and adiabatic limits. J. Symplectic Geom. 3, 55–159 (2005)
Guillemin, V.W., Sternberg, S.: Supersymmetry and Equivariant de Rham Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (1999)
Goldin, R., Holm, T.S., Knutson, A.: Orbifold cohomology of torus quotients. Duke Math. J. 139, 89–139 (2007)
Hu, J., Wang, B.-L.: Delocalized Chern character for stringy orbifold K-theory. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 365, 6309–6341 (2013)
Hsiang, W.-Y.: Lectures on Lie Groups. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore (1998)
Jarvis, T.J., Kaufmann, R., Kimura, T.: Stringy K-theory and the Chern character. Invent. Math. 168, 23–81 (2007)
Li, T.-Y., Chen, B.: Hamiltonian Gromov–Witten Invariants on \({\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}\) with \(S^1\)-action. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 32, 309–330 (2016)
Li, W.-P., Qin, Z.: The cohomological crepant resolution conjecture for the Hilbert–Chow morphisms. J. Differ. Geom. 104, 499–557 (2016)
Mundet i Riera, I.: A Hitchin–Kobayashi correspondence for Kähler fibrations. J. Reine Angew. Math. 528, 41–80 (2000)
Mundet i Riera, I.: Hamiltonian Gromov–Witten invariants. Topology 42, 525–553 (2003)
McDuff, D., Salamon, D.: J-Holomorphic Curves and Symplectic Topology, vol. 52. Colloquium Publications, Providence (2004)
Quillen, D.: Elementary proof of some results of cobordism theory using Steenord operators. Adv. Math. 7, 29–56 (1971)
Ruan, Y.: Stringy geometry and topology of orbifolds. In “Symposium in Honor of C. H. Clemens (Salt Lake City, UT, 2000)”, pp. 187–233, Contemp. Math., vol. 312, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (2002)
Ruan, Y.: Stringy orbifolds. In “Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics (Madison, WI, 2001)”, pp. 259–299, Contemp. Math., vol. 310, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (2002)
Ruan, Y.: The cohomology ring of crepant resolutions of orbifolds, in “Gromov–Witten theory of spin curves and orbifolds”, pp. 117–126, Contemp. Math., vol. 403, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (2006)
Uribe, B.: Orbifold cohomology of the symmetric product. Commun. Anal. Geom. 13, 113–128 (2005)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Bai-Ling Wang, Rui Wang and Yu Wang for useful discussions. The authors also thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading and helpful suggestions. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11431001, No. 11726607, No. 11890663, No. 11501393, No. 11626050), by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2019YJ0509), by Sichuan University (No. 1082204112190), by Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Education Commission of China (No. KJ1600324) and by Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (No. cstc2018jcyjAX0465).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Existence of equivariant volume form
Appendix A: Existence of equivariant volume form
In this appendix we show the existence of the equivariant volume form that we used in the definition of equivariant product \(\star _m\). Let G be a connected compact Lie group and T be its maximal torus. Let \(\mathfrak g\) and \(\mathfrak t\) be their Lie algebras. G acts on G by conjugation and on \(\mathfrak g\) by the adjoint representation.
Proposition 5
For every \(h\in T\), there exists an \(\alpha \in \mathfrak t\) such that \(C(h)=C(\alpha )\).
Corollary 3
For every \(h\in T\), G / C(h) is a Kähler manifold. Moreover, it has a G-equivariant volume form \({\varOmega }^G_h\) with equivariant integration 1.
Proof
By Proposition 5, \(G/C(h)=G/C(\alpha )\) for some \(\alpha \in \mathfrak t\). Since \(G/C(\alpha )\) is a (co)-adjoint orbit, it is Kähler and the G-action on it is Hamiltonian. Denote its Kähler form by \(\omega _\alpha \) and by \(\omega _\alpha + \mu _\alpha \) the equivariant extension of \(\omega _\alpha \), where \(\mu _\alpha \) is the moment map for the Hamiltonian G-action on \(G/C(\alpha )\). Then \((\omega _\alpha +\mu _\alpha )^d\) is an equivariant volume form, where d is the complex dimension of \(G/C(\alpha )\). Suppose the equivariant integration of \((\omega _\alpha +\mu _\alpha )^d\) is \(\theta \in {\mathbb {R}}\). Then \((\omega _\alpha +\mu _\alpha )^d/\theta \) has equivariant integration 1. \(\square \)
Proof of Proposition 5
Since T is abelian, its adjoint action on \(\mathfrak g\) induces a splitting
and the action is given by \(1\oplus \phi _1\oplus \cdots \oplus \phi _k\). Let \(T_i=\{t\in T\mid \phi _i(t)=1\}\), and for any \(I\subseteq \{1,\ldots ,k\}\), set
and \(T_\varnothing =T\). Then T is stratified by
Similarly, let \(\mathfrak t_I\) be the Lie algebra of \(T_I\) and \(\mathfrak t'_I\) forms a stratification of \(\mathfrak t\).
Suppose that \(h\in T'_I\), then choose an \(\alpha \in \mathfrak t'_I\). It is sufficient to show that \(\mathfrak c(h)=\mathfrak c(\alpha )\) which implies that \(C(h)=C(\alpha )\), since both C(h) and \(C(\alpha )\) are connected subgroup of G (cf. [20, Corollary 2, §3.1]). In fact,
since \(h\in T'_I\), it fixes \(\mathfrak t\) and all \({\mathbb {C}}_i\) for \(i\in I\). Hence \(\mathfrak c(h)=\mathfrak t\oplus \bigoplus _{i\in I}{\mathbb {C}}_i\). Similarly, \(\mathfrak c(\alpha )\) is the same space.
Theorem 4
Suppose that \(h_1, h_2\in T\) and \({\mathbf {h}}=(h_1,h_2)\). The fibration \(p_1:G/C(h_1, h_2)\rightarrow G/C(h_1)\) admits a fiber-wise G-equivariant volume form \(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1)\), such that \(p_{1,*}(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1))=1\).
Proof
The fiber of \(p_1:G/C(h_1,h_2)\rightarrow G/C(h_1)\) is \(C(h_1)/C(h_1,h_2)\). Set \(K=C(h_1)\). Since \(h_1\) and \(h_2\) commutes, \(h_2\in K\). Hence \(C(h_1,h_2)=C_K(h_2)\) and \(C(h_1)/C(h_1,h_2)=K/C_K(h_2)\). By Corollary 3, there exists a K-equivariant volume form \({\varOmega }^K_{h_2}\) on \(K/C_K(h_2)\). Note that
For each point \([h]\in G/C(h_1)\), write the fiber over [h] by \(F_{[h]}\). Then by setting \(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1)|_{F_{[h]}}=h^*{\varOmega }^K_{h_2}\) for each point \([h]\in G/C(h_1)\) we get this volume form \(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1)\). We can also get this volume form \(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1)\) via the canonical isomorphism
Since the equivariant integration of \({\varOmega }^K_{h_2}\) over \(K/C_K(h_2)\) is 1, \(p_{1,*}(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},h_1))=1\). The proof is complete. \(\square \)
By induction on the length of \({\mathbf {h}}=(h_1,\ldots ,h_m)\in G_m^{\textsf {f} }\), this theorem could be generalized to \(G/C({\mathbf {h}})\rightarrow G/C({\mathbf {h}}_{i_1,\ldots , i_k})\) and \(G/C({\mathbf {h}})\rightarrow G/C({\mathbf {h}}_{\infty })\). Therefore all kinds of fibrations used in the definition of the equivariant product \(\star _m\) have fiber-wise G-equivariant volume forms with equivariant push-forwards being 1. For example for \(p_1:G/C({\mathbf {h}})\rightarrow G/C(h_1)\) with \({\mathbf {h}}=(h_1,h_2,h_3)\), we could decompose \(p_1\) into
By similar proof as Theorem 4 we get the volume form \(\text {vol}({\mathbf {h}},(h_1,h_2))\) for \(p_{1,2}:G/C({\mathbf {h}})\rightarrow G/C(h_1,h_2)\). The fiber-wise G-equivariant volume form for \(p_1:G/C({\mathbf {h}})\rightarrow G/C(h_1)\) is
Moreover,
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, B., Du, CY. & Li, T. A new equivariant cohomology ring. Math. Z. 295, 1163–1182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-019-02398-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-019-02398-3