Skip to main content
Log in

Heegaard structure respects complicated JSJ decompositions

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let M be a 3-manifold with torus boundary components \(T_{1}\) and \(T_2\). Let \(\phi :T_{1} \rightarrow T_{2}\) be a homeomorphism, \(M_\phi \) the manifold obtained from M by gluing \(T_{1}\) to \(T_{2}\) via the map \(\phi \), and T the image of \(T_{1}\) in \(M_\phi \). We show that if \(\phi \) is “sufficiently complicated” then any incompressible or strongly irreducible surface in \(M_\phi \) can be isotoped to be disjoint from T. It follows that every Heegaard splitting of a 3-manifold admitting a “sufficiently complicated” JSJ decomposition is an amalgamation of Heegaard splittings of the components of the JSJ decomposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The results for this section in the case that M has two components have been obtained previously in [7] and [8]. While our focus is therefore on the case that M is connected, the results we establish here are general and include these previously obtained results in our own terminology, which we provide for completeness and ease of exposition in later sections.

References

  1. Bachman, D.: Connected sums of unstabilized Heegaard splittings are unstabilized. Geom. Topol. 12, 2327-2378 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachman, D., Derby-Talbot, R., Sedgwick, E.: Almost normal surfaces with boundary. In: Geometry & Topology Down Under, no. 597 in Contemp. Math., pp. 177-194. Amer. Math. Soc. (2013)

  3. Bachman, D., Schleimer, S., Sedgwick, E.: Sweepouts of amalgamated 3-manifolds. Algebraic Geom. Topol. 6, 171-194 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, D., Scharlemann, M.: The structure of a solvmanifold’s Heegaard splittings. In: Proceedings of 6th Gökova Geometry-Topology Conference, vol. 23, pp. 1-18 (1999)

  5. Floyd, W., Oertel, U.: Incompressible surfaces via branched surfaces. Topology 23(1), 117-125 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Haken, W.: Some results on surfaces in 3 -manifolds. In: Studies in Modern Topology, pp. 39-98. Math. Assoc. Amer (distributed by Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.) (1968)

  7. Hatcher, A.E.: On the boundary curves of incompressible surfaces. Pac. J. Math. 99(2), 373-377 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaco, W., Sedgwick, E.: Decision problems in the space of Dehn fillings. Topology 42(4), 845-906 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaco, W., Shalen, P.: Seifert fibered spaces in 3-manifolds. Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc. 220(20), viii-192 (1979)

  10. Jaco, W., Tollefson, J.L.: Algorithms for the complete decomposition of a closed $3$-manifold. Ill. J. Math. 39(3), 358-406 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Johannson, K.: Homotopy equivalences of 3-manifolds with boundary. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 761. Springer (1979)

  12. Johannson, K.: Topology and combinatorics of 3-manifolds. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1599. Springer (1995)

  13. Lackenby, M.: The Heegaard genus of amalgamated 3-manifolds. Geom. Dedicata 109, 139-145 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lackenby, M.: An algorithm to determine the Heegaard genus of simple 3-manifolds with nonempty boundary. Algebraic Geom. Topol. 8(2), 911-934 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, T.: On the Heegaard splittings of amalgamated 3-manifolds. Geom. Topol. Monogr. 12, 157-190 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lustig, M., Moriah, Y.: Nielsen equivalence in Fuchsian groups and Seifert fibered spaces. Topology 30(2), 191-204 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubinstein, J.H.: Polyhedral minimal surfaces, Heegaard splittings and decision problems for 3-dimensional manifolds. In: Proceedings of the Georgia Topology Conference, pp. 1-20 (1995)

  18. Scharlemann, M., Thompson, A.: Thin position for $3$-manifolds. In: Geometric topology (Haifa, 1992). Contemp. Math., vol. 164, pp. 231-238. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1994)

  19. Schultens, J.: The classification of Heegaard splittings for (compact orientable surface)$\,\times \, S^1$. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 67(2), 425-448 (1993)

  20. Schultens, J.: Heegaard splittings of Seifert fibered spaces with boundary. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347(7), 2533-2552 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Souto, J.: Distances in the curve complex and the Heegaard genus. http://souto.perso.math.cnrs.fr/Papers/Heeg-genus.pdf

  22. Stocking, M.: Almost normal surfaces in 3-manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 352, 171-207 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Derby-Talbot.

Additional information

D. Bachman was partially supported by National Science Foundation Grant DMS1207804.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bachman, D., Derby-Talbot, R. & Sedgwick, E. Heegaard structure respects complicated JSJ decompositions. Math. Ann. 365, 1137–1154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-015-1314-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-015-1314-9

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation