Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human risk assessment of di-isobutyl phthalate through the application of a developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of di-isobutyl phthalate and its major metabolite mono-isobutyl phthalate

  • Toxicokinetics and Metabolism
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP) is a substance used in the production of objects frequently used in human life. Mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP), a major in vivo metabolite of DiBP, is a biomarker for DiBP exposure assessment. Therefore, risk assessment studies on DiBP and MiBP, which have not yet been reported in detail, are needed. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for DiBP and MiBP in rats and extend this to human risk assessment based on human exposure. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in male rats following the administration of 5–100 mg/kg DiBP, and these results were used for the development and validation of the PBPK model. In addition, the previous pharmacokinetic results in female rats following DiBP administration and the pharmacokinetic results in both males and females according to multiple exposures to DiBP were used to develop and validate the PBPK model. The metabolism of DiBP to MiBP in the body was very significant and rapid, and the biodistribution of MiBP was broad and major. Furthermore, the amount of MiBP in the body showed a correlation with DiBP exposure, and from this, a PBPK model was developed to evaluate the external exposure of DiBP from the internal exposure of MiBP. The predicted rat plasma, urine, fecal, and tissue concentrations using the developed PBPK model fitted well with the observed values. The established PBPK model for rats was extrapolated to a human PBPK model of DiBP and MiBP based on human physiological parameters and allometric scaling. The reference dose of 0.512 mg/kg/day of DiBP and external doses of 6.14–280.90 μg/kg/day DiBP for human risk assessment were estimated using Korean biomonitoring values. Valuable insight and approaches to assessing human health risks associated with DiBP exposure were provided by this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DiBP:

Di-isobutyl phthalate

MiBP:

Mono-isobutyl phthalate

PBPK:

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic

UHPLC–ESI-MS/MS:

Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

IS:

Internal standard

LLOQ:

Lower limit of quantification

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

GI:

Gastrointestinal

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

SD:

Standard deviation

NOAEL:

No-observed-adverse-effect level

References

  • APA (1986) Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. J Exp Anal Behav 45(2):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bononi M, Tateo F (2009) Identification of diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) suspected as possible contaminant in recycled cellulose for take-away pizza boxes. Packag Technol Sci 22(1):53–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borch J, Axelstad M, Vinggaard AM, Dalgaard M (2006) Diisobutyl phthalate has comparable anti-androgenic effects to di-n-butyl phthalate in fetal rat testis. Toxicol Lett 163(3):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.10.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buser MC, Murray HE, Scinicariello F (2014) Age and sex differences in childhood and adulthood obesity association with phthalates: analyses of NHANES 2007–2010. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217(6):687–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clewell RA, Kremer JJ, Williams CC, Campbell JL Jr, Andersen ME, Borghoff SJ (2008) Tissue exposures to free and glucuronidated monobutylyphthalate in the pregnant and fetal rat following exposure to di-n-butylphthalate: evaluation with a PBPK model. Toxicol Sci 103(2):241–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies B, Morris T (1993) Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans. Pharm Res 10(7):1093–1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ECHA (2008) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment part D: exposure scenario building. European Chemical Agency, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2006) Approaches for the application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models and supporting data in risk assessment (final report). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

  • FDA (2018) Bioanalytical method validation gudiance for industry. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), Rockville, MD, USA

  • Fisher JS, Macpherson S, Marchetti N, Sharpe RM (2003) Human ‘testicular dysgenesis syndrome’: a possible model using in-utero exposure of the rat to dibutyl phthalate. Hum Reprod 18(7):1383–1394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster PM (2006) Disruption of reproductive development in male rat offspring following in utero exposure to phthalate esters. Int J Androl 29(1):140–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen H, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM (2007) Metabolism of phthalates in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res 51(7):899–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlowski LE, Jain RK (1983) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: principles and applications. J Pharm Sci 72:1103–1127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosokawa M, Furihata T, Yaginuma Y et al (2007) Genomic structure and transcriptional regulation of the rat, mouse, and human carboxylesterase genes. Drug Metab Rev 39(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howdeshell KL, Wilson VS, Furr J et al (2008) A mixture of five phthalate esters inhibits fetal testicular testosterone production in the Sprague-Dawley rat in a cumulative, dose-additive manner. Toxicol Sci 105(1):153–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu TM, Hayton WL (2001) Allometric scaling of xenobiotic clearance: uncertainty versus universality. AAPS Pharm Sci 3:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang PC, Tsai CH, Liang WY, Li SS, Pan WH, Chiang HC (2015) Age and gender differences in urinary levels of eleven phthalate metabolites in general Taiwanese population after a DEHP episode. PLoS ONE 10:e0133782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Igari Y, Sugiyama Y, Sawada Y, Iga T, Hanano M (1983) Prediction of diazepam disposition in the rat and man by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 11(6):577–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ito Y, Yokota H, Wang R et al (2005) Species differences in the metabolism of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in several organs of mice, rats, and marmosets. Arch Toxicol 79(3):147–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S-H, Jang J-H, Cho H-Y, Lee Y-B (2019) Simultaneous determination of diethyl phthalate and its major metabolite, monoethyl phthalate, in rat plasma, urine, and various tissues collected from a toxicokinetic study by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 173:108–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S-H, Jang J-H, Cho H-Y, Lee Y-B (2020a) Risk assessment for humans using physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of diethyl phthalate and its major metabolite, monoethyl phthalate. Arch Toxicol 94:2377–2400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S-H, Jang J-H, Cho H-Y, Lee Y-B (2020b) Toxicokinetics of diisobutyl phthalate and its major metabolite, monoisobutyl phthalate, in rats: UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method development for the simultaneous determination of diisobutyl phthalate and its major metabolite, monoisobutyl phthalate, in rat plasma, urine, feces, and 11 various tissues collected from a toxicokinetic study. Food Chem Toxicol 145:111747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S-H, Jang J-H, Cho H-Y, Oh I-J, Lee Y-B (2020c) A sensitive UPLC–ESI–MS/MS method for the quantification of cinnamic acid in vivo and in vitro: application to pharmacokinetic and protein binding study in human plasma. J Pharm Investig 50(2):159–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong SH, Jang JH, Cho HY, Lee YB (2020d) Simultaneous determination of three iridoid glycosides of Rehmannia glutinosa in rat biological samples using a validated hydrophilic interaction–UHPLC–MS/MS method in pharmacokinetic and in vitro studies. J Sep Sci 43(22):4148–4161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong S-H, Jang J-H, Cho H-Y, Lee Y-B (2021) Toxicokinetics, gender differences, and subacute toxicities of di-isobutyl phthalate in rats. Food Chem Toxicol (submitted and unpublished results)

  • Kamrin MA (2009) Phthalate risks, phthalate regulation, and public health: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B 12(2):157–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keys DA, Wallace DG, Kepler TB, Conolly RB (2000) Quantitative evaluation of alternative mechanisms of blood disposition of di (n-butyl) phthalate and mono (n-butyl) phthalate in rats. Toxicol Sci 53(2):173–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-J, Shin H, Lee Y-B, Cho H-Y (2018) Sex-specific risk assessment of PFHxS using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Arch Toxicol 92(3):1113–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-J, Choi E-J, Choi G-W, Lee Y-B, Cho H-Y (2019) Exploring sex differences in human health risk assessment for PFNA and PFDA using a PBPK model. Arch Toxicol 93(2):311–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Christensen K, Harth V, Lorber M, Brüning T (2012) Di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP) and diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP) metabolism in a human volunteer after single oral doses. Arch Toxicol 86(12):1829–1839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koniecki D, Wang R, Moody RP, Zhu J (2011) Phthalates in cosmetic and personal care products: concentrations and possible dermal exposure. Environ Res 111(3):329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber M, Koch HM (2013) Development and application of simple pharmacokinetic models to study human exposure to di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP) and diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP). Environ Int 59:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker JD, Sathyanarayana S, Swan SH (2009) Phthalates and other additives in plastics: human exposure and associated health outcomes. Philos Trans R Soc B 364(1526):2097–2113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saillenfait A, Sabate J, Gallissot F (2006) Developmental toxic effects of diisobutyl phthalate, the methyl-branched analogue of di-n-butyl phthalate, administered by gavage to rats. Toxicol Lett 165(1):39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma V, McNeill JH (2009) To scale or not to scale: the principles of dose extrapolation. Br J Pharmacol 157:907–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka A, Matsumoto A, Yamaha T (1978) Biochemical studies on phthalic esters. III. Metabolism of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) in animals. Toxicology 9(1–2):109–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ventrice P, Ventrice D, Russo E, De Sarro G (2013) Phthalates: European regulation, chemistry, pharmacokinetic and related toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36(1):88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weng T-I, Chen M-H, Lien G-W et al (2017) Effects of gender on the association of urinary phthalate metabolites with thyroid hormones in children: a prospective cohort study in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2010) Characterization and application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment. World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittassek M, Koch HM, Angerer J, Brüning T (2011) Assessing exposure to phthalates—the human biomonitoring approach. Mol Nutr Food Res 55(1):7–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wormuth M, Scheringer M, Vollenweider M, Hungerbühler K (2006) What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans? Risk Anal 26(3):803–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2020R1A6A3A13074075).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S-HJ: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, software, data analysis, and visualization; J-HJ: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review and editing, software, and data analysis; H-YC: writing—review, project administration, and conceptualization; Y-BL: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Bok Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 708 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, SH., Jang, JH., Cho, HY. et al. Human risk assessment of di-isobutyl phthalate through the application of a developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of di-isobutyl phthalate and its major metabolite mono-isobutyl phthalate. Arch Toxicol 95, 2385–2402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03057-5

Keywords

Navigation