Advertisement

Liftings, Young Measures, and Lower Semicontinuity

  • Filip Rindler
  • Giles ShawEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

This work introduces liftings and their associated Young measures as new tools to study the asymptotic behaviour of sequences of pairs (uj, Duj)j for \({(u_j)_j\subset {\rm BV}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^m)}\) under weak* convergence. These tools are then used to prove an integral representation theorem for the relaxation of the functional
$$\mathcal{F}\colon u\mapsto\int_\Omega f(x,u(x),\nabla u(x))\, {\rm d}x, \quad u \in {\rm W}^{1,1}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^m),\quad\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^d {\rm open,}$$
to the space \({{\rm BV}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^m)}\). Lower semicontinuity results of this type were first obtained by Fonseca and Müller (Arch Ration Mech Anal 123:1–49, 1993) and later improved by a number of authors, but our theorem is valid under more natural, essentially optimal, hypotheses than those currently present in the literature, requiring principally that f be Carathéodory and quasiconvex in the final variable. The key idea is that liftings provide the right way of localising \({\mathcal{F}}\) in the x and u variables simultaneously under weak* convergence. As a consequence, we are able to implement an optimal measure-theoretic blow-up procedure.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Irene Fonseca, Jan Kristensen and Neshan Wickramasekera for several helpful discussions related to this paper.

Funding

G.S.’s contribution to this work forms part of their PhD thesis and was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Grant EP/H023348/1 for the University of Cambridge Centre for Doctoral Training, the Cambridge Centre for Analysis. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Grant Agreement No 757254 (SINGULARITY). F. R. also acknowledges the support from an EPSRC Research Fellowship on Singularities in Nonlinear PDEs (EP/L018934/1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Acerbi, E., Fusco, N.: Semicontinuity problems in the calculus of variations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 86, 125–145 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alberti, G.: Rank one property for derivatives of functions with bounded variation. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 123, 239–274 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allard, W.K.: On the first variation of a varifold. Ann. Math. 95, 417–491 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Almgren, Jr. F.J.: Plateau's Problem: An Invitation to Varifold Geometry. Benjamin, 1966Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amar, M., De Cicco, V., Fusco, N.: A relaxation result in BV for integral functionals with discontinuous integrands. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 13, 396–412 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambrosio, L., Dal Maso, G.: On the relaxation in \({\rm BV}(\Omega; {\bf R}^m)\) of quasi-convex integrals. J. Funct. Anal. 109, 76–97 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambrosio, L., Fusco, N., Pallara, D.: Functions of Bounded Variation and Free-Discontinuity Problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luigi, A., Diego, P.: Integral representations of relaxed functionals on \({\rm BV}({\bf R}^n,{\bf R}^k)\) and polyhedral approximation. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42(2), 295–321 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aviles, P., Giga, Y.: A mathematical problem related to the physical theory of liquid crystal configurations. Miniconference on Geometry and Partial Differential Equations, 2 (Canberra, 1986), volume 12 of Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University. Australian National University, Canberra, 1–16, 1987Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aviles, P., Giga, Y.: Variational integrals on mappings of bounded variation and their lower semicontinuity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 115(3), 201–255 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aviles, P., Giga, Y.: Minimal currents, geodesics, and relaxation of variational integrals on mappings of bounded variation. Duke Math. J. 67(3), 517–538 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baldo, S.: Minimal interface criterion for phase transitions in mixtures of Cahn–Hilliard fluids. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 7(2), 67–90 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bildhauer, M.: Convex Variational Problems, volume 1818 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bouchitté, G., Fonseca, I., Malý, J.: The effective bulk energy of the relaxed energy of multiple integrals below the growth exponent. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 128(3), 463–479 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bouchitté, G., Fonseca, I., Mascarenhas, L.: A global method for relaxation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 145, 51–98 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brezis, H., Coron, J.-M., Lieb, E.H.: Harmonic maps with defects. Commun. Math. Phys. 107(4), 649–705 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dal Maso, G.: Integral representation on \({\rm BV}(\Omega )\) of \(\Gamma \)-limits of variational integrals. Manuscr. Math. 30, 387–416 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Federer, H.: Geometric measure theory, volume 153 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin, 1969Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Federer, H., Fleming, W.H.: Normal and integral currents. Ann. Math. 72, 458–520 (1960)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fonseca, I.: Phase transitions of elastic solid materials. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 107(3), 195–223 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fonseca, I., Leoni, G.: On lower semicontinuity and relaxation. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 131(3), 519–565 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fonseca, I., Müller, S.: Relaxation of quasiconvex functionals in \({\rm BV}(\Omega,{\bf R}^p)\) for integrands \(f(x, u,\nabla u)\). Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 123, 1–49 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fonseca, I., Müller, S., Pedregal, P.: Analysis of concentration and oscillation effects generated by gradients. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29, 736–756 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fonseca, I., Tartar, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions for systems with two potential wells. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb Sect. A 111(1–2), 89–102 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giaquinta, M., Modica, G., Souček, J.: Cartesian currents in the calculus of variations. I, volume 37 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, 1998Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giaquinta, M., Modica, G., Souček, J.: Cartesian Currents in the Calculus of Variations. II, volume 38 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, Berlin, 1998Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gurtin,M.E.: Some results and conjectures in the gradient theory of phase transitions. In Metastability and Incompletely Posed Problems (Minneapolis, MN, 1985), volume 3 of IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications. Springer, New York, 135–146, 1987Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jerrard, R.L., Jung, N.: Strict convergence and minimal liftings in \(BV\). Proc. R. Soc. Edinb Sect. A 134, 1163–1176 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirchheim, B., Kristensen, J.: On rank one convex functions that are homogeneous of degree one. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 221(1), 527–558 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kristensen, J.: Lower semicontinuity in spaces of weakly differentiable functions. Math. Ann. 313, 653–710 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kristensen, J., Rindler, F.: Relaxation of signed integral functionals in BV. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 37, 29–62 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kristensen, J., Rindler, F.: Characterization of generalized gradient Young measures generated by sequences in \(W^{1,1}\) and BV. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 197(2), 539–598 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marcellini, P.: Approximation of quasiconvex functions, and lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals. Manuscr. Math. 51, 1–28 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Menne, U.: Weakly differentiable functions on varifolds. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 65, 977–1088 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Modica, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 98(2), 123–142 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morse, A.P.: Perfect blankets. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 61, 418–442 (1947)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Müller, S.: On quasiconvex functions which are homogeneous of degree \(1\). Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41, 295–301 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rindler, F., Shaw, G.: Strictly continuous extension of functionals with linear growth to the space BV. Q. J. Math. 66(3), 953–978 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rindler, F., Shaw, G.: Relaxation for partially coercive integral functionals with linear growth. arXiv:1806.00343, 2018
  40. 40.
    Rubinstein, J., Sternberg, P., Keller, J.B.: Reaction-diffusion processes and evolution to harmonic maps. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49(6), 1722–1733 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics InstituteUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations